The Fight

Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Hotspots

Battery Fights Burst into Full View

And more of the week’s most important conflicts around renewable energy.

Map of renewable energy fights.
Heatmap Illustration

1. Westchester County, N.Y. – Residents in Yonkers are pressuring city officials to renew a moratorium on battery storage before it expires in July.

  • Battery fire fears predictably are the primary issue, per a local news report this week, which stated at least one project proposed by Saw Mill River Energy Storage is on hold pending the resolution of a study commissioned by local officials.

2. Atlantic County, New Jersey – Sorry Atlantic Shores, but you’re not getting your EPA permit back.

  • In a decision Tuesday, the EPA’s Environmental Appeals Board decided not to reconsider a decision by the agency to revoke an air permit for the Atlantic Shores offshore wind project.
  • Crucially, the opinion indicates that the EPA may now have a green light from the appeals board to revoke other permits held by offshore wind projects under President Donald Trump’s anti-wind executive order: “The [EPA’s] expressed intent to reevaluate the Project and its environmental impacts as part of a review called for under the Presidential Memorandum is reasonable, and granting a remand under these circumstances is within the Board’s discretion.”

3. St Clair County, Michigan – We may soon have what appears to be the first-ever county health regulations targeting renewable energy.

  • You may remember we warned you about this – the health department lead in St. Clair County, Remington Nevin, has led efforts to craft regulations on solar, wind, and battery facilities. We predicted at the time it could be a gambit to get around Michigan’s new permitting law that was intended to override local restrictions on renewables.
  • Well, we now have the draft rules, and they would impose noise and visual impact requirements (which the regulation called “visual pollution mitigation”). The county health department would also be required to sign off on any approval of a renewable energy project.
  • County officials held a public comment hearing Wednesday – now we wait for a final decision on this move.

4. Freeborn County, Minnesota – Officials in this county have rejected a Midwater Energy Storage battery storage project citing concerns about fires.

  • Apparently, the project would also be sited near a state-designated protected river. As we’ve previously explained, concerns about environmental and wildlife impacts are the most likely tripwire for communities to become hostile to developers.

5. Little River County, Arkansas – A petition circulating in this county would put the tax abatement for a NextEra solar project up for a vote county-wide.

6. Van Zandt County, Texas – Officials in this county have reportedly succeeded in getting a court to impose a restraining order against Taaleri Energy to halt the Amador battery storage project.

  • The order will last for 14 days and is intended to give the company time to prove the project complies with national fire codes.

7. Gillespie County, Texas – Peregrine Energy’s battery storage proposal in the rural town of Harper is also facing a mounting local outcry.

  • Residents are most concerned about the proximity to a nearby school and have adopted the slogan, “Don’t BESS With Texas.” (Not sure how I feel about how catchy that is.)

8. Churchill County, Nevada – Battery storage might be good for Nevada mining, but we have what appears to be our first sign of revolt against the technology in the state.

  • People living in and near the tiny desert town of Fallon are resisting a Redwood Materials’ storage facility that was already approved by the county planning commission.
  • Per local news reports, concerned locals are calling for additional permitting requirements on the project, but county officials are siding right now with Redwood. The next hearing on the project is tomorrow.
9. San Luis Obispo County, California – Vistra, the company overseeing the now-defunct Moss Landing battery project, has withdrawn its application with the town of Morro Bay to build a new battery storage project.

This article is exclusively
for Heatmap Plus subscribers.

Go deeper inside the politics, projects, and personalities
shaping the energy transition.
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Spotlight

The Trump Administration Is Now Delaying Renewable Projects It Thinks Are Ugly

The Army Corps of Engineers is out to protect “the beauty of the Nation’s natural landscape.”

Donald Trump, wetlands, and renewable energy.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

A new Trump administration policy is indefinitely delaying necessary water permits for solar and wind projects across the country, including those located entirely on private land.

The Army Corps of Engineers published a brief notice to its website in September stating that Adam Telle, the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works, had directed the agency to consider whether it should weigh a project’s “energy density” – as in the ratio of acres used for a project compared to its power generation capacity – when issuing permits and approvals. The notice ended on a vague note, stating that the Corps would also consider whether the projects “denigrate the aesthetics of America’s natural landscape.”

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Hotspots

A Data Center Dies in Wisconsin

Plus more of the week’s biggest renewable energy fights.

The United States.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

Dane County, Wisconsin – The QTS data center project we’ve been tracking closely is now dead, after town staff in the host community of DeForest declared its plans “unfeasible.”

  • As I previously explained to Fight readers, this QTS project was a quintessential data center conflict. Not only was it situated in a blue county inside of a purple state, but a recent imbroglio over emails between the village mayor and QTS have made it a key example of how private conversations between tech companies and local governments can tarnish the odds of getting a data center permitted.
  • Late Tuesday, DeForest town staff issued a public statement disclosing they would recommend rejecting QTS’ petition to annex land for construction, without which the developer can’t build. A vote on whether to formally deny the petition was scheduled for February 3.
  • If the town rejects the project, the statement reads, DeForest staff expect QTS to “formally withdraw” its request for changes to land zoning plans and the annexation application. The town also cited vociferous opposition to the project, declaring: “The Village of DeForest appreciates the dedicated engagement of our community. Engagement is at the core of democracy. Reviewing public information, participating in public meetings, and discussing potential opportunities and impacts are all important civic activities.”
  • I was prepared to wait and see what happened at the public meeting before declaring this project dead in the water, but QTS itself has gone and done it : “Through our engagement, it has become clear that now is not the right time for our proposed project to move forward in DeForest.”

Marathon County, Wisconsin – Elsewhere in Wisconsin, this county just voted to lobby the state’s association of counties to fight for more local control over renewable energy development.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Q&A

How Data Centers Became an Election Issue in Georgia

A conversation with Georgia Conservation Voters’ Connie Di Cicco.

The Q&A subject.
Heatmap Illustration

This week’s conversation is with Connie Di Cicco, legislative director for Georgia Conservation Voters. I reached out to Connie because I wanted to best understand last November’s Public Service Commission elections which, as I explained at the time, focused almost exclusively on data center development. I’ve been hearing from some of you that you want to hear more about how and why opposition to these projects has become so entrenched so quickly. Connie argues it’s because data centers are a multi-hit combo of issues at the top of voters’ minds right now.

The following conversation has been lightly edited for clarity.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow