The Fight

Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Hotspots

Battery Fights Burst into Full View

And more of the week’s most important conflicts around renewable energy.

Map of renewable energy fights.
Heatmap Illustration

1. Westchester County, N.Y. – Residents in Yonkers are pressuring city officials to renew a moratorium on battery storage before it expires in July.

  • Battery fire fears predictably are the primary issue, per a local news report this week, which stated at least one project proposed by Saw Mill River Energy Storage is on hold pending the resolution of a study commissioned by local officials.

2. Atlantic County, New Jersey – Sorry Atlantic Shores, but you’re not getting your EPA permit back.

  • In a decision Tuesday, the EPA’s Environmental Appeals Board decided not to reconsider a decision by the agency to revoke an air permit for the Atlantic Shores offshore wind project.
  • Crucially, the opinion indicates that the EPA may now have a green light from the appeals board to revoke other permits held by offshore wind projects under President Donald Trump’s anti-wind executive order: “The [EPA’s] expressed intent to reevaluate the Project and its environmental impacts as part of a review called for under the Presidential Memorandum is reasonable, and granting a remand under these circumstances is within the Board’s discretion.”

3. St Clair County, Michigan – We may soon have what appears to be the first-ever county health regulations targeting renewable energy.

  • You may remember we warned you about this – the health department lead in St. Clair County, Remington Nevin, has led efforts to craft regulations on solar, wind, and battery facilities. We predicted at the time it could be a gambit to get around Michigan’s new permitting law that was intended to override local restrictions on renewables.
  • Well, we now have the draft rules, and they would impose noise and visual impact requirements (which the regulation called “visual pollution mitigation”). The county health department would also be required to sign off on any approval of a renewable energy project.
  • County officials held a public comment hearing Wednesday – now we wait for a final decision on this move.

4. Freeborn County, Minnesota – Officials in this county have rejected a Midwater Energy Storage battery storage project citing concerns about fires.

  • Apparently, the project would also be sited near a state-designated protected river. As we’ve previously explained, concerns about environmental and wildlife impacts are the most likely tripwire for communities to become hostile to developers.

5. Little River County, Arkansas – A petition circulating in this county would put the tax abatement for a NextEra solar project up for a vote county-wide.

6. Van Zandt County, Texas – Officials in this county have reportedly succeeded in getting a court to impose a restraining order against Taaleri Energy to halt the Amador battery storage project.

  • The order will last for 14 days and is intended to give the company time to prove the project complies with national fire codes.

7. Gillespie County, Texas – Peregrine Energy’s battery storage proposal in the rural town of Harper is also facing a mounting local outcry.

  • Residents are most concerned about the proximity to a nearby school and have adopted the slogan, “Don’t BESS With Texas.” (Not sure how I feel about how catchy that is.)

8. Churchill County, Nevada – Battery storage might be good for Nevada mining, but we have what appears to be our first sign of revolt against the technology in the state.

  • People living in and near the tiny desert town of Fallon are resisting a Redwood Materials’ storage facility that was already approved by the county planning commission.
  • Per local news reports, concerned locals are calling for additional permitting requirements on the project, but county officials are siding right now with Redwood. The next hearing on the project is tomorrow.
9. San Luis Obispo County, California – Vistra, the company overseeing the now-defunct Moss Landing battery project, has withdrawn its application with the town of Morro Bay to build a new battery storage project.

This article is exclusively
for Heatmap Plus subscribers.

Go deeper inside the politics, projects, and personalities
shaping the energy transition.
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Spotlight

Trump Taps Nashville Legend to Fight Solar and Wind Farms

And data centers might be collateral damage.

Farmland.
Simon Abranowicz | Getty Images | Unsplash

After derailing gigawatts of renewable power with a permitting freeze, the Trump administration is expanding its war on renewable energy, retaining one of country music’s biggest stars in a PR offensive against utility-scale projects on “prime farmland.”

The administration recently onboarded John Rich – one half of the stadium-packing American musical duo Big & Rich – to be Trump’s “special envoy for American landowners.” Rich entered activism around landowner rights last January when he backed opponents fighting a large Tennessee Valley Authority transmission project routed through his home county of Cheatham, Tennessee. This led to him joining the Trump team, where he’s fashioning himself as a go-to guy and cheerleader for anyone who wants Trump to help stop a solar or wind farm they don’t want built.

Keep reading...Show less
Hotspots

Data Centers Are the Election Year Villain

And more of the week’s top news around project fights.

Data Centers Are the Election Year Villain
Heatmap Illustration

1. Kansas City, Missouri – Data centers are so toxic that politicians are using them as boogeymen in totally unrelated policy discussions.

  • All week I’ve been thinking about Missouri, where a widely-screened TV campaign ad is airing screeds against AI hyperscale projects to sell a constitutional amendment initiative up for a vote in this year’s November elections. “That hum is the sound of Big Tech making money on online gambling, for porn,” says a nameless man in the ad. “Amendment 5 makes Big Tech pay so you don’t have to. Yes on Amendment 5.”
  • What does Amendment 5 do? Based on the ad, you would think it was focused on tax exemptions for data centers. But no – a yes vote supports cutting the state income tax, a proposal backed by Republican Gov. Mike Kehoe.
  • The ad is misinformation and a mind-blowing use of a confusing conversation around tech infrastructure most were unfamiliar with before this year. Per reporting by the Missouri Independent, the state’s existing tax exemptions for data centers would stay in place if the amendment was adopted.
  • My gut tells me this is only the beginning of the data center industry’s transformation into an election year villain.

2. Ingham County, Michigan – We have our first major anti-data center candidate in a Democratic congressional primary.

Keep reading...Show less
Q&A

Why Data Center NDAs Are a Big Mistake

A conversation with Grant Gutierrez of Carbon Direct

Why Data Center NDAs Are a Big Mistake
Heatmap Illustration

This week’s conversation is with Grant Gutierrez, head of community impacts at carbon management company Carbon Direct. This week Carbon Direct published a white paper Gutierrez authored on opposition around data centers he’s studied. His research reinforces much of what Heatmap Pro has uncovered, but I was particularly intrigued by a topline finding – that transparency is the most common thread in the 46 data center fights he looked into. Was he seeing what I’ve been seeing? So I asked him to hop onto a Zoom call and let me know his thoughts.

The following conversation was lightly edited for clarity.

Keep reading...Show less