The Fight

Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Hotspots

Trump Administration to ‘Reconsider’ Approval for MarWin

And more of the week’s most important conflicts around renewable energy.

The United States.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

1. Sussex County, Delaware – The Trump administration has confirmed it will revisit permitting decisions for the MarWin offshore wind project off the coast of Maryland, potentially putting the proposal in jeopardy unless blue states and the courts intervene.

  • Justice Department officials admitted the plans in a paragraph tucked inside a filing submitted to a federal court in Delaware this week in litigation brought by a beach house owner opposed to the offshore wind project.
  • DOJ stated in the filing that more time was “necessary as Interior intends to reconsider its [construction and operations plan] approval” for MarWin, and that it plans to “move” for “voluntary remand of that agency action” in a separate case filed by Ocean City, Maryland against the project.
  • “The outcome of Interior’s reconsideration has the potential to affect the Plaintiff’s claims in this case,” the filing stated. “Continuing to litigate this case before any decision is made in the [Ocean City case] would potentially waste considerable time and resources for both the parties and the Court.” As of today, no new filings have been made in the Ocean City case.

2. Northwest Iowa – Locals fighting a wind project spanning multiple counties in northern Iowa are opposing legislation that purports to make renewable development easier in the state.

  • Both chambers of the Iowa legislature appear to be advancing an effort to streamline renewable permitting at the state and local level. Both versions of the bill – HSB 317 in the House and SF 376 in the Senate – would among other things create restrictions on local setback distances and standards on what guidelines municipalities can put in place against renewables projects.
  • Subcommittees in both chambers have recommended passage of the bills. It is unclear at the moment whether either of them stand a chance at becoming law soon, though it is altogether notable to see this effort gain traction in the Midwest.
  • Despite this uncertainty, the bills are reportedly becoming an issue in areas like Dickinson County, where some residents are fighting Invenergy’s Red Rock Wind Energy Center. I first learned about this effort because landowners against Red Rock now claim the setback restrictions in the bills would be insufficient to preserve their “property rights.”

3. Pima County, Arizona – Down goes another solar-powered data center, this time in Arizona.

  • Residents in Tuscon successfully defeated an Amazon proposal to build “Project Blue,” a hulking data center project. Tucson’s city council unanimously directed its staff to halt work on the project citing concerns about water use and energy demand.
  • According to public documents, Project Blue was itself proposed in Tuscon because it would get access to the region’s mix of renewable energy generation. The project would purportedly also include the construction of new solar-and-storage facilities to help power operations.

4. San Diego County, California – A battery storage developer has withdrawn plans to build in the southern California city of La Mesa amidst a broadening post-Moss Landing backlash over fire concerns.

  • EnerSmart, the developer of the project, told local media it rescinded the plans last week because of concerns about a transmission bottleneck. However, some of those fighting battery storage across the state have publicly taken credit for the decision and claim it was the product of community meetings with La Mesa.
  • “It was right next to homes, in close proximity to a school and conveniently positioned directly across the street from a substation,” wrote Kendra Correia, an activist who has fought other battery projects north of San Diego, in a Facebook post. “This community rallied together, met with local government leaders, gained media attention and campaigned against the placement of this facility, that would endanger their community. Congratulations!”

5. Logan and McIntosh Counties, North Dakota – These days, it’s worth noting when a wind project even gets approved.

  • North Dakota’s Public Service Commission approved Orsted’s Badger wind farm, which will span two counties in a southernmost stretch of the state. It did so despite the Federal Aviation Administration apparently denying the use of advanced lighting alerts for about half of the turbines.
  • The project will apparently complete construction before the end of 2025, which means it may ultimately still be able to qualify for tax credits under the Inflation Reduction Act.

6. Hamilton County, Indiana – This county is now denying an Aypa battery storage facility north of Indianapolis despite growing power concerns in the region.

  • Apparently, like many other places in the U.S., concerns about battery fires won out. Chemical worries also abounded, with at least one resident reportedly saying in the public hearing on the project that they’re worried about tornadoes picking up batteries.
  • Hamilton has an incredibly high renewable energy support score – but its opposition risk is just as high in the Heatmap Pro database. The reasoning? A powerful mixture of political resentment and a high population density.
Yellow

This article is exclusively
for Heatmap Plus subscribers.

Go deeper inside the politics, projects, and personalities
shaping the energy transition.
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Spotlight

The Trump Administration Is Now Delaying Renewable Projects It Thinks Are Ugly

The Army Corps of Engineers is out to protect “the beauty of the Nation’s natural landscape.”

Donald Trump, wetlands, and renewable energy.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

A new Trump administration policy is indefinitely delaying necessary water permits for solar and wind projects across the country, including those located entirely on private land.

The Army Corps of Engineers published a brief notice to its website in September stating that Adam Telle, the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works, had directed the agency to consider whether it should weigh a project’s “energy density” – as in the ratio of acres used for a project compared to its power generation capacity – when issuing permits and approvals. The notice ended on a vague note, stating that the Corps would also consider whether the projects “denigrate the aesthetics of America’s natural landscape.”

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Hotspots

A Data Center Dies in Wisconsin

Plus more of the week’s biggest renewable energy fights.

The United States.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

Dane County, Wisconsin – The QTS data center project we’ve been tracking closely is now dead, after town staff in the host community of DeForest declared its plans “unfeasible.”

  • As I previously explained to Fight readers, this QTS project was a quintessential data center conflict. Not only was it situated in a blue county inside of a purple state, but a recent imbroglio over emails between the village mayor and QTS have made it a key example of how private conversations between tech companies and local governments can tarnish the odds of getting a data center permitted.
  • Late Tuesday, DeForest town staff issued a public statement disclosing they would recommend rejecting QTS’ petition to annex land for construction, without which the developer can’t build. A vote on whether to formally deny the petition was scheduled for February 3.
  • If the town rejects the project, the statement reads, DeForest staff expect QTS to “formally withdraw” its request for changes to land zoning plans and the annexation application. The town also cited vociferous opposition to the project, declaring: “The Village of DeForest appreciates the dedicated engagement of our community. Engagement is at the core of democracy. Reviewing public information, participating in public meetings, and discussing potential opportunities and impacts are all important civic activities.”
  • I was prepared to wait and see what happened at the public meeting before declaring this project dead in the water, but QTS itself has gone and done it : “Through our engagement, it has become clear that now is not the right time for our proposed project to move forward in DeForest.”

Marathon County, Wisconsin – Elsewhere in Wisconsin, this county just voted to lobby the state’s association of counties to fight for more local control over renewable energy development.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Q&A

How Data Centers Became an Election Issue in Georgia

A conversation with Georgia Conservation Voters’ Connie Di Cicco.

The Q&A subject.
Heatmap Illustration

This week’s conversation is with Connie Di Cicco, legislative director for Georgia Conservation Voters. I reached out to Connie because I wanted to best understand last November’s Public Service Commission elections which, as I explained at the time, focused almost exclusively on data center development. I’ve been hearing from some of you that you want to hear more about how and why opposition to these projects has become so entrenched so quickly. Connie argues it’s because data centers are a multi-hit combo of issues at the top of voters’ minds right now.

The following conversation has been lightly edited for clarity.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow