The Fight

Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Q&A

What a Tax Attorney Thinks of Trump’s IRA Order

A conversation with Bob Moczulewski, tax director for law firm Baker Tilly’s federal credits and incentives practice

What a Tax Attorney Thinks of Trump’s IRA Order
Heatmap Illustration

Given the Trump administration’s new pause on grants under the Inflation Reduction Act, this week’s conversation is with Bob Moczulewski, tax director for law firm Baker Tilly’s federal credits and incentives practice. We asked him to explain this 90-day pause via executive order, because if anyone’s going to cut the nonsense and tell you what actually matters here, it’ll be a tax attorney.

The following chat was lightly edited for clarity.

Does Trump’s executive order actually impact the IRA’s tax credits?

The IRA had several components to it, most of which – the biggest things – are tax credits. Those are written into tax law. They are a legally binding ability for developers and users, creators of renewable energy that are allowed within the law – wind, solar, geothermal, battery storage, biogas – those are laws.

[The order] has a stop on those items that were more discretionary that had the control of the administration to delegate out: its grants, loans, and contracts. That has no impact on the tax credits, where the bulk of the IRA sits right now. A lot of that stuff was in anticipation of being heavily pushed through and sent out before January 20. There’s actual impact there. But tax credits are not appropriated funds.

This is not holding back the tax credits that are there.

You’ve said it is unclear if this covers all prospective funding, like direct pay?

If you’re a municipality and you put up a solar project that is eligible for tax credits and direct pay, that is the part with this potential slow play that could be done here. We really don’t know what the executive branch can do to hold back the payment of those direct payments. If you’re a business, you put up a solar, it’s a $10,000 tax credit, you can use it to reduce your taxable income. None of these orders impact that.

Now if you’re a municipality and you’re requesting a direct payment for those tax credits that are legally binding in tax law, I could see the possibility that an executive branch could have pressure on the Treasury Department, which has pressure on the IRS, to slow play those payments. But that’s only speculation. The law is stated, this is supposed to be paid out. This is in a realm of, y’know, almost a conspiracy theory-type of thing that could be done.

With respect to how a pause like this can impact the bankability of IRA, are you seeing it affect executives’ views on the durability of the law?

I would say there’s just a lot of caution as to [the] next steps around it. These are laws. Until the laws are repealed, if they are repealed, that would be the only way you’d know for certain.

As I’ve explained many times over, the history of tax credit laws is once they’re repealed or altered, those changes are prospective as to the time the law is changed. If I have a half a billion dollar solar project underway, I’ve met or begun a construction criteria. There has been no prior passing of tax laws that would revoke the ability to claim credits on that.

What are you watching for next for clarity?

There’s two things I’m looking for in the future. Where pundits around this really feel this is truly going. And the other part is to see if there’s any actual traction to repeal the tax credits that exist right now.

There’s a whole new realm of credits that begin in 2025 and continue through 2032. Will there be incentive to repeal those credits?

I have clients that are engaging in multi billions of dollars of projects that are in the heart of the southern tier of the United States of America, that would impact thousands of jobs. Those groups have strong ties to a lot of senators and congresspeople along the way. Just enough of a push and turn on this and all it takes is a few senators to not go along with it.

This article is exclusively
for Heatmap Plus subscribers.

Go deeper inside the politics, projects, and personalities
shaping the energy transition.
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Hotspots

A Fine Week For Solar, Bad For Everyone Else

And more of the week's news in renewable energy fights.

Map of contested renewable energy projects.
Heatmap Illustration

1. Magic Valley, Idaho – It’s never a dull day for the Lava Ridge wind project.

  • Trump’s executive order also put a moratorium on the wind project site and essentially invalidated its environmental review under Biden. As we’ve explained, the project got permits in the final days of the previous administration.
  • But opponents to the project – most notably Senator Jim Risch – got the president to turn this into a Keystone XL-style situation. Idaho Governor Brad Little yesterday issued an executive order instructing state regulators to comply with anything Trump’s folks do to stop the project, an executive order of his own he jokingly dubbed the “Gone With The Lava Ridge Wind Act.”
  • Lava Ridge has been crickets since Trump’s order and its developer Magic Valley Energy has not issued a public statement. The most recent statement available on their website is still about its permits being approved under Biden.
  • I’ve tried to get in touch with them via the most recently-listed media contact for the project all week over phone and email – most recently this afternoon – but have had no luck. (Amy, please call me back.)

2. Multiple counties, Ohio – Regulators in Ohio issued final decisions for two contested solar projects, clearing the way for one while all but stopping another.

Keep reading...Show less
Spotlight

Trump’s Wind Order Could Hit ‘More Than Half’ of New Projects

The American wind industry faces a potentially existential threat.

Trump and wind turbines.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

President Trump’s executive order halting permits and leases for wind projects is starting to look like a potential existential threat to the industry’s future. Just don’t expect everyone to say it out loud.

On Monday, Trump issued an order pausing new federal approvals for wind projects, pending a “comprehensive assessment” of permitting practices, while opening the door to a review of existing leases and previously-issued permits subject to litigation. In the days following the order, lawyers, industry trade representatives, and professionals who work for renewable energy developers explained to me how this could impact essentially any wind project, even ones not sited on federal lands. Wind projects are just so large and impactfulthat it’s hard to avoid a federal permit.

Keep reading...Show less
Hotspots

Tough Times for Renewable Energy Projects

A look at the week’s biggest fights over wind and solar farms.

Map of renewable energy fights.
Heatmap Illustration

1. McIntosh County, Oklahoma – Say goodbye to the Canadian River wind project, we hardly knew thee.

  • The TransAlta utility-scale wind facility was canceled mere days after we were first to report on the uprising in favor of a ban on new renewables in the state.
  • Local residents had banded together against the project due to its close proximity to Lake Eufaula, a large reservoir. Opposition included representatives of the native Muscogee Tribe.
  • TransAlta confirmed the project was dead in a statement to me last week after state politicians were first to declare its demise. On Monday, the company provided a statement in lieu of making someone available to speak with me: “The unfortunate decision to terminate the project was due to two primary reasons – challenges with land acquisition as well as ongoing uncertainty regarding grid interconnection.”

2. Allen County, Ohio – A utility-scale project caught in the crossfires over solar on farmland and local-vs-state conflicts now appears deceased, too.

Keep reading...Show less