Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Lifestyle

The Week’s Wackiest Real Estate Listings, Ranked by Climate Risk

Habitable
Heatmap Illustration/Habitable

Glued to real estate posts on The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, Dwell, Spaces, The Modern House, or Architectural Digest and wondering how those gorgeous homes will hold up in the next decades? I have you covered.

Heatmap has partnered with my new climate risk platform, Habitable. Every Friday, we add a climate risk score to the real estate listings featured in the news this week and ask: Could you live here as the climate changes?

Using a model developed by a team of Berkeley data scientists at Climate Check, Habitable scores each property for heat, flood, drought, and fire risk on a scale of 1-10. One represents the lowest risk and 10 is the highest. Our rating for each hazard is based on climate change projections through 2050. (You can check your own home’s climate risk here.)

For today’s edition, I apply the Habitable Index to check the climate risk of some of the wackiest houses on the market this week, homes that demand some truly creative wordsmithing by real estate companies.

1. If you like green eggs and ham ...

Red and blue Vermont house described as "a Giant Dr. Seuss Playhouse of Fun" Photo: Sothebys

A “colorful and quirky” New England House for sale in Vershire, Vermont, has been described as “a Giant Dr. Seuss Playhouse of Fun.” This home wins the prize for not only the lowest climate risk of this week’s listing, but for realtor adjectives too. Here are a few: truly remarkable, whimsical and unique, enchanting sanctuary, whimsical ambiance.

Vermont home interior.Photo: Sothebys

With no flood, drought, or fire risk and low heat risk, the house is, according to our index, quite habitable, but ... is it really?!

Featured on 92moose.fm for $579,500.


2. How about a Tudor on steroids?

Tudor homeCirca Old Houses

“Historic charmer!” “Stately.” “Turn of the 20th century.” “In a converted artists hamlet.” “Abundant in original details.”

This home near the Shawagunk Mountain Range in upstate New York has a lot of ‘character’ and many, many porches, creating “a serene and magical escape.” The climate risk is so minimal you may choose to overlook the overwhelming wood-iness and Tudor-ness of this ultimately habitable home.

Featured on Circa Old Houses and listed for $750,000.


3. With every bath you take ...

Low-rise property with solar panels in New Mexico Photo: Zillow

This off-the-grid Earthship in a community of similar housing — the Greater World Community in New Mexico — has hit the market for $399,000. Meant for a very special buyer, the adjectives for the home are all punctuated with exclamation marks: A Colorful Jewel! Full of quirks! Oh, the functionality! No utility bills! Every bath waters the planters! A stone labyrinth, fenced dog pen, and round rooms! The practicality is appealing if you prefer rounded walls and zero symmetry, but love a bath for two, because the flood and fire risks are nil and the drought and heat risks seem really low considering it’s a desert. Could a jewel of an earthship be your next home?

Featured in Realtor.com and listed for $399,000.


4. White House wannabe in California

Replica mansion of White House in California

Iconic "Western White House."

This replica of the Washington, D.C., White House is a luxury property that hit the market this week for a whopping $38 million. It’s luxurious, yes, but also just nutty enough (a house built to look identical to the White House?) to require some very careful wording. “Formal entry parlor,” “East Room,” “Oval Office,” “Stunning grounds with White House Rose Garden.” Is it a selling point to have an Oval Office like the President? Apparently it was for George R. Hearst in the 1930s (the eldest son of William Randolph Hearst), who commissioned this odd replica. The climate risk is moderate for drought, flooding, and wildfires, but minimal for heat. Plus all that white marble should keep things cool.

Featured in The San Francisco Chronicle and listed for $38, 900,000.


5. Goth Barbie goes to the beach.

Pink cottage in Martha's VineyardPhoto: Zillow

The Dirt real estate site's description of this just-listed home in Martha's Vineyard is priceless. Some highlights: “Pre-dating the Barbiecore explosion, the Carpenter Gothic-styled, wee, bubblegum-pink cottage is part of the Martha’s Vineyard Camp Meeting Association, which is known for its quaint gingerbread bungalows.”

But is it habitable? Barbie and crew will stay cool as heat, fire, drought risk are low, but all the hot pink surfboards, canoes or Barbie-sized yachts will not save them from extreme flood risk here.

Featured on Dirt and listed for $850,000.


6. Treehouse ‘chic’

Midcentury wood-covered house in VirginiaPhoto: Zillow

Perched among the trees, a teeny midcentury hit the market and immediately sold in Danville, Virginia, for $369,000. The subtlety of the description is what I like most: “minor architectural masterpiece” with “modernized appliances and finishes and yet the home’s original details remain intact.” While the house will not burn up, there’s a not-so-cute flood and drought risk (9/10). Is it built high enough to be truly habitable?

Featured in Realtor.com and sold for $369,000.


7. Kim Kardashian’s UFO not cleared for landing in Palm Springs.

Kim Kardashian’s collaboration with Japanese architect Tadao Ando for a spaceship-shaped home in Palm Springs has been all over the news this week. The project, described as “special’ “concrete, gray-toned, and really zen,” has not been approved. The project stall has nothing to do with the equally over the top drought, heat, and fire risk but all the same, if this building can fly away on command, they really should add that to the design plans.

Featured in NYPost.

Blue

You’re out of free articles.

Subscribe today to experience Heatmap’s expert analysis 
of climate change, clean energy, and sustainability.
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Energy

Meet Con Edison’s One-Woman Electrification Show

Julie Liu is converting gas customers to heat pumps, one home at a time.

Julie Liu.
Heatmap Illustration/Julie Liu, Getty Images

For Julie Liu, electrifying a home is like putting on an Off- Off- Broadway show.

Working almost entirely alone, Liu serves as producer, stage manager, and director, bankrolling the production, hiring the crew, arranging the logistics, choreographing the action, and dazzling the audience — the homeowner or tenants — along the way. Heat pumps and induction stoves are the stars. Plumbers, HVAC technicians, and insulation specialists sub in for set decorators, sound engineers, and costume designers. Electricians play themselves.

Keep reading...Show less
Green
AM Briefing

Data Deluge

On NREL’s rebrand, British LNG wariness, and Japan’s DAC embrace

A power worker.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

Current conditions: Everywhere from the Midwest to New York City are bracing for snow today • The death toll from flooding in Southeast Asia has eclipsed 1,000 • Temperatures of 95 degrees Fahrenheit in French Guiana, the westernmost border of the European Union, have broken December records.


Keep reading...Show less
Blue
Economy

Climate Change Is Already Costing U.S. Households Up to $900 Per Year

A new working paper from a trio of eminent economists tallies the effects of warming — particularly extreme weather — on Americans’ budgets.

Storms and money.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

Attempts to quantify the costs of climate change often end up as philosophical exercises in forecasting and quantifying the future. Such projects involve (at least) two difficult tasks: establishing what is the current climate “pathway” we’re on, which means projecting hard-to-predict phenomena such as future policy actions and potential climate system feedbacks; and then deciding how to value the wellbeing of those people who will be born in the decades — or centuries — to come versus those who are alive today.

But what about the climate impacts we’re paying for right now? That’s the question explored in a working paper by former Treasury Department officials Kimberley Clausing, an economist at the University of California, Los Angeles, and Catherine Wolfram, an economist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, along with Wolfram’s MIT colleague Christopher Knittel.

Keep reading...Show less
Blue