Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Lifestyle

Why Are the Rich and Famous Fleeing These L.A. Homes?

The buzziest real estate listings in Los Angeles, ranked by climate risk.

A for sale sign over Los Angeles.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

Glued to real estate posts on The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, Dwell, Spaces, The Modern House, or Architectural Digest and wondering how those gorgeous homes will hold up in the next decades? I have you covered.

Heatmap has partnered with my new climate risk platform, Habitable. Every Friday, we add a climate risk score to the real estate listings featured in the news this week and ask: Could you live here as the climate changes?

Using a model developed by a team of Berkeley data scientists at Climate Check, Habitable scores each property for heat, flood, drought, and fire risk on a scale of 1-10. One represents the lowest risk and 10 is the highest. Our rating for each hazard is based on climate change projections through 2050. (You can check your own home’s climate risk here.)

For today’s edition, I apply the Habitable Index to check the climate risk of the very many L.A. and Southern California houses that seem to have hit the market simultaneously. Most of these significant estates are selling at pretty significant prices, maybe taking into account the mansion tax that went into effect April 1 where the seller is required to pay an additional 5.5% tax.

1. You could hunker down here.

James Cameron house.Zillow

James Cameron’s off grid paradise is ready for the climate apocalypse. On more than 100 acres in the Hollister Ranch community, which restricts development to leave room for local wildlife, this stunning property is for sale for what feels like a comparative bargain at $33,000,000.

Organic gardens grow most of the food here, there is enough solar and wind power to live off grid, and there are wells for drinking water and for farming. Most importantly, there is a helicopter landing pad for a quick escape when TSHTF. The climate risk — some fire and low drought — still makes this place totally habitable given the infrastructure. Cameron is leaving town for his other climate bunker in New Zealand. I would snap this up and hunker down.

Featured on Robb Report and listed for $33 million.


2. Swipe right?

Tinder founder house.Zillow

The Tinder founder is in the news for listing his picture-perfect luxury house, which was on the cover of Architectural Digest. Marble everywhere with nine bathrooms and three garage spaces (which apparently is a big selling point in L.A.), the house will be mostly habitable for a while. Even with a severe drought risk, it’s got surprisingly low heat and fire risk compared to most of L.A.

Featured in New York Post and listed for $32 million.


3. Leaving on a a jet plane. Don’t know when James Corden’ll be back again.

James Corden house.The Agency

The quintessential L.A. home that housed James Corden’s excellent L.A. adventure is now for sale for $17.1 million (down from $22 million when it was listed earlier this year). Lot of laughs to be had here with a trampoline, pool, spa, and pizza oven and an enviable three-car garage! Does Corden’s timing for leaving L.A. have anything to do with the extreme drought and moderate fire risk? We’ll never know.

Featured in Architectural Digest and sold for $17.1 million.


4. Betcha can’t sell this house!

Beach house.Zillow

A former Frito-Lay food scientist and an oil executive from Houston are selling this busy beachfront property for $42 million. Every floor opens to views of crashing waves and surfers and Catalina Island. The crashing waves are probably destined to level this oceanfront mansion with a trifecta of climate conditions, though — lots of fire, drought, and flooding risk.

Featured in WSJ and listed for $42.5 million.


5. Dropping out of an extremely risky spot.

Mansion in Holmby HillsZillow

With the Playboy Mansion and Spelling Manor as neighbors and a starring role in “The Dropout,” this massive Holmby Hills estate has everything you’ll need, including a 13-car garage. There is so much beauty here that will be at risk from severe flood, drought, and fires though.

Featured on the Dirt and listed for $40 million.


6. Run from those Hollywood Hills

Hollywood Hills house.Zillow.

A 1920s Spanish Colonial with an enviable six parking spots hits the market this week for the bargain price of $2,895,000. In L.A.’s Beachwood Canyon community, the house is adorable and surrounded by old growth trees. But it’s hot and really dry and flammable. On the bright side, no flood risk.

Featured in Dwell and listed for $2,895,000.


7. Yachts Rocked

Harbour Island.Zillow

Harbour Island in Newport Beach is a gated-waterfront community with lots of sailing. This 100-year-old home owned by the same family for generations is on market this week for what would be a record-breaking price of $74 million.

The home — as close to the water as you can possibly be — comes with old trees and a private dock for more than one yacht. It sits on the largest parcel in Newport Harbor. Big price, big views, and astounding flood risk for the price.

You have to wonder now that a few home insurers have left the state of California, how in the world would someone justify paying $74 million for a house destined to be underwater soon? I’ll be fascinated to watch this space.

Featured in WSJ and listed for $74 million.

Blue

You’re out of free articles.

Subscribe today to experience Heatmap’s expert analysis 
of climate change, clean energy, and sustainability.
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Energy

All the Nuclear Workers Are Building Data Centers Now

There has been no new nuclear construction in the U.S. since Vogtle, but the workers are still plenty busy.

A hardhat on AI.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

The Trump administration wants to have 10 new large nuclear reactors under construction by 2030 — an ambitious goal under any circumstances. It looks downright zany, though, when you consider that the workforce that should be driving steel into the ground, pouring concrete, and laying down wires for nuclear plants is instead building and linking up data centers.

This isn’t how it was supposed to be. Thousands of people, from construction laborers to pipefitters to electricians, worked on the two new reactors at the Plant Vogtle in Georgia, which were intended to be the start of a sequence of projects, erecting new Westinghouse AP1000 reactors across Georgia and South Carolina. Instead, years of delays and cost overruns resulted in two long-delayed reactors 35 miles southeast of Augusta, Georgia — and nothing else.

Keep reading...Show less
Blue
Q&A

How California Is Fighting the Battery Backlash

A conversation with Dustin Mulvaney of San Jose State University

Dustin Mulvaney.
Heatmap Illustration

This week’s conversation is a follow up with Dustin Mulvaney, a professor of environmental studies at San Jose State University. As you may recall we spoke with Mulvaney in the immediate aftermath of the Moss Landing battery fire disaster, which occurred near his university’s campus. Mulvaney told us the blaze created a true-blue PR crisis for the energy storage industry in California and predicted it would cause a wave of local moratoria on development. Eight months after our conversation, it’s clear as day how right he was. So I wanted to check back in with him to see how the state’s development landscape looks now and what the future may hold with the Moss Landing dust settled.

Help my readers get a state of play – where are we now in terms of the post-Moss Landing resistance landscape?

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Hotspots

A Tough Week for Wind Power and Batteries — But a Good One for Solar

The week’s most important fights around renewable energy.

The United States.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

1. Nantucket, Massachusetts – A federal court for the first time has granted the Trump administration legal permission to rescind permits given to renewable energy projects.

  • This week District Judge Tanya Chutkan – an Obama appointee – ruled that Trump’s Bureau of Ocean Energy Management has the legal latitude to request the withdrawal of permits previously issued to offshore wind projects. Chutkan found that any “regulatory uncertainty” from rescinding a permit would be an “insubstantial” hardship and not enough to stop the court from approving the government’s desires to reconsider issuing it.
  • The ruling was in a case that the Massachusetts town of Nantucket brought against the SouthCoast offshore wind project; SouthCoast developer Ocean Winds said in statements to media after the decision that it harbors “serious concerns” about the ruling but is staying committed to the project through this new layer of review.
  • But it’s important to understand this will have profound implications for other projects up and down the coastline, because the court challenges against other offshore wind projects bear a resemblance to the SouthCoast litigation. This means that project opponents could reach deals with the federal government to “voluntarily remand” permits, technically sending those documents back to the federal government for reconsideration – only for the approvals to get lost in bureaucratic limbo.
  • What I’m watching for: do opponents of land-based solar and wind projects look at this ruling and decide to go after those facilities next?

2. Harvey County, Kansas – The sleeper election result of 2025 happened in the town of Halstead, Kansas, where voters backed a moratorium on battery storage.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow