Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Politics

The 3 Interesting Climate Parts of Biden’s Budget Proposal

The plan tells us a lot about where the White House thinks it can make a deal with Republicans.

Biden, crypto, gas, and solar panels
Heatmap illustration/Getty News

Let’s start here: The Biden administration’s federal budget proposal for fiscal-year 2024 has zero chance of becoming law. The PDFs and press releases published by the White House today — and met with acclaim from Democratic-aligned nonprofits — are basically fiscal fan fiction; to first approximation, they more closely resemble pregame trash talk than solemn policymaking.

To be clear, this is not only because the Republican Party controls the House of Representatives and wants far deeper cuts than Biden has ventured. It’s because no president’s budget proposal ever becomes law. Even during the early years of the Trump administration — when the GOP held the White House and both houses of Congress —Republican lawmakers looked at the president’s proposed 31% cuts to the Environmental Protection Agency, laughed a bit, then went back to their appropriating.

So why pay attention at all? There are two reasons. First, the proposal is the White House’s opening move in one of the year’s biggest political stories: whether Democrats and Republicans can agree on a new federal budget without shattering the debt ceiling and triggering a financial crisis. The budget, in that sense, is an argument that the government can reduce the federal deficit — and slow inflation — without the kind of drastic spending cuts that Republicans have mused about so far. Biden’s proposal contends that revenue can fill the gap, calling for about $5 trillion in new taxes on companies and the wealthy over the next decade.

The budget also shows that climate change remains a central concern for Biden’s team. Although the bipartisan infrastructure law and Inflation Reduction Act released a flood of climate-related funding, Biden officials are now asking for even more to pursue their decarbonization-related goals. And this hints at the second reason to heed today’s proposal: that if nothing else, it reveals the White House’s aspirational priorities.

Will any of the proposals outlined below make it into the final budget? It’s hard to say; a few climate-adjacent topics — especially energy security and permitting — now have such bipartisan support that Republicans may eventually opt for them in the final deal. But regardless, these climate policies are the ones you’re likely to keep hearing about from Democrats — especially as they look toward the 2024 election.

Here are some of the most interesting ideas in the proposal:

1. A new tax on the electricity used for crypto.

The cryptocurrency industry’s voracious use of energy has long concerned Democrats; at peak, crypto miners consumed more energy than Finland. Now the industry has sagged— and the party smells blood. Last month, Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts promised that a crackdown on crypto’s energy use is coming, and the Department of Energy and EPA have said that they have the legal authority to compel crypto miners to disclose their energy use.

Biden’s budget goes further, proposing a new and gradually rising 30% tax on crypto’s electricity use. The White House estimates it will bring in $3.5 billion over the next decade.

2. An end to fossil-fuel subsidies.

Biden campaigned on ending fossil-fuel subsidies and tax breaks; in his first year as president, American diplomats endorsed a United Nations pledge to end such subsidies globally.

Yet so far he’s struggled to actually make it happen. He couldn’t get Congress — and especially Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia — to swallow the reform in the Inflation Reduction Act last year. (In fact, Biden has sometimes boosted de facto fossil-fuel subsidies: After gasoline prices spiked last year, he invoked the Defense Production Act to make sure fracking firms had the resources they needed to drill.)

Now he’s trying again, proposing reforms to fossil-fuel subsidies that the White House estimates could bring in more than $90 billion over the next decade. That said, it’s unlikely to go anywhere this time.

3. More money for permitting renewable energy.

One of the White House’s biggest worries is that the Inflation Reduction Act’s hundreds of billions of climate funding is going to wither on the vine. If developers and energy companies can’t get new clean-energy projects sited and approved, then many tax credits might expire before firms can take advantage of them, officials fear. After Democrats rejected a Manchin-led effort to reform environmental-permitting laws last year, those concerns intensified.

Now, Biden has requested another $60 million in funding to help the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration build the internal capacity it needs to approve offshore wind farms. It has asked for millions more to build rural electricity infrastructure and overcome other procedural holdups. And unlike other aspects of the budget, this could actually go somewhere: House Republicans have identified permitting as one of their own priorities and approved a bill in committee on Thursday. If there’s a climate-related deal this year, it’s likely to happen on permitting.

Yellow

You’re out of free articles.

Subscribe today to experience Heatmap’s expert analysis 
of climate change, clean energy, and sustainability.
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Energy

If Wind and Solar Are So Cheap, Why Do They Need Tax Credits?

Removing the subsidies would be bad enough, but the chaos it would cause in the market is way worse.

Money and clean energy.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

In their efforts to persuade Republicans in Congress not to throw wind and solar off a tax credit cliff, clean energy advocates have sometimes made what would appear to be a counterproductive argument: They’ve emphasized that renewables are cheap and easily obtainable.

Take this statement published by Advanced Energy United over the weekend: “By effectively removing tax credits for some of the most affordable and easy-to-build energy resources, Congress is all but guaranteeing that consumers will be burdened with paying more for a less reliable electric grid.”

Keep reading...Show less
Green
Politics

The Megabill’s Most Bizarre Fossil Fuel Handout

A new subsidy for metallurgical coal won’t help Trump’s energy dominance agenda, but it would help India and China.

The Capitol.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

Crammed into the Senate’s reconciliation bill alongside more attention-grabbing measures that could cripple the renewables industry in the U.S. is a new provision to amend the Inflation Reduction Act to support metallurgical coal, allowing producers to claim the advanced manufacturing tax credit through 2029. That extension alone could be worth up to $150 million a year for the “beautiful clean coal” industry (as President Trump likes to call it), according to one lobbyist following the bill.

Putting aside the perversity of using a tax credit from a climate change bill to support coal, the provision is a strange one. The Trump administration has made support for coal one of the centerpieces of its “energy dominance” strategy, ordering coal-fired power plants to stay open and issuing a raft of executive orders to bolster the industry. President Trump at one point even suggested that the elite law firms that have signed settlements with the White House over alleged political favoritism could take on coal clients pro bono.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Ideas

The GOP Megabill Is Playing Right Into China’s Hands

Two former Department of Energy staffers argue from experience that severe foreign entity restrictions aren’t the way to reshore America’s clean energy supply chain.

Xi Jinping and solar panels.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

The latest version of Congress’s “One Big, Beautiful Bill” claims to be tough on China. Instead, it penalizes American energy developers and hands China the keys to dominate 21st century energy supply chains and energy-intensive industries like AI.

Republicans are on the verge of enacting a convoluted maze of “foreign entity” restrictions and penalties on U.S. manufacturers and energy companies in the name of excising China from U.S. energy supply chains. We share this goal to end U.S. reliance on Chinese minerals and manufacturing. While at the U.S. Department of Energy and the White House, we worked on numerous efforts to combat China’s grip on energy supply chains. That included developing tough, nuanced and, importantly, workable rules to restrict tax credit eligibility for electric vehicles made using materials from China or Chinese entities — rules that quickly began to shift supply chains away from China and toward the U.S. and our allies.

Keep reading...Show less