Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Politics

The 3 Interesting Climate Parts of Biden’s Budget Proposal

The plan tells us a lot about where the White House thinks it can make a deal with Republicans.

Biden, crypto, gas, and solar panels
Heatmap illustration/Getty News

Let’s start here: The Biden administration’s federal budget proposal for fiscal-year 2024 has zero chance of becoming law. The PDFs and press releases published by the White House today — and met with acclaim from Democratic-aligned nonprofits — are basically fiscal fan fiction; to first approximation, they more closely resemble pregame trash talk than solemn policymaking.

To be clear, this is not only because the Republican Party controls the House of Representatives and wants far deeper cuts than Biden has ventured. It’s because no president’s budget proposal ever becomes law. Even during the early years of the Trump administration — when the GOP held the White House and both houses of Congress —Republican lawmakers looked at the president’s proposed 31% cuts to the Environmental Protection Agency, laughed a bit, then went back to their appropriating.

So why pay attention at all? There are two reasons. First, the proposal is the White House’s opening move in one of the year’s biggest political stories: whether Democrats and Republicans can agree on a new federal budget without shattering the debt ceiling and triggering a financial crisis. The budget, in that sense, is an argument that the government can reduce the federal deficit — and slow inflation — without the kind of drastic spending cuts that Republicans have mused about so far. Biden’s proposal contends that revenue can fill the gap, calling for about $5 trillion in new taxes on companies and the wealthy over the next decade.

The budget also shows that climate change remains a central concern for Biden’s team. Although the bipartisan infrastructure law and Inflation Reduction Act released a flood of climate-related funding, Biden officials are now asking for even more to pursue their decarbonization-related goals. And this hints at the second reason to heed today’s proposal: that if nothing else, it reveals the White House’s aspirational priorities.

Will any of the proposals outlined below make it into the final budget? It’s hard to say; a few climate-adjacent topics — especially energy security and permitting — now have such bipartisan support that Republicans may eventually opt for them in the final deal. But regardless, these climate policies are the ones you’re likely to keep hearing about from Democrats — especially as they look toward the 2024 election.

Here are some of the most interesting ideas in the proposal:

1. A new tax on the electricity used for crypto.

The cryptocurrency industry’s voracious use of energy has long concerned Democrats; at peak, crypto miners consumed more energy than Finland. Now the industry has sagged— and the party smells blood. Last month, Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts promised that a crackdown on crypto’s energy use is coming, and the Department of Energy and EPA have said that they have the legal authority to compel crypto miners to disclose their energy use.

Biden’s budget goes further, proposing a new and gradually rising 30% tax on crypto’s electricity use. The White House estimates it will bring in $3.5 billion over the next decade.

2. An end to fossil-fuel subsidies.

Biden campaigned on ending fossil-fuel subsidies and tax breaks; in his first year as president, American diplomats endorsed a United Nations pledge to end such subsidies globally.

Yet so far he’s struggled to actually make it happen. He couldn’t get Congress — and especially Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia — to swallow the reform in the Inflation Reduction Act last year. (In fact, Biden has sometimes boosted de facto fossil-fuel subsidies: After gasoline prices spiked last year, he invoked the Defense Production Act to make sure fracking firms had the resources they needed to drill.)

Now he’s trying again, proposing reforms to fossil-fuel subsidies that the White House estimates could bring in more than $90 billion over the next decade. That said, it’s unlikely to go anywhere this time.

3. More money for permitting renewable energy.

One of the White House’s biggest worries is that the Inflation Reduction Act’s hundreds of billions of climate funding is going to wither on the vine. If developers and energy companies can’t get new clean-energy projects sited and approved, then many tax credits might expire before firms can take advantage of them, officials fear. After Democrats rejected a Manchin-led effort to reform environmental-permitting laws last year, those concerns intensified.

Now, Biden has requested another $60 million in funding to help the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration build the internal capacity it needs to approve offshore wind farms. It has asked for millions more to build rural electricity infrastructure and overcome other procedural holdups. And unlike other aspects of the budget, this could actually go somewhere: House Republicans have identified permitting as one of their own priorities and approved a bill in committee on Thursday. If there’s a climate-related deal this year, it’s likely to happen on permitting.

Yellow

You’re out of free articles.

Subscribe today to experience Heatmap’s expert analysis 
of climate change, clean energy, and sustainability.
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Politics

It’s Chris Wright’s Worldview. They’re Just Legislating It.

The energy secretary's philosophy is all over the Senate mega-bill.

Chris Wright.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

As the Senate Finance Committee worked on its version of the reconciliation bill that would, among things, overhaul the Inflation Reduction Act, there was much speculation among observers that there could be a carve out for sources of power like geothermal, hydropower, and nuclear, which provide steady generation and tend to be more popular among Republicans, along the lines of the slightly better treatment received by advanced nuclear in the House bill.

Instead, the Senate Finance Committee’s text didn’t carve out these “firm” sources of power, it carved out solar and wind, preserving tax credits for everything else through 2035, while sunsetting solar and wind by 2028.

Keep reading...Show less
Wires and panels.
Heatmap Illustration | Abbr. Projects

When I reached out to climate tech investors on Tuesday to gauge their reaction to the Senate’s proposed overhaul of the clean energy tax credits, I thought I might get a standard dose of can-do investor optimism. Though the proposal from the Senate Finance committee would cut tax credits for wind and solar, it would preserve them for other sources of clean energy, such as geothermal, nuclear, and batteries — areas of significant focus and investment for many climate-focused venture firms.

But the vibe ended up being fairly divided. While many investors expressed cautious optimism about what this latest text could mean for their particular portfolio companies, others worried that by slashing incentives for solar and wind, the bill’s implications for the energy transition at large would be categorically terrible.

Keep reading...Show less
Podcast

It’s Easiest to Electrify This Type of Truck

Rob and Jesse talk with John Henry Harris, the cofounder and CEO of Harbinger Motors.

Harbinger.
Heatmap Illustration/Harbinger Motors

You might not think that often about medium-duty trucks, but they’re all around you: ambulances, UPS and FedEx delivery trucks, school buses. And although they make up a relatively small share of vehicles on the road, they generate an outsized amount of carbon pollution. They’re also a surprisingly ripe target for electrification, because so many medium-duty trucks drive fewer than 150 miles a day.

On this week’s episode of Shift Key, Rob and Jesse talk with John Henry Harris, the cofounder and CEO of Harbinger Motors. Harbinger is a Los Angeles-based startup that sells electric and hybrid chassis for medium-duty vehicles, such as delivery vans, moving trucks, and ambulances.

Keep reading...Show less