Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Climate Tech

Tyba Raises $14 Million to Help Batteries Make Money

The startup told Heatmap exclusively that the funding will help it reach new markets in the U.S. and abroad.

Tyba facilities.
Heatmap Illustration/Tyba, Getty Images

By 2035, BloombergNEF projects that the U.S. will build an additional 221 gigawatts of battery storage, a more than 10-tenfold increase from July of last year. But as intermittent renewables, rising electricity demand, and extreme weather make grid operations increasingly complex, it can be a struggle for energy producers to manage their battery assets as efficiently and profitably as they could be — discharging when prices are highest and energy is needed most and charging when prices are lowest.

Tyba helps a range of companies — from oil major TotalEnergies to smaller, independent energy producers — optimize their battery storage systems. The startup’s AI-enabled platform provides timely, accurate price forecasts and automates energy dispatch decisions and bidding strategies to sell electricity into the market. The company just raised a $13.9 million Series A round, led by the climate tech investor Energize Capital, bringing its total funding to $18.5 million. Tyba currently supports over 1 gigawatt of batteries in California and Texas, but Baker told me this latest funding round will allow the company to expand into new markets domestically, and eventually internationally.

“When there’s a winter storm, or when there’s a plant that trips offline, prices can go up from, on average, $50 to $5,000, and so that massive spike drives a tremendous amount of revenue. In a single five-minute interval, we might earn up to 20% of the revenue for a year,” Tyba’s CEO and co-founder Michael Baker told me. “Our forecast strategies and also our bidding strategies are especially tuned to forecasting those events and making sure we’re in the market to sell power and capture that.”

Referring to data from Texas energy regulator ERCOT, Baker told me that top-performing battery assets there generated about 50% more revenue than average-performing assets, and that the batteries Tyba managed were consistently in the top tier. (California doesn’t release as much data, so he can’t be as precise, but Baker said “the uplift is comparable“ there.) Energy producers today generally work with less sophisticated, bespoke software solutions that are difficult to replicate, as they’re usually tailor-made to solve specific problems in specific markets. Especially in a political environment that’s unfriendly to renewables development in general, though, making battery storage systems the most profitable option for power producers is an obvious way to ensure they’re more widely deployed.

“These developers, they’re infrastructure companies. They’re not technology companies,” Tyler Lancaster, a partner at Energize Capital, explained. And they’ve had a hard time building software that can keep up with the ever-changing needs of the grid. “As a result, they’ve seen those assets and those batteries that they’ve deployed generate a lot less revenue than they thought.”

The Northeast and Mid-Atlantic regions are likely areas for growth due to their acute grid capacity needs, he said. Many of Tyba’s customers are working closely with data center developers as tech companies desperately seek out clean, reliable power to support their AI-driven load growth.

As for the impact of President Trump’s increased tariffs on Chinese imports or the potential elimination of Inflation Reduction Act incentives such as the investment and production tax credits, neither would be good news for the battery storage sector at large. “If we do have substantial tariffs and there is any impact on the tax credits, that will certainly slow down the pace of deployment and the growth of these technologies,” Baker told me. Tyba’s customers are gearing up. “They’re definitely preparing for the worst, including things like pre-purchasing equipment years in advance.”

The economics of battery storage have to be an undeniable winner to weather these headwinds, and Baker is confident that Tyba can help the sector continue its momentum over the next four years and beyond. As he told me, “The overall fundamentals of renewable energy are pretty undeniable.”

Editor’s note: This story has been updated to clarify the description of Tyba’s model.

Green

You’re out of free articles.

Subscribe today to experience Heatmap’s expert analysis 
of climate change, clean energy, and sustainability.
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Adaptation

The ‘Buffer’ That Can Protect a Town from Wildfires

Paradise, California, is snatching up high-risk properties to create a defensive perimeter and prevent the town from burning again.

Homes as a wildfire buffer.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

The 2018 Camp Fire was the deadliest wildfire in California’s history, wiping out 90% of the structures in the mountain town of Paradise and killing at least 85 people in a matter of hours. Investigations afterward found that Paradise’s town planners had ignored warnings of the fire risk to its residents and forgone common-sense preparations that would have saved lives. In the years since, the Camp Fire has consequently become a cautionary tale for similar communities in high-risk wildfire areas — places like Chinese Camp, a small historic landmark in the Sierra Nevada foothills that dramatically burned to the ground last week as part of the nearly 14,000-acre TCU September Lightning Complex.

More recently, Paradise has also become a model for how a town can rebuild wisely after a wildfire. At least some of that is due to the work of Dan Efseaff, the director of the Paradise Recreation and Park District, who has launched a program to identify and acquire some of the highest-risk, hardest-to-access properties in the Camp Fire burn scar. Though he has a limited total operating budget of around $5.5 million and relies heavily on the charity of local property owners (he’s currently in the process of applying for a $15 million grant with a $5 million match for the program) Efseaff has nevertheless managed to build the beginning of a defensible buffer of managed parkland around Paradise that could potentially buy the town time in the case of a future wildfire.

Keep reading...Show less
Spotlight

How the Tax Bill Is Empowering Anti-Renewables Activists

A war of attrition is now turning in opponents’ favor.

Massachusetts and solar panels.
Heatmap Illustration/Library of Congress, Getty Images

A solar developer’s defeat in Massachusetts last week reveals just how much stronger project opponents are on the battlefield after the de facto repeal of the Inflation Reduction Act.

Last week, solar developer PureSky pulled five projects under development around the western Massachusetts town of Shutesbury. PureSky’s facilities had been in the works for years and would together represent what the developer has claimed would be one of the state’s largest solar projects thus far. In a statement, the company laid blame on “broader policy and regulatory headwinds,” including the state’s existing renewables incentives not keeping pace with rising costs and “federal policy updates,” which PureSky said were “making it harder to finance projects like those proposed near Shutesbury.”

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Hotspots

The Midwest Is Becoming Even Tougher for Solar Projects

And more on the week’s most important conflicts around renewables.

The United States.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

1. Wells County, Indiana – One of the nation’s most at-risk solar projects may now be prompting a full on moratorium.

  • Late last week, this county was teed up to potentially advance a new restrictive solar ordinance that would’ve cut off zoning access for large-scale facilities. That’s obviously bad for developers. But it would’ve still allowed solar facilities up to 50 acres and grandfathered in projects that had previously signed agreements with local officials.
  • However, solar opponents swamped the county Area Planning Commission meeting to decide on the ordinance, turning it into an over four-hour display in which many requested in public comments to outright ban solar projects entirely without a grandfathering clause.
  • It’s clear part of the opposition is inflamed over the EDF Paddlefish Solar project, which we ranked last year as one of the nation’s top imperiled renewables facilities in progress. The project has already resulted in a moratorium in another county, Huntington.
  • Although the Paddlefish project is not unique in its risks, it is what we view as a bellwether for the future of solar development in farming communities, as the Fort Wayne-adjacent county is a picturesque display of many areas across the United States. Pro-renewables advocates have sought to tamp down opposition with tactics such as a direct text messaging campaign, which I previously scooped last week.
  • Yet despite the counter-communications, momentum is heading in the other direction. At the meeting, officials ultimately decided to punt a decision to next month so they could edit their draft ordinance to assuage aggrieved residents.
  • Also worth noting: anyone could see from Heatmap Pro data that this county would be an incredibly difficult fight for a solar developer. Despite a slim majority of local support for renewable energy, the county has a nearly 100% opposition risk rating, due in no small part to its large agricultural workforce and MAGA leanings.

2. Clark County, Ohio – Another Ohio county has significantly restricted renewable energy development, this time with big political implications.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow