You’re out of free articles.
Log in
To continue reading, log in to your account.
Create a Free Account
To unlock more free articles, please create a free account.
Sign In or Create an Account.
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Welcome to Heatmap
Thank you for registering with Heatmap. Climate change is one of the greatest challenges of our lives, a force reshaping our economy, our politics, and our culture. We hope to be your trusted, friendly, and insightful guide to that transformation. Please enjoy your free articles. You can check your profile here .
subscribe to get Unlimited access
Offer for a Heatmap News Unlimited Access subscription; please note that your subscription will renew automatically unless you cancel prior to renewal. Cancellation takes effect at the end of your current billing period. We will let you know in advance of any price changes. Taxes may apply. Offer terms are subject to change.
Subscribe to get unlimited Access
Hey, you are out of free articles but you are only a few clicks away from full access. Subscribe below and take advantage of our introductory offer.
subscribe to get Unlimited access
Offer for a Heatmap News Unlimited Access subscription; please note that your subscription will renew automatically unless you cancel prior to renewal. Cancellation takes effect at the end of your current billing period. We will let you know in advance of any price changes. Taxes may apply. Offer terms are subject to change.
Create Your Account
Please Enter Your Password
Forgot your password?
Please enter the email address you use for your account so we can send you a link to reset your password:
Talks, workshops, demos, and tours worth checking out at the United States’ biggest — and most chaotic — climate event.
There is no bigger climate event in the country than Climate Week NYC — and, it might be fair to say, no event more impenetrable. With over 400 talks, workshops, demos, screenings, tours, karaoke parties (???), private events, and networking mingles, and no central event space, trying to make sense of what to see and where to go is not for the faint of heart. Looking at the seemingly endless events calendar, you get the impression that you should have begun strategizing back in August.
If you are not one of those people with amazing foresight, though, then the first full day of Climate Week could have you scrambling. Some cool events are already sold out; others are invite-only. Here’s Heatmap’s last-minute guide to saving your Climate Week:
Lucid Air Demo Drives
From: Ongoing
Where: Lucid Studio, 2 9th Avenue
Do luxury EVs have you curious? Then put your name on the waitlist for a demo drive of a Lucid Air on “a designated route through the iconic streets of Manhattan,” followed by a poke around the automaker’s Meatpacking District flagship studio. Learn more here.
Book Talk with Jeff Goodell, author of The Heat Will Kill You First: Life and Death on a Scorched Planet
From: 5:30 p.m. - 7:00 p.m.
Where: The Institute for Public Knowledge, 20 Cooper Square, 2nd floor
Jeff Goodell has a knack for timing; his “propulsive” new book on extreme heat was met with raves when it came out this summer during the deadly heat dome in the southwest. On Monday night, he speaks with The Institute for Public Knowledge’s Eric Klinenberg and Eleni (Lenio) Myrivili, the chief heat officer of Athens, Greece, about “life and death on a scorched planet.” Learn more here.
Up2Us2023: A Better World Is Possible
From: 7:00 p.m. - 8:30 p.m.
Where: Virtual and at Adler Hall at The New York Society for Ethical Culture, 2 W. 64th Street
The climate crisis has a communication problem. At this event, Scott Z. Burns (the writer/director of Apple TV+’s Extrapolations), Project Drawdown’s lead scientist Dr. Kate Marvel, Sunrise Movement co-founder Varshini Prakash, 350.org founder Bill McKibben, and other major climate communicators will discuss how to better speak about the collaborations, actions, and global solutions at hand. Learn more here.
The Nest Climate Campus
From: Sept. 19 at 8:30 a.m. - Sept. 21, 5:30 p.m.
Where: Javits Center
The Nest Climate Campus at Javits Center is its own ecosystem within the greater Climate Week — you have to register (for free) separately, but once inside you have access to “the Climate Collective,” an “energetic networking space” filled with demos, products, and activations, as well as the main stage, where there will be speakers including former EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy and her fellow America Is All In co-chair, Washington state Governor Jay Inslee (on Thursday). Learn more here.
The Roadmap for Decarbonizing Cities
From: 10:00 a.m. - 10:45 a.m.
Where: Sustainability Summit NYC, 666 3rd Avenue, 21st Floor
Cities are responsible for two-thirds of global energy consumption and 70% of carbon emissions annually — but how do you go about making a whole entire urban environment greener? This short discussion is hosted by the Consulate General of Denmark in New York, and will feature Sharon Dijksma, the mayor of Utrecht — one of Heatmap’s seven sustainable neighborhoods of the future — as one of the speakers. There will be an opportunity at the end to ask questions. Learn more here.
Classic Harbor Line AIANY Climate Change Tour: Resiliency, Sustainable Architecture and the Future of NYC
From: 2:30 p.m. - 5:15 p.m.
Where: Departs from Chelsea Piers (Pier 62) - W. 22nd Street and Hudson River
It can be easy to forget that Manhattan is an island — and susceptible to all the climate impacts that come with it. As such, to really understand how New York is changing, you need to get out on its waterways. Expect to see examples of green infrastructure, tidal marshes, and wetlands, and learn the “steps that interdisciplinary teams of urban planners, architects, landscape architects, developers, and community groups are taking to address storm surges, intense rains, and hotter temperatures.” If you miss the boat, another sailing will take place on Wednesday. Learn more here.
The Climate Boot Camp
From: Wednesday through Saturday
Where: Virtual
Want to seriously up your sustainability and organizing games? The EcoActUs Working Group is offering a free, seven-and-a-half hour “Climate Boot Camp,” which involves insight from “52 expert climate leaders [about what] needs to be done about the climate crisis and how to get it done — in a series of 8-to-15-minute presentations.” The bootcamp is self-guided and virtual, and comes with a free e-workbook with “160 curated drill-down links to lectures, websites, podcasts, music, art, and film.” Learn more here.
Demo Hall: Hard Tech Solutions to the Climate Crisis
From: 4:30 p.m. - 7:00 p.m.
Where: Near Washington Square Park (exact location available upon RSVP)
Are you eager to actually get your hands on “prototypes of the technology reshaping the energy and climate economy”? Over 20 companies will be showing off their clean-tech solutions in this demo hall, with an accompanying “fireside chat” between Dr. Evelyn Wang, the director at the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E), and journalist Molly Wood starting at 5 p.m. See the full list of attendees and learn more here.
SAVE HER! The Environmental Drag Show
From: 7:00 p.m. - 10:00 p.m.
Where: House of Yes, 2 Wyckoff Avenue, Brooklyn
Forget about going to some boring networking mixer this Climate Week, because Pattie Gonia and VERA! are hosting “performances by nine sustainability drag queens, kings, and things” at the House of Yes. Start planning your outfit now: The theme is “Mother Nature’s Disco,” complete with an accompanying mood board to get you started. Learn more here.
The New York Times’ Climate Forward events
From: 9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.
Where: Virtual
The New York Times is hosting a day-long Climate Week event featuring presentations by Bill Gates, former Mayor Michael Bloomberg, former Vice President Al Gore, chef José Andrés, tidying expert Marie Kondo, the President of the World Bank Group Ajay Banga, and others. In-person tickets are currently waitlist only and start at $350, but attending the event virtually is free for New York Times subscribers and includes access to a Slack channel set up for remote attendees. Learn more here.
Global Choices: An Evening On Ice
From: 5:00 p.m. - 6:00 p.m.
Where: Virtual and at The Explorers Club, 46 E. 70th Street
How long will it take someone at the Explorers’ Club’s “Evening On Ice” event to make an “Ice, Ice, Baby” reference? Find out for yourself by RSVPing to learn more about the global “ice crisis,” featuring speakers who will discuss “the science and geopolitics” behind disappearing ice and snowpack, as well as “hopeful pathways forward.” Learn more here.
Tripling Global Clean Energy Capacity By 2030: Is It Enough? Is It Possible? Will It Be Fair?
From: 10:00 a.m. - 11:30 a.m.
Where: Virtual and at Volvo Hall, Scandinavia House, 58 Park Avenue
RMI brings together government and clean-energy leaders to discuss “how powerful change drivers can accelerate renewable energy deployment globally by the end of this decade.” The discussion will have a particular emphasis on the Global South, especially as it pertains to adopting global energy targets around COP28. Learn more here.
Marketplace of the Future
From: 2:30 p.m. - 10:00 p.m.
Where: Starrett-Lehigh Building, 601 West 26th Street
“Everything from solar power, electric vehicles, compost programs, building retrofits, and circular fashion will be available to explore” at the seventh annual Marketplace of the Future exhibition. Tickets for the day cost $49.87. Browse the speakers and events here and learn more here.
Meet the New York Climate Exchange
From: Tours start 11:45 a.m., 12:45 p.m., and 1:45 p.m.
Where: Liggett Terrace, Governors Island
When it is completed in 2025, the New York Climate Exchange will be a 400,000-square-foot campus on Governors Island “dedicated to researching and creating innovative climate solutions that will be scaled across New York City and the world.” You don’t have to wait 15-plus months for an official introduction, though: This free tour and informational session will get you up to speed on the Climate Exchange, which will one day serve 600 postsecondary students, 4,500 K‑12 students, 6,000 workforce trainees, and up to 30 businesses through its incubator program. Be sure to check out other Governors Island events happening this week too. Learn more here.
Log in
To continue reading, log in to your account.
Create a Free Account
To unlock more free articles, please create a free account.
Paradise, California, is snatching up high-risk properties to create a defensive perimeter and prevent the town from burning again.
The 2018 Camp Fire was the deadliest wildfire in California’s history, wiping out 90% of the structures in the mountain town of Paradise and killing at least 85 people in a matter of hours. Investigations afterward found that Paradise’s town planners had ignored warnings of the fire risk to its residents and forgone common-sense preparations that would have saved lives. In the years since, the Camp Fire has consequently become a cautionary tale for similar communities in high-risk wildfire areas — places like Chinese Camp, a small historic landmark in the Sierra Nevada foothills that dramatically burned to the ground last week as part of the nearly 14,000-acre TCU September Lightning Complex.
More recently, Paradise has also become a model for how a town can rebuild wisely after a wildfire. At least some of that is due to the work of Dan Efseaff, the director of the Paradise Recreation and Park District, who has launched a program to identify and acquire some of the highest-risk, hardest-to-access properties in the Camp Fire burn scar. Though he has a limited total operating budget of around $5.5 million and relies heavily on the charity of local property owners (he’s currently in the process of applying for a $15 million grant with a $5 million match for the program) Efseaff has nevertheless managed to build the beginning of a defensible buffer of managed parkland around Paradise that could potentially buy the town time in the case of a future wildfire.
In order to better understand how communities can build back smarter after — or, ideally, before — a catastrophic fire, I spoke with Efseaff about his work in Paradise and how other communities might be able to replicate it. Our conversation has been lightly edited and condensed for clarity.
Do you live in Paradise? Were you there during the Camp Fire?
I actually live in Chico. We’ve lived here since the mid-‘90s, but I have a long connection to Paradise; I’ve worked for the district since 2017. I’m also a sea kayak instructor and during the Camp Fire, I was in South Carolina for a training. I was away from the phone until I got back at the end of the day and saw it blowing up with everything.
I have triplet daughters who were attending Butte College at the time, and they needed to be evacuated. There was a lot of uncertainty that day. But it gave me some perspective, because I couldn’t get back for two days. It gave me a chance to think, “Okay, what’s our response going to be?” Looking two days out, it was like: That would have been payroll, let’s get people together, and then let’s figure out what we’re going to do two weeks and two months from now.
It also got my mind thinking about what we would have done going backwards. If you’d had two weeks to prepare, you would have gotten your go-bag together, you’d have come up with your evacuation route — that type of thing. But when you run the movie backwards on what you would have done differently if you had two years or two decades, it would include prepping the landscape, making some safer community defensible space. That’s what got me started.
Was it your idea to buy up the high-risk properties in the burn scar?
I would say I adapted it. Everyone wants to say it was their idea, but I’ll tell you where it came from: Pre-fire, the thinking was that it would make sense for the town to have a perimeter trail from a recreation standpoint. But I was also trying to pitch it as a good idea from a fuel standpoint, so that if there was a wildfire, you could respond to it. Certainly, the idea took on a whole other dimension after the Camp Fire.
I’m a restoration ecologist, so I’ve done a lot of river floodplain work. There are a lot of analogies there. The trend has been to give nature a little bit more room: You’re not going to stop a flood, but you can minimize damage to human infrastructure. Putting levees too close to the river makes them more prone to failing and puts people at risk — but if you can set the levee back a little bit, it gives the flood waters room to go through. That’s why I thought we need a little bit of a buffer in Paradise and some protection around the community. We need a transition between an area that is going to burn, and that we can let burn, but not in a way that is catastrophic.
How hard has it been to find willing sellers? Do most people in the area want to rebuild — or need to because of their mortgages?
Ironically, the biggest challenge for us is finding adequate funding. A lot of the property we have so far has been donated to us. It’s probably upwards of — oh, let’s see, at least half a dozen properties have been donated, probably close to 200 acres at this point.
We are applying for some federal grants right now, and we’ll see how that goes. What’s evolved quite a bit on this in recent years, though, is that — because we’ve done some modeling — instead of thinking of the buffer as areas that are managed uniformly around the community, we’re much more strategic. These fire events are wind-driven, and there are only a couple of directions where the wind blows sufficiently long enough and powerful enough for the other conditions to fall into play. That’s not to say other events couldn’t happen, but we’re going after the most likely events that would cause catastrophic fires, and that would be from the Diablo winds, or north winds, that come through our area. That was what happened in the Camp Fire scenario, and another one our models caught what sure looked a lot like the [2024] Park Fire.
One thing that I want to make clear is that some people think, “Oh, this is a fire break. It’s devoid of vegetation.” No, what we’re talking about is a well-managed habitat. These are shaded fuel breaks. You maintain the big trees, you get rid of the ladder fuels, and you get rid of the dead wood that’s on the ground. We have good examples with our partners, like the Butte Fire Safe Council, on how this works, and it looks like it helped protect the community of Cohasset during the Park Fire. They did some work on some strips there, and the fire essentially dropped to the ground before it came to Paradise Lake. You didn’t have an aerial tanker dropping retardant, you didn’t have a $2-million-per-day fire crew out there doing work. It was modest work done early and in the right place that actually changed the behavior of the fire.
Tell me a little more about the modeling you’ve been doing.
We looked at fire pathways with a group called XyloPlan out of the Bay Area. The concept is that you simulate a series of ignitions with certain wind conditions, terrain, and vegetation. The model looked very much like a Camp Fire scenario; it followed the same pathway, going towards the community in a little gulch that channeled high winds. You need to interrupt that pathway — and that doesn’t necessarily mean creating an area devoid of vegetation, but if you have these areas where the fire behavior changes and drops down to the ground, then it slows the travel. I found this hard to believe, but in the modeling results, in a scenario like the Camp Fire, it could buy you up to eight hours. With modern California firefighting, you could empty out the community in a systematic way in that time. You could have a vigorous fire response. You could have aircraft potentially ready. It’s a game-changing situation, rather than the 30 minutes Paradise had when the Camp Fire started.
How does this work when you’re dealing with private property owners, though? How do you convince them to move or donate their land?
We’re a Park and Recreation District so we don’t have regulatory authority. We are just trying to run with a good idea with the properties that we have so far — those from willing donors mostly, but there have been a couple of sales. If we’re unable to get federal funding or state support, though, I ultimately think this idea will still have to be here — whether it’s five, 10, 15, or 50 years from now. We have to manage this area in a comprehensive way.
Private property rights are very important, and we don’t want to impinge on that. And yet, what a person does on their property has a huge impact on the 30,000 people who may be downwind of them. It’s an unusual situation: In a hurricane, if you have a hurricane-rated roof and your neighbor doesn’t, and theirs blows off, you feel sorry for your neighbor but it’s probably not going to harm your property much. In a wildfire, what your neighbor has done with the wood, or how they treat vegetation, has a significant impact on your home and whether your family is going to survive. It’s a fundamentally different kind of event than some of the other disasters we look at.
Do you have any advice for community leaders who might want to consider creating buffer zones or something similar to what you’re doing in Paradise?
Start today. You have to think about these things with some urgency, but they’re not something people think about until it happens. Paradise, for many decades, did not have a single escaped wildfire make it into the community. Then, overnight, the community is essentially wiped out. But in so many places, these events are foreseeable; we’re just not wired to think about them or prepare for them.
Buffers around communities make a lot of sense, even from a road network standpoint. Even from a trash pickup standpoint. You don’t think about this, but if your community is really strung out, making it a little more thoughtfully laid out also makes it more economically viable to provide services to people. Some things we look for now are long roads that don’t have any connections — that were one-way in and no way out. I don’t think [the traffic jams and deaths in] Paradise would have happened with what we know now, but I kind of think [authorities] did know better beforehand. It just wasn’t economically viable at the time; they didn’t think it was a big deal, but they built the roads anyway. We can be doing a lot of things smarter.
A war of attrition is now turning in opponents’ favor.
A solar developer’s defeat in Massachusetts last week reveals just how much stronger project opponents are on the battlefield after the de facto repeal of the Inflation Reduction Act.
Last week, solar developer PureSky pulled five projects under development around the western Massachusetts town of Shutesbury. PureSky’s facilities had been in the works for years and would together represent what the developer has claimed would be one of the state’s largest solar projects thus far. In a statement, the company laid blame on “broader policy and regulatory headwinds,” including the state’s existing renewables incentives not keeping pace with rising costs and “federal policy updates,” which PureSky said were “making it harder to finance projects like those proposed near Shutesbury.”
But tucked in its press release was an admission from the company’s vice president of development Derek Moretz: this was also about the town, which had enacted a bylaw significantly restricting solar development that the company was until recently fighting vigorously in court.
“There are very few areas in the Commonwealth that are feasible to reach its clean energy goals,” Moretz stated. “We respect the Town’s conservation go als, but it is clear that systemic reforms are needed for Massachusetts to source its own energy.”
This stems from a story that probably sounds familiar: after proposing the projects, PureSky began reckoning with a burgeoning opposition campaign centered around nature conservation. Led by a fresh opposition group, Smart Solar Shutesbury, activists successfully pushed the town to drastically curtail development in 2023, pointing to the amount of forest acreage that would potentially be cleared in order to construct the projects. The town had previously not permitted facilities larger than 15 acres, but the fresh change went further, essentially banning battery storage and solar projects in most areas.
When this first happened, the state Attorney General’s office actually had PureSky’s back, challenging the legality of the bylaw that would block construction. And PureSky filed a lawsuit that was, until recently, ongoing with no signs of stopping. But last week, shortly after the Treasury Department unveiled its rules for implementing Trump’s new tax and spending law, which basically repealed the Inflation Reduction Act, PureSky settled with the town and dropped the lawsuit – and the projects went away along with the court fight.
What does this tell us? Well, things out in the country must be getting quite bleak for solar developers in areas with strident and locked-in opposition that could be costly to fight. Where before project developers might have been able to stomach the struggle, money talks – and the dollars are starting to tell executives to lay down their arms.
The picture gets worse on the macro level: On Monday, the Solar Energy Industries Association released a report declaring that federal policy changes brought about by phasing out federal tax incentives would put the U.S. at risk of losing upwards of 55 gigawatts of solar project development by 2030, representing a loss of more than 20 percent of the project pipeline.
But the trade group said most of that total – 44 gigawatts – was linked specifically to the Trump administration’s decision to halt federal permitting for renewable energy facilities, a decision that may impact generation out west but has little-to-know bearing on most large solar projects because those are almost always on private land.
Heatmap Pro can tell us how much is at stake here. To give you a sense of perspective, across the U.S., over 81 gigawatts worth of renewable energy projects are being contested right now, with non-Western states – the Northeast, South and Midwest – making up almost 60% of that potential capacity.
If historical trends hold, you’d expect a staggering 49% of those projects to be canceled. That would be on top of the totals SEIA suggests could be at risk from new Trump permitting policies.
I suspect the rate of cancellations in the face of project opposition will increase. And if this policy landscape is helping activists kill projects in blue states in desperate need of power, like Massachusetts, then the future may be more difficult to swallow than we can imagine at the moment.
And more on the week’s most important conflicts around renewables.
1. Wells County, Indiana – One of the nation’s most at-risk solar projects may now be prompting a full on moratorium.
2. Clark County, Ohio – Another Ohio county has significantly restricted renewable energy development, this time with big political implications.
3. Daviess County, Kentucky – NextEra’s having some problems getting past this county’s setbacks.
4. Columbia County, Georgia – Sometimes the wealthy will just say no to a solar farm.
5. Ottawa County, Michigan – A proposed battery storage facility in the Mitten State looks like it is about to test the state’s new permitting primacy law.