The Fight

Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Hotspots

Ben Carson vs. the Anti-Solar Movement

And more on the week’s most important conflicts around renewable energy.

The United States.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

1. Dukes County, Massachusetts – The Supreme Court for the second time declined to take up a legal challenge to the Vineyard Wind offshore project, indicating that anti-wind activists' efforts to go directly to the high court have run aground.

  • The more worthwhile case to follow now is the Democratic state-led challenge to Trump’s executive order against offshore wind, which was filed earlier this week.
  • That lawsuit argues, among other things, that the order violated the Administrative Procedures Act and was “contrary to and in excess of” existing environmental and coastal energy leasing laws. One can easily assume the administration and Democratic states may take this case all the way to the high court depending how the federal district court judge rules in the case.

2. Brooklyn/Staten Island, New York – The battery backlash in the NYC boroughs is getting louder – and stranger – by the day.

  • A Soltage battery storage facility is now the target of community ire, including by Protect Our Children New York, a volunteer organization that purports to fight human trafficking, child abuse… and now also battery storage. Peter DiMiceli, a founder of the organization, handcuffed himself to a different battery storage facility site a few weeks ago.
  • One of the complaints with Soltage’s project, and others in Brooklyn like this NineDot proposal, appears to be a lack of prior notice before the project entered the formal approval process. But fire safety concerns also permeate this discussion, as they tend to do a lot nowadays.

3. Baltimore County, Maryland – It’s Ben Carson vs. the farmer near Baltimore, as a solar project proposed on the former Housing and Urban Development secretary’s land is coming under fire from his neighbors.

  • Carson and his wife have reportedly signed a contract with Nexamp to allow a 33-acre solar project to be built on property they own in Upperco, Maryland, a largely rural part of Baltimore County. According to news reports, Carson no longer lives at the home situated in Upperco and records indicate he lives in Palm Beach, Florida.
  • This situation has upset neighbors – as it tends to do in Maryland farming communities. Carson’s property reportedly is covered by an agricultural easement that forbids construction of solar projects, and representatives for Carson have tried – so far unsuccessfully – to get a special permit from local regulators to get permission to build.

4. Mecklenburg County, Virginia – Landowners in this part of Virginia have reportedly received fake “good neighbor agreement” letters claiming to be from solar developer Longroad Energy, offering large sums of cash to people neighboring the potential project.

  • Longroad’s 80-megawatt 7 Bridges solar farm has been backed by local planning regulators and while it is currently unclear who the culprit was, this effort may have been an attempt by hostile actors to paint the developer as trying to offer cash to residents to quell potential dissent.

5. York County, South Carolina – Silfab Solar is now in a bitter public brawl with researchers at the University of South Carolina after they released a report claiming that a proposed solar manufacturing plant poses a significant public risk in the event of a chemical emissions release.

  • The report, which was directed to activists that oppose the proposed Silfab plant in York County, focused heavily on a “worst case” situation where different toxic chemicals used in the solar manufacturing process were somehow released into the air.
  • Silfab has accused the researchers of bias against the plant. “I was alarmed and more importantly I was disappointed [by the report],” Silfab director of operations Greg Basden told local news outlet WRHI. “What they described as worst-case would never happen.”

6. Jefferson Davis County, Mississippi – Apex Clean Energy’s Bluestone Solar project was just approved by the Mississippi Public Service Commission with no objections against the project.

  • But it’s not all fun and games in Mississippi. A Lightsource BP solar farm in Lamar County was withdrawn from the permitting process on Monday after local opposition delayed approval before the local planning committee for more than a year.
  • Pro data predicted Lamar County, which is whiter, wealthier, Trumpier, and over-indexed for hospitality jobs, would be much riskier to build in than Jefferson Davis County, which has a larger Black population, doesn’t have any workforce sensitivities, and could use more economic development.

7. Plaquemine Parish, Louisiana – NextEra’s Coastal Prairie solar project got an earful from locals in this parish that sits within the Baton Rouge metro area, indicating little has changed since the project was first proposed two years ago.

8. Huntington County, Indiana – Well it turns out Heatmap’s Most At-Risk Projects of the Energy Transition has been right again: the Paddlefish solar project has now been indefinitely blocked by this county under a new moratorium on the project area in tandem with a new restrictive land use ordinance on solar development overall.

  • The county has now banned all solar from being built on “prime farmland” and will have to be screened for all sorts of new requirements, including the avoidance of glare.

9. Albany County, Wyoming – The Rail Tie wind farm is back in the news again, as county regulators say landowners feel misled by Repsol, the project’s developer.

  • Rail Tie, which is mostly sited on private lands but has a fifth of its project footprint on state property, has been fully permitted. But legal representatives for landowners in the construction zone are pressing for transparency in Rail Tie’s compliance with its permits and say landowners did not see a site plan with precise turbine locations available.

10. Klickitat County, Washington – Cypress Creek Renewables is on a lucky streak with a solar project near Goldendale, Washington, getting to bypass local opposition from the nearby Yakama Nation.

  • Yakama officials reportedly submitted a report to state officials on the Cypress Creek project’s impacts to “tribal cultural properties” and requested an environmental impact statement. Instead of doing that, the state Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council voted Monday to qualify the project for a fast-track permitting process that would eschew local regulators.

11. Pinal County, Arizona – A large utility-scale NextEra solar farm has been rejected by this county’s Board of Supervisors.

  • The Valley Farms Energy Center would provide 200 megawatts to Salt River Project, a major Arizona utility, which testified in support of the project and said it would be needed to meet the state’s energy needs.
  • But despite the SRP and landowners testifying in support, supervisors said their constituents were against the project and ultimately sided against the project.
Yellow

This article is exclusively
for Heatmap Plus subscribers.

Go deeper inside the politics, projects, and personalities
shaping the energy transition.
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Spotlight

The National Park Service is Fighting a Solar Farm

A battle ostensibly over endangered shrimp in Kentucky

Mammoth Cave.
Heatmap Illustration/Library of Congress, Getty Images

A national park is fighting a large-scale solar farm over potential impacts to an endangered shrimp – what appears to be the first real instance of a federal entity fighting a solar project under the Trump administration.

At issue is Geenex Solar’s 100-megawatt Wood Duck solar project in Barren County, Kentucky, which would be sited in the watershed of Mammoth Cave National Park. In a letter sent to Kentucky power regulators in April, park superintendent Barclay Trimble claimed the National Park Service is opposing the project because Geenex did not sufficiently answer questions about “irreversible harm” it could potentially pose to an endangered shrimp that lives in “cave streams fed by surface water from this solar project.”

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Q&A

Meet the Avatar Fan Fighting for Offshore Wind

A conservation with George Povall of All Our Energy

The May 8 interviewee.
Heatmap Illustration

Today’s chat is with George Povall, director of the All Our Energy pro-offshore wind environmental group. Povall – who told me he was inspired to be an environmentalist by the film Avatar – has for more than a decade been a key organizer on the ground in the Long Island area for supporting offshore wind development. But these days he spends a lot more time fighting renewables disinformation, going so far as to travel the community trying to re-educate people about this technology in light of the loud activism against it.

After the news dropped that states are suing to undo the Trump executive order against offshore wind, I wanted to chat with Povell about what environmentalists should do to combat the anti-renewables movement and whether there’s still any path forward for the industry he’s spent nearly a decade working to build as an activist.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Spotlight

Trump Just Permitted a Solar Farm

Are more on the way?

Donald Trump.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

The Trump administration appears to be advancing solar projects through the permitting process now.

After a temporary halt to permitting for solar projects, the Bureau of Land Management told me a few weeks ago that it had lifted the pause, but I had told you I would wait for confirmation to see whether projects could actually move through government permitting. On Friday, the Bureau of Land Management publicly confirmed that federal solar permitting can happen again, formally approving the Leeward Renewable’s Elisabeth solar project in Yuma County, Arizona – what appears to be the first utility-scale solar facility on federal acreage approved by the Trump administration.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow