The Fight

Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Hotspots

Ben Carson vs. the Anti-Solar Movement

And more on the week’s most important conflicts around renewable energy.

The United States.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

1. Dukes County, Massachusetts – The Supreme Court for the second time declined to take up a legal challenge to the Vineyard Wind offshore project, indicating that anti-wind activists' efforts to go directly to the high court have run aground.

  • The more worthwhile case to follow now is the Democratic state-led challenge to Trump’s executive order against offshore wind, which was filed earlier this week.
  • That lawsuit argues, among other things, that the order violated the Administrative Procedures Act and was “contrary to and in excess of” existing environmental and coastal energy leasing laws. One can easily assume the administration and Democratic states may take this case all the way to the high court depending how the federal district court judge rules in the case.

2. Brooklyn/Staten Island, New York – The battery backlash in the NYC boroughs is getting louder – and stranger – by the day.

  • A Soltage battery storage facility is now the target of community ire, including by Protect Our Children New York, a volunteer organization that purports to fight human trafficking, child abuse… and now also battery storage. Peter DiMiceli, a founder of the organization, handcuffed himself to a different battery storage facility site a few weeks ago.
  • One of the complaints with Soltage’s project, and others in Brooklyn like this NineDot proposal, appears to be a lack of prior notice before the project entered the formal approval process. But fire safety concerns also permeate this discussion, as they tend to do a lot nowadays.

3. Baltimore County, Maryland – It’s Ben Carson vs. the farmer near Baltimore, as a solar project proposed on the former Housing and Urban Development secretary’s land is coming under fire from his neighbors.

  • Carson and his wife have reportedly signed a contract with Nexamp to allow a 33-acre solar project to be built on property they own in Upperco, Maryland, a largely rural part of Baltimore County. According to news reports, Carson no longer lives at the home situated in Upperco and records indicate he lives in Palm Beach, Florida.
  • This situation has upset neighbors – as it tends to do in Maryland farming communities. Carson’s property reportedly is covered by an agricultural easement that forbids construction of solar projects, and representatives for Carson have tried – so far unsuccessfully – to get a special permit from local regulators to get permission to build.

4. Mecklenburg County, Virginia – Landowners in this part of Virginia have reportedly received fake “good neighbor agreement” letters claiming to be from solar developer Longroad Energy, offering large sums of cash to people neighboring the potential project.

  • Longroad’s 80-megawatt 7 Bridges solar farm has been backed by local planning regulators and while it is currently unclear who the culprit was, this effort may have been an attempt by hostile actors to paint the developer as trying to offer cash to residents to quell potential dissent.

5. York County, South Carolina – Silfab Solar is now in a bitter public brawl with researchers at the University of South Carolina after they released a report claiming that a proposed solar manufacturing plant poses a significant public risk in the event of a chemical emissions release.

  • The report, which was directed to activists that oppose the proposed Silfab plant in York County, focused heavily on a “worst case” situation where different toxic chemicals used in the solar manufacturing process were somehow released into the air.
  • Silfab has accused the researchers of bias against the plant. “I was alarmed and more importantly I was disappointed [by the report],” Silfab director of operations Greg Basden told local news outlet WRHI. “What they described as worst-case would never happen.”

6. Jefferson Davis County, Mississippi – Apex Clean Energy’s Bluestone Solar project was just approved by the Mississippi Public Service Commission with no objections against the project.

  • But it’s not all fun and games in Mississippi. A Lightsource BP solar farm in Lamar County was withdrawn from the permitting process on Monday after local opposition delayed approval before the local planning committee for more than a year.
  • Pro data predicted Lamar County, which is whiter, wealthier, Trumpier, and over-indexed for hospitality jobs, would be much riskier to build in than Jefferson Davis County, which has a larger Black population, doesn’t have any workforce sensitivities, and could use more economic development.

7. Plaquemine Parish, Louisiana – NextEra’s Coastal Prairie solar project got an earful from locals in this parish that sits within the Baton Rouge metro area, indicating little has changed since the project was first proposed two years ago.

8. Huntington County, Indiana – Well it turns out Heatmap’s Most At-Risk Projects of the Energy Transition has been right again: the Paddlefish solar project has now been indefinitely blocked by this county under a new moratorium on the project area in tandem with a new restrictive land use ordinance on solar development overall.

  • The county has now banned all solar from being built on “prime farmland” and will have to be screened for all sorts of new requirements, including the avoidance of glare.

9. Albany County, Wyoming – The Rail Tie wind farm is back in the news again, as county regulators say landowners feel misled by Repsol, the project’s developer.

  • Rail Tie, which is mostly sited on private lands but has a fifth of its project footprint on state property, has been fully permitted. But legal representatives for landowners in the construction zone are pressing for transparency in Rail Tie’s compliance with its permits and say landowners did not see a site plan with precise turbine locations available.

10. Klickitat County, Washington – Cypress Creek Renewables is on a lucky streak with a solar project near Goldendale, Washington, getting to bypass local opposition from the nearby Yakama Nation.

  • Yakama officials reportedly submitted a report to state officials on the Cypress Creek project’s impacts to “tribal cultural properties” and requested an environmental impact statement. Instead of doing that, the state Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council voted Monday to qualify the project for a fast-track permitting process that would eschew local regulators.

11. Pinal County, Arizona – A large utility-scale NextEra solar farm has been rejected by this county’s Board of Supervisors.

  • The Valley Farms Energy Center would provide 200 megawatts to Salt River Project, a major Arizona utility, which testified in support of the project and said it would be needed to meet the state’s energy needs.
  • But despite the SRP and landowners testifying in support, supervisors said their constituents were against the project and ultimately sided against the project.
Yellow

This article is exclusively
for Heatmap Plus subscribers.

Go deeper inside the politics, projects, and personalities
shaping the energy transition.
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Spotlight

The New Transmission Line Pitting Trump’s Rural Fans Against His Big Tech Allies

Rural Marylanders have asked for the president’s help to oppose the data center-related development — but so far they haven’t gotten it.

Donald Trump, Maryland, and Virginia.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

A transmission line in Maryland is pitting rural conservatives against Big Tech in a way that highlights the growing political sensitivities of the data center backlash. Opponents of the project want President Trump to intervene, but they’re worried he’ll ignore them — or even side with the data center developers.

The Piedmont Reliability Project would connect the Peach Bottom nuclear plant in southern Pennsylvania to electricity customers in northern Virginia, i.e.data centers, most likely. To get from A to B, the power line would have to criss-cross agricultural lands between Baltimore, Maryland and the Washington D.C. area.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Hotspots

Trump Punished Wind Farms for Eagle Deaths During the Shutdown

Plus more of the week’s most important fights around renewable energy.

The United States.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

1. Wayne County, Nebraska – The Trump administration fined Orsted during the government shutdown for allegedly killing bald eagles at two of its wind projects, the first indications of financial penalties for energy companies under Trump’s wind industry crackdown.

  • On November 3, Fox News published a story claiming it had “reviewed” a notice from the Fish and Wildlife Service showing that it had proposed fining Orsted more than $32,000 for dead bald eagles that were discovered last year at two of its wind projects – the Plum Creek wind farm in Wayne County and the Lincoln Land Wind facility in Morgan County, Illinois.
  • Per Fox News, the Service claims Orsted did not have incidental take permits for the two projects but came forward to the agency with the bird carcasses once it became aware of the deaths.
  • In an email to me, Orsted confirmed that it received the letter on October 29 – weeks into what became the longest government shutdown in American history.
  • This is the first action we’ve seen to date on bird impacts tied to Trump’s wind industry crackdown. If you remember, the administration sent wind developers across the country requests for records on eagle deaths from their turbines. If companies don’t have their “take” permits – i.e. permission to harm birds incidentally through their operations – they may be vulnerable to fines like these.

2. Ocean County, New Jersey – Speaking of wind, I broke news earlier this week that one of the nation’s largest renewable energy projects is now deceased: the Leading Light offshore wind project.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Q&A

The Guy Debunking Myths About Wind Along the Jersey Shore

A conversation with Cape May County Commissioner candidate Eric Morey.

Eric Morey.
Heatmap Illustration

This week’s conversation is with Eric Morey, who just ran to be a commissioner for Cape May County, New Jersey – one of the Garden State coastal counties opposed to offshore wind. Morey is a Democrat and entered the race this year as a first-time politician, trying to help crack the county panel’s more-than-two-decade Republican control. Morey was unsuccessful, losing by thousands of votes, but his entry into politics was really interesting to me – we actually met going back and forth about energy policy on Bluesky, and he clearly had a passionate interest in debunking some of the myths around renewables. So I decided to call him up in the hopes he would answer a perhaps stupid question: Could his county ever support offshore wind?

The following conversation has been lightly edited for clarity.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow