If the Trump team follows through on even some of the ideas in the draft executive order, it would be a huge win for a nascent anti-renewables uprising in America. It would also be a harbinger of pain to come for wind energy in America under Trump. At the very least, it shows activists believe the next president has many powers at his disposal to make offshore wind developers’ lives miserable.
Mandy Davis, president of REACT Alliance, told Heatmap it had submitted the draft executive order to the transition team, and that REACT was the primary group behind the document. Davis is also head of the National Offshore-Wind Opposition Alliance, a new country-wide coalition of local groups opposed to offshore wind.
Davis said the draft order demonstrates the myriad ways she thinks the incoming administration can curtail wind development beyond a pause on new permits. “Our role is going to be determined to a great degree by what our new administration is doing,” she told Heatmap. “We also have to be really, really cognizant of the fact that even though the federal government is going to put major monkey wrenches in the works … it’s going to take a while.”
We’re still watching and waiting to see if Trump follows through with his promise to stop offshore wind in its tracks on Day 1. New Jersey Republican congressman Jeff Van Drew said in a statement Monday that Trump’s team is working with his office to draft an order that “halt[s] offshore wind turbine activities” on the East Coast and the “proposed order” is “expected to be finalized within the first few months of the administration.”
It is worth noting that Van Drew is one of the anti-offshore wind’s favorite allies in Congress. But it is unclear to what extent – if any – that the activists’ draft executive order obtained by Heatmap is winding up in the product Van Drew and his staff are working on with the Trump team. Representatives for Van Drew’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the draft executive order.
It’s hard to fathom the extent of damage even a work stoppage order would have on the American offshore wind industry. Roughly 5.8 gigawatts of electricity capacity are under construction offshore and more than 8 gigawatts of projects have been fully permitted but haven’t begun construction, according to data shared with Heatmap News that was compiled by Christian Roselund, a policy analyst seasoned in the renewables industry. At least 10 gigawatts of additional capacity is currently in the federal review process and would be stymied by a halt at the permitting level. Taken together, the proposals in the draft could take millions of homes’ worth of carbon-free electricity off the table indefinitely.
A source within the offshore wind industry who requested anonymity to speak candidly said, if enacted, the proposals in the draft executive order would “lay off thousands of Americans” and potentially lead to work stoppages in other links in the industry’s supply chain, like shipyards in Louisiana and steel plants in the Midwest.
What’s in the draft order?
In addition to pausing permits, the draft executive order calls on the incoming administration to:
- Conduct a full-government review of all offshore wind projects previously approved by the federal government “for reconsideration” based on their impacts to national security, aviation safety, grid stability, biodiversity, and a host of other factors.
- Issue a “stop-work order” on all permitted offshore wind projects in construction until that review is completed.
- Instruct each branch of the military to independently assess if offshore wind projects impact their operations.
- Require the Treasury Department to conduct rulemaking activity to exclude offshore wind projects from any existing tax credits possible under the Inflation Reduction Act “pending a comprehensive review.”
- Compel the Commerce, Energy, and Interior Departments to each conduct studies evaluating the economic impacts of offshore wind, and require the Energy and Transportation Departments to suspend federal grants and loans to projects related to offshore wind, including port upgrades and grid alterations.
- Make the Justice Department “reevaluate its current defense of lawsuits related to offshore wind projects” and direct the agency “to pursue settlement discussions in cases where it is legally and ethically appropriate.” (Note: This is something consultants have previously advised developers could happen under Trump.)
- Get the National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration to do a “comprehensive overhaul” of its process for reviewing and approving commercial activities within habitat for species protected under the Marine Mammal Protection Act.
- Order the Health and Human Services Department to commission a study on the effects of electromagnetic fields, infrasound and plastic pollution from offshore wind projects on human and animal health, as well as the safety of commercial seafood. It calls for a separate HHS study into the impacts of bisphenol A, or BPA, that activists claim they fear could leach from offshore wind turbine components into the ocean.
- Request for an Office of Management and Budget audit of any and all federal funding to universities and research institutions related to offshore wind.
According to emails and other documents reviewed by Heatmap, the draft executive order also involved the work of Lisa Quattrocki Knight, president of the Rhode Island anti-offshore wind organization Green Oceans and a board member of the National Offshore-Wind Opposition Alliance.
Along with the draft executive order, Heatmap obtained other documents with Green Oceans’ letterhead addressed to the incoming administration, calling on it to “justify removing all permitted wind farm projects off the eastern coast of the U.S.” under multiple potential legal authorities including the National Emergencies Act, the Defense Production Act, and Federal Power Act.
Knight did not respond to requests for an interview. A spokesperson for Green Oceans contacted by Heatmap confirmed the organization played a role in crafting the draft executive order and provided a statement that the “draft Executive Order was developed as part of our broader efforts to provide science-based, actionable recommendations to decision-makers, regardless of political affiliation.”
“We believe that meaningful environmental progress requires bipartisan cooperation, and we remain committed to working with all leaders who share our vision of a sustainable future,” the statement read.
The documents also show the draft was endorsed by key groups fighting offshore wind in the New Jersey and New York region, including Protect Our Coast Long Island and Save the East Coast, as well as local opposition groups based on the West Coast and in New England. Many of these organizations will be participating in a national day of protest this Saturday.
