The Fight

Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Hotspots

Solar Threats, Quiet Cancellations, and One Nice Thing

The week’s most important news around renewable project fights.

Solar Threats, Quiet Cancellations, and One Nice Thing
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

1. Western Nevada — The Esmeralda 7 solar mega-project may be no more.

  • Last night I broke the news that the Bureau of Land Management quietly updated the permitting website for Esmeralda 7 to reflect project cancelation. BLM did so with no public statement and so far, none of the companies involved — NextEra, Invenergy, ConnectGen, and more — have said anything about it.
  • Esmeralda 7 was all set to receive its record of decision as soon as July, until the Trump administration froze permitting for solar projects on federal lands. The roughly 6.2 gigawatt mega-project had been stalled ever since.
  • It’s unclear if this means all of the components within Esmeralda 7 are done, or if facilities may be allowed to continue through permitting on a project-by-project basis. Judging from the messages I’ve fielded this morning so far, confusion reigns supreme here.

2. Washoe County, Nevada – Elsewhere in Nevada, the Greenlink North transmission line has been delayed by at least another month.

  • As a reminder, Trump’s war on federal permits for solar caught the NV Energy project in a bind. Greenlink North, which would connect to solar farms on federal lands, was all set to receive a record of decision from the Bureau of Land Management. That was, until the agency was ordered to stop issuing permits to solar farms … and then suddenly moved back its deadline to finish the process by 18 days, to the end of September.
  • I predicted that BLM would use the end-of-month date as boilerplate and that the timing would slip again. Hate to say I told you so, but in an update to the project’s website, a record of decision is now expected by the end of October.

3. Oconto County, Wisconsin – Solar farm town halls are now sometimes getting too scary for developers to show up at.

  • This past week, NextEra Energy representatives were supposed to speak at a town hall for their Fox Solar facility, which requires only state permits from the Wisconsin Public Service Commission to advance to construction. NextEra was still seeking public buy-in, though, as it is increasingly considered a best practice in the sector.
  • Concerns about “online threats” led NextEra to skip the event, sending employees instead to other pre-scheduled meetups at local coffee shops. The company reportedly declined to share the social media threats, but the Oconto Sheriff’s Office did tell local news it was aware of them.
  • My best guess is the intense reaction to NextEra is happening for the same reasons Oconto County has an incredibly high opposition risk rating.

4. Apache County, Arizona – In brighter news, this county looks like it will give its first-ever conditional use permit for a large solar farm, EDF Renewables’ Juniper Spring project.

  • This is significant because Apache County is also the site of Repsol’s Lava Run wind farm, a project that has galvanized such strong opposition to wind energy that it helped spur an effort in the Arizona legislature to all but ban utility-scale turbine fields. That a large solar farm could survive the gamut of loud opposition mounting in this county and elsewhere in rural Arizona is a feat unto itself.
  • Juniper Spring was approved by the Apache Planning and Zoning Commission with several conditions, including significant decommissioning and bonding rules, a move to assuage locals upset about the risk of stranded assets.
  • Now the permit will have to be approved by the county’s board of supervisors, who get the final say.

5. Putnam County, Indiana – After hearing about what happened here this week, I’m fearful for any solar developer trying to work in Indiana.

  • After a raucous three-hour hearing, a chorus of anti-solar activists got the county commission to undo a previous rezoning request that would’ve allowed EnergyRe to build a 2,000-acre solar farm. The county’s planning commission denied a separate request key to constructing the project last month.
  • Litigation is likely in the offing here, and may have been inevitable. During the hearing, an attorney representing landowners adjacent to the project threatened to sue the county if it allowed the rezoning. EnergyRe left the door open to suing the county over an undone approval. “We will look at all the options,” Paul Cummings, senior vice president of EnergyRe, told the room.

6. Tippecanoe County, Indiana – Two counties to the north of Putnam is a test case for the impacts a backlash on solar energy can have on data centers.

  • Reed Davisson and Nicole Duttlinger are two Indiana residents involved in the fight against solar farms – one against solar, and the other in favor. Together, they published a lengthy op-ed in the Lafayette Journal & Courier this week calling for Tippecanoe County to restrict data center development as it has solar farms.
  • The op-ed notes that the county could become a hotbed for future data center development given its electricity and water supplies, as well as its proximity to Purdue University.
  • “[Tippecanoe] commissioners paused new solar projects to review the ordinance governing them. That same caution, transparency and foresight must now be applied to data centers,” the pair declares.
  • To be honest, if we start seeing more op-eds and joint statements like these, data centers might start becoming political pariahs. If it’s hard to build solar in places like these, what could that mean for this new tech infrastructure?
Yellow

This article is exclusively
for Heatmap Plus subscribers.

Go deeper inside the politics, projects, and personalities
shaping the energy transition.
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Spotlight

I Spent the Day At a Noisy Data Center. Here’s What I Learned.

Noise ordinances won’t necessarily stop a multi-resonant whine from permeating the area.

A data center.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

What did you do for Earth Day this year? I spent mine visiting a notoriously loud artificial intelligence campus in Virginia’s Data Center Alley. The experience brought home to me just how big a problem noise can be for the communities adjacent to these tech campuses – and how much further local officials have to go in learning how to deal with them.

The morning of April 22, I jumped into a Toyota Highlander and drove it out to the Vantage VA2 data center campus in Sterling, Virginia, smack dab in the middle of a large residential community. The sensation when I got out of the car was unignorable – imagine an all-encompassing, monotonous whoosh accompanied by a low rumble you can feel in your body. It sounds like a jet engine that never stops running or a household vacuum amplified to 11 running at all hours. It was rainy the day I visited and planes from nearby Dulles International Airport were soaring overhead, but neither sound could remotely eclipse the thudding, multi-resonant hum.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Hotspots

Wind Dies in New Jersey, Solar Lives in Alabama

Plus more of the week’s biggest project development fights.

Wind Dies in New Jersey, Solar Lives in Alabama
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

New Jersey – Crucial transmission for future offshore wind energy in New Jersey is scrapped for now.

  • The New Jersey Board of Public Utilities on Wednesday canceled the agreement it reached with PJM Interconnection in 2021 to develop wires and a substation necessary to send electricity generated by offshore wind across the state.
  • The state terminated this agreement because much of New Jersey’s expected offshore wind capacity has either been canceled by developers or indefinitely stalled by President Donald Trump, including the now-scrapped TotalEnergies project scrubbed in a settlement with his administration.
  • “New Jersey is now facing a situation in which there will be no identified, large-scale in-state generation projects under active development that can make use of [the agreement] on the timeline the state and PJM initially envisioned,” the board wrote in a letter to PJM requesting termination of the agreement.
  • Wind energy backers are not taking this lying down. “We cannot fault the Sherrill Administration for making this decision today, but this must only be a temporary setback,” Robert Freudenberg of the New Jersey and New York-focused environmental advocacy group Regional Plan Association, said in a statement released after the agreement was canceled.
  • The only question mark remaining is whether this means the state will try to still proceed with building any of the transmission given rising electricity demand and if these plans may be revisited at a later date. Of course, anything related to offshore wind will be conditional on the White House.

Montgomery County, Alabama – A statewide solar farm ban is dead for now after being blocked by lawmakers who had already reduced its scope.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Q&A

Why PJM Is ‘A Conveyor Belt Heading Into a Volcano’

Chatting with the Mid-Atlantic Renewable Energy Coalition’s Evan Vaughan.

The Q&A subject.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

This week’s conversation is with Evan Vaughan, executive director of the Mid-Atlantic Renewable Energy Coalition. The trade group is at the center of things right now, representing many of the 13 states in the PJM Interconnection region, including power-hungry Virginia. MAREC reached out to me so we could talk about how it sees various energy trends, from the rise of a new transmission build-out to the resilience of renewable energy in the Trump 2.0 era.

The following conversation was lightly edited for clarity.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow