The Fight

Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Hotspots

Solar Threats, Quiet Cancellations, and One Nice Thing

The week’s most important news around renewable project fights.

Solar Threats, Quiet Cancellations, and One Nice Thing
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

1. Western Nevada — The Esmeralda 7 solar mega-project may be no more.

  • Last night I broke the news that the Bureau of Land Management quietly updated the permitting website for Esmeralda 7 to reflect project cancelation. BLM did so with no public statement and so far, none of the companies involved — NextEra, Invenergy, ConnectGen, and more — have said anything about it.
  • Esmeralda 7 was all set to receive its record of decision as soon as July, until the Trump administration froze permitting for solar projects on federal lands. The roughly 6.2 gigawatt mega-project had been stalled ever since.
  • It’s unclear if this means all of the components within Esmeralda 7 are done, or if facilities may be allowed to continue through permitting on a project-by-project basis. Judging from the messages I’ve fielded this morning so far, confusion reigns supreme here.

2. Washoe County, Nevada – Elsewhere in Nevada, the Greenlink North transmission line has been delayed by at least another month.

  • As a reminder, Trump’s war on federal permits for solar caught the NV Energy project in a bind. Greenlink North, which would connect to solar farms on federal lands, was all set to receive a record of decision from the Bureau of Land Management. That was, until the agency was ordered to stop issuing permits to solar farms … and then suddenly moved back its deadline to finish the process by 18 days, to the end of September.
  • I predicted that BLM would use the end-of-month date as boilerplate and that the timing would slip again. Hate to say I told you so, but in an update to the project’s website, a record of decision is now expected by the end of October.

3. Oconto County, Wisconsin – Solar farm town halls are now sometimes getting too scary for developers to show up at.

  • This past week, NextEra Energy representatives were supposed to speak at a town hall for their Fox Solar facility, which requires only state permits from the Wisconsin Public Service Commission to advance to construction. NextEra was still seeking public buy-in, though, as it is increasingly considered a best practice in the sector.
  • Concerns about “online threats” led NextEra to skip the event, sending employees instead to other pre-scheduled meetups at local coffee shops. The company reportedly declined to share the social media threats, but the Oconto Sheriff’s Office did tell local news it was aware of them.
  • My best guess is the intense reaction to NextEra is happening for the same reasons Oconto County has an incredibly high opposition risk rating.

4. Apache County, Arizona – In brighter news, this county looks like it will give its first-ever conditional use permit for a large solar farm, EDF Renewables’ Juniper Spring project.

  • This is significant because Apache County is also the site of Repsol’s Lava Run wind farm, a project that has galvanized such strong opposition to wind energy that it helped spur an effort in the Arizona legislature to all but ban utility-scale turbine fields. That a large solar farm could survive the gamut of loud opposition mounting in this county and elsewhere in rural Arizona is a feat unto itself.
  • Juniper Spring was approved by the Apache Planning and Zoning Commission with several conditions, including significant decommissioning and bonding rules, a move to assuage locals upset about the risk of stranded assets.
  • Now the permit will have to be approved by the county’s board of supervisors, who get the final say.

5. Putnam County, Indiana – After hearing about what happened here this week, I’m fearful for any solar developer trying to work in Indiana.

  • After a raucous three-hour hearing, a chorus of anti-solar activists got the county commission to undo a previous rezoning request that would’ve allowed EnergyRe to build a 2,000-acre solar farm. The county’s planning commission denied a separate request key to constructing the project last month.
  • Litigation is likely in the offing here, and may have been inevitable. During the hearing, an attorney representing landowners adjacent to the project threatened to sue the county if it allowed the rezoning. EnergyRe left the door open to suing the county over an undone approval. “We will look at all the options,” Paul Cummings, senior vice president of EnergyRe, told the room.

6. Tippecanoe County, Indiana – Two counties to the north of Putnam is a test case for the impacts a backlash on solar energy can have on data centers.

  • Reed Davisson and Nicole Duttlinger are two Indiana residents involved in the fight against solar farms – one against solar, and the other in favor. Together, they published a lengthy op-ed in the Lafayette Journal & Courier this week calling for Tippecanoe County to restrict data center development as it has solar farms.
  • The op-ed notes that the county could become a hotbed for future data center development given its electricity and water supplies, as well as its proximity to Purdue University.
  • “[Tippecanoe] commissioners paused new solar projects to review the ordinance governing them. That same caution, transparency and foresight must now be applied to data centers,” the pair declares.
  • To be honest, if we start seeing more op-eds and joint statements like these, data centers might start becoming political pariahs. If it’s hard to build solar in places like these, what could that mean for this new tech infrastructure?
Yellow

This article is exclusively
for Heatmap Plus subscribers.

Go deeper inside the politics, projects, and personalities
shaping the energy transition.
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Spotlight

Battery Developers Are Feeling Bullish on Mamdani

NineDot Energy’s nine-fiigure bet on New York City is a huge sign from the marketplace.

Battery installation.
Heatmap Illustration/NineDot Energy, Getty Images

Battery storage is moving full steam ahead in the Big Apple under new Mayor Zohran Mamdani.

NineDot Energy, the city’s largest battery storage developer, just raised more than $430 million in debt financing for 28 projects across the metro area, bringing the company’s overall project pipeline to more than 60 battery storage facilities across every borough except Manhattan. It’s a huge sign from the marketplace that investors remain confident the flashpoints in recent years over individual battery projects in New York City may fail to halt development overall. In an interview with me on Tuesday, NineDot CEO David Arfin said as much. “The last administration, the Adams administration, was very supportive of the transition to clean energy. We expect the Mamdani administration to be similar.”

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Hotspots

A Solar Fight in Wild, Wild Country

The week’s most notable updates on conflicts around renewable energy and data centers.

The United States
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

1. Wasco County, Oregon – They used to fight the Rajneeshees, and now they’re fighting a solar farm.

  • BrightNight Solar is trying to build a giant solar farm in the rural farming town of Deschutes, Oregon. Except there’s just one problem: Rated as a 82 out of 100 for risk by Heatmap Pro, the county is a vociferously conservative agricultural area known best as the site of the Netflix documentary Wild, Wild Country. Despite the fact the project is located miles away from the town, the large landowners surrounding the facility’s proposed location are vehemently opposed to construction, claiming it would be built “right on top of them.” (At least a cult isn’t poisoning the food this time.)
  • An activist group called Save Juniper Flat published an open letter to Donald Trump’s Agriculture Department stating that it’s located on land designated as “exclusive” for farming, and that the agency should conduct “awareness, oversight, and any assistance” to ensure the property “remains truly protected from industrialization – not just on paper, more importantly in reality.” It’s worth stating that BrightNight claims the project is intentionally sited on less suitable farmland.
  • The group did not respond to a request for comment about whether the letter was also provided directly to the agency, but one must reasonably assume they are seeking its attention.

2. Worcester County, Maryland – The legal fight over the primary Maryland offshore wind project just turned in an incredibly ugly direction for offshore projects generally.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Q&A

Can an Algorithm Solve Data Centers’ Power Problem?

A conversation with Adib Nasle, CEO of Xendee Corporation

The Q&A subject.
Heatmap Illustration

Today’s Q&A is with Adib Nasle, CEO of Xendee Corporation. Xendee is a microgrid software company that advises large power users on how best to distribute energy over small-scale localized power projects. It’s been working with a lot with data centers as of late, trying to provide algorithmic solutions to alleviate some of the electricity pressures involved with such projects.

I wanted to speak with Nasle because I’ve wondered whether there are other ways to reduce data center impacts on local communities besides BYO power. Specifically, I wanted to know whether a more flexible and dynamic approach to balancing large loads on the grid could help reckon with the cost concerns driving opposition to data centers.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow