The Fight

Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Hotspots

Solar Threats, Quiet Cancellations, and One Nice Thing

The week’s most important news around renewable project fights.

Solar Threats, Quiet Cancellations, and One Nice Thing
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

1. Western Nevada — The Esmeralda 7 solar mega-project may be no more.

  • Last night I broke the news that the Bureau of Land Management quietly updated the permitting website for Esmeralda 7 to reflect project cancelation. BLM did so with no public statement and so far, none of the companies involved — NextEra, Invenergy, ConnectGen, and more — have said anything about it.
  • Esmeralda 7 was all set to receive its record of decision as soon as July, until the Trump administration froze permitting for solar projects on federal lands. The roughly 6.2 gigawatt mega-project had been stalled ever since.
  • It’s unclear if this means all of the components within Esmeralda 7 are done, or if facilities may be allowed to continue through permitting on a project-by-project basis. Judging from the messages I’ve fielded this morning so far, confusion reigns supreme here.

2. Washoe County, Nevada – Elsewhere in Nevada, the Greenlink North transmission line has been delayed by at least another month.

  • As a reminder, Trump’s war on federal permits for solar caught the NV Energy project in a bind. Greenlink North, which would connect to solar farms on federal lands, was all set to receive a record of decision from the Bureau of Land Management. That was, until the agency was ordered to stop issuing permits to solar farms … and then suddenly moved back its deadline to finish the process by 18 days, to the end of September.
  • I predicted that BLM would use the end-of-month date as boilerplate and that the timing would slip again. Hate to say I told you so, but in an update to the project’s website, a record of decision is now expected by the end of October.

3. Oconto County, Wisconsin – Solar farm town halls are now sometimes getting too scary for developers to show up at.

  • This past week, NextEra Energy representatives were supposed to speak at a town hall for their Fox Solar facility, which requires only state permits from the Wisconsin Public Service Commission to advance to construction. NextEra was still seeking public buy-in, though, as it is increasingly considered a best practice in the sector.
  • Concerns about “online threats” led NextEra to skip the event, sending employees instead to other pre-scheduled meetups at local coffee shops. The company reportedly declined to share the social media threats, but the Oconto Sheriff’s Office did tell local news it was aware of them.
  • My best guess is the intense reaction to NextEra is happening for the same reasons Oconto County has an incredibly high opposition risk rating.

4. Apache County, Arizona – In brighter news, this county looks like it will give its first-ever conditional use permit for a large solar farm, EDF Renewables’ Juniper Spring project.

  • This is significant because Apache County is also the site of Repsol’s Lava Run wind farm, a project that has galvanized such strong opposition to wind energy that it helped spur an effort in the Arizona legislature to all but ban utility-scale turbine fields. That a large solar farm could survive the gamut of loud opposition mounting in this county and elsewhere in rural Arizona is a feat unto itself.
  • Juniper Spring was approved by the Apache Planning and Zoning Commission with several conditions, including significant decommissioning and bonding rules, a move to assuage locals upset about the risk of stranded assets.
  • Now the permit will have to be approved by the county’s board of supervisors, who get the final say.

5. Putnam County, Indiana – After hearing about what happened here this week, I’m fearful for any solar developer trying to work in Indiana.

  • After a raucous three-hour hearing, a chorus of anti-solar activists got the county commission to undo a previous rezoning request that would’ve allowed EnergyRe to build a 2,000-acre solar farm. The county’s planning commission denied a separate request key to constructing the project last month.
  • Litigation is likely in the offing here, and may have been inevitable. During the hearing, an attorney representing landowners adjacent to the project threatened to sue the county if it allowed the rezoning. EnergyRe left the door open to suing the county over an undone approval. “We will look at all the options,” Paul Cummings, senior vice president of EnergyRe, told the room.

6. Tippecanoe County, Indiana – Two counties to the north of Putnam is a test case for the impacts a backlash on solar energy can have on data centers.

  • Reed Davisson and Nicole Duttlinger are two Indiana residents involved in the fight against solar farms – one against solar, and the other in favor. Together, they published a lengthy op-ed in the Lafayette Journal & Courier this week calling for Tippecanoe County to restrict data center development as it has solar farms.
  • The op-ed notes that the county could become a hotbed for future data center development given its electricity and water supplies, as well as its proximity to Purdue University.
  • “[Tippecanoe] commissioners paused new solar projects to review the ordinance governing them. That same caution, transparency and foresight must now be applied to data centers,” the pair declares.
  • To be honest, if we start seeing more op-eds and joint statements like these, data centers might start becoming political pariahs. If it’s hard to build solar in places like these, what could that mean for this new tech infrastructure?
Yellow

This article is exclusively
for Heatmap Plus subscribers.

Go deeper inside the politics, projects, and personalities
shaping the energy transition.
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Spotlight

Wind Farm Trump Killed Derails a Major Transmission Line

The collateral damage from the Lava Ridge wind project might now include a proposed 285-mile transmission line initially approved by federal regulators in the 1990s.

The western United States.
Heatmap Illustration/Library of Congress, Getty Images

The same movement that got Trump to kill the Lava Ridge wind farm Trump killed has appeared to derail a longstanding transmission project that’s supposed to connect sought-after areas for wind energy in Idaho to power-hungry places out West.

The Southwest Intertie Project-North, also known as SWIP-N, is a proposed 285-mile transmission line initially approved by federal regulators in the 1990s. If built, SWIP-N is supposed to feed power from the wind-swept plains of southern Idaho to the Southwest, while shooting electrons – at least some generated from solar power – back up north into Idaho from Nevada, Utah, and Arizona. In California, regulators have identified the line as crucial for getting cleaner wind energy into the state’s grid to meet climate goals.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Q&A

How Data Center Developers Are Navigating the Battery Fire Freakout

A conversation with Spencer Hanes of EnerVenue

Spencer.
Heatmap Illustration

Today’s conversation is with Spencer Hanes, vice president of international business development for long-duration battery firm EnerVenue and a veteran in clean energy infrastructure development. I reached out to Hanes for two reasons: One, I wanted to gab about solutions, for once, and also because he expressed an interest in discussing how data center companies are approaching the media-driven battery safety panic sweeping renewable energy development. EnerVenue doesn’t use lithium-ion batteries – it uses metal-hydrogen, which Hanes told me may have a much lower risk of thermal runaway (a.k.a. unstoppable fire).

I really appreciated our conversation because, well, it left me feeling like battery alternatives might become an easy way for folks to dodge the fire freakout permeating headlines and local government hearing rooms.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Spotlight

Data Centers Collide with Local Restrictions on Renewables

A review of Heatmap Pro data reveals a troubling new trend in data center development.

A data center and a backyard.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

Data centers are being built in places that restrict renewable energy. There are significant implications for our future energy grid – but it’s unclear if this behavior will lead to tech companies eschewing renewables or finding novel ways to still meet their clean energy commitments.

In the previous edition of The Fight, I began chronicling the data center boom and a nascent backlash to it by talking about Google and what would’ve been its second data center in southern Indianapolis, if the city had not rejected it last Monday. As I learned about Google’s practices in Indiana, I focused on the company’s first project – a $2 billion facility in Fort Wayne, because it is being built in a county where officials have instituted a cumbersome restrictive ordinance on large-scale solar energy. The county commission recently voted to make the ordinance more restrictive, unanimously agreeing to institute a 1,000-foot setback to take effect in early November, pending final approval from the county’s planning commission.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow