The Fight

Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Q&A

Do Community Benefit Agreements Actually Work?

A conversation with Matilda Krieder of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory

Do Community Benefit Agreements Actually Work?

This week I spoke with Matilda Krieder, a researcher at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, about a database she and her colleagues released this week showing how onshore and offshore wind developers use community benefit agreements – a form of compact aimed at improving local benefits from projects. We talked about whether communities really see the agreements as helpful or if there’s a better way.

The following is an abridged version of our conversation edited for clarity and space:

How much have you heard from people concerned that community benefit agreements are a form of financial influence or a false promise where they don’t receive real benefits?

I haven’t heard very much about the not-receiving end of things — and the reason I’ll say that is at least on the land-based wind side, an actual community benefit agreement is pretty uncommon. The vast majority of the time it’s just donations. And that, I think, is less likely to have the false promise thing because developers are handing over a one-time check, so there’s not really a perception that it won’t come to fruition.

So walk me through what your research shows with respect to how effective community benefit agreements are in assuaging local opposition to a project?

Unfortunately my research is not super helpful there. Because we didn’t look at failed projects, I don’t think I can say anything about whether [community benefit agreements] help or not.

But the existing literature that other people have done is not really positive on the connection between community benefits and improving community perception of projects, which is really interesting to me because I think people in the U.S. are really buying into it. Especially for offshore wind. So much pressure is being put on community benefits agreements as the thing that’ll change everything. And I support developers giving them, even if it doesn’t change anything, because it’s a net good. But I do wonder if developers or anybody setting regulations are reading what’s been studied. If so, I don’t know if they’d be putting all their eggs in this basket.

Okay then what if you walked me through the benefits you’ve found, at least in wind?

So it’s very different from offshore wind to land-based wind. In offshore wind, we’re seeing huge amounts of money, especially in the communities that host cable landings for the projects, because that’s the only point in offshore wind where the local government has any way to stop or change the way the project is developed. The cable landing is where you’re seeing $150 million [contributions]. And that hasn’t been happening long enough to measure the impacts of school funding or taxes over time.

The agreements that are more likely to be impactful are the ones that are more specific. I point to the Salem offshore wind terminal as a positive example because it’s such specific funding. You can tell they did the work to understand what the community’s priorities were and they directed funding to those areas.

In terms of land-based wind, it would be up to who you talk to. I’ve talked to county commissioners who’ve spoken really positively about the things that would be considered small potatoes. Not millions of dollars but directed funding in a specific way that met the community’s priorities and that changed people’s perception of the project. That’s a very small sample size, so you can’t identify a trend there, but I think it has potential.

I’m starting to view the donation side more positively than a lot of people too because a community benefit agreement most of the time is going to the local government, [and] a lot of people distrust their local government.

So instead, donations directly to services instead of county or local governments?

Yeah. That’s just a function of how in agreements, 95% of the funding goes to a local government. And people may not ever know what happens to it after that. It’s less visible.

What are you hearing from communities about community benefit agreements then?

I hear, how do we get one? The problem is, it’s still entirely in the developers’ hands so sometimes I feel a bit limited in the advice I can give to get one. It kind of comes down to what leverage you have with a developer.

This article is exclusively
for Heatmap Plus subscribers.

Go deeper inside the politics, projects, and personalities
shaping the energy transition.
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Spotlight

Why Data Centers Are Turning People Against Renewables

Both are now trapped in the same doom loop.

Protesters, a data center, and solar panels.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

Renewable energy is getting roped into the data center sector’s publicity woes as a broader industrial techlash sweeps many corners of the nation.

Data center developers often want solar energy because you can stand up a project with it quite quickly. It’s also plainly better for the planet to have solar powering data hubs as opposed to gas or coal. But across the country, counties and towns enacting moratoria on data centers are blocking solar developments, not to mention wind and battery storage, while politicians struggling with resident concerns about data centers are responding by going after renewables and transmission that would add solar or wind to the grid.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Hotspots

An Anti-Data Center Democrat Is Challenging an Anti-Renewables Republican in New Jersey

Plus more of the week’s top development fights.

The United States.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

1. Cumberland County, New Jersey – A Democratic candidate for Congress is vying to oust one of the most powerful anti-renewable voices in Congress with a surprising maneuver: leading the public fight against a data center complex.

  • Meet Bayly Winder, a former staffer in the U.S. Agency for International Development (or USAID) who is running for office after he lost his job because the Trump administration tore the agency apart. Winder is the frontrunner for the Democratic nomination to try and oust Jeff Van Drew, one of the most influential anti-wind voices in Congress. Though this is a right-leaning community, Van Drew used to represent this area as a Democrat before he switched his party affiliation in 2019.
  • Winder is campaigning for Congress while also helping organize opposition to a large DataOne hyperscaler campus in the suburban community of Vineland. Phase 1 of the gas-powered project is under construction, and grassroots activists are currently fighting municipal approvals for any potential expansions with support from the Sierra Club. Residents say they received little to no public notice of the project and are up in arms about water and noise impacts from construction and operation. (Listen to the humming.)
  • Winder published an op-ed on March 16 claiming Van Drew “championed this data center while taking money from the CEO of one of the non-union construction companies involved” – a serious charge. “How can we trust a representative who lets his conflicts of interest override the concerns of his own voters?”
  • Van Drew’s campaign quickly issued a response saying that Winder was lying and that it is “completely false” to claim Van Drew “had any role whatsoever in approving or advocating for a data center in Vineland.”
  • “Van Drew understands and shares concerns about the rapid growth of artificial intelligence (AI) and the demands that come with it, but it’s important to be clear that unlike offshore wind – which involved FEDERAL permits – there is no federal government component to the Vineland data center project so anyone who tells you otherwise simply isn’t shooting straight,” wrote Ron Filan, Van Drew’s campaign manager and director of political affairs.
  • Could focusing on a single data center help Winder win office? Genuinely, who knows! Clearly Van Drew is scared of the 2026 midterms as the Trump ally recently said his party could be “killed” in the coming elections. For what it’s worth, newly elected governor Mikie Sherill flipped Cumberland County and the city of Vineland from Republican to Democrat in the off-year elections last November.

2. Hampden County, Massachusetts – This Commonwealth just killed an anti-battery storage ordinance.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Q&A

How Data Center Fights Are Like Occupy Wall Street

A conversation with Silicon Ranch CEO Reagan Farr.

The Q&A subject.
Heatmap Illustration

This week’s conversation is with Reagan Farr, CEO of solar developer Silicon Ranch. I connected with Farr after my story last week on legislation in the Alabama Senate potentially banning solar in the wake of a fight over a single Silicon Ranch project, which would help offset power demand from a large Meta data center outside the state capitol of Montgomery. To my surprise, Farr was incredibly candid about the solar sector’s increasingly fraught circumstances amidst the AI boom. Yes, demand is going up – but the public’s animosity towards data centers is starting to rub off on clean energy too.

The following conversation was lightly edited for clarity.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow