The Fight

Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Q&A

How the Wind Industry Can Fight Back

A conversation with Chris Moyer of Echo Communications

The Q&A subject.
Heatmap Illustration

Today’s conversation is with Chris Moyer of Echo Communications, a D.C.-based communications firm that focuses on defending zero- and low-carbon energy and federal investments in climate action. Moyer, a veteran communications adviser who previously worked on Capitol Hill, has some hot takes as of late about how he believes industry and political leaders have in his view failed to properly rebut attacks on solar and wind energy, in addition to the Inflation Reduction Act. On Tuesday he sent an email blast out to his listserv – which I am on – that boldly declared: “The Wind Industry’s Strategy is Failing.”

Of course after getting that email, it shouldn’t surprise readers of The Fight to hear I had to understand what he meant by that, and share it with all of you. So here goes. The following conversation has been abridged and lightly edited for clarity.

What are you referencing when you say, ‘the wind industry’s strategy is failing’?

Anyone in the climate space, in the clean energy space, the worst thing you can do is go silent and pretend that this is just going to go away. Even if it’s the president and the administration delivering the attacks, I think there’s an important strategy that’s been lacking in the wind and other sectors that I don’t think has been effective. There was a recent E&E News story that noted a couple of wind developers when asked for comment just say, “No comment.” This to me misses a really big opportunity to not get in a fight with people but talk about the benefits of wind.

Not taking advantage of milestones like ground breaking or construction starting is a missed opportunity to drive public opinion. If you lose support in public opinion, you’re going to lose support from public officials, because they largely follow public opinion.

And there’s no way that’s going to change if you don’t take the opportunities to talk about the benefits that wind can provide, in terms of good-paying local jobs or supplying more electrons to the grid. By almost any measure the strategy employed so far has not really worked.

Okay, but what is the wind industry strategy that isn’t working? What are they doing to rebut attacks on the technology, on property values, on the environment?

We’re not hearing them. We’re not hearing those arguments.

You can’t let criticisms go unanswered.It would better serve the industry and these companies to push back against criticisms. It’s not like you can’t anticipate what they are. And what do you have to lose? You’re in the worst position of any energy sector in this political moment. It would be nice to see some fight and sharp campaign skills and strategic effort in terms of communication. And there’s no strategic value from what I can tell in [being silent].

I understand not wanting to pick a fight with folks who hold your fate in their hands, but there’s a way to thread a needle that isn’t antagonizing anybody but also making sure the facts have been heard. And that’s been missing.

You’d specifically said the industry should stop ‘being paralyzed in fear and start going on offense.’ What does that look like to you?

Taking every opportunity to get your message out there. The lowest hanging fruit is when a reporter comes and asks you, What do you think about this criticism? You should definitely reply. It’s lifting up third-party voices that are benefiting from a specific project, talking about the economic impacts more broadly, talking about the benefits to the grid.

There’s a whole number of tools in the toolbox to put to use but the toolboxes remain shut thus far. Targeted paid media, elevating the different voices and communities that are going to resonate with different legislators, and certainly the facts are helpful. Also having materials prepared, like validators and frequently asked questions and answers.

You’re trying to win. You’re trying to get your project to be successful and deliver jobs and tax revenue. And I think it would be wise for companies to look at the playbooks of electoral campaigns, because there’s lots of tools that campaigns use.

How do renewable energy developers get around the problem of partisanship? How do you get outta that through a campaign approach?

These projects are decided locally. It’s deciding who the decision-makers are and not just letting opponents who are getting talking points through right-wing media show up and reiterate these talking points. Oftentimes, there’s no one on the pro side even showing up at all, and it makes it really easy for city councils to oppose projects. They’re losing by forfeit. We can’t keep doing that.

Yellow

This article is exclusively
for Heatmap Plus subscribers.

Go deeper inside the politics, projects, and personalities
shaping the energy transition.
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Spotlight

How Worried Should Data Center Developers Be About Violence?

Why the shooting in Indianapolis might be a bellwether

A data center, a threat, and Indianapolis.
Heatmap Illustration/Ron Gibson, Getty Images

This week, the fight over data centers turned violent and it has clearly spooked the sector. Extremism researchers say they’re right to be concerned and this may only be the beginning.

Life may never be the same for Indianapolis city-county councilor Ron Gibson, who voted for a controversial data center last week, citing its economic benefits, and, on the morning of April 6, woke to find 13 bullets were fired through the door of his north-east Indy home. Beneath his doormat read a note left behind: “No Data Centers.” Gibson, who did not respond to multiple requests for additional comment, told the media some of the shots landed near where he played with his child hours earlier.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Hotspots

Texas Investigates Battery Project Over China Fears

And more of the week’s top news on project conflicts.

The United States.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

1. Van Zandt County, Texas – The Texas attorney general’s office is investigating a battery storage project by Finnish energy company Taaleri over using energy storage with batteries made by CATL, the Chinese lithium-ion giant.

  • Will Wassdorf, Texas’ associate deputy attorney general for civil litigation, told lawmakers in a state Senate Business and Commerce Committee hearing on April 1 that the state is probing whether a “smart plug” for the battery facility would allow Chinese companies to “monitor” aspects of the Texas grid.
  • The investigation is due to a complaint filed by Texas anti-BESS activist Nancy White to the attorney general’s office claiming the battery project posed a potential risk to the grid. Wassdorf said they’re only in the initial phases of looking into the matter and quizzing experts on grid connectivity to best understand if a real risk is even there.
  • “If it’s just monitoring, that’s one thing. If it’s a level of connectivity that would provide access or control, where they could turn the batteries off, that would be another issue,” he told the committee.
  • This is as far as I know the first confirmed instance of a state attorney general’s office going after a utility-grade renewable energy or battery storage facility over China ties. CATL is certainly an easy target politically, having been added to restricted businesses lists for federal military procurement. But the idea that using Chinese tech on-site could result in a regulatory crackdown independent of national defense? That’s a new one.
  • Some of the impetus here is locally driven. Van Zandt County has been fighting this project for years, with residents going so far as to seek a restraining order against construction.
  • Taaleri did not respond to a request for comment.

2. Ozaukee County, Wisconsin – We appear to have the first town approving an anti-data center ballot initiative, as the citizens of Port Washington approved a measure allowing them to reject future hyperscalers.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Q&A

Someone Has to Invest in the Grid. Why Not Data Centers?

A conversation with Searchlight Institute's Jane Flegal about America’s aging grid

Jane Flegal.
Heatmap Illustration

This week’s conversation is with Jane Flegal, esteemed energy wonk extraordinaire and friend of Heatmap News. I reached out to Jane because she recently authored a paper for a think tank – the Searchlight Institute – focused on how to try and get transmission built to satisfy growing electricity demand without creating the cost pain points that foment discontent on the ground. Y’know, how to avoid the sorts of frustrations we chronicle here at The Fight! So ahead of reporting on transmission conflicts I have coming up next week, it made sense to have a candid conversation about just how hard all of this is.

The following transcript was lightly edited for clarity.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow