The Fight

Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Hotspots

A New York Town Bans Both Renewable Energy And Data Centers

And more on this week’s most important conflicts around renewable energy.

The United States.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

1. Chautauqua, New York – More rural New York towns are banning renewable energy.

  • Chautauqua, a vacation town in southern New York, has now reportedly issued a one-year moratorium on wind projects – though it’s not entirely obvious whether a wind project is in active development within its boundaries, and town officials have confessed none are being planned as of now.
  • Apparently, per local press, this temporary ban is tied to a broader effort to update the town’s overall land use plan to “manage renewable energy and other emerging high-impact uses” – and will lead to an ordinance that restricts data centers as well as solar and wind projects.
  • I anticipate this strategy where towns update land use plans to target data centers and renewables at the same time will be a lasting trend.

2. Virginia Beach, Virginia – Dominion Energy’s Coastal Virginia offshore wind project will learn its fate under the Trump administration by this fall, after a federal judge ruled that the Justice Department must come to a decision on how it’ll handle a court challenge against its permits by September.

  • I previously explained that it looked like the organizations challenging Coastal Virginia would potentially be working with the Trump administration to potentially undo approvals for this project, and potentially others, through legal settlements with groups that sued the government in federal court.
  • For months, the deliberations over this lawsuit have stayed private, and both the groups and the federal attorneys have kicked deadlines for a decision down the road. However, the judge presiding over the case this week ruled that the Justice Department must decide how it wishes to proceed by some time in September.

3. Bedford County, Pennsylvania – Arena Renewables is trying to thread a needle through development in one of the riskiest Pennsylvania counties for development, with an agriculture-fueled opposition risk score of 89.

  • Per a local media report this week, Arena representatives were pilloried at a local town hall this week by residents who were skeptical that an unnamed project currently under development on private land would actually benefit them, and local firefighters seem to fret the risk of the solar farm.

4. Knox County, Ohio – The Ohio Power Siting Board has given the green light to Open Road Renewables’ much-watched Frasier Solar project.

  • As we previously reported, the Frasier project was so polarizing locally that it turned a county commissioner race into a referendum on future solar projects.
  • However, after a year of hearings, those complaints failed to win out over the backing of state regulators, the state Chamber of Commerce, and local landowners whose properties would be home to the project. The reasoning? OPSB said in its opinion that the opposition was not unanimous and so there was still room for public benefit from the solar project.

5. Clay County, Missouri – We’ll find out next week if rural Missouri can still take it easy on a large solar project.

  • Next week, Solis Renewables will be presenting its conditional use zoning application for Gateway Trails Solar, a 20-megawatt project that needs approval from the Clay County Planning and Zoning Commission.
  • The local concerns being raised are to be expected: fire worries, property value fears, and a lingering feeling that federal tax credits might get wiped away, making it harder to finance construction.
  • Notably, however, local environmental and climate advocates have made more of an effort at showing up to local planning meetings than I’m used to seeing with projects in red states, and this hearing next week will be an interesting test for solar in Missouri.

6. Clark County, Nevada – President Trump’s Bureau of Land Management has pushed back the permitting process for EDF Renewables’ Bonanza solar project by at least two months and possibly longer .

  • BLM was supposed to complete the environmental review for Bonanza by June 5. But I’ve learned from an update quietly posted to a federal permitting dashboard that BLM has failed to meet that deadline. The dashboard now says the project will be fully permitted by January of next year.
  • I reached out to EDF to try and get an answer here on when they expected the environmental review to be completed. EDF replied with a screenshot of a different federal webpage that stated a new completion date for the environmental review: July 25. So I guess we’ll… see what happens?

7. Klickitat County, Washington – Washington State has now formally overridden local opposition to Cypress Creek’s Carriger solar project after teeing up the decision in May.

  • The newly-issued recommendations approved this week by the state Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council mean that now the project is all but assured to go through, unless litigation against this decision somehow crops up.
Yellow

This article is exclusively
for Heatmap Plus subscribers.

Go deeper inside the politics, projects, and personalities
shaping the energy transition.
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Hotspots

Surprise! A Large Solar Farm Just Got Federal Approval

And more on the week’s most important conflicts around renewable energy projects.

The United States.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

1. Lawrence County, Alabama – We now have a rare case of a large solar farm getting federal approval.

  • The Tennessee Valley Authority last week quietly published its record of decision formally approving the 200-megawatt Hillsboro Solar project. The TVA – a quasi-federal independent power agency that delivers electricity across the Southeast – completed the environmental review for the project in June, prior to the federal government’s fresh clampdown on permits for renewables, and declared the project essential to meeting future energy demand.
  • It’s honestly sort of a miracle this was even able to happen. The Trump administration has sought to strongarm the agency into making resource planning decisions in line with the president’s political whims, and has successfully browbeaten the TVA’s board into backing away from certain projects.

2. Virginia Beach, Virginia – It’s time to follow up on the Coastal Virginia offshore wind project.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Q&A

Permitting on Federal Land Has Long Been a Headache

A conversation with Elizabeth McCarthy of the Breakthrough Institute.

Elizabeth McCarthy.
Heatmap Illustration/The Breakthrough Institute

This week’s conversation is with Elizabeth McCarthy of the Breakthrough Institute. Elizabeth was one of several researchers involved in a comprehensive review of a decade of energy project litigation – between 2013 and 2022 – under the National Environment Policy Act. Notably, the review – which Breakthrough released a few weeks ago – found that a lot of energy projects get tied up in NEPA litigation. While she and her colleagues ultimately found fossil fuels are more vulnerable to this problem than renewables, the entire sector has a common enemy: difficulty of developing on federal lands because of NEPA. So I called her up this week to chat about what this research found.

The following conversation was lightly edited for clarity.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Spotlight

‘Enhanced’ Reviews Await Power Lines Tied to Solar and Wind, BLM Says

Uh oh.

Power lines.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

The Bureau of Land Management says it will be heavily scrutinizing transmission lines if they are expressly necessary to bring solar or wind energy to the power grid.

Since the beginning of July, I’ve been reporting out how the Trump administration has all but halted progress for solar and wind projects on federal lands through a series of orders issued by the Interior Department. But last week, I explained it was unclear whether transmission lines that connect to renewable energy projects would be subject to the permitting freeze. I also identified a major transmission line in Nevada – the north branch of NV Energy’s Greenlink project – as a crucial test case for the future of transmission siting in federal rights-of-way under Trump. Greenlink would cross a litany of federal solar leases and has been promoted as “essential to helping Nevada achieve its de-carbonization goals and increased renewable portfolio standard.”

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow