You’re out of free articles.
Log in
To continue reading, log in to your account.
Create a Free Account
To unlock more free articles, please create a free account.
Sign In or Create an Account.
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Welcome to Heatmap
Thank you for registering with Heatmap. Climate change is one of the greatest challenges of our lives, a force reshaping our economy, our politics, and our culture. We hope to be your trusted, friendly, and insightful guide to that transformation. Please enjoy your free articles. You can check your profile here .
subscribe to get Unlimited access
Offer for a Heatmap News Unlimited Access subscription; please note that your subscription will renew automatically unless you cancel prior to renewal. Cancellation takes effect at the end of your current billing period. We will let you know in advance of any price changes. Taxes may apply. Offer terms are subject to change.
Subscribe to get unlimited Access
Hey, you are out of free articles but you are only a few clicks away from full access. Subscribe below and take advantage of our introductory offer.
subscribe to get Unlimited access
Offer for a Heatmap News Unlimited Access subscription; please note that your subscription will renew automatically unless you cancel prior to renewal. Cancellation takes effect at the end of your current billing period. We will let you know in advance of any price changes. Taxes may apply. Offer terms are subject to change.
Create Your Account
Please Enter Your Password
Forgot your password?
Please enter the email address you use for your account so we can send you a link to reset your password:
This is a different kind of compound climate disaster.
Libya is reeling from the aftermath of Storm Daniel, which swept across the Mediterranean and unleashed downpours that inundated towns, destroyed dams, and swept away entire neighborhoods. In the city of Derna alone, more than 6,000 people are dead, around 10,000 are missing, and at least 30,000 have been displaced, according to CNN.
“It's truly difficult to fathom the scale of the destruction,” Will Todman, deputy director and senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, told me. “Local officials are saying that what they need most at the moment are body bags.”
It’s a disaster that would be difficult to deal with under any circumstances. But Libya, which has been splintered by more than a decade of fighting, was particularly vulnerable to a storm like this one. It’s also a terrifying showcase of the intersection of conflict and climate: War and climate change are devastating on their own, but together they make their own particularly destructive kind of compound event.
To understand why Libya — and, more specifically, Derna — was primed for a disaster like this, we have to look at its recent history. In the years since Moammar Gadhafi was overthrown in 2011, the country split into two regions administered by rival governments. The Government of National Accord (GNA), based in Tripoli, commands the country’s western regions and is internationally recognized. Meanwhile the Libyan National Army (LNA), backed by the military leader Khalifa Hifter, commands the country’s east from Benghazi; this is the government that oversees the regions impacted by the floods, including Derna.
Derna, meanwhile, has been a particular hotbed of conflict; while most of the country has been relatively peaceful since the overthrow of Gadhafi, according to Todman, Derna was essentially a warzone from 2014 to 2019. Hifter’s LNA forces spent most of those years fighting either the Islamic State or a group called the Shura Council, which was backed by the GNA and took control of the city in 2015. The LNA finally captured Derna in 2019, but all those years of war took a toll on the city’s infrastructure, which meant it was especially vulnerable to flooding.
The splintered government means it’s impossible to coordinate practically anything on a national level in the country, including something as simple as the weather forecasting that could have helped prepare for the storm. “There is no one meteorological agency that is trusted by all the authorities in the various states of control in Libya,” Todman told me. “Certainly the area is lacking the early warning systems that could have helped alert for the potential of something like this happening.”
Consequently, officials did not warn residents about the storm before it arrived. There was also nobody maintaining the dams outside Derna, which were supposed to protect the city from an event like this one; instead they burst, further inundating the city in an event The New York Times has compared to New Orleans’ levees failing during Hurricane Katrina. The storm was so intense that it’s difficult to say whether the dams would have held up even if they had been maintained, Todman told me. But if they had been kept up and the city’s neglected infrastructure been fixed, he said, the damage would not have been nearly as catastrophic.
The flooding in Libya is by no means the first instance of conflict and climate change intersecting, and it certainly won’t be the last. In 2022, Russia attempted to weaponize climate change by cutting off energy supplies to Ukraine and the European Union during the winter; a relatively mild winter helped sidestep that gambit, but this winter will bring more challenges. Researchers have long warned of climate change’s potential to start wars; Libya shows us what the aftermath could look like.
If there’s any bright side, it’s that the disaster might — maybe, potentially, possibly — spur the kind of unification the United Nations has been trying to achieve in Libya for years. Libyans in the western part of the country have been organizing donation drives, and The New York Timesreports the government in Tripoli sent rescue workers to help with the relief efforts.
“There is some hope that something like this tragedy could be a kind of black swan event,” Todaman told me. “It could actually open up some space for unification and dialogue. So there is a little bit of hope.”
Log in
To continue reading, log in to your account.
Create a Free Account
To unlock more free articles, please create a free account.
Did a battery plant disaster in California spark a PR crisis on the East Coast?
Battery fire fears are fomenting a storage backlash in New York City – and it risks turning into fresh PR hell for the industry.
Aggrieved neighbors, anti-BESS activists, and Republican politicians are galvanizing more opposition to battery storage in pockets of the five boroughs where development is actually happening, capturing rapt attention from other residents as well as members of the media. In Staten Island, a petition against a NineDot Energy battery project has received more than 1,300 signatures in a little over two months. Two weeks ago, advocates – backed by representatives of local politicians including Rep. Nicole Mallitokis – swarmed a public meeting on the project, getting a local community board to vote unanimously against the project.
According to Heatmap Pro’s proprietary modeling of local opinion around battery storage, there are likely twice as many strong opponents than strong supporters in the area:
Heatmap Pro
Yesterday, leaders in the Queens community of Hempstead enacted a year-long ban on BESS for at least a year after GOP Rep. Anthony D’Esposito, other local politicians, and a slew of aggrieved residents testified in favor of a moratorium. The day before, officials in the Long Island town of Southampton said at a public meeting they were ready to extend their battery storage ban until they enshrined a more restrictive development code – even as many energy companies testified against doing so, including NineDot and solar plus storage developer Key Capture Energy. Yonkers also recently extended its own battery moratorium.
This flurry of activity follows the Moss Landing battery plant fire in California, a rather exceptional event caused by tech that was extremely old and a battery chemistry that is no longer popular in the sector. But opponents of battery storage don’t care – they’re telling their friends to stop the community from becoming the next Moss Landing. The longer this goes on without a fulsome, strident response from the industry, the more communities may rally against them. Making matters even worse, as I explained in The Fight earlier this year, we’re seeing battery fire concerns impact solar projects too.
“This is a huge problem for solar. If [fires] start regularly happening, communities are going to say hey, you can’t put that there,” Derek Chase, CEO of battery fire smoke detection tech company OnSight Technologies, told me at Intersolar this week. “It’s going to be really detrimental.”
I’ve long worried New York City in particular may be a powder keg for the battery storage sector given its omnipresence as a popular media environment. If it happens in New York, the rest of the world learns about it.
I feel like the power of the New York media environment is not lost on Staten Island borough president Vito Fossella, a de facto leader of the anti-BESS movement in the boroughs. Last fall I interviewed Fossella, whose rhetorical strategy often leans on painting Staten Island as an overburdened community. (At least 13 battery storage projects have been in the works in Staten Island according to recent reporting. Fossella claims that is far more than any amount proposed elsewhere in the city.) He often points to battery blazes that happen elsewhere in the country, as well as fears about lithium-ion scooters that have caught fire. His goal is to enact very large setback distance requirements for battery storage, at a minimum.
“You can still put them throughout the city but you can’t put them next to people’s homes – what happens if one of these goes on fire next to a gas station,” he told me at the time, chalking the wider city government’s reluctance to capitulate on batteries to a “political problem.”
Well, I’m going to hold my breath for the real political problem in waiting – the inevitable backlash that happens when Mallitokis, D’Esposito, and others take this fight to Congress and the national stage. I bet that’s probably why American Clean Power just sent me a notice for a press briefing on battery safety next week …
And more of the week’s top conflicts around renewable energy.
1. Queen Anne’s County, Maryland – They really don’t want you to sign a solar lease out in the rural parts of this otherwise very pro-renewables state.
2. Logan County, Ohio – Staff for the Ohio Power Siting Board have recommended it reject Open Road Renewables’ Grange Solar agrivoltaics project.
3. Bandera County, Texas – On a slightly brighter note for solar, it appears that Pine Gate Renewables’ Rio Lago solar project might just be safe from county restrictions.
Here’s what else we’re watching…
In Illinois, Armoracia Solar is struggling to get necessary permits from Madison County.
In Kentucky, the mayor of Lexington is getting into a public spat with East Kentucky Power Cooperative over solar.
In Michigan, Livingston County is now backing the legal challenge to Michigan’s state permitting primacy law.
On the week’s top news around renewable energy policy.
1. IRA funding freeze update – Money is starting to get out the door, finally: the EPA unfroze most of its climate grant funding it had paused after Trump entered office.
2. Scalpel vs. sledgehammer – House Speaker Mike Johnson signaled Republicans in Congress may take a broader approach to repealing the Inflation Reduction Act than previously expected in tax talks.
3. Endangerment in danger – The EPA is reportedly urging the White House to back reversing its 2009 “endangerment” finding on air pollutants and climate change, a linchpin in the agency’s overall CO2 and climate regulatory scheme.