Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Politics

The Climate Corps Invests in a Different Kind of Green Economy

It’s not just about decarbonization.

President Biden.
The Climate Corps Invests in a Different Kind of Green Economy
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

The climate corps is back.

In his first week in office, President Joe Biden signed an executive order calling for, among other things, the creation of a job-training program modeled after the New Deal-era Civilian Conservation Corps that would “mobilize the next generation of conservation and resilience workers and maximize the creation of accessible training opportunities and good jobs.” He called it the Civilian Climate Corps.

After that, the program kind of … disappeared. A version of it flitted through early drafts of the Inflation Reduction Act, but was eventually dropped. For all intents and purposes, it seemed dead.

Until yesterday, when it came back under a new name: The American Climate Corps. And it has grand ambitions, starting with putting 20,000 people to work in its first year.

"We're opening up pathways to good-paying careers, lifetimes of being involved in the work of making our communities more fair, more sustainable, more resilient," Ali Zaidi, Biden’s climate policy advisor, told reporters.

What I’m most struck by is the expansiveness with which the Biden administration defines climate jobs. There’s clean energy, of course, and if you read Heatmap with any regularity you’ve probably read my colleagues’ thoughts on the various ways the clean energy economy is evolving. Among other things, Zaidi said the climate corps will help train up electricians — a profession that my colleague Emily has written is in dire need of more recruits.

But the White House’s fact sheet about the American Climate Corps rightly also identifies what it calls the “climate resilience economy.” The corps, it says, will create jobs that range from restoring wetlands to protect communities from flooding, managing forests to prevent wildfires, and advancing environmental justice.

I find this very exciting: Decarbonization is important, of course, but this emphasis on resilience-oriented employment will prove essential as climate impacts worsen. According to Bloomberg, analysts at Bank of America predict the climate adaptation market will be worth $2 trillion a year by 2026, and the more of that money that’s spent on preventative measures the better off we will collectively be. Even the act of naming the market — “climate resilience economy” isn’t a phrase I’ve seen much before this announcement — feels important.

Much of the last year of federal climate policy, led by the IRA, has focused on energy, and this announcement shows the Biden administration is at least starting to be proactive about the various other ways climate change will transform our world. The Climate Corps provides a space for us to ask important questions about how our relationship with nature can and should change in the future; there is room here to have conversations about stewardship that often take a back seat to other economic priorities.

It’s the kind of thing youth organizers — particularly the Sunrise Movement — have long been pushing for. The idea for the climate corps first came out of negotiations between the Biden 2020 campaign and members and allies of the Bernie Sanders campaign as the two sides hashed out a platform meant to unify the Democratic party.

“I think this represents a significant step forward,” Varshini Prakash, co-founder of Sunrise and a member of the task force that worked on the unity platform, told CNN. “Young people need to see actions like this and more of it in the leadup to the 2024 election.”

Twenty thousand jobs is, to be clear, not very many in the grand scheme of things — the Civilian Conservation Corps created an estimated three million jobs over the decade it was in existence — but it is an important first step; an invitation to the table, if you will, particularly for young people who might feel otherwise helpless in the face of climate change. And unlike the Civilian Conservation Corps, which only created jobs for white men, the American Climate Corps is emphasizing the opportunities available for people from marginalized communities that will be disproportionately affected by climate change. This time around, the Climate Corps seems to say, we can shape the world in our collective image.

Sign-ups for the American Climate Corps opened on Wednesday: http://whitehouse.gov/climatecorps

You’re out of free articles.

Use code: CWNYC30 to save 30%.
Subscribe to access Heatmap’s exclusive polling and expert analysis of energy, climate change, and sustainability, now just $99/year $69.30/year.
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Hotspots

A Big Battery Relief in New York

And more of the week’s top news around project fights.

The United States.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

1. Suffolk County, New York – Rarely do I get to say battery fire fears can be quelched but we have a very good example brewing in the Empire State.

  • On September 11, New York state regulators did a Friday News Dump: The Department of Environmental Conservation confirmed a large PFAS pollution site in East Hampton was explicitly tied to fighting a battery storage site fire. The investigation began after PFAS chemicals, known as “forever chemicals,” were detected in drinking water wells.
  • Investigators will still have to produce a final report, but in their bulletin confirming the pollution source, the agency said it is now working with state energy and fire officials to avoid a specific chemical fire suppression system identified as a potential culprit known as Novec 1230. “The investigation points to the fire suppression system, not battery storage, as a [PFAS] source,” the bulletin states, adding this system wasn’t used in other recent fires at BESS facilities.This defuses what was poised to be a new PR problem for the battery storage sector in a state where local moratoria and restrictive ordinances have become increasingly common.

2. Loudon County, Virginia – I can’t believe it: Data Center Alley is going to enact a moratorium.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Q&A

The Case for a Data Center Dividend

A conversation with Sam Lyman of the Bitcoin Policy Institute.

The Bitcoin Policy Institute’s Sam Lyman.
Heatmap Illustration

This week’s conversation is with Sam Lyman, head of research at the Bitcoin Policy Institute. Originally focused on cryptocurrency, Lyman’s organization has expanded to policy and messaging development around data centers, most notably providing research many AI boosters cite to claim foreign influence is driving opposition to new hyperscale projects. Last week, the think tank released a new report calling for a novel solution to the data center permitting bottleneck: direct cash payments from data center projects to individuals involved with building them, as well as residents nearby facilities once they’re operating.

I reached out to BPI and asked for a chat with Lyman about the data center dividend proposal. I also tried to get to the bottom of where this increasingly relevant think tank stands on the general idea of a national data center law. The conversation was immensely informative. So here it is, in a lightly abridged and edited format.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Politics

The Bipartisan Buddies With a Plan to Fix Transmission

With a permitting deal seemingly on the horizon, Republican Gabe Evans and Democrat Scott Peters may be about to see their partnership pay off.

Gabe Evans and Scott Peters.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

The fate of permitting reform legislation that could smooth the way to all kinds of new and improved energy infrastructure — including transmission lines and renewables — is currently hostage to opaque discussions between Senate committee chairs. Rhode Island Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, the Democratic ranking member of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, told a Rhode Island business group earlier this week that “we’re actually in a pretty good place on permitting reform,” and that there was “maybe another week of negotiations.” Whitehouse’s Republican counterpart on the EPW committee, West Virginia Senator Shelly Moore-Capito, told Semafor on Friday that any bill has “got to pop out of here in the next 48 hours.”

If that’s going to happen, it will be because Republicans and Democrats have decided it’s worth it to get along. Any deal will eventually have to be voted on by the House, which has already produced several bills on a bipartisan basis, and even passed one — the SPEED Act — late last year.

Keep reading...Show less
Green