You’re out of free articles.
Log in
To continue reading, log in to your account.
Create a Free Account
To unlock more free articles, please create a free account.
Sign In or Create an Account.
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Welcome to Heatmap
Thank you for registering with Heatmap. Climate change is one of the greatest challenges of our lives, a force reshaping our economy, our politics, and our culture. We hope to be your trusted, friendly, and insightful guide to that transformation. Please enjoy your free articles. You can check your profile here .
subscribe to get Unlimited access
Offer for a Heatmap News Unlimited Access subscription; please note that your subscription will renew automatically unless you cancel prior to renewal. Cancellation takes effect at the end of your current billing period. We will let you know in advance of any price changes. Taxes may apply. Offer terms are subject to change.
Subscribe to get unlimited Access
Hey, you are out of free articles but you are only a few clicks away from full access. Subscribe below and take advantage of our introductory offer.
subscribe to get Unlimited access
Offer for a Heatmap News Unlimited Access subscription; please note that your subscription will renew automatically unless you cancel prior to renewal. Cancellation takes effect at the end of your current billing period. We will let you know in advance of any price changes. Taxes may apply. Offer terms are subject to change.
Create Your Account
Please Enter Your Password
Forgot your password?
Please enter the email address you use for your account so we can send you a link to reset your password:
That said, the U.S. EV maker also reported record fourth-quarter deliveries.

Tesla reported today that it had delivered 495,570 cars in the last three months of the year, and 1,789,226 in 2024 as a whole. That represents a decline in annual sales from 2023 — Tesla’s first annual decline in more than 10 years, back when the company’s deliveries were counted in the hundreds or single-digit thousands — although the fourth quarter figure is a record for quarterly deliveries.
Analysts polled by Bloomberg expected 510,400 deliveries for the fourth quarter, while Tesla had forecast around 515,000 deliveries to meet its “slight growth” goals. The company had cited “sustained macroeconomic headwinds” weighing on the broader electric vehicle market in its most recent investor letter, and again referred to “ongoing macroeconomic conditions” to explain the miss on deliveries. In the fourth quarter of 2023, Tesla deliveries stood at 484,507, with 1,808,581 for the year as a whole.
Going forward, Tesla buyers in the United States are likely to lose out on up to $7,500 in federal subsidies as the incoming Trump administration puts its stamp on energy and environmental policy. Tesla’s chief executive, Elon Musk, has supported ditching EV credits.
The below-expectations deliveries dragged on the stock, which traded down more than 4.5% in early trading Thursday. Tesla shares have otherwise been on a tear, rising around 75% in the last six months before today, with especially torrid performance following the 2024 United States presidential election.
The Chinese car company BYD is in a virtual tie with Tesla for annual battery electric vehicle sales, with 1,764,992 delivered in 2024, the company announced Wednesday. While Tesla’s 2024 sales confirm that the U.S. company maintains a narrow lead over BYD, the Chinese automaker’s sales are growing at a rapid clip — electric sales increased by over 12% for the year, compared to the slight fall in Tesla sales from 2023 to 2024.
While Tesla’s car business appears to have stalled to some extent — though it was buoyed by the release of a new model, the Cybertruck, which is already the third best-selling electric vehicle in the United States — the company’s energy storage business is another story. The company said that in the fourth quarter of last year it had deployed 11 gigawatt-hours of storage, and 31.4 gigawatt-hours in the year as a whole. If Tesla’s deployment rate in 2025 merely matched its fourth quarter rate, it would mean 40% annual growth.
Log in
To continue reading, log in to your account.
Create a Free Account
To unlock more free articles, please create a free account.
Current conditions: Two major storms, Tropical Cyclone Maila and Tropical Cyclone Vaianu are barreling through the South Pacific • San Juan, Puerto Rico’s capital, is on track for heavy thunderstorms with lightning throughout most of the week • Temperatures in the Philippines’ densest northern cities are set to hit 100 degrees Fahrenheit this week.
It’s become a sort of dark ritual for the past two weeks, where President Donald Trump threatens to unleash a bombing blitz on Iran’s power stations — escalating the conflict in a way that mirrors Russia’s campaign against Ukraine. Well, it’s that time again. In a Sunday post on his Truth Social network, the president said Tuesday will be what he called “power plant day,” when the United States military will target Iran’s electrical station in addition to its bridges. “There will be nothing like it,” Trump wrote with three exclamation points, before dropping an F-bomb, calling the Iranian regime “crazy bastards,” and offering a “Praise be to Allah.”
In his past threats, typically postponed by the time markets opened Monday morning, Trump emphasized that the U.S. would target “all” of Iran’s power stations. That would include the Bushehr nuclear plant, Iran’s first and only civilian atomic power station. The plant’s single Russian-made reactor came online in September 2011, just six months after the Fukushima disaster in Japan. Russia’s state-owned nuclear company, Rosatom, was working on expanding the facility with additional reactors when the war began. Rosatom has warned that U.S. and Israeli missiles struck too close for comfort to the Bushehr facility, and criticized United Nations officials for holding Washington to a different standard than Moscow. Russia’s occupation of the Zaporizhzhia atomic power plant and turning Europe’s largest nuclear station into a front line in the war with Kyiv drew widespread condemnation.
If only oil and gas were the only commodities choked off from the global economy by Iran’s military at the Strait of Hormuz. There’s helium, urea, and plastics ingredients such as polyethylene. And then, of course, there’s aluminum. Before the war, demand for aluminum had soared to record highs in China, and the U.S. had just begun laying the groundwork for a new smelter. In fact, that deal was between a U.S. company and Emirates Global Aluminum, which, as I reported in January, was looking to expand its footprint in America. Now the Abu Dhabi-based industrial giant has some problems at home. The Middle East’s biggest aluminum producer said the Al Taweelah smelter that went into emergency shutdown last week following damage from Iranian missiles and drones may take as long as a year to restore its full output. The company said Friday that it had completed its initial damage assessment and “is in contact with customers whose shipments may be impacted,” Mining.com reported.
Offshore wind is a bit like a mullet. It triggered one hell of a backlash in the U.S. But the Australians embrace it, and now it could get big in Brazil. The government in Brasilia has established the guidelines for regulating offshore wind development, including the rules for designating patches of the coast to energy production and permitting, according to offshoreWIND.biz. Back in January, Australia scheduled its first offshore wind tender for later this year, adding itself to the list of countries looking to establish or expand seaward turbine farms even as the U.S. tries to smother its nascent industry. The Netherlands just put out a tender for a gigawatt of additional offshore wind, Renewables Now reported.
Meanwhile, another of the Trump administration’s multi-pronged efforts to quash the U.S. offshore wind sector is coming in for scrutiny. Last month, as I previously wrote, the Department of the Interior brokered a deal to pay the French energy giant TotalEnergies $1 billion to shut down two offshore wind farms in the U.S. and invest instead in natural gas. Two leading progressives in Congress are now calling for the administration to halt the payment. In a letter sent last week to Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York and Massachusetts Senator Ed Markey called the plan “legally dubious.”
Sign up to receive Heatmap AM in your inbox every morning:
Just a month ago, BYD unveiled newer, faster Flash Chargers, so swift they “basically make recharging your EV as quick as getting gas,” InsideEVs wrote. Now the Chinese automotive giant has already rolled out the next-generation chargers at at least 5,000 stations across China. The buildout comes as BYD races to gain a retail foothold in North America now that Canada has eased its tariffs. As I previously wrote, the company has already selected 20 sites for dealerships.
China’s wind turbine giant Mingyang is investing $10 billion into renewables, green hydrogen, and ammonia projects in Ethiopia. The Ethiopian Investment Commission, a government agency, called the deal a “transformative move for the energy sector,” coming a week after the company teased a larger investment at an economic forum in Addis Ababa. Mingyang ranked as the world’s third-largest wind manufacturer by gigawatts last year, as I wrote last month, one of China’s top champions in a growing sector.

Dominica is one of the most isolated and underdeveloped island nations in the Caribbean, often called “the nature isle.” So it makes sense that the country’s population of less than 70,000 people would avoid the oil-burning trap that afflicts the power sectors in Cuba and Puerto Rico and skip straight to harvesting renewable energy from beneath the island’s charmingly not-Margaritaville-ified shores. A new 10-megawatt geothermal power plant in the inland town of Laudat has entered “advanced stages of commissioning and has started supplying electricity to the grid,” ThinkGeoEnergy reported.
PJM’s market monitor got spicy in its latest annual report.
The independent market monitor of PJM Interconnection, America’s largest electricity market spanning some or all of 13 states from the Jersey Shore to Chicago, took advantage of its latest annual report to share eye-popping figures on how data centers raise electricity costs and lambast existing proposals to fix it.
“Data center load growth is the primary reason for recent and expected capacity market conditions, including total forecast load growth, the tight supply and demand balance, and high prices,” the independent market monitor said in the report, released Thursday. Some PJM states like New Jersey and Maryland have seen some of the fastest retail electricity price hikes in the country, in part due to spiraling costs stemming from capacity auctions, in which generators bid to be available when the grid is stressed. Capacity prices have risen from $29 per megawatt-day to the statutory cap of around $330 in just a few years, costing ratepayers some $46.7 billion over the past three auctions. The total from the three prior auctions: $8.3 billion.
The independent market monitor has used its regular reports and ad hoc commentary to blame data centers for the price boom over the past few years, and its 2025 annual report was no different. “Inclusion of existing and forecast data center load growth resulted in a combined total increase in capacity market revenues” of just over $23 billion, the market monitor wrote of the past three auctions. “Large data center load additions have already had a significant and irreversible impact that will be paid through May of 2028 and will have additional significant impacts on other customers as a result of higher transmission costs, higher energy market prices and higher capacity market prices,” the report said.
The assessment comes at a moment of turmoil for PJM, which has endured pressure from energy regulators and the White House to reform itself in order to bring on more generation more quickly. Some other proposed solutions to PJM’s price woes include coming up with new rules that encourage data centers to bring their own electricity generation, co-locate with existing or planned generation, or to operate more flexibly to avoid calling on the grid at peak demand times. The White House and PJM states even called for a special auction in the system to procure $15 billion of new generation, with a proposal for how the auction would actually run expected in April, according to Julien Dumoulin-Smith, an analyst at Jefferies.
The market monitor used the report to promote its own position: That data centers should bring their own generation, and that they should have their own “expedited fast track load and generation interconnection process.” Data centers that don’t bring their own generation should then have to put up with mandatory supply curtailment by the grid in moments of peak demand.
The market monitor argued that this proposal was consistent with the White House and PJM governors’ agreed-upon principles, as well as the “ratepayer protection pledge” drawn up by the Trump administration and signed onto by most of the country’s big players in artificial intelligence to protect utility customers for higher costs stemming for data center development.
In language more stirring than is typical for a report on market operations for a regional transmission organization, the market monitor called for preserving the market-like structure of PJM and the principle that all customers be served on the grid.
“All loads should be served,” the report said. “All loads should be served reliably. The process for adding large data center loads should be transparent. All loads should benefit from competitive markets.”
“It is difficult to imagine more arbitrary and capricious decisionmaking than that at issue here.”
A federal court shot down President Trump’s attempt to kill New York City’s congestion pricing program on Tuesday, allowing the city’s $9 toll on cars entering downtown Manhattan during peak hours to remain in effect.
Judge Lewis Liman of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled that the Trump administration’s termination of the program was illegal, writing, “It is difficult to imagine more arbitrary and capricious decisionmaking than that at issue here.”
So concludes a fight that began almost exactly one year ago, just after Trump returned to the White House. On February 19, 2025, the newly minted Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy sent a letter to Kathy Hochul, the governor of New York, rescinding the federal government’s approval of the congestion pricing fee. President Trump had expressed concerns about the program, Duffy said, leading his department to review its agreement with the state and determine that the program did not adhere to the federal statute under which it was approved.
Duffy argued that the city was not allowed to cordon off part of the city and not provide any toll-free options for drivers to enter it. He also asserted that the program had to be designed solely to relieve congestion — and that New York’s explicit secondary goal of raising money to improve public transit was a violation.
Trump, meanwhile, likened himself to a monarch who had risen to power just in time to rescue New Yorkers from tyranny. That same day, the White House posted an image to social media of Trump standing in front of the New York City skyline donning a gold crown, with the caption, "CONGESTION PRICING IS DEAD. Manhattan, and all of New York, is SAVED. LONG LIVE THE KING!"
New York had only just launched the tolling program a month earlier after nearly 20 years of deliberation — or, as reporter and Hell Gate cofounder Christopher Robbins put it in his account of those years for Heatmap, “procrastination.” The program was supposed to go into effect months earlier before, at the last minute, Hochul tried to delay the program indefinitely, claiming it was too much of a burden on New Yorkers’ wallets. She ultimately allowed congestion pricing to proceed with the fee reduced from $15 during peak hours to $9, and thereafter became one of its champions. The state immediately challenged Duffy’s termination order in court and defied the agency’s instruction to shut down the program, keeping the toll in place for the entirety of the court case.
In May, Judge Liman issued a preliminary injunction prohibiting the DOT from terminating the agreement, noting that New York was likely to succeed in demonstrating that Duffy had exceeded his authority in rescinding it.
After the first full year the program was operating, the state reported 27 million fewer vehicles entering lower Manhattan and a 7% boost to transit ridership. Bus speeds were also up, traffic noise complaints were down, and the program raised $550 million in net revenue.
The final court order issued Tuesday rejected Duffy’s initial arguments for terminating the program, as well as additional justifications he supplied later in the case.
“We disagree with the court’s ruling,” a spokesperson for the Transportation Department told me, adding that congestion pricing imposes a “massive tax on every New Yorker” and has “made federally funded roads inaccessible to commuters without providing a toll-free alternative.” The Department is “reviewing all legal options — including an appeal — with the Justice Department,” they said.