Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Climate

COP28 So Far: A Cheat Sheet

Halfway through the year’s marquee climate conference, here’s where things stand.

COP28 elements.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

It’s a “rest day” at COP28, which means there probably won’t be a ton of news coming out of Dubai as delegates take a breather before the climate talks shift into high gear tomorrow. That makes now a good time to reflect on what’s happened so far and what to expect as the conference enters its second half.

Some key accomplishments:

  • The loss and damage fund: On day one of the conference, world leaders reached a landmark deal to help vulnerable nations deal with the costly effects of climate change. The early accomplishment set an optimistic tone for the summit — although The Guardiannotes that wealthy countries have so far pledged $700 million to the fund, “far short of what is needed.” In total, countries have announced $57 billion of various funding pledges at the conference.
  • Methane cuts: About 50 oil and gas companies pledged to slash their methane leaks by 2030. Critics cry greenwashing, but as Heatmap’s Emily Pontecorvo points out, recent technological advances in methane monitoring – including satellites, drones, and handheld detectors – could help in the international effort to hold these companies accountable. A planned $40 million infusion from billionaire philanthropist Michael Bloomberg will bolster the cause, too.
  • A renewables pledge: At least 120 countries backed a pledge to triple global renewable energy capacity by 2030. That goal made it into an early draft of the global stocktake report, the summit’s final deliverable, but that’s no guarantee it will be formally adopted.
  • A nuclear energy declaration: More than 20 countries including the U.S., Canada, the UK, and the United Arab Emirates, pledged to triple global nuclear energy capacity by 2050.
  • Growing support for a fossil phase-out: The number of countries pledging to voluntarily end oil and gas extraction and exploration grew to 24 when Spain, Kenya, and Samoa joined the Beyond Oil & Gas Alliance
  • A global cooling pledge: More than 60 countries pledged to reduce their cooling-related emissions by at least 68% by 2050.

Still to come:

  • Phase out or phase down?: The global stocktake will be the main focus heading into the second week of COP28. This key document will set out the world’s climate goals for the coming years, and help determine how they’ll be accomplished. The most contentious issue is whether to include a call for a phase out of fossil fuels. A new draft of the global stocktake is expected tomorrow.
  • What comes after $100 billion?: Ministers will also need to lay the groundwork for new climate financing targets for poorer countries. Rich nations recently (and belatedly) hit their goal of providing $100 billion annually for poorer countries, a pledge set out in 2009. But finance efforts don’t end there, explains the World Resources Institute. Next year’s COP will call for setting a new “collective quantified goal” that uses the existing $100 billion target as a jumping off point but will likely balloon to be much bigger. Delegates in Dubai will try to come to some consensus on what to prioritize when negotiations start at COP29.

“We had a pretty damn good week here in Dubai already,” U.S. Special Envoy John Kerry told the AP. But underlying it all is the reality that the event is being held in one of the world’s biggest petrostates, fossil fuel lobbyists are out in force, and the summit’s president, Sultan Al-Jaber, has been openly skeptical about the science connecting fossil fuel caps to taming global temperatures.

“I’m not telling you that everybody’s going to come kumbaya to the table,” Kerry added, “but I am telling you we’re going to make our best effort to get the best agreement we can to move as far as we can as fast as we can. That’s what people in the world want us to do. It’s time for adults to behave like adults and get the job done.”

The summit is set to end on December 12, but previous COPs have run into overtime.

Yellow

You’re out of free articles.

Subscribe today to experience Heatmap’s expert analysis 
of climate change, clean energy, and sustainability.
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Climate

What Started the Fires in Los Angeles?

Plus 3 more outstanding questions about this ongoing emergency.

Los Angeles.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

As Los Angeles continued to battle multiple big blazes ripping through some of the most beloved (and expensive) areas of the city on Thursday, a question lingered in the background: What caused the fires in the first place?

Though fires are less common in California during this time of the year, they aren’t unheard of. In early December 2017, power lines sparked the Thomas Fire near Ventura, California, which burned through to mid-January. At the time it was the largest fire in the state since at least the 1930s. Now it’s the ninth-largest. Although that fire was in a more rural area, it ignited for many of the same reasons we’re seeing fires this week.

Keep reading...Show less
Green
Hotspots

Fox News Goes After a Solar Farm

And more of this week’s top renewable energy fights across the country.

Map of U.S. renewable energy.
Heatmap Illustration

1. Otsego County, Michigan – The Mitten State is proving just how hard it can be to build a solar project in wooded areas. Especially once Fox News gets involved.

  • Last week, the Michigan Department of Natural Resources said it wanted to lease more than 400 acres of undeveloped state-owned forestland for part of a much larger RWE Clean Energy solar project near the northern Michigan town of Gaylord.
  • Officials said they were approached by the company about the land. But the news sparked an immediate outcry, as state elected Republicans – and some Democrats – demanded to know why a forest would be cleared for ‘green’ energy. Some called for government firings.
  • Then came the national news coverage. On Friday, Fox News hosted a full four-minute segment focused on this one solar farm featuring iconoclastic activist Michael Shellenberger.
  • A few days later, RWE told the media it would not develop the project on state lands.
  • “[D]uring the development process, we conducted outreach to all landowners adjacent to the project location, including the Michigan Department of Natural Resources,” the company said in a statement to the Petoskey News-Review, adding it instead decided to move forward with leasing property from two private landowners.

2. Atlantic County, New Jersey – Opponents of offshore wind in Atlantic City are trying to undo an ordinance allowing construction of transmission cables that would connect the Atlantic Shores offshore wind project to the grid.

Keep reading...Show less
Policy Watch

How to Solve a Problem Like a Wind Ban

And more of this week’s top policy news around renewables.

Trump.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

1. Trump’s Big Promise – Our nation’s incoming president is now saying he’ll ban all wind projects on Day 1, an expansion of his previous promise to stop only offshore wind.

  • “They litter our country like paper, like dropping garbage in a field,” Trump said at a press conference Tuesday. “We’re going to try and have a policy where no windmills are built.”
  • Is this possible? It would be quite tricky, as the president only has control over the usage of federal lands and waters. While offshore wind falls entirely under the president’s purview, many onshore wind projects themselves fall entirely on state lands.
  • This is where the whole “wind kills birds” argument becomes important. Nearly all wind projects have at least some federal nexus because of wildlife protection laws, such as the Endangered Species Act and Migratory Bird Treaty Act.
  • Then there are the cables connecting these projects to the grid and interstate transmission projects that may require approval from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
  • I’m personally doubtful he will actually stop all wind in the U.S., though I do think offshore wind in its entirety is at risk (which I’ve written about). Trump has a habit of conflating things, and in classic fashion, he only spoke at the press conference about offshore wind projects. I think he was only referring to offshore wind, though I’m willing to eat my words.

2. The Big Nuclear Lawsuit – Texas and Utah are suing to kill the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s authority to license small modular reactors.

Keep reading...Show less