Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Electric Vehicles

The Ioniq 6 Is an Aerodynamic Solution to the EV Battery Problem

Sleekness to the rescue.

An Ioniq 6.
Heatmap Illustration/Hyundai, Getty Images

If there’s one thing Americans want from an electric vehicle, it’s range. Consumers regularly cite the distance an EV can travel before recharging as one of their biggest hang-ups about the transition away from gas cars. And yet longer range EVs come at an environmental cost, thanks to bigger batteries. Some have surveyed this sad situation and concluded that Americans need to settle for less range.

But what if we didn’t have to settle? As the Hyundai Ioniq 6 shows, it’s possible to go really far on an average battery.

Electric vehicles in the United States have become dominated by crossovers and SUVs, just like their gas-powered counterparts. These mega-sized, mega-powered, luxury behemoths are fast and technically impressive, and they have certainly helped entice people to embrace electrification. But they can seem incredibly silly when viewed through the lens of why we’re going electric in the first place.

Now, the Ioniq 6’s isn’t necessarily immune to that critique. Like its sister model, the Hyundai Ioniq 5, the Hyundai’s styling department did a good job disguising the vehicle’s physical girth, because the Ioniq 6 isn’t really all that small. Park the Ioniq 6 next to any traditional sedan or hatchback from not that long ago, like say, a Toyota Prius, and the Ioniq 6 towers over it. The Ioniq 6’s sedan body may stand out in the sea of electrified crossovers and SUVs, but its 4,200-pound as-tested curb weight puts it in the same ballpark as them.

However, we can’t let the perfect become the enemy of the good, and the Ioniq 6 is very, very good. A week with the Ioniq 6 showed me exactly how good it really is.

The 2023 Hyundai Ioniq 6 uses a common vehicle architecture, called E-GMP, shared with sister brands Genesis and Kia. This purpose-built, electric-only architecture is found under the Kia EV6, Genesis GV60, and SUV (or hatchback, depending on who you ask) Hyundai Ioniq 5. It will form the basis of many other Hyundai, Kia, and Genesis EVs in the near future, like the Kia EV9. The platform is modular, allowing for a bevy of electric motor outputs, battery sizes, and wheelbase lengths to accommodate varying types of vehicles. But, the Ioniq 6 stands out from its SUV-shaped mechanical cousins by having the best battery-to-range ratio of them all, partially because of its slippery sedan shape.

In the SE Long Range, single-motor rear-wheel-drive, with 18-inch wheels with aero wheel covers, the Ioniq 6 is rated for 361 miles of range. This all comes from a relatively svelte 77.4 kWh (74 usable) battery – that’s about 60 miles more than the Ioniq 5 in similar specifications with the same sized battery. In fact, the Ioniq 6 is the most efficient vehicle on sale in the U.S., edging out the Lucid Air Grand Touring.

The Ioniq 6 accomplishes this feat by focusing hard on aerodynamics. With a drag coefficient of 0.21, the Ioniq 6 is one of the most aerodynamic cars in the world; its low drag shape means it uses a lot less energy to cut through the air. Even in Hyundai’s own stable, the boxy Ioniq 5 with its 0.29 drag coefficient can only manage 303 miles of range with the same motor and battery as the Ioniq 6.

Now, manufacturers may advertise all sorts of numbers, but achieving them in real-world driving, especially freeway driving, isn’t always that easy. To get the 361-mile range that Hyundai advertises on the Ioniq 6, I would need to average 4.87 miles per kilowatt hour. That is a very tall order. Most of the EVs I’ve driven have struggled to break the 4-mile-per-kilowatt-hour barrier, including the supposedly hyper-efficient Lucid Air.

But the Ioniq 6’s real-world efficiency impressed me. Even with the air conditioning on, in 85 to 90-degree weather, the Ioniq 6 could touch as high as 6 miles per kilowatt hour under stop-and-go short trips. Under one long journey, averaging 70 MPH with the air conditioning set to 72 degrees, the Ioniq 6 averaged 4.6 miles per kWh. At that rate, the Ioniq 6 was on track to travel 340 miles on a full charge, or about 94% of the Ioniq 6’s claimed range – all done on the freeway. These efficiency numbers mean the Ioniq 6 could easily do a 5-hour freeway drive, without stopping. From my perspective, Hyundai has succeeded in creating an EV that has compromised little to nothing compared to a gas-powered vehicle.

That strong on-road, real-world efficiency begs the question: What if the Ioniq 6 was smaller and lighter? Could we get the same range with an even smaller battery? Or, at the very least, what if more automakers adopted the Ioniq 6’s streamlined ethos? Instead of big mega SUVs that cost six figures and need 200 kWh to go 450 miles, we’d have sleek sedans and hatchbacks that go plenty far on a battery that’s a third of the size or less.

The Ioniq 6 may not be perfect, but it does suggest that one day, we might be able to drive more sustainably — while still going super far.

Yellow
Kevin Williams profile image

Kevin Williams

Kevin Williams is an automotive journalist focused on the corner where electrification meets automotive culture. Published in spaces like The Verge, Road & Track, The Drive, and more, he focuses on how electric vehicles impact everyday drivers.

Politics

Why Republicans Grilled the Energy Secretary About UFOs

You have to get creative when you allege a “war on energy” during an oil boom.

Jennifer Granholm and UFOs.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

When Donald Trump met with a group of oil executives at Mar-a-Lago last month, his message was somewhere between “refreshingly blunt” and “blatant shakedown.” Attendees spilled to The Washington Post that Trump told the executives they should raise a billion dollars for his campaign so he could make them even richer by reducing their taxes and removing regulations on their industry.

One can’t help but wonder if any of them thought to themselves that as appealing as that kind of deal might be, there’s no reason for them to be desperate. After all, the Biden years have actually been quite good for the fossil fuel industry.

Keep reading...Show less
Blue
Politics

Biden’s Long Game on Climate

The president isn’t trying to cut emissions as fast possible. He’s doing something else.

President Biden playing chess.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

Here’s the problem with President Joe Biden’s climate policy: From a certain point of view, it makes no sense.

Take his electricity policy. At the top level, Biden has committed to eliminating greenhouse-gas pollution from the power sector by 2035. He wants to accomplish this largely by making clean energy cheaper — that’s the goal of the Inflation Reduction Act, of course — and he has also changed federal rules so it’s slightly easier to build power lines and large-scale renewable projects. He has also added teeth to that goal in the form of new Environmental Protection Agency rules cracking down on coal and natural gas.

Keep reading...Show less
Green
Technology

AM Briefing: Greenlight for Geoengineering?

On the return of geoengineering, climate lawsuits, and a cheaper EV.

Sunrise over a mountain.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

Current conditions: Battered Midwest in for more bad weather this weekend • Tornadoes keep hitting the Great Plains • A heat wave in New Delhi that pushed temperatures above 116 degrees Fahrenheit on Friday is expected to last several more days.

THE TOP FIVE

1. Red states challenge climate lawsuits

Nineteen Republican-led states are asking the Supreme Court to stop Democrat-led states from trying to force oil and gas companies to pay for the impacts of climate change. Rhode Island in 2018 became the first state to sue major oil companies for climate damages and has since been joined by California, Connecticut, Minnesota, and New Jersey. The states pursuing legal action against oil companies are trying to “dictate the future of the American energy industry,” the Republican attorneys general argued in a motion filed this week, “not by influencing federal legislation or by petitioning federal agencies, but by imposing ruinous liability and coercive remedies on energy companies” through the court system.

Keep reading...Show less