The Fight

Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Hotspots

A Solar Fight in Wild, Wild Country

The week’s most notable updates on conflicts around renewable energy and data centers.

The United States
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

1. Wasco County, Oregon – They used to fight the Rajneeshees, and now they’re fighting a solar farm.

  • BrightNight Solar is trying to build a giant solar farm in the rural farming town of Deschutes, Oregon. Except there’s just one problem: Rated as a 82 out of 100 for risk by Heatmap Pro, the county is a vociferously conservative agricultural area known best as the site of the Netflix documentary Wild, Wild Country. Despite the fact the project is located miles away from the town, the large landowners surrounding the facility’s proposed location are vehemently opposed to construction, claiming it would be built “right on top of them.” (At least a cult isn’t poisoning the food this time.)
  • An activist group called Save Juniper Flat published an open letter to Donald Trump’s Agriculture Department stating that it’s located on land designated as “exclusive” for farming, and that the agency should conduct “awareness, oversight, and any assistance” to ensure the property “remains truly protected from industrialization – not just on paper, more importantly in reality.” It’s worth stating that BrightNight claims the project is intentionally sited on less suitable farmland.
  • The group did not respond to a request for comment about whether the letter was also provided directly to the agency, but one must reasonably assume they are seeking its attention.

2. Worcester County, Maryland – The legal fight over the primary Maryland offshore wind project just turned in an incredibly ugly direction for offshore projects generally.

  • This week a federal judge ruled against all of U.S. Wind’s counter-claims in a lawsuit filed by Ocean City, Maryland against construction of a large wind project off the city’s shoreline. This means federal judges are looking harshly at efforts to challenge the financial harms visited upon energy projects halted by lawsuits like this one.
  • “This ruling reinforces what we have maintained from the beginning: Ocean City has raised legitimate concerns regarding the offshore wind project and its impacts on our community, economy, tourism industry, and coastal environment,” the Ocean City government said in a statement. “Attempts to shift responsibility or complicate these proceedings through additional claims have now been dismissed by the Court.”
  • In tandem with that decision, the Trump administration this week filed a notice to appeal the ruling that struck down Trump’s Day 1 anti-wind executive order. The notice does not itself lay out the basis for the appeal.

3. Manitowoc County, Wisconsin – Towns are starting to pressure counties to ban data centers, galvanizing support for wider moratoria in a fashion similar to what we’ve seen with solar and wind power.

  • Three towns in Manitowoc County passed a resolution this week to enact a sweeping ban on data centers. It happened after one of the towns was contacted by Cloverleaf Infrastructure, a data center developer. Cloverleaf is also behind a controversial data center project in progress in Port Washington, Wisconsin, that has become a national flashpoint over water use. There’s currently an effort to recall the town mayor over that project.
  • This county was already predisposed to disdain industrial tech development, with a 95 clean energy opposition score and an 80 data center opposition index in Heatmap Pro’s database. A lot of this seems driven by natural environment concerns, water worries, and overall ratepayer fears.

4. Pinal County, Arizona – This county’s commission rejected a 8,122-acre solar farm unanimously this week, only months after the same officials approved multiple data centers.

  • The commission made the move saying that the Arena Power solar project would take up too much land. But the data centers would take up roughly 4,000 acres across the county – so one must wonder whether there’s a difference only by degrees here.
  • Heatmap Pro data indicates there remains a risk for both kinds of projects in the county.

.

Yellow

This article is exclusively
for Heatmap Plus subscribers.

Go deeper inside the politics, projects, and personalities
shaping the energy transition.
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Spotlight

Trump Taps Nashville Legend to Fight Solar and Wind Farms

And data centers might be collateral damage.

Farmland.
Simon Abranowicz | Getty Images | Unsplash

After derailing gigawatts of renewable power with a permitting freeze, the Trump administration is expanding its war on renewable energy, retaining one of country music’s biggest stars in a PR offensive against utility-scale projects on “prime farmland.”

The administration recently onboarded John Rich – one half of the stadium-packing American musical duo Big & Rich – to be Trump’s “special envoy for American landowners.” Rich entered activism around landowner rights last January when he backed opponents fighting a large Tennessee Valley Authority transmission project routed through his home county of Cheatham, Tennessee. This led to him joining the Trump team, where he’s fashioning himself as a go-to guy and cheerleader for anyone who wants Trump to help stop a solar or wind farm they don’t want built.

Keep reading...Show less
Hotspots

Data Centers Are the Election Year Villain

And more of the week’s top news around project fights.

Data Centers Are the Election Year Villain
Heatmap Illustration

1. Kansas City, Missouri – Data centers are so toxic that politicians are using them as boogeymen in totally unrelated policy discussions.

  • All week I’ve been thinking about Missouri, where a widely-screened TV campaign ad is airing screeds against AI hyperscale projects to sell a constitutional amendment initiative up for a vote in this year’s November elections. “That hum is the sound of Big Tech making money on online gambling, for porn,” says a nameless man in the ad. “Amendment 5 makes Big Tech pay so you don’t have to. Yes on Amendment 5.”
  • What does Amendment 5 do? Based on the ad, you would think it was focused on tax exemptions for data centers. But no – a yes vote supports cutting the state income tax, a proposal backed by Republican Gov. Mike Kehoe.
  • The ad is misinformation and a mind-blowing use of a confusing conversation around tech infrastructure most were unfamiliar with before this year. Per reporting by the Missouri Independent, the state’s existing tax exemptions for data centers would stay in place if the amendment was adopted.
  • My gut tells me this is only the beginning of the data center industry’s transformation into an election year villain.

2. Ingham County, Michigan – We have our first major anti-data center candidate in a Democratic congressional primary.

Keep reading...Show less
Q&A

Why Data Center NDAs Are a Big Mistake

A conversation with Grant Gutierrez of Carbon Direct

Why Data Center NDAs Are a Big Mistake
Heatmap Illustration

This week’s conversation is with Grant Gutierrez, head of community impacts at carbon management company Carbon Direct. This week Carbon Direct published a white paper Gutierrez authored on opposition around data centers he’s studied. His research reinforces much of what Heatmap Pro has uncovered, but I was particularly intrigued by a topline finding – that transparency is the most common thread in the 46 data center fights he looked into. Was he seeing what I’ve been seeing? So I asked him to hop onto a Zoom call and let me know his thoughts.

The following conversation was lightly edited for clarity.

Keep reading...Show less