The Fight

Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Hotspots

An Influential Anti-ESG Activist Targets A Wind Farm

And more of the week’s most important news around renewable energy conflicts.

Map of renewable energy fights.
Heatmap Illustration

1. Carroll County, Arkansas – The head of an influential national right-wing advocacy group is now targeting a wind project in Arkansas, seeking federal intervention to block something that looked like it would be built.

  • Will Hild, executive director of Consumers’ Research, recently called on the Trump administration to intervene against the development of Scout Clean Energy’s Nimbus wind project in Arkansas. Consumers’ Research is known as one of the leading anti-ESG advocacy organizations, playing a key role in the “anti-woke” opposition against the climate- and socially-conscious behavior of everyone from utilities to Anheuser-Busch.
  • In a lengthy rant posted to X earlier this month, Hild pointed to Carroll County’s local moratorium on wind projects and claimed Nimbus being built would be “a massive win for ESG radicals – and a slap in the face for local democracy.”
  • As I told you in April, the Nimbus project prompted Carroll County to enact the moratorium but it was grandfathered in because of contracts signed prior to the ban’s enactment.
  • However, even though Nimbus is not sited on federal land, there is a significant weak point for the project: its potential impacts on endangered birds and bats.
  • Scout Clean Energy has been working with the Fish and Wildlife Service since at least 2018 under Trump 1.0. However, the project’s habitat conservation plan was not completed before the start of the current Trump term and Scout did not submit an application for Nimbus to receive an incidental take permit from the Service until May of this year.
  • Enter the Trump administration’s bird-centric wind power crackdown and the impact of Hild’s commentary comes into fuller focus. What will happen to all the years of work that Scout and the Service did? It’s unclear how the project reckons with this heightened scrutiny and risk of undue federal attention.

2. Suffolk County, New York – EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin this week endorsed efforts by activists on Long Island to oppose energy storage in their neighborhoods.

  • Zeldin, a Long Island native, spoke at a rally Monday in the town of Hauppage where an outcry over a proposed BESS system has prompted the same kind of outcry I’ve been chronicling for months. He also endorsed the residents’ efforts to block the project with an op-ed in the New York Post that invoked the fire in California at Moss Landing – a facility bearing little resemblance to anything proposed in New York City.
  • The EPA also released a non-binding set “federal safety toolkit” for battery energy storage siting that recommended response plans allow for “an isolation zone for large commercial BESS that is at least 330 feet, depending on the site.” The toolkit did acknowledge that BESS fires “have decreased” but noted “some recent fires have gained attention in the media.”
  • It’s worth noting this is a departure from Energy Secretary Chris Wright’s bullish approach to battery storage, which was also spared in the Republican reconciliation bill.

3. Multiple counties, Indiana – This has been a very bad week for renewables in the Sooner state.

  • In Clark County on Wednesday, a sea of red shirts was able to crowd out a small group of pro-solar activists to block a permit for a utility-scale BrightNight project.
  • In Blackford County, a giant throng of opponents packed the hearing for a special zoning exception needed to build RWE’s Prairie Creek wind facility. They also won, sending that project into further limbo.
  • And in St. Joseph County, the area’s planning commissioners passed a unique ordinance requiring solar developers to compensate land owners adjacent to their projects for any lost property value from construction and operation.

4. Brunswick County, North Carolina – Duke Energy is pouring cold water on anyone still interested in developing offshore wind off the coast of North Carolina.

  • In a filing to North Carolina regulators, Duke Energy disclosed its own independent review that found that “offshore wind generation is not cost effective relative to other available resources at this time.” The assessment took into account both rising inflationary pressures and the federal pause on offshore wind permitting, which represented a “significant shift in federal energy policy.”
  • Notably this assessment did not take into account the de facto repeal of the IRA’s renewable energy credits, but it did conclude this “increase[s] uncertainty” “confirms” Duke’s plans to simply “monitor the market potential for offshore wind.”

5. Bell County, Texas – We have a solar transmission stand-off brewing in Texas, of all places.

  • A 200-mile transmission line under development by Oncor is galvanizing enough local opposition to prompt hundreds to sign a petition against the project and generate local news stories. Opponents are citing land use concerns as well as the fear of health risks in living near high-voltage power lines.
  • It’s unlikely this line can be stopped because recent law streamlined and expedited the process for approving new transmission due to blackouts and grid strain. However, the concerns are noteworthy because significant public backlash can always change the direction of policy in a deep red state, even Texas.
  • It’s also worth noting that while Texas is overall a safer state for development than most, Bell County – the area protesting this project most publicly – is a risky area to propose renewables and transmission due to its higher concentration of protected lands and political polarization, according to Heatmap Pro data.

This article is exclusively
for Heatmap Plus subscribers.

Go deeper inside the politics, projects, and personalities
shaping the energy transition.
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Spotlight

The Trump Administration Is Now Delaying Renewable Projects It Thinks Are Ugly

The Army Corps of Engineers is out to protect “the beauty of the Nation’s natural landscape.”

Donald Trump, wetlands, and renewable energy.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

A new Trump administration policy is indefinitely delaying necessary water permits for solar and wind projects across the country, including those located entirely on private land.

The Army Corps of Engineers published a brief notice to its website in September stating that Adam Telle, the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works, had directed the agency to consider whether it should weigh a project’s “energy density” – as in the ratio of acres used for a project compared to its power generation capacity – when issuing permits and approvals. The notice ended on a vague note, stating that the Corps would also consider whether the projects “denigrate the aesthetics of America’s natural landscape.”

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Hotspots

A Data Center Dies in Wisconsin

Plus more of the week’s biggest renewable energy fights.

The United States.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

Dane County, Wisconsin – The QTS data center project we’ve been tracking closely is now dead, after town staff in the host community of DeForest declared its plans “unfeasible.”

  • As I previously explained to Fight readers, this QTS project was a quintessential data center conflict. Not only was it situated in a blue county inside of a purple state, but a recent imbroglio over emails between the village mayor and QTS have made it a key example of how private conversations between tech companies and local governments can tarnish the odds of getting a data center permitted.
  • Late Tuesday, DeForest town staff issued a public statement disclosing they would recommend rejecting QTS’ petition to annex land for construction, without which the developer can’t build. A vote on whether to formally deny the petition was scheduled for February 3.
  • If the town rejects the project, the statement reads, DeForest staff expect QTS to “formally withdraw” its request for changes to land zoning plans and the annexation application. The town also cited vociferous opposition to the project, declaring: “The Village of DeForest appreciates the dedicated engagement of our community. Engagement is at the core of democracy. Reviewing public information, participating in public meetings, and discussing potential opportunities and impacts are all important civic activities.”
  • I was prepared to wait and see what happened at the public meeting before declaring this project dead in the water, but QTS itself has gone and done it : “Through our engagement, it has become clear that now is not the right time for our proposed project to move forward in DeForest.”

Marathon County, Wisconsin – Elsewhere in Wisconsin, this county just voted to lobby the state’s association of counties to fight for more local control over renewable energy development.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Q&A

How Data Centers Became an Election Issue in Georgia

A conversation with Georgia Conservation Voters’ Connie Di Cicco.

The Q&A subject.
Heatmap Illustration

This week’s conversation is with Connie Di Cicco, legislative director for Georgia Conservation Voters. I reached out to Connie because I wanted to best understand last November’s Public Service Commission elections which, as I explained at the time, focused almost exclusively on data center development. I’ve been hearing from some of you that you want to hear more about how and why opposition to these projects has become so entrenched so quickly. Connie argues it’s because data centers are a multi-hit combo of issues at the top of voters’ minds right now.

The following conversation has been lightly edited for clarity.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow