The Fight

Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Hotspots

Renewables at War in the Worcesters

And more of the week’s top conflicts around renewable energy

The United States.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

1. Worcester County, Massachusetts – The town of Oakham is piping mad about battery energy storage.

  • A Rhynland Energy BESS facility filed a request with Massachusetts regulators in April to override longstanding local reservations against battery storage, dating back to a previous project fight from 2022. Local conservative organizations have been amplifying opposition to the project.
  • Rhyland may be able to sidestep Oakham’s opposition thanks to a new permitting law providing for exemptions from local restrictions, a la Michigan and other “primacy” states.

2. Worcester County, Maryland – A different drama is going down in a different Worcester County on Maryland’s eastern shore, where fishing communities are rejecting financial compensation from U.S. Wind tied to MarWin, its offshore project.

  • U.S. Wind offered $20 million to fishing communities directly, including a large “Maryland Fishing Community Resilience Fund.” But the mayor of Ocean City has rejected the proposal, calling it a buyout.
  • This is yet another example of the struggles in community benefit approaches that include direct payments: they can very quickly backfire.

3. Lackawanna County, Pennsylvania – A Pivot Energy solar project is moving ahead with getting its conditional use permit in the small town of Ransom, but is dealing with considerable consternation from residents next door.

  • Local reporting indicates that neighbors are upset about proximity primarily and successfully got Pivot to move its project back to a 500-foot buffer from their property lines. A decision will be made on the project in 45 days and it is unclear where the local officials will land.
  • Two things leave me pessimistic about its chances: First, the project site features Heatmap Pro’s highest risk rating at a 99. Second, the county is something of a graveyard of solar farms; multiple nearby projects have been killed by local governments.

4. Cumberland County, North Carolina – It’s hard out here for a 5-megawatt solar project, apparently.

  • The Cumberland County Board of Commissioners has rejected a solar project requested by the city of Fayetteville’s public works panel, apparently without a fulsome effort by the commissioners to resolve their concerns with the city’s officials.

5. Barren County, Kentucky – Remember the Geenex solar project getting in the fight with a National Park? The county now formally has a restrictive ordinance on solar… that will allow projects to move through permitting.

6. Stark County, Ohio – Stark Solar is no more, thanks to the Ohio Public Siting Board.

  • If you remember, the OPBS rejected Stark Solar’s project. The company is now declining to appeal, telling the public in a statement that it is dropping development.
  • Stark had the option to appeal to the Ohio Supreme Court, which recently affirmed a favorable ruling by the OPBS for Harvey Solar in Licking County. It’s unclear why the company opted not to appeal, although perhaps getting the court to affirm a green light is easier than reversing a rejection.

7. Cheboygan County, Michigan – A large EDP Renewables solar project called the Northern Waters Solar Park is entering the community relations phase and – stop me if you’ve heard this before – it’s getting grumbles from locals.

  • Locals parried EDP with questions at a recent community meeting and reportedly have the backing of Michigan state senator Cam Cavitt, a lawmaker involved in leading the effort to undo the state’s permitting primacy law.

8. Adams County, Illinois – A Summit Ridge Energy solar project located near the proposal in the town of Ursa we’ve been covering is moving forward without needing to pay the city taxes, due to the project being just outside city limits.

  • The city is in control of the project and will decide whether to permit it but it will not pay the city taxes. Making matters more difficult, the project will require the conversion of agricultural land to industrial zoning. We’ll have to wait and see how Summit Ridge navigates this tricky wicket.

9. Cottonwood County, Minnesota – National Grid Renewables has paused work on the Plum Creek wind farm despite having received key permits to build, a sign that economic headwinds may be more powerful than your average NIMBY these days.

  • Plum Creek, as far as I can tell, faced little headwinds of its own locally. NGR cited the impacts of tariffs on construction costs for the pause as well as inflation.

10. Oklahoma County, Oklahoma – Turns out you can’t kill wind in Oklahoma that easily.

  • Despite a rabid activist campaign to get the Sooner state to stop wind altogether, the state’s GOP Senate pro tem Lonnie Paxton said in a public statement issued Tuesday that he would not allow passage of legislation mirroring a bill from the state House that would set what he called “unreasonable” setbacks on the tip height of a wind turbine.
  • Paxton also called the bill “overreaching legislation that is a massive violation of private property rights.”
  • This may doom the chances of a state-wide restrictive ordinance bill advancing this legislation session – barring any massive unforeseen changes to the state’s political, err, winds. (Please clap.)

11. Washoe County, Nevada – Trump’s Bureau of Land Management has opened another solar project in the desert up for public comment.

  • NextEra’s Dodge Flat II solar project would produce 200 megawatts. BLM’s request for comment specifically asks for input under the federal historic preservation law, an archeological preservation statute focused on protecting potentially important artifacts buried underground.

12. Shasta County, California – The California Energy Commission this week held a public hearing on the ConnectGen Fountain Wind project, which we previously told you already has gotten a negative reaction from the panel’s staff.

  • Shasta County, a rural Central Valley community featuring Heatmap Pro’s worst risk rating in the state, has rejected Fountain Wind twice and has its own website dedicated to opposing the project on predictable viewshed and property value concerns. Staff on the commission had their own issues with the environmental impacts of the project.
  • A vote on Fountain Wind is expected in late July.
Yellow

This article is exclusively
for Heatmap Plus subscribers.

Go deeper inside the politics, projects, and personalities
shaping the energy transition.
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Spotlight

The Trump Administration Is Now Delaying Renewable Projects It Thinks Are Ugly

The Army Corps of Engineers is out to protect “the beauty of the Nation’s natural landscape.”

Donald Trump, wetlands, and renewable energy.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

A new Trump administration policy is indefinitely delaying necessary water permits for solar and wind projects across the country, including those located entirely on private land.

The Army Corps of Engineers published a brief notice to its website in September stating that Adam Telle, the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works, had directed the agency to consider whether it should weigh a project’s “energy density” – as in the ratio of acres used for a project compared to its power generation capacity – when issuing permits and approvals. The notice ended on a vague note, stating that the Corps would also consider whether the projects “denigrate the aesthetics of America’s natural landscape.”

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Hotspots

A Data Center Dies in Wisconsin

Plus more of the week’s biggest renewable energy fights.

The United States.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

Dane County, Wisconsin – The QTS data center project we’ve been tracking closely is now dead, after town staff in the host community of DeForest declared its plans “unfeasible.”

  • As I previously explained to Fight readers, this QTS project was a quintessential data center conflict. Not only was it situated in a blue county inside of a purple state, but a recent imbroglio over emails between the village mayor and QTS have made it a key example of how private conversations between tech companies and local governments can tarnish the odds of getting a data center permitted.
  • Late Tuesday, DeForest town staff issued a public statement disclosing they would recommend rejecting QTS’ petition to annex land for construction, without which the developer can’t build. A vote on whether to formally deny the petition was scheduled for February 3.
  • If the town rejects the project, the statement reads, DeForest staff expect QTS to “formally withdraw” its request for changes to land zoning plans and the annexation application. The town also cited vociferous opposition to the project, declaring: “The Village of DeForest appreciates the dedicated engagement of our community. Engagement is at the core of democracy. Reviewing public information, participating in public meetings, and discussing potential opportunities and impacts are all important civic activities.”
  • I was prepared to wait and see what happened at the public meeting before declaring this project dead in the water, but QTS itself has gone and done it : “Through our engagement, it has become clear that now is not the right time for our proposed project to move forward in DeForest.”

Marathon County, Wisconsin – Elsewhere in Wisconsin, this county just voted to lobby the state’s association of counties to fight for more local control over renewable energy development.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Q&A

How Data Centers Became an Election Issue in Georgia

A conversation with Georgia Conservation Voters’ Connie Di Cicco.

The Q&A subject.
Heatmap Illustration

This week’s conversation is with Connie Di Cicco, legislative director for Georgia Conservation Voters. I reached out to Connie because I wanted to best understand last November’s Public Service Commission elections which, as I explained at the time, focused almost exclusively on data center development. I’ve been hearing from some of you that you want to hear more about how and why opposition to these projects has become so entrenched so quickly. Connie argues it’s because data centers are a multi-hit combo of issues at the top of voters’ minds right now.

The following conversation has been lightly edited for clarity.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow