Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Sparks

Poland Spring’s Water Wars

A bottled water company is accused of political skullduggery in Maine.

Poland Spring bottles.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

BlueTriton, the company that produces Poland Spring bottled water, is quietly trying to gut a Maine bill that would limit the number of years that such businesses can ship its water out of state, The New York Times reports. The proposed legislation would reduce the length of such contracts to seven years, far short of the 45 years sought by BlueTriton. The seven-year cap would give Maine greater flexibility to, in effect, turn off BlueTriton's spigot if climate change and drought affect the state's future water supply.

“We’re seeing our communities get locked into these contracts that are going to last, basically, the rest of my lifetime,” Margaret O’Neil, the Democratic state legislator who introduced the bill, told the Times. Though it received a majority committee vote on its way to the full legislature, the measure seems to have been stalled by a BlueTriton lobbyist who reportedly urged lawmakers to “strike everything.” Sure enough, the bill was rescinded, and now faces an uncertain future.

“We couldn’t believe it. Their amendment strikes the entire bill,” Democratic state representative Christopher Kessler told the Times. “Because all this happened behind closed doors, the public doesn’t know that Poland Spring stalled the process.” A new section on BlueTriton’s website asserts that “we take a principled approach to assessing proposed regulations” and that the company is “committed to transparency and accountability, and [we] are open about our involvement in the legislative process.”

As climate change and overuse threatens the country’s aquifers, the role of bottlers such as BlueTriton has come under greater scrutiny, especially in drought-prone areas. In September, California’s water board blocked BlueTriton's use of a San Bernardino county watershed, and in Michigan, proposed legislation would prohibit the out-of-state shipment of bottled water. And though Maine's groundwater supplies appear to be largely healthy and rainfall in the region is expected to increase as the planet warms, the state has also experienced significant droughts in recent years, including one from 1999 to 2002 that dried out an estimated 17,000 private wells. As a group of researchers at the University of Maine’s Climate Change Institute wrote in 2020, “There is considerable uncertainty whether drought will become more frequent in the future, presenting further challenges to decision-making.”

BlueTriton, meanwhile, maintains that “some of our oldest brands have sourced water from many of the same springs for decades, and we are continuing to conserve them for their vitality tomorrow.” Though the company sources water from eight different areas of Maine, it neglects to mention that the iconic spring in the town of Poland, which gave the brand its start, ran dry in 1967.

Yellow

You’re out of free articles.

Subscribe today to experience Heatmap’s expert analysis 
of climate change, clean energy, and sustainability.
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Sparks

Offshore Wind Developers Are Now 3 for 3 Against Trump

A third judge rejected a stop work order, allowing the Coastal Virginia offshore wind project to proceed.

Donald Trump and offshore wind.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

Offshore wind developers are now three for three in legal battles against Trump’s stop work orders now that Dominion Energy has defeated the administration in federal court.

District Judge Jamar Walker issued a preliminary injunction Friday blocking the stop work order on Dominion’s Coastal Virginia offshore wind project after the energy company argued it was issued arbitrarily and without proper basis. Dominion received amicus briefs supporting its case from unlikely allies, including from representatives of PJM Interconnection and David Belote, a former top Pentagon official who oversaw a military clearinghouse for offshore wind approval. This comes after Trump’s Department of Justice lost similar cases challenging the stop work orders against Orsted’s Revolution Wind off the coast of New England and Equinor’s Empire Wind off New York’s shoreline.

Keep reading...Show less
Sparks

New York’s Empire Wind Project May Resume Construction, Judge Says

The decision marks the Trump administration’s second offshore wind defeat this week.

Offshore wind.
Heatmap Illustration/Equinor

A federal court has lifted Trump’s stop work order on the Empire Wind offshore wind project, the second defeat in court this week for the president as he struggles to stall turbines off the East Coast.

In a brief order read in court Thursday morning, District Judge Carl Nichols — a Trump appointee — sided with Equinor, the Norwegian energy developer building Empire Wind off the coast of New York, granting its request to lift a stop work order issued by the Interior Department just before Christmas.

Keep reading...Show less
Green
Sparks

How Trump’s Case Against Revolution Wind Fell Apart (Again)

A federal court has once again allowed Orsted to resume construction on its offshore wind project.

Donald Trump and wind turbines.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

A federal court struck down the Trump administration’s three-month stop work order on Orsted’s Revolution offshore wind farm, once again allowing construction to resume (for the second time).

Explaining his ruling from the bench Monday, U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth said that project developer Orsted — and the states of Rhode Island and Connecticut, which filed their own suit in support of the company — were “likely” to win on the merits of their lawsuit that the stop work order violated the Administrative Procedures Act. Lamberth said that the Trump administration’s stop work order, issued just before Christmas, amounted to a change in administration position without adequate justification. The justice said he was not sure the emergency being described by the government exists, and that the “stated national security reason may have been pretextual.”

Keep reading...Show less
Blue