You’re out of free articles.
Log in
To continue reading, log in to your account.
Create a Free Account
To unlock more free articles, please create a free account.
Sign In or Create an Account.
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Welcome to Heatmap
Thank you for registering with Heatmap. Climate change is one of the greatest challenges of our lives, a force reshaping our economy, our politics, and our culture. We hope to be your trusted, friendly, and insightful guide to that transformation. Please enjoy your free articles. You can check your profile here .
subscribe to get Unlimited access
Offer for a Heatmap News Unlimited Access subscription; please note that your subscription will renew automatically unless you cancel prior to renewal. Cancellation takes effect at the end of your current billing period. We will let you know in advance of any price changes. Taxes may apply. Offer terms are subject to change.
Subscribe to get unlimited Access
Hey, you are out of free articles but you are only a few clicks away from full access. Subscribe below and take advantage of our introductory offer.
subscribe to get Unlimited access
Offer for a Heatmap News Unlimited Access subscription; please note that your subscription will renew automatically unless you cancel prior to renewal. Cancellation takes effect at the end of your current billing period. We will let you know in advance of any price changes. Taxes may apply. Offer terms are subject to change.
Create Your Account
Please Enter Your Password
Forgot your password?
Please enter the email address you use for your account so we can send you a link to reset your password:
A bottled water company is accused of political skullduggery in Maine.

BlueTriton, the company that produces Poland Spring bottled water, is quietly trying to gut a Maine bill that would limit the number of years that such businesses can ship its water out of state, The New York Times reports. The proposed legislation would reduce the length of such contracts to seven years, far short of the 45 years sought by BlueTriton. The seven-year cap would give Maine greater flexibility to, in effect, turn off BlueTriton's spigot if climate change and drought affect the state's future water supply.
“We’re seeing our communities get locked into these contracts that are going to last, basically, the rest of my lifetime,” Margaret O’Neil, the Democratic state legislator who introduced the bill, told the Times. Though it received a majority committee vote on its way to the full legislature, the measure seems to have been stalled by a BlueTriton lobbyist who reportedly urged lawmakers to “strike everything.” Sure enough, the bill was rescinded, and now faces an uncertain future.
“We couldn’t believe it. Their amendment strikes the entire bill,” Democratic state representative Christopher Kessler told the Times. “Because all this happened behind closed doors, the public doesn’t know that Poland Spring stalled the process.” A new section on BlueTriton’s website asserts that “we take a principled approach to assessing proposed regulations” and that the company is “committed to transparency and accountability, and [we] are open about our involvement in the legislative process.”
As climate change and overuse threatens the country’s aquifers, the role of bottlers such as BlueTriton has come under greater scrutiny, especially in drought-prone areas. In September, California’s water board blocked BlueTriton's use of a San Bernardino county watershed, and in Michigan, proposed legislation would prohibit the out-of-state shipment of bottled water. And though Maine's groundwater supplies appear to be largely healthy and rainfall in the region is expected to increase as the planet warms, the state has also experienced significant droughts in recent years, including one from 1999 to 2002 that dried out an estimated 17,000 private wells. As a group of researchers at the University of Maine’s Climate Change Institute wrote in 2020, “There is considerable uncertainty whether drought will become more frequent in the future, presenting further challenges to decision-making.”
BlueTriton, meanwhile, maintains that “some of our oldest brands have sourced water from many of the same springs for decades, and we are continuing to conserve them for their vitality tomorrow.” Though the company sources water from eight different areas of Maine, it neglects to mention that the iconic spring in the town of Poland, which gave the brand its start, ran dry in 1967.
Log in
To continue reading, log in to your account.
Create a Free Account
To unlock more free articles, please create a free account.
The nearly California-based company is buying a pipeline of projects from an unnamed Japanese developer.
The energy transition isn’t static, and the companies pivoting to match the shifting needs of the moment tend to point the way to where demand is going.
Take Energy Vault. Founded by a group of Swiss engineers in 2017, the company sought to meet the swelling need for long-duration energy storage that can last beyond the four hours or so you get from a grid-scale lithium-ion battery by devising a new gravity-based systems for keeping energy stored for the long term. The problem was, there was no obvious market.
After going public in 2021 via a reverse merger with a blank-check company, Energy Vault swerved. The startup widened its focus beyond a long-duration energy storage technology critics called “obviously flawed” to energy storage in general, beefing up its portfolio of projects with traditional lithium-ion batteries and green hydrogen facilities.
Now Energy Vault is attempting to follow the well-trodden path for a Western company with a compelling technological alternative to fossil fuels: Make it big in Japan.
On Thursday, the company plans to announce its formal entry into the Japanese market through a binding agreement to buy a pipeline of battery projects from a domestic developer, I can exclusively report for Heatmap.
The move comes as East Asia braces for the worst of the energy shock emanating from the Strait of Hormuz. Despite the two-week ceasefire deal President Donald Trump announced Tuesday with Iran to reopen the waterway to tanker traffic, the market has yet to fully digest the weeks of near-total closure, as the last ships to leave the Persian Gulf are still arriving in ports to unload fuel deliveries. Countries such as Taiwan, South Korea, and Japan are particularly vulnerable to price swings due to their heavy reliance on imports of oil and liquified natural gas. Japan became especially dependent on LNG as a primary source of fuel after halting power production at most of its nuclear reactors following the 2011 Fukushima disaster.
Energy Vault declined to disclose the name of the developer from which it’s buying the projects, only describing the counterparty as a “leading” Japanese storage provider.
The deal includes 350 megawatts of “advanced-stage” battery projects that are expected to start construction by the second half of next year and begin operations in the second half of 2028. It also includes another 500 megawatts of early-stage projects, providing what the company called “a robust, multi-year growth pipeline that positions Energy Vault for long-term leadership in the Japanese energy storage market,” which it described as “one of the fastest growing and structurally advantaged” in any developed country.
The Japanese energy market allows storage companies to engage in what’s called “revenue stacking,” pulling in income from wholesale arbitrage, capacity markets, and grid-balancing services. Energy Vault said it maintains a “technology-agnostic approach,” which should allow it to take advantage of that flexibility, and touted a recent strategic partnership with the sodium-ion battery developer Peak Energy as an example of next-generation hardware it hopes to commercialize.
“Entering the Japanese market is a key component of our high-growth markets expansion strategy and represents one of the most compelling energy storage growth opportunities globally,” Robert Piconi, the chairman and chief executive of Energy Vault, told me in a statement. “Despite being a highly developed economy, Japan’s energy storage market remains significantly underpenetrated and is now entering a period of accelerated growth driven by renewable expansion and structural grid constraints.”
Current conditions: Two major storms, Tropical Cyclone Maila and Tropical Cyclone Vaianu are barreling through the South Pacific • San Juan, Puerto Rico’s capital, is on track for heavy thunderstorms with lightning throughout most of the week • Temperatures in the Philippines’ densest northern cities are set to hit 100 degrees Fahrenheit this week.
It’s become a sort of dark ritual for the past two weeks, where President Donald Trump threatens to unleash a bombing blitz on Iran’s power stations — escalating the conflict in a way that mirrors Russia’s campaign against Ukraine. Well, it’s that time again. In a Sunday post on his Truth Social network, the president said Tuesday will be what he called “power plant day,” when the United States military will target Iran’s electrical station in addition to its bridges. “There will be nothing like it,” Trump wrote with three exclamation points, before dropping an F-bomb, calling the Iranian regime “crazy bastards,” and offering a “Praise be to Allah.”
In his past threats, typically postponed by the time markets opened Monday morning, Trump emphasized that the U.S. would target “all” of Iran’s power stations. That would include the Bushehr nuclear plant, Iran’s first and only civilian atomic power station. The plant’s single Russian-made reactor came online in September 2011, just six months after the Fukushima disaster in Japan. Russia’s state-owned nuclear company, Rosatom, was working on expanding the facility with additional reactors when the war began. Rosatom has warned that U.S. and Israeli missiles struck too close for comfort to the Bushehr facility, and criticized United Nations officials for holding Washington to a different standard than Moscow. Russia’s occupation of the Zaporizhzhia atomic power plant and turning Europe’s largest nuclear station into a front line in the war with Kyiv drew widespread condemnation.
If only oil and gas were the only commodities choked off from the global economy by Iran’s military at the Strait of Hormuz. There’s helium, urea, and plastics ingredients such as polyethylene. And then, of course, there’s aluminum. Before the war, demand for aluminum had soared to record highs in China, and the U.S. had just begun laying the groundwork for a new smelter. In fact, that deal was between a U.S. company and Emirates Global Aluminum, which, as I reported in January, was looking to expand its footprint in America. Now the Abu Dhabi-based industrial giant has some problems at home. The Middle East’s biggest aluminum producer said the Al Taweelah smelter that went into emergency shutdown last week following damage from Iranian missiles and drones may take as long as a year to restore its full output. The company said Friday that it had completed its initial damage assessment and “is in contact with customers whose shipments may be impacted,” Mining.com reported.
Offshore wind is a bit like a mullet. It triggered one hell of a backlash in the U.S. But the Australians embrace it, and now it could get big in Brazil. The government in Brasilia has established the guidelines for regulating offshore wind development, including the rules for designating patches of the coast to energy production and permitting, according to offshoreWIND.biz. Back in January, Australia scheduled its first offshore wind tender for later this year, adding itself to the list of countries looking to establish or expand seaward turbine farms even as the U.S. tries to smother its nascent industry. The Netherlands just put out a tender for a gigawatt of additional offshore wind, Renewables Now reported.
Meanwhile, another of the Trump administration’s multi-pronged efforts to quash the U.S. offshore wind sector is coming in for scrutiny. Last month, as I previously wrote, the Department of the Interior brokered a deal to pay the French energy giant TotalEnergies $1 billion to shut down two offshore wind farms in the U.S. and invest instead in natural gas. Two leading progressives in Congress are now calling for the administration to halt the payment. In a letter sent last week to Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York and Massachusetts Senator Ed Markey called the plan “legally dubious.”
Sign up to receive Heatmap AM in your inbox every morning:
Just a month ago, BYD unveiled newer, faster Flash Chargers, so swift they “basically make recharging your EV as quick as getting gas,” InsideEVs wrote. Now the Chinese automotive giant has already rolled out the next-generation chargers at at least 5,000 stations across China. The buildout comes as BYD races to gain a retail foothold in North America now that Canada has eased its tariffs. As I previously wrote, the company has already selected 20 sites for dealerships.
China’s wind turbine giant Mingyang is investing $10 billion into renewables, green hydrogen, and ammonia projects in Ethiopia. The Ethiopian Investment Commission, a government agency, called the deal a “transformative move for the energy sector,” coming a week after the company teased a larger investment at an economic forum in Addis Ababa. Mingyang ranked as the world’s third-largest wind manufacturer by gigawatts last year, as I wrote last month, one of China’s top champions in a growing sector.

Dominica is one of the most isolated and underdeveloped island nations in the Caribbean, often called “the nature isle.” So it makes sense that the country’s population of less than 70,000 people would avoid the oil-burning trap that afflicts the power sectors in Cuba and Puerto Rico and skip straight to harvesting renewable energy from beneath the island’s charmingly not-Margaritaville-ified shores. A new 10-megawatt geothermal power plant in the inland town of Laudat has entered “advanced stages of commissioning and has started supplying electricity to the grid,” ThinkGeoEnergy reported.
PJM’s market monitor got spicy in its latest annual report.
The independent market monitor of PJM Interconnection, America’s largest electricity market spanning some or all of 13 states from the Jersey Shore to Chicago, took advantage of its latest annual report to share eye-popping figures on how data centers raise electricity costs and lambast existing proposals to fix it.
“Data center load growth is the primary reason for recent and expected capacity market conditions, including total forecast load growth, the tight supply and demand balance, and high prices,” the independent market monitor said in the report, released Thursday. Some PJM states like New Jersey and Maryland have seen some of the fastest retail electricity price hikes in the country, in part due to spiraling costs stemming from capacity auctions, in which generators bid to be available when the grid is stressed. Capacity prices have risen from $29 per megawatt-day to the statutory cap of around $330 in just a few years, costing ratepayers some $46.7 billion over the past three auctions. The total from the three prior auctions: $8.3 billion.
The independent market monitor has used its regular reports and ad hoc commentary to blame data centers for the price boom over the past few years, and its 2025 annual report was no different. “Inclusion of existing and forecast data center load growth resulted in a combined total increase in capacity market revenues” of just over $23 billion, the market monitor wrote of the past three auctions. “Large data center load additions have already had a significant and irreversible impact that will be paid through May of 2028 and will have additional significant impacts on other customers as a result of higher transmission costs, higher energy market prices and higher capacity market prices,” the report said.
The assessment comes at a moment of turmoil for PJM, which has endured pressure from energy regulators and the White House to reform itself in order to bring on more generation more quickly. Some other proposed solutions to PJM’s price woes include coming up with new rules that encourage data centers to bring their own electricity generation, co-locate with existing or planned generation, or to operate more flexibly to avoid calling on the grid at peak demand times. The White House and PJM states even called for a special auction in the system to procure $15 billion of new generation, with a proposal for how the auction would actually run expected in April, according to Julien Dumoulin-Smith, an analyst at Jefferies.
The market monitor used the report to promote its own position: That data centers should bring their own generation, and that they should have their own “expedited fast track load and generation interconnection process.” Data centers that don’t bring their own generation should then have to put up with mandatory supply curtailment by the grid in moments of peak demand.
The market monitor argued that this proposal was consistent with the White House and PJM governors’ agreed-upon principles, as well as the “ratepayer protection pledge” drawn up by the Trump administration and signed onto by most of the country’s big players in artificial intelligence to protect utility customers for higher costs stemming for data center development.
In language more stirring than is typical for a report on market operations for a regional transmission organization, the market monitor called for preserving the market-like structure of PJM and the principle that all customers be served on the grid.
“All loads should be served,” the report said. “All loads should be served reliably. The process for adding large data center loads should be transparent. All loads should benefit from competitive markets.”