You’re out of free articles.
Log in
To continue reading, log in to your account.
Create a Free Account
To unlock more free articles, please create a free account.
Sign In or Create an Account.
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Welcome to Heatmap
Thank you for registering with Heatmap. Climate change is one of the greatest challenges of our lives, a force reshaping our economy, our politics, and our culture. We hope to be your trusted, friendly, and insightful guide to that transformation. Please enjoy your free articles. You can check your profile here .
subscribe to get Unlimited access
Offer for a Heatmap News Unlimited Access subscription; please note that your subscription will renew automatically unless you cancel prior to renewal. Cancellation takes effect at the end of your current billing period. We will let you know in advance of any price changes. Taxes may apply. Offer terms are subject to change.
Subscribe to get unlimited Access
Hey, you are out of free articles but you are only a few clicks away from full access. Subscribe below and take advantage of our introductory offer.
subscribe to get Unlimited access
Offer for a Heatmap News Unlimited Access subscription; please note that your subscription will renew automatically unless you cancel prior to renewal. Cancellation takes effect at the end of your current billing period. We will let you know in advance of any price changes. Taxes may apply. Offer terms are subject to change.
Create Your Account
Please Enter Your Password
Forgot your password?
Please enter the email address you use for your account so we can send you a link to reset your password:
And it just raised a $20 million round of Series B funding.
A century ago, prospectors tromped through remote areas, hoping to spot valuable, mineralized rocks simply poking out of the ground. Eventually, after they found all of the obvious stuff, they progressed to doing airborne geophysical surveys that used tools such as electromagnetic sensing to identify minerals that were just below the surface or highly concentrated. But there’s always been a lot more out there than we had the mechanisms to find. So now, companies are training artificial intelligence models on heaps of historical data to help locate untouched reserves of minerals that are key to clean energy technologies such as electric vehicle batteries and wind turbines.
One of the biggest players in this space is Earth AI, a Sydney-based startup that today announced a $20 million Series B round, bringing the company’s total investment to over $38 million since its founding in 2017. While the company had initially sought to raise $15 million in this round, investor interest was so strong that it exceeded its target by $5 million. Lead investors were Tamarack Global and Cantos Ventures.
Earth AI has a two-stage business model. First, it uses its proprietary software to locate likely deposits and purchases the mineral rights to the land. Then, it sends in its drilling rig and in-house team of geologists to produce mineral samples. The team then shows these samples to mining companies to prove that the area warrants further development and — assuming the miners are interested — sells them the mineral rights. “Because of the scarcity of this, because of the deficit of where we are and where we’re going, these price tags are $500 million to $2.5 billion,” Monte Hackett, Earth AI’s chief financial officer, told me. Huge as that may sound, it’s much less than what a mining company would typically spend doing traditional exploration themselves. This latest funding will allow the startup to purchase additional drill rigs and increase its project pipeline to over 50 sites.
“The problem is obvious,” Hackett told me. “We need $10 trillion of critical metal production by 2050. We’re producing $320 billion, a $9.7 trillion shortfall.” To better locate the trillions of dollars worth of minerals necessary for the energy transition, the startup’s CEO, geoscientist Roman Teslyuk, digitized decades of old Australian geophysical survey data, then overlaid that with remote sensing data such as satellite imagery to train a model to recognize the Earth systems and geological processes that created minerals deposits millennia ago. “Another way I like to think about it is that our algorithm looks for the geological shadow that is cast by a dense mineral body,” Hackett explained in a follow-up email.
Hackett told me that Earth AI focuses specifically on “greenfield” applications — that is, areas where no mining activity or substantial minerals exploration has previously occurred. So far, the company’s discoveries include a significant deposit of palladium, which also contains platinum and nickel, as well as a gold deposit and a molybdenum deposit. “We’re finding things that go against what has been the common sense of the industry so far,” Hackett told me, referencing the company’s palladium discovery. “There was geological consensus that there was no platinum palladium on the East Coast of Australia, and our algorithm learned what it looked like on the West Coast and then identified it on the East Coast.”
While Hackett said Earth AI is open for business anywhere, right now all of its projects are in Australia, where the company has “600 ‘x’s on our treasure map” — that is, likely areas for deposits, Hackett wrote in a follow-up email. Outlining the advantages of doing business there, he explained, “We don’t have to go somewhere where there’s unsavory working conditions or there are issues where we have to put our principles into balance. Here, everything is very regulated and above board.” Plus, mining has long been an important component of the Australian economy. “They’re incredibly efficient at doing this well. So the timeline for development is the shortest compared to other places,” Hackett told me.
This tech could have important domestic implications too, though. As the newly-inaugurated President Trump prioritizes ramping up U.S. production of critical minerals, Earth AI could one day help locate deposits here, as well. And since Australia is a close American ally, the nation could play a key role in helping wean the U.S. off of Chinese imports, providing the U.S. with critical minerals that it can’t now, or perhaps ever, produce in sufficient quantities itself.
Log in
To continue reading, log in to your account.
Create a Free Account
To unlock more free articles, please create a free account.
Did a battery plant disaster in California spark a PR crisis on the East Coast?
Battery fire fears are fomenting a storage backlash in New York City – and it risks turning into fresh PR hell for the industry.
Aggrieved neighbors, anti-BESS activists, and Republican politicians are galvanizing more opposition to battery storage in pockets of the five boroughs where development is actually happening, capturing rapt attention from other residents as well as members of the media. In Staten Island, a petition against a NineDot Energy battery project has received more than 1,300 signatures in a little over two months. Two weeks ago, advocates – backed by representatives of local politicians including Rep. Nicole Mallitokis – swarmed a public meeting on the project, getting a local community board to vote unanimously against the project.
According to Heatmap Pro’s proprietary modeling of local opinion around battery storage, there are likely twice as many strong opponents than strong supporters in the area:
Heatmap Pro
Yesterday, leaders in the Queens community of Hempstead enacted a year-long ban on BESS for at least a year after GOP Rep. Anthony D’Esposito, other local politicians, and a slew of aggrieved residents testified in favor of a moratorium. The day before, officials in the Long Island town of Southampton said at a public meeting they were ready to extend their battery storage ban until they enshrined a more restrictive development code – even as many energy companies testified against doing so, including NineDot and solar plus storage developer Key Capture Energy. Yonkers also recently extended its own battery moratorium.
This flurry of activity follows the Moss Landing battery plant fire in California, a rather exceptional event caused by tech that was extremely old and a battery chemistry that is no longer popular in the sector. But opponents of battery storage don’t care – they’re telling their friends to stop the community from becoming the next Moss Landing. The longer this goes on without a fulsome, strident response from the industry, the more communities may rally against them. Making matters even worse, as I explained in The Fight earlier this year, we’re seeing battery fire concerns impact solar projects too.
“This is a huge problem for solar. If [fires] start regularly happening, communities are going to say hey, you can’t put that there,” Derek Chase, CEO of battery fire smoke detection tech company OnSight Technologies, told me at Intersolar this week. “It’s going to be really detrimental.”
I’ve long worried New York City in particular may be a powder keg for the battery storage sector given its omnipresence as a popular media environment. If it happens in New York, the rest of the world learns about it.
I feel like the power of the New York media environment is not lost on Staten Island borough president Vito Fossella, a de facto leader of the anti-BESS movement in the boroughs. Last fall I interviewed Fossella, whose rhetorical strategy often leans on painting Staten Island as an overburdened community. (At least 13 battery storage projects have been in the works in Staten Island according to recent reporting. Fossella claims that is far more than any amount proposed elsewhere in the city.) He often points to battery blazes that happen elsewhere in the country, as well as fears about lithium-ion scooters that have caught fire. His goal is to enact very large setback distance requirements for battery storage, at a minimum.
“You can still put them throughout the city but you can’t put them next to people’s homes – what happens if one of these goes on fire next to a gas station,” he told me at the time, chalking the wider city government’s reluctance to capitulate on batteries to a “political problem.”
Well, I’m going to hold my breath for the real political problem in waiting – the inevitable backlash that happens when Mallitokis, D’Esposito, and others take this fight to Congress and the national stage. I bet that’s probably why American Clean Power just sent me a notice for a press briefing on battery safety next week …
And more of the week’s top conflicts around renewable energy.
1. Queen Anne’s County, Maryland – They really don’t want you to sign a solar lease out in the rural parts of this otherwise very pro-renewables state.
2. Logan County, Ohio – Staff for the Ohio Power Siting Board have recommended it reject Open Road Renewables’ Grange Solar agrivoltaics project.
3. Bandera County, Texas – On a slightly brighter note for solar, it appears that Pine Gate Renewables’ Rio Lago solar project might just be safe from county restrictions.
Here’s what else we’re watching…
In Illinois, Armoracia Solar is struggling to get necessary permits from Madison County.
In Kentucky, the mayor of Lexington is getting into a public spat with East Kentucky Power Cooperative over solar.
In Michigan, Livingston County is now backing the legal challenge to Michigan’s state permitting primacy law.
On the week’s top news around renewable energy policy.
1. IRA funding freeze update – Money is starting to get out the door, finally: the EPA unfroze most of its climate grant funding it had paused after Trump entered office.
2. Scalpel vs. sledgehammer – House Speaker Mike Johnson signaled Republicans in Congress may take a broader approach to repealing the Inflation Reduction Act than previously expected in tax talks.
3. Endangerment in danger – The EPA is reportedly urging the White House to back reversing its 2009 “endangerment” finding on air pollutants and climate change, a linchpin in the agency’s overall CO2 and climate regulatory scheme.