You’re out of free articles.
Log in
To continue reading, log in to your account.
Create a Free Account
To unlock more free articles, please create a free account.
Sign In or Create an Account.
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Welcome to Heatmap
Thank you for registering with Heatmap. Climate change is one of the greatest challenges of our lives, a force reshaping our economy, our politics, and our culture. We hope to be your trusted, friendly, and insightful guide to that transformation. Please enjoy your free articles. You can check your profile here .
subscribe to get Unlimited access
Offer for a Heatmap News Unlimited Access subscription; please note that your subscription will renew automatically unless you cancel prior to renewal. Cancellation takes effect at the end of your current billing period. We will let you know in advance of any price changes. Taxes may apply. Offer terms are subject to change.
Subscribe to get unlimited Access
Hey, you are out of free articles but you are only a few clicks away from full access. Subscribe below and take advantage of our introductory offer.
subscribe to get Unlimited access
Offer for a Heatmap News Unlimited Access subscription; please note that your subscription will renew automatically unless you cancel prior to renewal. Cancellation takes effect at the end of your current billing period. We will let you know in advance of any price changes. Taxes may apply. Offer terms are subject to change.
Create Your Account
Please Enter Your Password
Forgot your password?
Please enter the email address you use for your account so we can send you a link to reset your password:
Silicon Valley is betting better design will bring heat pumps to the masses.

Gleaming solar panels, soaring wind turbines, sleek electric cars. These are the Avengers of the climate technoverse, the most widely recognized symbols of the fight to kick fossil fuels and halt global warming. But the lineup is incomplete. Clean electricity and transportation are covered, but what about heat?
There’s a clear emerging hero waiting in the wings to warm our buildings without emissions. It’s called a heat pump, and it’s a technology that’s been around for decades. The problem is that heat pumps are still largely unfamiliar to most Americans, and the process of trying to get them installed can be a nightmare.
A new cohort of Silicon Valley entrepreneurs is trying to change that by applying a proven formula. The idea is not just to build a better heat pump, but to make one that’s as attractive, convenient, and envy-inducing as a Tesla.
“That’s the only way you win, right?” said Paul Lambert, the founder and CEO of the startup Quilt, which recently raised $9 million in seed funding from Lowercarbon Capital and other investors. “You almost need, like, this Trojan horse. You need to be able to convince people who are skeptical. It needs to be better on its own merits.”
Heat pumps are key to tackling climate change because they run fully on electricity, are far more energy efficient than furnaces and boilers, and function as air conditioners in addition to heaters. Rather than warming a room by means of an electrical current or a flame, they move latent heat around, transferring it either inside or outside of the building, depending on the season.
Only about 16 percent of American homes use heat pumps today, according to the advocacy group Rewiring America. In a recent report, the organization estimated that in order to achieve the U.S. climate goal of net-zero emissions by 2050, heat pump sales need to grow three times faster than they’re expected to by 2032 and to take over the entire residential heating market by 2035. New federal tax credits and rebates created by last year’s Inflation Reduction Act will help, but likely won’t be enough.
“It's going to require lots of new choices for people and continued improvement in all aspects of product design,” Rewiring America’s head of market transformation Stephen Pantano told me. “So the more people investing in this and paying attention to this, the better.”
Despite their technological wizardry, heat pumps are rather dull looking. Some are big metal boxes that get hidden in an attic or closet and push hot or cool air through ducts and vents, while other models require mounting a rectangular hunk of plastic on the wall of every room. Quilt is redesigning the latter.
It’s unclear whether a heat pump could ever achieve the cultural capital of a sports car, no matter how nice it looks. Pantano recalled the scene in Home Alone where Kevin goes looking for his parents in the basement, and the glowing maw of the furnace sends him running. “I think that represents the way a lot of people think about their heating systems, which is that they don't, until they have to, which is usually when it breaks.”
Nonetheless, the heat pumps on the market now aren’t exactly turning heads.
“Whenever we do want to put a unit on the wall, we always get pushback from the consumer regarding the aesthetics,” said Larry Waters, the president of Electrify My Home, a heat pump installation company in Northern California. That’s one of many reasons Waters prefers selling systems that use ductwork. But every building is different, and that isn’t possible in all cases.
That’s especially true for small apartments or for renters who have no power over their HVAC system. Another startup, Gradient, is trying to serve those segments of the market with an attractive heat pump that sits in the window like an air conditioner. It doesn’t require a professional to install, and hangs over the sill like a saddle, solving a key drawback of the average AC by allowing continued use of the window. Last year, the company won a contract to provide 10,000 units for New York City public housing developments.

When I spoke to Gradient’s founder Vince Romanin in the summer of 2021, he also compared his approach to Tesla’s. “People didn’t start off buying electric cars because they’re better for the environment, but because they provided a dramatically different and better experience,” he told me.
Gradient’s heat pump recently hit the market. Emily Grubert, a civil engineer and sociologist at the University of Notre Dame, told me she got one for an unheated and un-air conditioned room in her house where her pet rabbits spend most of their time, and where the temperature fluctuates from below freezing in the winter to more than 100 degrees in the summer. It cost $2,000, took about an hour to install, and so far has maintained a comfortable temperature “through multiple days of 90-plus degree weather.”
A third design-forward heat pump startup, Electric Air, was founded by a former Tesla thermal engineer, and is literally advertising itself as “The Tesla of home heating and cooling.” The company’s other selling point is that it plans to combine regular heat pump functionality with improved air purification.

I recently visited Quilt’s headquarters just south of San Francisco to see how the company’s device was shaping up. There I met Lambert along with his two co-founders, Bill Kee and Matthew Knoll. The trio got acquainted while working at Google, and also all recently became fathers, which they said was a big part of what inspired them to leave the tech giant to work on climate solutions. They guided me over to a wall mounted with a few iterations of heat pump designs, as well as a Mitsubishi mini-split, one of the most popular models currently on the market.
Lambert praised the unit’s efficiency, near-silent operation, and ability to heat and cool a room very quickly. “On the other hand, it’s kind of cheap plastic,” he said, rapping his knuckles on the casing. “And it’s quite tall, which is an issue because in a lot of American homes you can’t fit this in the place where people most want it.”
Quilt’s design is certainly more sleek, but it’s by no means a total overhaul. The company doesn’t plan to make its design public until early next year, so I can’t share much, but the improvements are subtle: A slightly smaller frame, a customizable aesthetic, and a few other bells and whistles added based on feedback from focus groups.
Design wasn’t the only factor in Tesla’s success, and Quilt is working on a number of other upgrades, like user experience. Today, when people install wall-mounted heat pumps in multiple rooms in their house, they each come with a separate remote control that has a ton of buttons and looks straight out of the 1980s. In addition to building a more convenient app to control the settings, the company is developing software that will help customers optimize efficiency based on how they use their homes.
“The areas of efficiency that have been exploited in this space have largely been at the mechanical level,” said Kee. “But we think there's a major gain to be made in efficiency by managing the system with intelligence.”
Quilt is also trying to improve the sales process. In addition to being new fathers, Lambert, Kee, and Knoll all recently went through a great deal of trouble trying to get heat pumps installed in their own buildings. “I had people telling me categorically that they wouldn’t work, or that I had to use my ducts, or that I couldn’t use my ducts,” Kee said. “I was totally disempowered. I just became obsessed with the idea that like, this has to be easier for people to do.”
They hope that the direct-to-consumer model, with transparent pricing and predictable scheduling, will help. But it hinges on building an army of ace partner contractors who know the systems inside and out, which could be quite a challenge. The team at Electrify My Home runs heat pump trainings for other contractors in California. Alex Sloan, the company’s vice president of business operations, told me it’s already an uphill battle getting the workforce to adopt existing technology, and to learn to do higher quality installations.
That just may be the one issue a Tesla makeover alone can’t solve.
Log in
To continue reading, log in to your account.
Create a Free Account
To unlock more free articles, please create a free account.
The data center boom is everywhere you look in U.S. economic and emissions data.
This is an edition of Heatmap Daily, an evening review of the day’s news written by our executive editor. Sign up for it here.
It isn’t exactly a new thought, but I’ve been struck recently by how many trends in America’s economic and environmental data are fundamentally about the data center boom and the return of electricity demand:
First, the Energy Information Administration reported this week that U.S. emissions grew by more than 2% last year, driven by surging electricity demand and an increase in coal-fired generation. What caused that higher power demand? New factories and data centers — as well as record summertime cooling demand.
Second, many of the new factories driving that higher power demand are themselves producing goods that are … let’s say … data center-adjacent. There are the enormous new semiconductor fabs, of course. But Ford and General Motors have also set up new production lines (or repurposed old ones) to manufacture grid-scale batteries to meet power demand.
Third, take a look at the recent U.S. spending on private non-residential construction — in other words, everything American companies are building that is not houses, condos, or apartments.
The construction industry’s spent almost $60 billion on data centers over the past year, which is more than it spent on all other office buildings combined (and more than it spent building warehouses, too). Just a handful of categories — data centers, power plants, electricity infrastructure, and certain kinds of electronics manufacturing — now make up a third of all U.S. private non-residential construction investment. They’ve never made up such a large share of construction spending since data collection began in 2014.
As The New York Times recently noted, the American economy is unusually dependent on the American stock market right now — and the stock market is unusually dependent on artificial intelligence. This week, investors started to balk at the enormous spending hyperscalers are planning to keep building out the AI boom; Alphabet’s shares dropped 8% this week after it boosted its planned 2026 capital expenditure and signaled 2027 will be even bigger. If the data center boom started to slow down in earnest, then more than just that budget will change.
Speaking of which, my colleague Emily Pontecorvo wrote earlier this week about how many businesses are struggling to even estimate their carbon emissions from artificial intelligence. The carbon accounting startup Watershed recently unveiled a new formula to help companies get a sense of their AI-related emissions.
But even that formula is still limited by the amount of data hyperscalers publish — and they don’t publish that much. Google, for instance, is the only AI company that has (laudably) provided estimates of its emissions on a per-prompt basis. Yet no company has published its per-token emissions, or how emissions sync up with particular models or regions.
So Emily asked Google: Why aren’t you — or any other model provider — disclosing this kind of data yet?
The tech company didn’t get back to us until after we’d published Emily’s story. But its response was interesting enough that I wanted to quote some of it here.
The problem is “industry consensus,” Cooper Elsworth, a Google spokesperson, told us. “There is currently very little consensus on how to comprehensively and fairly measure the serving environmental impact of generative AI (such as text generation),” he wrote. “Without standardized, ‘apples-to-apples’ frameworks, it is difficult to compare different providers accurately.”
That’s partly because energy use — and emissions data — can vary from site to site and depend on “custom-built hardware, software compilers, and advanced inference techniques.” And he claimed Google doesn’t always have the measurement hardware in place to provide such specific estimates: “Providing precise, repeatable data requires highly advanced measurement infrastructure,” he said. “For example, software-based energy monitoring tools often suffer from sampling biases. For our study, we had to step away from top-down averages and directly measure actual energy at the physical power supply unit (PSU) level across our deployed fleet. Not all providers have the telemetry or data sets required to benchmark their operations at this level of granularity.”
Read Emily’s story to understand the other reasons why estimating — or even “guesstimating” — AI-related carbon emissions is so challenging.
A conversation with Emma Uridge of the Kansas Health Institute.
This week’s conversation is with Emma Uridge, analyst with the Kansas Health Institute. Uridge spent copious hours analyzing state and local laws on data center development to best understand how policymakers are responding to the potential environmental public health impacts of large AI infrastructure, including power and water. The report, which came out this week, also goes in depth into those health impacts. I reached out to her to discuss what she sees as must-watch territory for our readers on this emerging policy arena.
Our conversation was lightly edited for clarity.
What is actually being done on policy when it comes to data centers — beyond moratoria of course?
So first I’d like to just talk about the point of moratoria. It’s helpful to talk about how these policies emerge in the first place. One area where moratoria are helpful is when a data center is proposed but the county has no approach for how they’d like to potentially regulate them. That’s temporary, most of the time. It lets local governments conduct research on the various impacts and also negotiate community benefits, ones that can mitigate any potential negative impacts — like Lancaster Pennsylvania, which instituted a community benefit agreement that maximized the potential benefits of development while mitigating what large data centers can do. That agreement looked at capping municipal water use at 20,000 gallons per day and requiring 100% clean energy. It had financial penalties for non-compliance. The company also committed $20 million to their local economic development and clean energy fund. There are ways to negotiate with developers.
We also see amendments to existing zoning. Data center proposals are increasingly popping up in rural areas, many of which are unzoned, so there’s no way a county can negotiate unless there’s a moratorium in place.
Other policy solutions include different performance standards or requiring on-site renewable energy, like what Jefferson County, Missouri, looked at. Also setback requirements, mandatory noise buffers, ending by-right zoning.
Where are local governments getting ideas for regulating data centers?
A lot of the technical information comes from developers. That can in cases be seen as a biased source of information. I wouldn’t say there’s a dedicated group providing assistance to local governments when a project is proposed — which is a similar story to wind industry development, where we have only a handful of consultants who provide technical advice. It can be really helpful to get a multi-disciplinary approach to hearing information. It can be helpful to have the utility commission, public health folks, those in academia, as well as the developer.
As of right now, especially in rural areas, local governments have a hard task of balancing pushback while getting the most accurate, evidence-based, neutral information to make decisions. That balance can be contentious.
What is the federal government doing on data center policy? How is the Trump administration approaching it?
A few things there. In the early days, the drive was for AI expansion and to be competitive with foreign adversaries. Now due to the amount of public pushback in red and blue localities and a more cautious approach.
I’m not seeing a lot of actual policy movement at this time.
I know the EPA is looking at the chemicals used in cooling data centers because when that water is cycled through the system, some of it is discharged into the water system, so they’re looking at the Toxic Substances and Control Act for monitoring that.
How much of an impact does this minimal federal role have on industry behavior?
Y’know, this isn’t specific to data centers. This is true for all kinds of large-scale development: there’s a need to require some sort of federal monitoring and regulation.
That’s where I see an emerging role for public health. At the federal level, there could be policy movement towards requiring some sort of environmental monitoring at data centers to make sure they’re operating responsibility. Looking at specific water use relative to water availability and what happens when there’s a time of severe, persistent drought. With air quality too — we’ve seen areas where the grid isn’t as reliable so their diesel generators are kicking on more and affecting air quality for residents.
We’re just not seeing all of that right now. We need corporate disclosure.
What do you see as the most important public health impacts from data center development?
It varies by localities. The most discussed obviously is water usage. One thing I’d note about my conversations with folks enthusiastic around emerging tech is, there are still questions that need to be asked about the capacity of localities to support a data center. Like a small town in Kansas may only be using 40% of their water for their utility needs. If a data center came online, how much of that water goes to the data center?
One area underexplored within the public health discipline is energy poverty and energy security. The ability of a household to meet the needs of everything energy provides in our lives. It’s known we have an aging electric grid but we’re not talking enough about large-scale blackouts when the grid is not sufficient to support some of these new data centers.
Plus more of the week’s big development fights.
1. Laramie County, Wyoming — Meta is fighting the fine it received in the Cheyenne data center water pollution controversy, and the conflict between the tech giant and the city’s small board of public utilities is continuing to spill out into the public.
2. Niagara County, New York — This county just rejected a solar project’s highway work permits in a show of retaliation against the state’s Office of Renewable Energy Siting.
3. Barron County, Wisconsin — The anti-solar protest is the new campaign stop in deep red Wisconsin.
4. Chesapeake, Virginia — A large battery storage project on the Virginia coastline is on the rocks amidst rampant local opposition.
5. Lewis County, West Virginia — West Virginia is now a key battleground in the fight over transmission, as a line spanning all of West Virginia and Maryland — and cutting through Data Center Alley in Virginia — causes compounding consternation.