Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Climate Tech

Electra Raises $186 Million to Decarbonize Steel

The company has developed a low-temperature refining process that’s similar to the one used for copper, nickel, and other metals.

•
Green steel.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

Energy use in the iron and steel industry accounts for about 7% of global greenhouse gas emissions — that’s more than it takes to power commercial buildings, more than twice the emissions of the entire cement industry, and nearly four times as much as the aviation sector. Steel-related emissions are so high primarily because melting and refining iron ore, the base metal of steel, requires extremely high temperatures, which has typically come from burning coke — derived from coal — in blast furnaces.

Electra, a Colorado-based startup, is building momentum around a low-temperature electrochemical approach to iron refining that stands to drastically reduce emissions, and on Thursday announced a $186 million Series B funding round. The company’s battery-like devices would electrify the steelmaking process while their relatively small size could move the industry towards a more modularized, “Lego block” approach, negating the need to build a huge facility all at once.

If it works, there’s a lot of money to be made. “The steel industry is so big,” Electra’s CEO, Sandeep Nijhawan, told me. “We're talking about a $1 trillion a year market, and something like $600 billion of iron-making that has to happen every year.” The company’s latest funding round was led by the Singaporean investment firm Temasek Holdings and the sustainable investment firm Capricorn Investment Group.

Electra can refine iron at just 60 degrees Celsius — cooler than your average cup of coffee and orders of magnitude cooler than the 1,600 degrees Celsius that traditional steelmaking requires. This low-temperature approach is particularly conducive to working with renewables, as the process can be easily started and stopped in tandem with the availability of wind and solar resources. That’s not the case for high-temperature systems such as the one used by green steel startup Boston Metal, which works with molten ore that must be kept extremely hot at all times, lest it harden.

First, Electra’s process involves dissolving iron ore in an acidic solution at near room temperature, which separates the iron from impurities in the ore such as alumina and silica. Then an electric current is passed through the solution, which causes a chemical reaction that deposits the pure iron onto stainless steel sheets, a much lower-temperature process than refining iron in a blast furnace. Electra’s steelmaking partners then convert the sheets of iron into steel via an electric arc furnace, which has the potential to be nearly emissions-free if powered by renewables.

The process isn’t actually so different from the way other metals such as copper, zinc, nickel, or cobalt are produced, Nijhawan told me, and it allows Electra to use contaminated or low-grade iron ores that would otherwise be ill-suited to low-carbon steel production.

The reason it’s taken so long to figure out how to refine iron ore the way we’ve been refining other metals for centuries is because iron can be particularly difficult to work with. For one, it takes a whole lot longer to dissolve in acid than other common metals; one of Electra’s breakthroughs was finding a proprietary way to pre-treat its ores so that they would dissolve more quickly. Secondly, once the iron eventually dissolves, it’s no longer stable, and tends to fall out of the solution before all the impurities are removed. Figuring out how to stabilize the ore by changing its oxidation state was another one of Electra’s breakthroughs. “Putting that system-level package together is where our innovation is,” Nijhawan told me.

This latest funding round will help finance the construction of Electra’s demonstration plant in Colorado, where it already operates two pilot plants powered with 100% clean energy, procured via a renewables program from the local utility, Xcel Energy. The company’s demo plant, which should be operational by early next year, will also run on renewable power from Xcel, while its first commercial plant, planned for the end of the decade, will either be located in an area with high renewables penetration or be powered with help from renewable energy partners, Nijhawan explained.

“Eventually when this scales, you will purpose-build the renewables infrastructure to feed the plant,” Nijhawan told me. Some of the biggest strategic investors in the space have bought into this model of steel decarbonization, including three large iron ore companies — Rio Tinto, BHP, and Roy Hill — as well as two large steel producers — Nucor and the Japanese company Yamato Kogyo. Prominent climate tech investors such as Breakthrough Energy Ventures and Lowercarbon Capital also invested.

Once the process scales, Electra expects its iron to reach cost parity with traditional processes. Scaling-up, of course, is the tricky part, especially as tariffs and the generalized atmosphere of uncertainty is making infrastructure investors clam up when it comes to betting on large, first-of-a-kind projects. Nijhawan told me that so far, Electra’s scale-up strategy that he laid out last year remains unchanged.

“We are trying to replace how iron has been made for centuries with electro-iron, hopefully for decades to come”, he told me, explaining that in this moment of uncertainty, it helps to take the long-term view. “We now have this broad set of investors. Some of them have a 100 year history, they have deep manufacturing experience, and have been through administrations and policy changes. You just have to build a strategy that's built to last.”

Green
🔒

You’ve reached your free article limit

Subscribe to Heatmap News for unlimited access to daily energy and climate coverage.
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Spotlight

A Giant Data Center Offers a Permitting Reform Test Case

What would happen to Project Jupiter if the Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act is passed?

Project Jupiter.
Heatmap Illustration/Project Jupiter, Library of Congress

One of the nation’s largest data centers is struggling under permitting woes. So let’s play a game: would the bipartisan permitting bill in Congress make the path easier, or might the federal legislation be irrelevant to large hyperscalers under development today?

Meet Project Jupiter, a mega project in southern New Mexico in Dona Ana County under development by Oracle and OpenAI, with financial backing from SoftBank and political support from the Trump administration for being a part of Stargate, a major Trump administration public-private initiative boosting AI development. Project Jupiter would be one of the largest data centers in the country if completed and currently is expected to run on a microgrid powered by fuel cells converting gas to electricity, which the developers claim will burn much cleaner than a typical off-grid gas turbine power plant.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Hotspots

The Trump Administration Is Still Messing with Offshore Wind Farms

And more of the week’s top news around project fights.

The United States.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

1. New England (and Maryland) – The Trump administration is still messing with offshore wind farms, even while trying to pass a permitting reform deal. Examining the court filings reveals why they may feel empowered to do it — and I’m not sure how this ends.

  • Last Friday, in a legal case brought by anti-wind activists, the Justice Department submitted a motion in federal court to send the construction and operations plan for Orsted’s Revolution Wind project in New England back to the Interior Department for more analysis. On Wednesday, the DOJ entered a similar motion in another case challenging the construction and operations plan for U.S. Wind’s MarWin project off the coast of Maryland in a lawsuit brought by the state’s coastal community of Ocean City.
  • Trump’s actions led some to question whether the president was sabotaging the deal, and others to claim the media coverage itself was an attempt to kill it. Going further, supporters of the bipartisan bill claimed the DOJ's motions were precisely why the bill should become law, implying it would guard offshore wind farms against this sort of maneuver.
  • However, for the bill’s backers, it’s worth considering why the Trump administration believes it has the legal authority to do this. It’s also time to ask whether the bill would actually protect these wind farms against this tactic.
  • To answer those questions, you have to rewind. On May 1, 2025, the Interior Department withdrew a Biden solicitor’s opinion instructing the agency to “strike a rational balance” between wind power and fishing interests. This revocation document is technically not in effect at the moment; one year later, a federal court ruled the opinion was potentially illegal as a part of a preliminary injunction on five anti-renewables actions requested by solar and wind trade groups. The Trump administration is contesting that ruling, and the administration has filed a notice of appeal.
  • In August, despite that opinion being in doubt, a federal judge granted Trump permission under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to remand the construction and operations plan for the now-defunct Atlantic Shores offshore wind farm in the waters of New Jersey. U.S. District Judge Jia Cobb specifically wrote that Atlantic Shores failed to demonstrate the federal government had limitations under OSCLA on revisiting these plans and that the injunction from the litigation on appeal “did not prohibit all reevaluation of agency action.”
  • In the recent Revolution and MarWin filings, Trump’s Justice Department argues the construction and operations plans should be remanded under OSCLA without being vacated. The DOJ motions include claims that previous decision documents did not adequately explain impacts to commercial fishing and other industries that use OSCLA waters. It’s not clear if the administration will win these motions.
  • The bipartisan permitting bill would bar the Interior Department and other federal agencies from taking “any new action that would revoke, rescind, withdraw, terminate, suspend, amend, or alter a federal authorization or permit in effect on or after September 16, 2026,” or “any other action to interfere with or prevent the construction or operation at full capacity of a project that has secured all necessary federal authorizations and permits.” The restriction exempts cases where “the agency is required to take such action by order of a court.” As I wrote in our lengthy piece explaining the bill, this provision has a damages component that allows companies impacted by violations to pursue financial compensation.
  • Here’s the billion-dollar question I expect we won’t have answered unless the bill language is enacted and then litigated: Would the court order exception apply to rulings that grant these motions? Or would the developers be able to sue for damages?

2. Columbia County, N.Y. – New York’s renewable energy permitting office has rejected an upstate solar farm on farmland as a House Democrat representing the area joined hands with the Trump administration in publicly railing against the project.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Politics

Climate Races to Watch This November

These seven elections could change state energy policy.

Watching voting.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

No matter how well Democrats do in the House and Senate in November, it’s unlikely to mean anything new on climate policy in Washington, D.C., for as long as Donald Trump remains in the White House.

That is not true when it comes to the other elections this year.

Several states are on the verge of a possible Democratic trifecta, meaning unified control of both chambers of the state legislature and the governor’s mansion. It’s a position that could enable such states to either top off existing climate and energy policies passed in the last decade or to make the first real run at climate legislation in recent history.

Keep reading...Show less
Blue