Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Climate Tech

We’ve Got Sexy Heat Pumps. Now It’s Time for Sexy Water Heaters.

Boston-based startup Reservoir has raised an $8 million seed round to commercialize heat pump-powered water heaters.

•
Reservoir water heaters.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images, Reservoir

There are plenty of ways to leverage everyday household appliances to shift electricity demand and free up capacity on the grid. But when energy nerds talk about these opportunities, they’re mostly focused on distributed energy resources like smart thermostats, residential batteries, and electric vehicle chargers. Water heaters — the vast majority of which are not internet connected — rarely enter the conversation.

Boston-based startup Reservoir wants to change that, raising a $8 million seed round to bring its sexier, techier heat pump water heaters to market. Asymmetric Capital Partners led the round, alongside Founder Collective and the climate-focused investor MCJ.

The startup has already installed its water heaters in nearly 100 homes around Boston. Each unit pairs an onboard computer with a heat pump, allowing it to learn a household’s hot water habits so it can begin preheating hours in advance of, say, your morning shower. That long lead time matters, as a heat pump can take five or six hours to warm up a standard 50-gallon tank. But if your schedule shifts and you need hot water at an atypical time, the unit comes equipped with backup resistance heating elements, allowing it to heat the tank quickly using the same technology many conventional water heaters do.

The company’s CEO, Luke Winston-Almanzar, was inspired to start the company when he realized that his water heater consumed more energy per year than it took to charge his electric car, but was dumber than his air fryer or watch.

“Most people don’t realize the water heater is the second biggest use of energy in the home. It’s almost 20%,” he told me, coming in behind space heating and cooling, which account for around half of a household’s total energy consumption. He saw an opportunity to help bring smart, energy efficient water heaters into the digital age, much the way Nest did for thermostats.

Simply switching to a heat pump water heater can already cut energy use by about 75% compared with standard electric models, which account for about half the nation’s fleet. And while most heat pump models now come equipped with internet connectivity and remote adjustment mechanisms, the startup’s predictive software is what truly sets it apart. While other units simply hold water at a consistent temperature, Reservoir squeezes out additional energy savings by only heating when it anticipates hot water will actually be needed, Winston-Almanzar told me. Ultimately, this adds up to an average $800 per year in customer savings compared to standard electric tanks, and around $150 for gas-powered tanks, according to the company’s estimates.

Scale that up to thousands of households, and water heaters become a grid resource that can participate in demand response programs and virtual power plants. “You get a smart water heater in homes — you can save people money, you can increase their comfort. But then you get 50,000 of them, and they’re connected, and you can actually offset Elon Musk’s data center,” Winston-Almanzar explained.

Because water heaters store thermal rather than electrical energy, they can’t send electricity back to the grid like residential battery storage systems can. But they can still shift when they consume electricity. For example, Reservoir can heat water in the early morning when demand on the grid is low and hold it until people start waking up and showering. Or for households that use more hot water in the evening, the system can heat up around midday when there’s lots of cheap, clean power on the grid. During times of peak demand, it can simply pause its heating cycle, drawing on the water it’s already stored.

While Reservoir hasn’t yet integrated its systems with a virtual power plant provider that could compensate customers for helping to alleviate strain on the grid, Winston-Almanzar sees this as a near-term opportunity. “What I’m sprinting towards is getting 1,000 units installed in Massachusetts because that gets us to the megawatt-hour-scale of thermal storage,” he told me, explaining that’s when VPP integration will start to make sense for a specific region.

Today, the startup’s base model retails for less than $4,000 fully installed, compared to $3,000 to $6,000 for a standard electric water heater, and includes all of Reservoir’s predictive capabilities. The company also offers a more feature-rich $5,450 model that has a “Party Mode,” which effectively stretches the capacity of a 50-gallon tank to deliver up to 150 gallons of hot water on high-demand days, such as when a household is hosting guests. This model can also proactively adjust the system when water pipes are at risk of freezing and offers “no-wait” showers, using a recirculation pump to deliver hot water instantaneously, without having to let the tap run first.

Those prices include the $1,050 rebate available for heat pump water heaters in Massachusetts, where Reservoir’s early installations are concentrated. While the Trump administration axed the Energy Efficient Home Improvement Credit, which covered 30% of the costs of eligible units up to $2,000, Winston-Almanzar says state-level incentives are helping fill the gap. The company has already expanded into Maine and New Hampshire, which offer their own rebates, and plans to enter additional major metro markets such as New York, Washington DC, Seattle, and San Francisco.

The company is also betting on its installation process as a competitive advantage. Rather than relying entirely on third-party contractors, Reservoir employs an in-house team of young, digitally native plumbers to install its systems — a team it expects will grow substantially as the company scales.

Ultimately, if Reservoir succeeds in becoming the Nest of water heaters, Winston-Almanzar predicts systems like his will eventually replace smart thermostats in VPP programs. “If you have a battery for where you need electrons moving, and you have a tank of water for when you need just heat moving, homeowners don’t even need to feel it,” he explained. While adjusting a customer’s thermostat can immediately impact their comfort, changing a water heater’s background operations will go largely unnoticed, he argued, making them a better option for VPP integration.

Turning one of a home’s largest energy loads into a giant grid battery that saves customers money certainly seems like a good bet. But it’s still early days. Reservoir will have to prove, through many thousands more installations, that the humble water heater truly has what it takes to become one of the grid’s most valuable distributed resources.

Green
🔒

You’ve reached your free article limit

Subscribe to Heatmap News for unlimited access to daily energy and climate coverage.
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Spotlight

A Giant Data Center Offers a Permitting Reform Test Case

What would happen to Project Jupiter if the Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act is passed?

Project Jupiter.
Heatmap Illustration/Project Jupiter, Library of Congress

One of the nation’s largest data centers is struggling under permitting woes. So let’s play a game: would the bipartisan permitting bill in Congress make the path easier, or might the federal legislation be irrelevant to large hyperscalers under development today?

Meet Project Jupiter, a mega project in southern New Mexico in Dona Ana County under development by Oracle and OpenAI, with financial backing from SoftBank and political support from the Trump administration for being a part of Stargate, a major Trump administration public-private initiative boosting AI development. Project Jupiter would be one of the largest data centers in the country if completed and currently is expected to run on a microgrid powered by fuel cells converting gas to electricity, which the developers claim will burn much cleaner than a typical off-grid gas turbine power plant.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Hotspots

The Trump Administration Is Still Messing with Offshore Wind Farms

And more of the week’s top news around project fights.

The United States.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

1. New England (and Maryland) – The Trump administration is still messing with offshore wind farms, even while trying to pass a permitting reform deal. Examining the court filings reveals why they may feel empowered to do it — and I’m not sure how this ends.

  • Last Friday, in a legal case brought by anti-wind activists, the Justice Department submitted a motion in federal court to send the construction and operations plan for Orsted’s Revolution Wind project in New England back to the Interior Department for more analysis. On Wednesday, the DOJ entered a similar motion in another case challenging the construction and operations plan for U.S. Wind’s MarWin project off the coast of Maryland in a lawsuit brought by the state’s coastal community of Ocean City.
  • Trump’s actions led some to question whether the president was sabotaging the deal, and others to claim the media coverage itself was an attempt to kill it. Going further, supporters of the bipartisan bill claimed the DOJ's motions were precisely why the bill should become law, implying it would guard offshore wind farms against this sort of maneuver.
  • However, for the bill’s backers, it’s worth considering why the Trump administration believes it has the legal authority to do this. It’s also time to ask whether the bill would actually protect these wind farms against this tactic.
  • To answer those questions, you have to rewind. On May 1, 2025, the Interior Department withdrew a Biden solicitor’s opinion instructing the agency to “strike a rational balance” between wind power and fishing interests. This revocation document is technically not in effect at the moment; one year later, a federal court ruled the opinion was potentially illegal as a part of a preliminary injunction on five anti-renewables actions requested by solar and wind trade groups. The Trump administration is contesting that ruling, and the administration has filed a notice of appeal.
  • In August, despite that opinion being in doubt, a federal judge granted Trump permission under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to remand the construction and operations plan for the now-defunct Atlantic Shores offshore wind farm in the waters of New Jersey. U.S. District Judge Jia Cobb specifically wrote that Atlantic Shores failed to demonstrate the federal government had limitations under OSCLA on revisiting these plans and that the injunction from the litigation on appeal “did not prohibit all reevaluation of agency action.”
  • In the recent Revolution and MarWin filings, Trump’s Justice Department argues the construction and operations plans should be remanded under OSCLA without being vacated. The DOJ motions include claims that previous decision documents did not adequately explain impacts to commercial fishing and other industries that use OSCLA waters. It’s not clear if the administration will win these motions.
  • The bipartisan permitting bill would bar the Interior Department and other federal agencies from taking “any new action that would revoke, rescind, withdraw, terminate, suspend, amend, or alter a federal authorization or permit in effect on or after September 16, 2026,” or “any other action to interfere with or prevent the construction or operation at full capacity of a project that has secured all necessary federal authorizations and permits.” The restriction exempts cases where “the agency is required to take such action by order of a court.” As I wrote in our lengthy piece explaining the bill, this provision has a damages component that allows companies impacted by violations to pursue financial compensation.
  • Here’s the billion-dollar question I expect we won’t have answered unless the bill language is enacted and then litigated: Would the court order exception apply to rulings that grant these motions? Or would the developers be able to sue for damages?

2. Columbia County, N.Y. – New York’s renewable energy permitting office has rejected an upstate solar farm on farmland as a House Democrat representing the area joined hands with the Trump administration in publicly railing against the project.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Politics

Climate Races to Watch This November

These seven elections could change state energy policy.

Watching voting.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

No matter how well Democrats do in the House and Senate in November, it’s unlikely to mean anything new on climate policy in Washington, D.C., for as long as Donald Trump remains in the White House.

That is not true when it comes to the other elections this year.

Several states are on the verge of a possible Democratic trifecta, meaning unified control of both chambers of the state legislature and the governor’s mansion. It’s a position that could enable such states to either top off existing climate and energy policies passed in the last decade or to make the first real run at climate legislation in recent history.

Keep reading...Show less
Blue