Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Culture

What We Read to Understand the Wildfires

Here are our favorite articles on the wildfires from around the web.

•
A man reading a smoky magazine.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

The past week of wildfire smoke blanketing the East Coast was confusing, unprecedented, and unnerving.

While Heatmap has covered the story’s many angles, our writers are also looking to other sources to understand — and help them explain — the last two days of extreme weather. Here’s a selection of stories that we found helpful:

“Canadian Wildfires and Climate Change” (The Climate Brink)

I really enjoyed Zeke Hausfather’s review of what the research says about the connection between these wildfires and climate change. The science of these fires is more complicated than Western blazes, and I think Zeke threads the needle well. –Robinson Meyer

“We Suffer Too Many Fools Who Start Wildfires” (The New York Times)

I liked this piece because, as a climate journalist, I have a tendency to see wildfires as the result of system changes in the environment that lead to more fires. This piece, an essay by a former fire protection official, makes what seems like an obvious point that's too often unheeded: wildfires are often the immediate result of very stupid behavior. –Matthew Zeitlin

“Liberty Game Postponed as NYC Battles Air Quality Issues from Wildfire Smoke” (New York Post)

We hear so much about how we ought to stay inside during air quality events like this, but the indoors isn’t totally safe — apparently, smoke actually penetrated Barclays Center, where the game was supposed to be played. But if we can’t get away from the smoke indoors, where does that leave us left to go? –Jeva Lange

“Trying to Breathe in a City of Smoke” (The New Yorker)

“We know the story of the climate crisis, of how wealthy nations have burned fossil fuels at an astonishing rate, pushing our planet to the brink. Yet we live as though we do not, and we breathe the consequences,” Carolyn Kormann writes for The New Yorker. –Neel Dhanesha

“As Smoke Darkens the Sky, the Future Becomes Clear” (The New York Times)

“The haunting gray glow of the sky this week was both a throwback to a more contaminated past and a portent of a future clouded more regularly by airborne toxic events such as these," David Wallace-Wells writes. –Emily Pontecorvo

“WGA East Cancels All NYC Picketing for Rest of the Week Due to Record Unhealthy Air Quality” (Deadline)

Wildfire smoke has all kinds of implications - including on labor, when the smoke in New York forced the Writers Guild of America East to cancel its planned pickets for Wednesday. But unions can't be stopped so easily, and ironically the air quality in LA was better, so WGA West pickets went on as scheduled. –Neel Dhanesha

Blue

You’re out of free articles.

Subscribe to access Heatmap's exclusive climate and energy polling, award-winning journalism, and subscriber-only events. Save $57 on an annual subscription, just $156 $99/year.
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Daily Briefing

The Anti-Utility Election

Electricity companies look like one of the biggest losers of the 2026 midterms.

Adam Hamilton.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

This is Heatmap Daily, a weekday digest written by our executive editor. Subscribe here.

I’m still wrapping my head around the size and scale of the Democratic victory on Tuesday. I suspect Wall Street is, too. Yesterday, the S&P 500 gained about 1.6% as investors saw an upside in the Democratic blow-out. Today, they lost their nerve: The S&P fell almost 4.4%, and the tech-focused Nasdaq slid by more than 5%. That AI-loaded index is now down more than 10% from its all-time high in October, which means it’s technically entered a “correction.” (If it drops by 20%, it’ll be in a bear market.)

Keep reading...Show less
Blue
Gina Hinojosa and Texas.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

When it comes to energy and data centers, everyone loves Texas. Its pro-business political consensus, unusually deregulated electricity market, wide-open plains, sunny skies, and large natural gas and oil deposits have attracted data center developers, renewables developers, liquefied natural gas export terminals, and battery storage entrepreneurs alike.

But this all happened under decades of unified Republican control of Texas’ government. That’s ending on January 19, when Gina Hinojosa is sworn in as governor alongside every other holder of statewide elected office who won this year. In Austin, they will join a Democratic majority Texas House of Representatives, which has been under Republican control since 2003.

Keep reading...Show less
Politics

Renewables Super PAC Takes a Victory Lap

Invest in Tomorrow Coalition says it took out clean energy adversaries in the midterms. Now it’s setting its sights on 2028.

Victoria Spartz and Lauren Boebert.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

A pro-renewables Super PAC – Invest in Tomorrow Coalition – is taking a victory lap, claiming it played a key role in the blue wave and announcing plans to be involved in the 2028 presidential primaries.

When I first heard of the Invest in Tomorrow Coalition, it was clearly a revenge operation. Backed by renewables companies and crypto magnate Chris Larsen, the Super PAC waded into primary elections this year to take out Republicans who voted to repeal most of the Inflation Reduction Act. Tom Matzzie, a renewables executive leading the Super PAC, described the organization to me as “focused on accountability for elected officials who decide they want to attack the clean energy industry.” Shortly afterwards, Invest in Tomorrow announced an investment in seven races before ultimately expanding to 18 races.

Keep reading...Show less
Blue