The Fight

Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Hotspots

Trump Punished Wind Farms for Eagle Deaths During the Shutdown

Plus more of the week’s most important fights around renewable energy.

•
The United States.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

1. Wayne County, Nebraska – The Trump administration fined Orsted during the government shutdown for allegedly killing bald eagles at two of its wind projects, the first indications of financial penalties for energy companies under Trump’s wind industry crackdown.

  • On November 3, Fox News published a story claiming it had “reviewed” a notice from the Fish and Wildlife Service showing that it had proposed fining Orsted more than $32,000 for dead bald eagles that were discovered last year at two of its wind projects – the Plum Creek wind farm in Wayne County and the Lincoln Land Wind facility in Morgan County, Illinois.
  • Per Fox News, the Service claims Orsted did not have incidental take permits for the two projects but came forward to the agency with the bird carcasses once it became aware of the deaths.
  • In an email to me, Orsted confirmed that it received the letter on October 29 – weeks into what became the longest government shutdown in American history.
  • This is the first action we’ve seen to date on bird impacts tied to Trump’s wind industry crackdown. If you remember, the administration sent wind developers across the country requests for records on eagle deaths from their turbines. If companies don’t have their “take” permits – i.e. permission to harm birds incidentally through their operations – they may be vulnerable to fines like these.

2. Ocean County, New Jersey – Speaking of wind, I broke news earlier this week that one of the nation’s largest renewable energy projects is now deceased: the Leading Light offshore wind project.

  • Proposed to sit off the Jersey coastline, Leading Light would’ve provided enough power to supply a million homes, according to its developers, Invenergy and energyRe. But now it is no more, after legal counsel representing the project developers submitted a letter on Friday to the state’s Board of Public Utilities saying that they no longer see a way to finish construction.
  • “The Board is well aware that the offshore wind industry has experienced economic and regulatory conditions that have made the development of new offshore wind projects extremely difficult,” counsel Colleen Foley wrote in the letter, which was reviewed by Heatmap News, adding that it does “not see a pathway forward for the LLW Project.”
  • It’s unclear whether Leading Light’s demise was solely because of Trump’s renewables permitting freeze and war on offshore wind. As intrepid Heatmap reader (and contributor) Fred Stafford noted, this project had requested multiple delays before Trump entered office, and was suffering from significant supply chain issues that magnified any pain caused by permit woes. “Each request cited supply chain problems and turbine price volatility given its contract, not federal regulatory barriers,” Stafford wrote on X.

3. Dane County, Wisconsin – The fight over a ginormous data center development out here is turning into perhaps one of the nation’s most important local conflicts over AI and land use.

  • Digital infrastructure firm QTS is trying to build what it says will be a $12 billion data center complex here in the village of DeForest, about a half-hour north of Madison as the crow flies. The revolt against the project has been enormous. The opposition Facebook group has almost 2,000 members now and a MoveOn petition has nearly 300 signatures.
  • On Wednesday evening, the village of Vienna, adjacent to DeForest, held a meeting on whether to annex more than 1,500 acres of property for the data center in exchange for a $40 million contribution from QTS over 15 years. Residents stormed the meeting opposing the project and got Vienna local leaders to vote unanimously to reject the cooperative agreement for annexation.
  • There’s evidence opposition to the data center is part of the broader land use techlash I’ve been chronicling in The Fight. Not only is the primary argument against the project focused on farmland preservation but on the main data center opposition group’s website, its president, Rhonda Meinholz, proudly boasts of having previously killed a large-scale solar project Invenergy proposed in Vienna. “I have concerns about any and all large scale development projects that could impact our environment,” she states on the website. “Farmland is one of Wisconsin’s most precious resources and we need to keep it that way.”
  • Dane County has an exceptionally high support score for renewable energy, and even registers a likelihood for supporting data centers in our Heatmap Pro database. But the odds of opposition are just as apparent, and towns across the county currently have ordinances discouraging solar projects on farmland.

4. Hardeman County, Texas – It’s not all bad news today for renewable energy – because it never really is.

  • This week Hardeman County approved a tax abatement for an OCI Energy solar project proposed along a farm road in the community. County leaders like the project because it would potentially include millions in funds to the school board and emergency medical services.
  • A handful of people – described by local media as “over ten” – spoke at the public meeting on Monday against the project, but county officials shrugged it off. “The abatement will help citizens of the community in a lot of ways, but it is going to hurt one or two citizens,” County Judge Ronald Ingraham told reporters. “[It’s for] we think the greater good of the county and I hate that anybody has to be upset by it or hurt by it.”
  • It’s unclear when construction will begin because OCI is first trying to trap a species of rat present at the project site that is listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act.
Yellow

This article is exclusively
for Heatmap Plus subscribers.

Go deeper inside the politics, projects, and personalities
shaping the energy transition.
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Hotspots

Meta Data Center Federal Pipeline Review Due Early Next Year

And more of the week’s top fights around development.

•
The United States.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

1. Richland Parish, Louisiana – Gird your loins for the coming fight over the Meta Hyperion data center’s gas pipeline.

  • On Wednesday, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission laid out plans for an environmental assessment of the Entergy pipeline for the Meta data center under the National Environmental Policy Act and stated it’ll be issued in early January 2027. Federal agencies have been ordered by the panel to complete any remaining decisions on authorizations by April.
  • The decision to do an environmental assessment under NEPA will be controversial. The Sierra Club filed comments to FERC stating they wanted an environmental impact statement instead that took into account the environmental impacts of the data center being fed by the pipeline, as well as a review of the project’s cumulative impacts, as the activist group said they’re explicitly linked to the data center’s operations. “The power stations and data center are not remote or speculative developments unrelated to the proposed action,” their comments read.
  • This is quite similar to what’s playing out with the Green Chile pipeline in New Mexico for Oracle and OpenAI’s Project Jupiter, which we recently explained could turn into litigation with high stakes for future gas pipelines linked to data centers. But to me, this conflict with Meta feels like it has more at stake for this individual project, as it’s playing out while construction on gas power plants for the data center has been underway for almost a year after earlier being blessed by state regulators.
  • I asked Sierra Club what could happen next. Eric Huber, one of their managing attorneys, told me on Thursday, “I heard the EA is expected in January, but we are in wait and see mode and will decide on further steps when it comes out.” Meta and Entergy did not respond to a request for comment.

2. Spartanburg County, South Carolina – I have one last data center race to tell you to watch on Tuesday: South Carolina’s 4th, on the northern rim of the state.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Plus

Is the Election Really About Data Centers?

Talking with Kevin Gundersen, the head of public affairs for Digital Realty.

•
Kevin Gundersen
Heatmap Illustration

This week’s conversation is with Kevin Gundersen, head of public affairs for data center developer Digital Realty. On Wednesday, Digital Realty released a fascinating poll as part of Infrastructure for America, a pro-data center organization that also includes Compass, Vantage Data Centers, and QTS. The poll pushed back on the idea that we’re currently in the middle of a “data center election”; instead, it found most voters are not expected to choose their national elected officials based on a politician’s stance on data centers.

I reached out to folks involved in the poll's release, and they put me in touch with Gundersen, whom I’ve met before and consider to be a straight shooter. He accepted my invitation to do a candid hot-seat chat about the findings, his thoughts on all the data center attack ads, and whether his industry’s actually recovering any ground with the American people.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Spotlight

Trump Hasn’t Been Advancing New Wind Farms During Permitting Talks

Only upgrades for pre-existing wind projects have been approved.

••
Donald Trump.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

In September, the Trump administration told a reporter that the president directed the Pentagon to finally process wind projects through routine airspace approvals as required under a court order. By doing this, it created the appearance of real headway and good faith in talks with Democrats in Congress on energy permitting legislation before the November midterm elections.

But the White House’s assurances are not what they seem.

Keep reading...Show less