Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy


I Regret to Inform You the Electrification of ‘Fast X’ Was Overblown

Still, wind turbines at least make an appearance.

Vin Diesel holding a charger.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images, IMP Awards

There is nothing like the release of a new Fast & Furious movie to remind you of the unforgiving and relentless march of time. Summer movie season officially kicks off this weekend with the chaotically titledFast X hitting theaters, the first of a two-part finale that is intended to bring home the series that first started way back in the comparatively guilt-free gas-guzzling days of 2001 (admittedly, nothing is ever really over; at the very least, Fast & Furiousspinoffs are reportedly on their way).

A lot has changed in the past two-plus decades of the franchise, much of it for the better. These days, tough action heroes say “sorry” more and apparently care about their carbon footprint. While it might be a stretch to call Dom Toretto a climate dad, fans staked out on the film set in Echo Park, Los Angeles, last fall leaked photos of a Dodge Daytona SRT EV concept car parked outside his house. A DeLorean Alpha5 prototype was also photographed at the scene; together, the cars marked the first EVs to be featured in the high-octane franchise. Car blogs breathlessly reported the news: “From V8 to EV: Vin Diesel Goes Green in Fast X,” reported GT Junkies. “Vin Diesel Shocks Fans with Electric Choice for Fast and Furious 10,” added Tesla Reporter. “The Electric and the Engineless?” wondered MotorTrend.

Despite these rumors, I can confirm the cars in Fast X still most certainly go vroom. The aforementioned EVs did make it into the final cut of the film — Dom keeps his Dodge inexplicably parked on the street and Cipher drives the DeLorean — but the extent of the cars’ purpose in the film is as gearhead Easter eggs. They’re not otherwise commented on by the characters nor do they get to enjoy any action scenes. For the film’s big chase sequence — which involves a round, rolling Indiana Jones-reminiscent bomb that chases after the heroes like it has a mind of its own — Dom opts instead to drive a Dodge Charger SRT Hellcat Redeye widebody that runs on traditional dinosaur juice.

The Dodge Daytona SRT EV, in the lower righthand corner of the frame, is about as much of an EV as you’ll get to enjoy in Fast X.YouTube/The Fast Saga

Supposedly the Fast X production team wanted to have done more with the EVs. Dennis McCarthy, the car supervisor, told The Independent that the electric Dodge is “incredible” and “I wished we’d had a bit more time to put it into an action sequence,” while the film’s director geeked out over getting his hands on the DeLorean to Collider.

While some scolds have chided the film as furthering “car propaganda” (when in fact Fast & Furious is a fun, dumb symptom and not the disease), there’s a strange and subtle acknowledgment in Fast X that things are changing. Sure, the film starts with Dom teaching his son how to drive and musing that “each generation” ought to be “better than the last” (he means fatherhood, not eco-consciousness) — a bit of torch-passing that is befitting of the penultimate installment of a long-running franchise. But it seems like no mistake either that the film culminates with the gang’s cars weaving between wind turbines and climaxes with two gasoline tank trucks colliding against each other atop a hydroelectric dam.

Vin Diesel — a man who, we must remember, literally named himself after a fossil fuel — has fantasized about the 11th film’s big bad being a driverless-car-pushing technocrat. “The days where one man behind the wheel can make a difference are over,” one character even intones in Fast X, adding that maybe “the days of any man behind the wheel are over.” This is, of course, the great fear of the Fasterverse; the threat of losing the freedom of the open road, an end to the sacred bond between man and his (and occasionally her) machine.

But while Fast X is an absolutely absurd movie with no grounding whatsoever in any kind of human reason or physical logic — a film in which “I took the bus” is a gasp line, in which the final scene feels like it was choreographed by a kid playing with Hot Wheels (because it was), and in which Jason Momoa takes inspiration from both the Joker and Captain Jack Sparrow and somehow makes it work — it is also aware.

It knows the future is coming. It just might take a few more sequels to get there.

Jeva Lange profile image

Jeva Lange

Jeva is a founding staff writer at Heatmap. Her writing has also appeared in The Week, where she formerly served as executive editor and culture critic, as well as in The New York Daily News, Vice, and Gothamist, among others. Jeva lives in New York City.


Wind Is More Powerful Than J. D. Vance Seems to Think

Just one turbine can charge hundreds of cell phones.

J.D. Vance.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

It’s a good thing most of us aren’t accountable for every single silly thing we’ve ever said, but most of us are not vice presidential running mates, either. Back in 2022, when J.D. Vance was still just a “New York Times bestselling author” and not yet a “junior senator from Ohio,” much less “second-in-line to a former president who will turn 80 in office if he’s reelected,” he made a climate oopsie that — now that it’s recirculating — deserves to be addressed.

If Democrats “care so much about climate change,” Vance argued during an Ohio Republican senator candidate forum during that year, “and they think climate change is caused by carbon emissions, then why is their solution to scream about it at the top of their lungs, send a bunch of our jobs to China, and then manufacture these ridiculous ugly windmills all over Ohio farms that don’t produce enough electricity to run a cell phone?”

Keep reading...Show less

Republicans Have No New Ideas About Energy

On night one of the convention, the GOP presented a platform that repackages Biden-era achievements with an all-caps flourish.

Donald Trump and J.D. Vance.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

National political conventions don’t make for the best TV. Prime-time speeches are delivered by a parade of party celebrities and last for only a few minutes — typically just enough time to bash gas prices (nonsensically) and get in a few digs at the opposition. The highlight of the Republican National Convention’s broadcast out of Milwaukee on Monday night was, in fact, entirely wordless: former President Donald Trump’s walk across the floor with a conspicuous white bandage over his ear.

The only words that really mattered on Monday were reviewed and approved behind closed doors. “It’s a different kind of platform,” Tennessee Senator and Chair of the Committee on the Platform Marsha Blackburn said by way of introduction during her speech yesterday evening. Reviewing how the 2024 Republican Party Platform’s energy sections compare to the ones in 2016 (the GOP did not write a new platform for its convention in 2020), it’s clear how true that actually is.

Keep reading...Show less

AM Briefing: J.D. Vance’s Climate Stance

On Trump’s VP pick, Alaskan oil, and the pull of the moon

What to Know About Vance’s Climate Stance

Current conditions: A year’s worth of rain fell in one day in China’s Henan province • A tornado reportedly touched down outside Chicago’s O’Hare Airport • The heat index could reach 110 degrees Fahrenheit today in Washington, D.C.


1. Trump announces J.D. Vance as VP pick

Donald Trump has tapped Hillbilly Elegy author and Ohio junior senator J.D. Vance as his 2024 running mate. In recent years Vance has become a vocal climate change skeptic, casting doubt on the role of carbon emissions in warming the planet. As Heatmap’s Jeva Lange and Matthew Zeitlin write, he is a champion of the fossil fuel industry, especially in his home state of Ohio, where his 2022 Senate campaign received generous backing from the oil and gas industry. He is also a prominent critic of the use of environmental, governance, and social standards in investing, otherwise known as ESG, which he has called “a racket to destroy what we still have so that a few people on Wall Street can make some money.”

Keep reading...Show less