Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Culture

I Regret to Inform You the Electrification of ‘Fast X’ Was Overblown

Still, wind turbines at least make an appearance.

Vin Diesel holding a charger.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images, IMP Awards

There is nothing like the release of a new Fast & Furious movie to remind you of the unforgiving and relentless march of time. Summer movie season officially kicks off this weekend with the chaotically titled Fast X hitting theaters, the first of a two-part finale that is intended to bring home the series that first started way back in the comparatively guilt-free gas-guzzling days of 2001 (admittedly, nothing is ever really over; at the very least, Fast & Furious spinoffs are reportedly on their way).

A lot has changed in the past two-plus decades of the franchise, much of it for the better. These days, tough action heroes say “sorry” more and apparently care about their carbon footprint. While it might be a stretch to call Dom Toretto a climate dad, fans staked out on the film set in Echo Park, Los Angeles, last fall leaked photos of a Dodge Daytona SRT EV concept car parked outside his house. A DeLorean Alpha5 prototype was also photographed at the scene; together, the cars marked the first EVs to be featured in the high-octane franchise. Car blogs breathlessly reported the news: “From V8 to EV: Vin Diesel Goes Green in Fast X,” reported GT Junkies. “Vin Diesel Shocks Fans with Electric Choice for Fast and Furious 10,” added Tesla Reporter. “The Electric and the Engineless?” wondered MotorTrend.

Despite these rumors, I can confirm the cars in Fast X still most certainly go vroom. The aforementioned EVs did make it into the final cut of the film — Dom keeps his Dodge inexplicably parked on the street and Cipher drives the DeLorean — but the extent of the cars’ purpose in the film is as gearhead Easter eggs. They’re not otherwise commented on by the characters nor do they get to enjoy any action scenes. For the film’s big chase sequence — which involves a round, rolling Indiana Jones-reminiscent bomb that chases after the heroes like it has a mind of its own — Dom opts instead to drive a Dodge Charger SRT Hellcat Redeye widebody that runs on traditional dinosaur juice.

The Dodge Daytona SRT EV, in the lower righthand corner of the frame, is about as much of an EV as you’ll get to enjoy in Fast X.YouTube/The Fast Saga

Supposedly the Fast X production team wanted to have done more with the EVs. Dennis McCarthy, the car supervisor, told The Independent that the electric Dodge is “incredible” and “I wished we’d had a bit more time to put it into an action sequence,” while the film’s director geeked out over getting his hands on the DeLorean to Collider.

While some scolds have chided the film as furthering “car propaganda” (when in fact Fast & Furious is a fun, dumb symptom and not the disease), there’s a strange and subtle acknowledgment in Fast X that things are changing. Sure, the film starts with Dom teaching his son how to drive and musing that “each generation” ought to be “better than the last” (he means fatherhood, not eco-consciousness) — a bit of torch-passing that is befitting of the penultimate installment of a long-running franchise. But it seems like no mistake either that the film culminates with the gang’s cars weaving between wind turbines and climaxes with two gasoline tank trucks colliding against each other atop a hydroelectric dam.

Vin Diesel — a man who, we must remember, literally named himself after a fossil fuel — has fantasized about the 11th film’s big bad being a driverless-car-pushing technocrat. “The days where one man behind the wheel can make a difference are over,” one character even intones in Fast X, adding that maybe “the days of any man behind the wheel are over.” This is, of course, the great fear of the Fasterverse; the threat of losing the freedom of the open road, an end to the sacred bond between man and his (and occasionally her) machine.

But while Fast X is an absolutely absurd movie with no grounding whatsoever in any kind of human reason or physical logic — a film in which “I took the bus” is a gasp line, in which the final scene feels like it was choreographed by a kid playing with Hot Wheels (because it was), and in which Jason Momoa takes inspiration from both the Joker and Captain Jack Sparrow and somehow makes it work — it is also aware.

It knows the future is coming. It just might take a few more sequels to get there.

Green

You’re out of free articles.

Subscribe today to experience Heatmap’s expert analysis 
of climate change, clean energy, and sustainability.
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Energy

Trump Wants to Prop Up Coal Plants. They Keep Breaking Down.

According to a new analysis shared exclusively with Heatmap, coal’s equipment-related outage rate is about twice as high as wind’s.

Donald Trump as Sisyphus.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

The Trump administration wants “beautiful clean coal” to return to its place of pride on the electric grid because, it says, wind and solar are just too unreliable. “If we want to keep the lights on and prevent blackouts from happening, then we need to keep our coal plants running. Affordable, reliable and secure energy sources are common sense,” Chris Wright said on X in July, in what has become a steady drumbeat from the administration that has sought to subsidize coal and put a regulatory straitjacket around solar and (especially) wind.

This has meant real money spent in support of existing coal plants. The administration’s emergency order to keep Michigan’s J.H. Campbell coal plant open (“to secure grid reliability”), for example, has cost ratepayers served by Michigan utility Consumers Energy some $80 million all on its own.

Keep reading...Show less
Blue
Spotlight

The New Transmission Line Pitting Trump’s Rural Fans Against His Big Tech Allies

Rural Marylanders have asked for the president’s help to oppose the data center-related development — but so far they haven’t gotten it.

Donald Trump, Maryland, and Virginia.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

A transmission line in Maryland is pitting rural conservatives against Big Tech in a way that highlights the growing political sensitivities of the data center backlash. Opponents of the project want President Trump to intervene, but they’re worried he’ll ignore them — or even side with the data center developers.

The Piedmont Reliability Project would connect the Peach Bottom nuclear plant in southern Pennsylvania to electricity customers in northern Virginia, i.e.data centers, most likely. To get from A to B, the power line would have to criss-cross agricultural lands between Baltimore, Maryland and the Washington D.C. area.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Hotspots

Trump Punished Wind Farms for Eagle Deaths During the Shutdown

Plus more of the week’s most important fights around renewable energy.

The United States.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

1. Wayne County, Nebraska – The Trump administration fined Orsted during the government shutdown for allegedly killing bald eagles at two of its wind projects, the first indications of financial penalties for energy companies under Trump’s wind industry crackdown.

  • On November 3, Fox News published a story claiming it had “reviewed” a notice from the Fish and Wildlife Service showing that it had proposed fining Orsted more than $32,000 for dead bald eagles that were discovered last year at two of its wind projects – the Plum Creek wind farm in Wayne County and the Lincoln Land Wind facility in Morgan County, Illinois.
  • Per Fox News, the Service claims Orsted did not have incidental take permits for the two projects but came forward to the agency with the bird carcasses once it became aware of the deaths.
  • In an email to me, Orsted confirmed that it received the letter on October 29 – weeks into what became the longest government shutdown in American history.
  • This is the first action we’ve seen to date on bird impacts tied to Trump’s wind industry crackdown. If you remember, the administration sent wind developers across the country requests for records on eagle deaths from their turbines. If companies don’t have their “take” permits – i.e. permission to harm birds incidentally through their operations – they may be vulnerable to fines like these.

2. Ocean County, New Jersey – Speaking of wind, I broke news earlier this week that one of the nation’s largest renewable energy projects is now deceased: the Leading Light offshore wind project.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow