The Fight

Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Hotspots

Bad News for Agrivoltaics in Ohio

And more of the week’s top conflicts around renewable energy.

Map of renewable energy conflicts.
Heatmap Illustration

1. Queen Anne’s County, Maryland – They really don’t want you to sign a solar lease out in the rural parts of this otherwise very pro-renewables state.

  • County officials this week issued a public notice encouraging all residents to consider the economic impacts of taking farmland out of use to build solar farms.
  • “The Queen Anne’s County Commissioners are concerned that large-scale conversion of farmland to solar energy facilities may impact the long-term viability of agriculture in the county and surrounding region,” read the notice, which told anyone approached by a solar company about their land to immediately consult an attorney and think about these “key considerations.”
  • “As more farmland is transitioned to solar use, the demand for these agricultural support services diminishes. If enough land is taken out of production, it could create serious challenges for those who wish to continue farming.”
  • It’s not immediately clear whether this was related to a specific project or an overall rise in renewables development that’s happening in the county. But there’s a clear trend going on. Officials said in an accompanying press release that officials in neighboring Caroline County sent a similar notice to property owners. And it seems Worcester County did something similar last month.

2. Logan County, Ohio – Staff for the Ohio Power Siting Board have recommended it reject Open Road Renewables’ Grange Solar agrivoltaics project.

  • The staff report states: “Opposition to the project has been long-standing and unwavering, which is a strong measure of the local opposition to the project. While some local opposition is not uncommon in many power generation siting projects, when observing and documenting considerable opposition filed in this docket, staff recognizes that in this proceeding the opposition has been especially prominent and overwhelmingly one-sided from the local government agencies.”
  • This rejection is particularly striking as Open Road Renewables held multiple listening sessions for the surrounding community, modified its scope in light of the feedback, and claimed that 80% of public comments on the project were supportive. (Heatmap Pro, meanwhile, has Logan in the 99th percentile of the riskiest counties in America to build a clean energy project.)
  • What comes next for Grange Solar? The OPSB will ultimately have to vote on whether to side with its staff, though it rarely votes against. Open Road Renewables will then have the right to appeal this project. It feels unlikely that it’ll meet the company’s 2026 construction start plan.

3. Bandera County, Texas – On a slightly brighter note for solar, it appears that Pine Gate Renewables’ Rio Lago solar project might just be safe from county restrictions.

  • At a county commission hearing this week, Bandera Commissioner Jack Moseley told a room of anti-solar residents that even though he wanted to stop the project, there was no role for him to do so. That’s because, as we explained in our deep dive on Rio Lago, Texas’ state laws are quite weak on local control around solar.
  • “I don’t want it here. I don’t think any of these commissioners want it here, and I don’t think there’s anyone in this room that wants it here. But, we the County cannot stop it,” Moseley said, according to local news outlet Bandera Bulletin.

Here’s what else we’re watching…

In Illinois, Armoracia Solar is struggling to get necessary permits from Madison County.

In Kentucky, the mayor of Lexington is getting into a public spat with East Kentucky Power Cooperative over solar.

In Michigan, Livingston County is now backing the legal challenge to Michigan’s state permitting primacy law.

This article is exclusively
for Heatmap Plus subscribers.

Go deeper inside the politics, projects, and personalities
shaping the energy transition.
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Q&A

How Building Transmission Could Lower Electricity Costs

Talking with National Grid’s Matthew Satterwhite about his new report with S&P Global.

The Q&A subject.
Heatmap Illustration

This week’s conversation is with Matthew Satterwhite, head of U.S. policy for National Grid. This week National Grid released a report in collaboration with S&P Global I found noteworthy amidst the data center backlash, asserting that building new transmission lines can potentially reduce consumer costs. I reached out asking if we could chat about how this argument leans into the fight over hyperscale infrastructure. I found our conversation illuminating and educational.

The following Q&A was lightly edited for clarity.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Hotspots

The Solar Farm-to-Data Center Switcheroo Hits a Snag

Plus more of the week’s biggest development fights.

The United States.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

1. Clark County, Nevada – The first data center approved on federal lands has hit a legal brick wall.

  • On Monday, the Townsite 2 solar farm-to-data center environmental review swap I’ve previously covered received a stay from the Interior Department’s board of appeals. David Gunter, a Biden appointee, ruled that the Center for Biological Diversity’s appeal of the permit flip was likely to succeed on the merits because a solar farm … is not a data center. Seems logical!
  • As I covered at the time, the Bureau of Land Management approved the environmental review swap claiming that a solar farm and a data center have essentially the same characteristics. It was a bold claim. Both the agency and Townsite said the characteristics would have substantially the same environmental impacts. Gunter shrugged off the claim idea, however, stating that statute requires projects to be both substantially similar and have equally similar impacts under the National Environmental Policy Act.
  • Crucially, Gunter also noted that the federal agency had never done an environmental review of any data centers under NEPA, so there’s not even a proper frame of reference. “BLM has not studied the Townsite data center project, or indeed any other data center project, in any environmental document,” he wrote.

2. Jackson County, Missouri – We have yet another high-profile case of a city councilor losing their job over voting for a data center, and this one’s a doozy.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Spotlight

These 5 States Are Primed for a Data Center Pause

Where temporary moratoria could happen next.

A data center protest.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

Brace yourself for more statewide data center moratoria.

So far there are only two full state-wide blocks on data center permits, in New York and Texas. At least fifteen states have moratorium legislation in the pipeline, but few if any of those bills stand a chance of becoming law in the short term. Here are five states, however, where a broad development pause may gain momentum in the next year or two — and all of them are crucial to watch this November.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow