The Fight

Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Hotspots

South Carolina County Mulls Lifting Solar Ban

And more of the week’s top fights around development.

The United States.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

1. Berkeley County, South Carolina – Forget about Richland County, Ohio. All eyes in Solar World should be on this county where officials are trying to lift a solar moratorium.

  • Berkeley County instituted a solar moratorium in 2023. Now RWE is asking the county to lift the moratorium and the county’s land use committee voted this week at a hearing to recommend doing so, citing concerns from state utility Santee Cooper about energy prices. The county has seen electricity prices rise roughly 20% over the past three years, according to our Electricity Price Hub.
  • “They flat out said they need more power. They’re not going to have enough power by 2029,” councilmember Amy Stern said at a hearing Monday. “We are going to have more of this [discussion]. The moratorium lift[ing], all it does is allow us to get more information.” RWE wants to rezone land for a utility-scale solar farm the company claims would provide 198 megawatts, enough power for 37,000 homes.
  • Some most vocally supportive of the moratorium packed the hearing room, becoming so boisterous the council threatened local sheriff intervention. This shouldn’t be surprising; public opinion modeling indicates overall support for renewable energy in Berkeley County but the area has a substantial opposition risk score – 62 – in the Heatmap Pro database.
  • I’m closely monitoring whether the outcry overrules concerns about energy prices and Berkeley County supervisor Johnny Cribb told attendees of the hearing he’s against lifting the moratorium: “I’m against large-scale solar farms in this county, because of the reality of our county.”

2. Hill County, Texas – We have our first Texas county trying to ban new data centers and it’s in one of the more conservative pockets of the state.

  • The county commission voted this week to temporarily halt approvals for new data center developments for one year while it studies project impacts, with an eye to developments elsewhere in Texas.
  • It’s an unusual step in a state where such zoning restrictions on energy use have long been considered illegal and the county’s legal counsel even warned at the vote that they were signing up to be sued. This fits a growing trend of Texas counties enacting industrial development restrictions almost asking to become a legal test case (see: Van Zandt County and BESS).
  • Hill County is a Republican-leaning Dallas ex-urb represented in Congress by Rep. Jake Ellzey, one of the legislative body’s most conservative lawmakers. It also has one of the worst data center opposition scores in Texas in the Heatmap Pro database.

3. Sussex County, New Jersey – A town in north Jersey rapidly changed course from backing a new data center to outright banning all projects.

  • Over the weekend, Thomas Walsh Jr., mayor of the rural town of Andover in the Jersey Highlands, explained in a statement that he’d no longer allow the town to approve data centers. It comes after a backlash so fierce people were dragged out by police at a recent public hearing on the subject.
  • The town will also nix a land use ordinance established in September allowing data centers in a zone delegated for industrial redevelopment. There was only one project under development in Andover that would’ve provided almost one third of the town budget – but that won’t happen now.
  • I believe that this offers a case study in the limitations of brownfield development. The data center causing the hubbub would’ve been located at an abandoned former airport. Sounds ideal right? Until you see video of activists walking the area showing houses abutting the border of the data center site.

4. Porter County, Indiana – The Chicago ex-urb of Valparaiso is significantly restricting data centers too, after pulling the plug on a large project under development.

  • According to a new draft ordinance released this week, Valparaiso would ban data centers everywhere except industrial sites, pending individual reviews. Any project will also have to get a special use permit from the city. There’s a raft of other environmental rules, including a limitation on vibration – a nod to concerns about infrasound I discussed earlier this month.
  • Porter County actually banned data center approvals for one year, pending study of the issue. This also isn’t the only place in Porter county where data center developers have struggled. QTS rescinded a project in Union Township last fall after loud protests, most of which focused on its proximity to a school.
  • However, I believe Indiana counties will face continued political pressure not to indefinitely continue their moratoria given the weight of industry growth in the state.

5. King County, Washington – It’s Snoqualmie vs. the energy sector right now, as the new poster child for battery backlash bans BESS in its borders.

  • As I told you last week, Snoqualmie is up in arms about a large Jupiter Power battery storage project situated just outside of city limits. Snoqualmie leadership on Monday put forward a BESS moratorium and it’s exceedingly likely to be approved in the coming weeks. This won’t impact the Jupiter Power project, but it’s certainly a vent for frustration.
  • Meanwhile, the utility Puget Sound Energy shrugged off Snoqualmie’s request for Jupiter Power’s battery to be moved. In a two-page letter replying to city officials, PSE said residential concerns “should be considered in the permitting process,” and insisted the project will be safe. “King County underwent over a year of intensive stakeholder engagement in developing their BESS ordinance to determine where projects could be sited and to further strengthen safety requirements, among other elements. With King County's oversight, we believe that energy storage projects can be safely located without burdening established communities.”
Yellow

This article is exclusively
for Heatmap Plus subscribers.

Go deeper inside the politics, projects, and personalities
shaping the energy transition.
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Spotlight

Trump Taps Nashville Legend to Fight Solar and Wind Farms

And data centers might be collateral damage.

Farmland.
Simon Abranowicz | Getty Images | Unsplash

After derailing gigawatts of renewable power with a permitting freeze, the Trump administration is expanding its war on renewable energy, retaining one of country music’s biggest stars in a PR offensive against utility-scale projects on “prime farmland.”

The administration recently onboarded John Rich – one half of the stadium-packing American musical duo Big & Rich – to be Trump’s “special envoy for American landowners.” Rich entered activism around landowner rights last January when he backed opponents fighting a large Tennessee Valley Authority transmission project routed through his home county of Cheatham, Tennessee. This led to him joining the Trump team, where he’s fashioning himself as a go-to guy and cheerleader for anyone who wants Trump to help stop a solar or wind farm they don’t want built.

Keep reading...Show less
Hotspots

Data Centers Are the Election Year Villain

And more of the week’s top news around project fights.

Data Centers Are the Election Year Villain
Heatmap Illustration

1. Kansas City, Missouri – Data centers are so toxic that politicians are using them as boogeymen in totally unrelated policy discussions.

  • All week I’ve been thinking about Missouri, where a widely-screened TV campaign ad is airing screeds against AI hyperscale projects to sell a constitutional amendment initiative up for a vote in this year’s November elections. “That hum is the sound of Big Tech making money on online gambling, for porn,” says a nameless man in the ad. “Amendment 5 makes Big Tech pay so you don’t have to. Yes on Amendment 5.”
  • What does Amendment 5 do? Based on the ad, you would think it was focused on tax exemptions for data centers. But no – a yes vote supports cutting the state income tax, a proposal backed by Republican Gov. Mike Kehoe.
  • The ad is misinformation and a mind-blowing use of a confusing conversation around tech infrastructure most were unfamiliar with before this year. Per reporting by the Missouri Independent, the state’s existing tax exemptions for data centers would stay in place if the amendment was adopted.
  • My gut tells me this is only the beginning of the data center industry’s transformation into an election year villain.

2. Ingham County, Michigan – We have our first major anti-data center candidate in a Democratic congressional primary.

Keep reading...Show less
Q&A

Why Data Center NDAs Are a Big Mistake

A conversation with Grant Gutierrez of Carbon Direct

Why Data Center NDAs Are a Big Mistake
Heatmap Illustration

This week’s conversation is with Grant Gutierrez, head of community impacts at carbon management company Carbon Direct. This week Carbon Direct published a white paper Gutierrez authored on opposition around data centers he’s studied. His research reinforces much of what Heatmap Pro has uncovered, but I was particularly intrigued by a topline finding – that transparency is the most common thread in the 46 data center fights he looked into. Was he seeing what I’ve been seeing? So I asked him to hop onto a Zoom call and let me know his thoughts.

The following conversation was lightly edited for clarity.

Keep reading...Show less