Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Politics

Why the EPA is Changing A Major Emissions Rule

On gas plant pollution, a new IEA report, and Florida’s war on lab-grown meat

Why the EPA is Changing A Major Emissions Rule
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

Current conditions: England and Wales had their warmest February on record • An avalanche watch has been issued for Tahoe Basin • It will be warm and windy this weekend in the Texas Panhandle, where the Smokehouse Creek Fire is still burning out of control.

THE TOP FIVE

1. EPA to relax power plant emissions rules

The Biden administration is making changes to its sweeping plan to cut greenhouse gas emissions from power plants while it figures out a new, more ambitious rule. Here’s a TL;DR version of what’s happening.

The old plan: Existing coal plants, existing gas-fired plants, and gas plants built in the future would be required to dramatically reduce their carbon dioxide emissions by 2040.

The new (temporary) plan: Existing coal plants and new gas plants must still dramatically reduce their emissions. But existing gas plants are exempt.

The end goal: The Environmental Protection Agency wants a “stronger” rule that can “achieve greater emissions reductions.” This means covering the entire fleet of gas plants, and addressing toxic air pollutants, not just greenhouse gases.

The reaction: Extremely mixed. Environmental groups that had called for tougher restrictions are pleased. But so are some utility groups that wanted the rules weakened, and see the delay as an acknowledgment of their concerns. Rhode Island’s Democratic Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse said “failing to cover the plants responsible for the vast majority of future carbon pollution from the power sector makes no sense.”

The rub: The new rules probably won’t come into place until after Election Day, if at all. The decision comes as the administration is widely expected to relax tailpipe emissions rules, and “would call into question the ability of the United States to meet the president’s goal of cutting United States emissions roughly in half by the end of this decade,” explained The New York Times.

2. Biden says Chinese EVs could be a security risk

More news from Washington: The Biden administration yesterday opened an investigation into the national security risks posed by Chinese-made “connected vehicles,” which essentially means any vehicle or any car part that connects to the internet, explained Heatmap’s Robinson Meyer. New cars, especially EVs, are outfitted with cameras, sensors, or cellular modems required for modern safety features. The investigation isn’t hugely surprising, but it “is a big deal, in part because it marks that the backlash to Chinese EVs has begun in earnest in the U.S.,” Meyer wrote. And it shows that “tariffs alone probably can’t keep Chinese-branded EVs out of the American market forever.”

3. Equinor and Orsted win New York offshore wind auction

New York’s offshore wind industry is back, or at least back in contract. Two offshore wind projects, Empire Wind 1 and Sunrise Wind, have been awarded, respectively, to developers Equinor and the partnership of Orsted and Eversource. These two projects, which would amount to 1,700 megawatts of capacity in total (enough to power about a million homes, according to Governor Kathy Hochul’s office), had first been bid out in 2019 and then rebid when these same developers were unable to renegotiate their contracts to deal with rising material and interest rate costs. “But merely (re-)awarding the contracts does not ensure that steel goes into the water, let alone that electrons flow into homes,” wrote Heatmap’s Matthew Zeitlin. Sunrise Wind will likely be completed in 2026. Orsted has to hammer out the details of a new contract, and only then finally decide whether to go through with the thing or not; that’s expected to happen sometime in the second quarter of this year, with federal permitting finished in the summer. Empire Wind 1 has a similar timeline.

4. IEA: Energy-related CO2 emissions rose last year

There’s bad news and good news in the International Energy Agency’s CO2 Emissions in 2023 report. Let’s start with the bad news, so we can end on a positive note. Energy-related carbon emissions are still going up. Emissions increased by 1.1% in 2023, largely due to hydropower shortfalls caused by drought. The sooner we can stop pumping new carbon into the atmosphere, the better our chances of avoiding the worst effects of climate change. But there are glimmers of hope in the report: Last year’s rise was less extreme than the year before even though energy demand growth accelerated, and “without clean energy technologies, the global increase in CO2 emissions in the last five years would have been three times larger.” And the report finds that between 2019 to 2023, clean energy growth was twice as large as fossil fuel growth.

IEA

5. Florida Senate votes to ban lab-grown meat

The Florida Senate approved a bill that would make it a misdemeanor to manufacture or sell cultivated meat, or meat grown from animal cells. The “lab-grown meat” industry is still in its infancy, but some see it as a way to reduce the environmental effects of animal agriculture. Farmers and meat producers are up in arms about it, though, and cultivated meat has been drawn into Florida’s culture wars. The state House is considering its own version of the bill.

THE KICKER

The Toyota Prius Prime SE, a plug-in hybrid, was rated the “greenest” car in the country by the nonprofit American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy. At the bottom of the list was the Mercedes-Benz Maybach S680, with an estimated annual fuel cost of $3,031.

Yellow

You’re out of free articles.

Subscribe today to experience Heatmap’s expert analysis 
of climate change, clean energy, and sustainability.
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Daily Briefing

Lee Raymond, 311 ppm – 421 ppm

The former ExxonMobil CEO left his legacy both on the Earth and in the sky.

Lee Raymond.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

Lee Raymond, the former ExxonMobil chief executive who became one of the country’s most important and influential climate science deniers, died in Dallas on Saturday. His death was announced today.

Raymond would probably count as a world-historic figure even if viewed only through the lens of the fossil fuel business. As Exxon’s chief executive, he personally negotiated the company’s merger with Mobil, creating the modern oil and gas juggernaut ExxonMobil in 2000 — and uniting two major pieces of the old Standard Oil monopoly. He ran Exxon from 1993 to 1999, and then ExxonMobil until 2005, at a crucial period in the history of that company, turning it from a diversified conglomerate that sold office furniture, real estate, and uranium fuel into a streamlined and exorbitantly profitable oil and gas business. Even before taking over the company, he managed its response to the disastrous Exxon Valdez oil spill; he later oversaw a worker safety push that would be widely copied by the industry.

Keep reading...Show less
Climate

5 Key Changes to SBTi’s Net Zero Standard

The Science Based Targets Initiative just released a major update to its signature rulebook for setting climate goals.

A scientist and pollution.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

Companies have a new rulebook for what constitutes credible climate action. The Science Based Targets Initiative, an organization that seeks to align corporate sustainability plans with the goals of the Paris Agreement, published a major update to its signature Net Zero Standard on Thursday designed to help companies assess their progress on climate goals, not just set them.

The update marks a significant expansion of the standard, which previously defined what a good corporate emissions target looked like, but did not say much about how to achieve it. The new version sets requirements for what companies must do to prove they are advancing toward their benchmarks.

Keep reading...Show less
Blue
Climate Tech

Elon Musk’s Climate Tech Mafia

SpaceX and Tesla have produced executives and founders across the clean energy world. Here’s what they had to say about working for their former boss.

Elon Musk.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

While SpaceX founder and Tesla CEO Elon Musk is often lauded for turning technology like reusable rockets and American-made electric vehicles into thriving businesses in a way long thought impossible, or at least improbable, he has also more quietly done something about as unlikely: get investors excited about capital-intensive hard tech startups.

For most of the time Musk was sleeping on the floor of Tesla’s factory to oversee Model 3 assembly and his rockets were riding across the country on the back of flatbed trucks, the venture capitalists that fund the next generation of technology companies were largely enamored with software businesses, which required little capital to start up and could scale quickly with accelerating profitability.

Keep reading...Show less
Green