Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Politics

Why the EPA is Changing A Major Emissions Rule

On gas plant pollution, a new IEA report, and Florida’s war on lab-grown meat

Why the EPA is Changing A Major Emissions Rule
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

Current conditions: England and Wales had their warmest February on record • An avalanche watch has been issued for Tahoe Basin • It will be warm and windy this weekend in the Texas Panhandle, where the Smokehouse Creek Fire is still burning out of control.

THE TOP FIVE

1. EPA to relax power plant emissions rules

The Biden administration is making changes to its sweeping plan to cut greenhouse gas emissions from power plants while it figures out a new, more ambitious rule. Here’s a TL;DR version of what’s happening.

The old plan: Existing coal plants, existing gas-fired plants, and gas plants built in the future would be required to dramatically reduce their carbon dioxide emissions by 2040.

The new (temporary) plan: Existing coal plants and new gas plants must still dramatically reduce their emissions. But existing gas plants are exempt.

The end goal: The Environmental Protection Agency wants a “stronger” rule that can “achieve greater emissions reductions.” This means covering the entire fleet of gas plants, and addressing toxic air pollutants, not just greenhouse gases.

The reaction: Extremely mixed. Environmental groups that had called for tougher restrictions are pleased. But so are some utility groups that wanted the rules weakened, and see the delay as an acknowledgment of their concerns. Rhode Island’s Democratic Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse said “failing to cover the plants responsible for the vast majority of future carbon pollution from the power sector makes no sense.”

The rub: The new rules probably won’t come into place until after Election Day, if at all. The decision comes as the administration is widely expected to relax tailpipe emissions rules, and “would call into question the ability of the United States to meet the president’s goal of cutting United States emissions roughly in half by the end of this decade,” explained The New York Times.

2. Biden says Chinese EVs could be a security risk

More news from Washington: The Biden administration yesterday opened an investigation into the national security risks posed by Chinese-made “connected vehicles,” which essentially means any vehicle or any car part that connects to the internet, explained Heatmap’s Robinson Meyer. New cars, especially EVs, are outfitted with cameras, sensors, or cellular modems required for modern safety features. The investigation isn’t hugely surprising, but it “is a big deal, in part because it marks that the backlash to Chinese EVs has begun in earnest in the U.S.,” Meyer wrote. And it shows that “tariffs alone probably can’t keep Chinese-branded EVs out of the American market forever.”

3. Equinor and Orsted win New York offshore wind auction

New York’s offshore wind industry is back, or at least back in contract. Two offshore wind projects, Empire Wind 1 and Sunrise Wind, have been awarded, respectively, to developers Equinor and the partnership of Orsted and Eversource. These two projects, which would amount to 1,700 megawatts of capacity in total (enough to power about a million homes, according to Governor Kathy Hochul’s office), had first been bid out in 2019 and then rebid when these same developers were unable to renegotiate their contracts to deal with rising material and interest rate costs. “But merely (re-)awarding the contracts does not ensure that steel goes into the water, let alone that electrons flow into homes,” wrote Heatmap’s Matthew Zeitlin. Sunrise Wind will likely be completed in 2026. Orsted has to hammer out the details of a new contract, and only then finally decide whether to go through with the thing or not; that’s expected to happen sometime in the second quarter of this year, with federal permitting finished in the summer. Empire Wind 1 has a similar timeline.

4. IEA: Energy-related CO2 emissions rose last year

There’s bad news and good news in the International Energy Agency’s CO2 Emissions in 2023 report. Let’s start with the bad news, so we can end on a positive note. Energy-related carbon emissions are still going up. Emissions increased by 1.1% in 2023, largely due to hydropower shortfalls caused by drought. The sooner we can stop pumping new carbon into the atmosphere, the better our chances of avoiding the worst effects of climate change. But there are glimmers of hope in the report: Last year’s rise was less extreme than the year before even though energy demand growth accelerated, and “without clean energy technologies, the global increase in CO2 emissions in the last five years would have been three times larger.” And the report finds that between 2019 to 2023, clean energy growth was twice as large as fossil fuel growth.

IEA

5. Florida Senate votes to ban lab-grown meat

The Florida Senate approved a bill that would make it a misdemeanor to manufacture or sell cultivated meat, or meat grown from animal cells. The “lab-grown meat” industry is still in its infancy, but some see it as a way to reduce the environmental effects of animal agriculture. Farmers and meat producers are up in arms about it, though, and cultivated meat has been drawn into Florida’s culture wars. The state House is considering its own version of the bill.

THE KICKER

The Toyota Prius Prime SE, a plug-in hybrid, was rated the “greenest” car in the country by the nonprofit American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy. At the bottom of the list was the Mercedes-Benz Maybach S680, with an estimated annual fuel cost of $3,031.

Yellow

You’re out of free articles.

Subscribe today to experience Heatmap’s expert analysis 
of climate change, clean energy, and sustainability.
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Energy

Trump Wants to Prop Up Coal Plants. They Keep Breaking Down.

According to a new analysis shared exclusively with Heatmap, coal’s equipment-related outage rate is about twice as high as wind’s.

Donald Trump as Sisyphus.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

The Trump administration wants “beautiful clean coal” to return to its place of pride on the electric grid because, it says, wind and solar are just too unreliable. “If we want to keep the lights on and prevent blackouts from happening, then we need to keep our coal plants running. Affordable, reliable and secure energy sources are common sense,” Chris Wright said on X in July, in what has become a steady drumbeat from the administration that has sought to subsidize coal and put a regulatory straitjacket around solar and (especially) wind.

This has meant real money spent in support of existing coal plants. The administration’s emergency order to keep Michigan’s J.H. Campbell coal plant open (“to secure grid reliability”), for example, has cost ratepayers served by Michigan utility Consumers Energy some $80 million all on its own.

Keep reading...Show less
Blue
Spotlight

The New Transmission Line Pitting Trump’s Rural Fans Against His Big Tech Allies

Rural Marylanders have asked for the president’s help to oppose the data center-related development — but so far they haven’t gotten it.

Donald Trump, Maryland, and Virginia.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

A transmission line in Maryland is pitting rural conservatives against Big Tech in a way that highlights the growing political sensitivities of the data center backlash. Opponents of the project want President Trump to intervene, but they’re worried he’ll ignore them — or even side with the data center developers.

The Piedmont Reliability Project would connect the Peach Bottom nuclear plant in southern Pennsylvania to electricity customers in northern Virginia, i.e.data centers, most likely. To get from A to B, the power line would have to criss-cross agricultural lands between Baltimore, Maryland and the Washington D.C. area.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Hotspots

Trump Punished Wind Farms for Eagle Deaths During the Shutdown

Plus more of the week’s most important fights around renewable energy.

The United States.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

1. Wayne County, Nebraska – The Trump administration fined Orsted during the government shutdown for allegedly killing bald eagles at two of its wind projects, the first indications of financial penalties for energy companies under Trump’s wind industry crackdown.

  • On November 3, Fox News published a story claiming it had “reviewed” a notice from the Fish and Wildlife Service showing that it had proposed fining Orsted more than $32,000 for dead bald eagles that were discovered last year at two of its wind projects – the Plum Creek wind farm in Wayne County and the Lincoln Land Wind facility in Morgan County, Illinois.
  • Per Fox News, the Service claims Orsted did not have incidental take permits for the two projects but came forward to the agency with the bird carcasses once it became aware of the deaths.
  • In an email to me, Orsted confirmed that it received the letter on October 29 – weeks into what became the longest government shutdown in American history.
  • This is the first action we’ve seen to date on bird impacts tied to Trump’s wind industry crackdown. If you remember, the administration sent wind developers across the country requests for records on eagle deaths from their turbines. If companies don’t have their “take” permits – i.e. permission to harm birds incidentally through their operations – they may be vulnerable to fines like these.

2. Ocean County, New Jersey – Speaking of wind, I broke news earlier this week that one of the nation’s largest renewable energy projects is now deceased: the Leading Light offshore wind project.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow