Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Sparks

Marco Rubio Used to Champion Energy-Saving Buildings. Now He Fights Them.

Before he tried to sabotage a plan by the Biden administration, the senator touted energy efficiency as an “innovative” idea that would save taxpayers money.

Marco Rubio.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

Earlier this week, I reported on how Marco Rubio, the Republican senator from Florida, is trying to thwart the Biden administration’s plans to tighten energy efficiency standards for new buildings.

But today I learned that before Rubio became an adversary of energy efficiency, he was a champion of it.

Longtime Florida journalist and Heatmap contributor Michael Grunwald recalled that back in 2006, Rubio published a book called 100 Innovative Ideas for Florida’s Future. The book is apparently the result of an outreach campaign Rubio initiated in 2005 to ask regular Floridians what they wanted the legislature to accomplish. In the introduction, he called it “our best effort to make politics proactive.”

Lo and behold, numbers 70 through 73 propose four ideas to create an “Energy-Efficient Buildings Reward Program.”

A page from Marco Rubio's book that describes an energy efficiency rewards programCourtesy of Michael Grunwald

The ideas included implementing a voluntary statewide incentive program for energy efficiency, creating a fund to help public institutions pay for building upgrades, and providing tax incentives to help homeowners buy energy efficient appliances.

The fourth, number 73 in the book read, “Furthermore, Florida will work to build energy-efficient buildings that meet environmental standards and save taxpayers money.” That's exactly what the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development is aiming to do now.

In 2008, while Rubio was speaker of the Florida House, he succeeded in getting roughly three versions of these ideas passed. Though the legislature did not create a statewide incentive program, it did create a “Green Government Grants” program that provided funding to cities and towns to help them develop strategies to promote building efficiency. It also enacted rules requiring that new government buildings meet high-performance standards, and eliminated a looming expiration date on the state’s tax exemption for properties with solar panels.

When Rubio first ran for the Senate, he touted his accomplishments. “All 100 ideas were passed by the Florida House,” Rubio's campaign website said at the time. “Fifty-seven of these ideas ultimately became law, including measures to crack down on gangs and sexual predators, promote energy efficient buildings, appliances and vehicles, and help small businesses obtain affordable health coverage.” (Emphasis added.) Politifact later refuted that total number, finding that “using the most generous accounting, Rubio might be able to say that he got 34 ideas into state lawbooks.”

Now, after accepting more money from the homebuilding industry than any other senator during his 2022 re-election campaign, Rubio is single handedly trying to sabotage HUD’s plans to incentivize energy efficiency. The agency has proposed tightening standards that newly-built homes must adhere to in order for buyers to qualify for federally-backed loans. These rules would increase average home prices by about 2%, but they would pay for themselves within three years by saving residents money on their utility bills, in addition to significantly reducing energy demand and cutting emissions.

In the introduction to 100 Ideas, Rubio appeared to grasp the theory behind this kind of policy. “Tomorrow’s crises are only emerging problems today, and it is easier and less expensive to solve them now,” he wrote. “But when the problems go unresolved for too long … then the options narrow, and the price goes up.”

Rubio’s office told me the senator was worried about rising home prices. But it’s going to be much more expensive, and difficult, to make our buildings more efficient tomorrow than it is to integrate energy-saving measures today.

Editor’s note: A previous version of this article misstated when Michael Grunwald began covering Marco Rubio. It has been corrected. We regret the error.

You’re out of free articles.

Subscribe today to experience Heatmap’s expert analysis 
of climate change, clean energy, and sustainability.
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Sparks

This Natural Gas Plant Is a Poster Child for America’s Grid Weirdness

Elgin Energy Center is back from the dead.

A gas plant.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

At least one natural gas plant in America’s biggest energy market that was scheduled to shut down is staying open. Elgin Energy Center, an approximately 500 megawatt plant in Illinois approximately 40 miles northwest of downtown Chicago was scheduled to shut down next June, according to filings with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and officials from PJM Interconnection, the country’s largest regional transmission organization, which governs the relevant portion of the U.S. grid. Elgin’s parent company “no longer intends to deactivate and retire all four units ... at the Elgin Energy Center,” according to a letter dated September 4 and posted to PJM’s website Wednesday.

The Illinois plant is something of a poster child for PJM’s past few years. In 2022, it was one of many natural gas plants to shut down during Winter Storm Elliott as the natural gas distribution seized up. Its then-parent company, Lincoln Power — owned by Cogentrix, the Carlyle Group’s vehicle for its power business — filed for bankruptcy the following year, after PJM assessed almost $40 million in penalties for failing to operate during the storm. In June, a bankruptcy court approved the acquisition of the Elgin plant, along with one other, by Middle River Power, a generation business backed by Avenue Capital, a $12 billion investment firm, in a deal that was closed in December.

Keep reading...Show less
Green
Sparks

Trump’s Odd Attack on German Energy Policy

What’s a “normal energy plant”?

Donald Trump.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

In the closing minutes of the first presidential debate tonight, Donald Trump’s attacks on Kamala Harris took an odd, highly specific, and highly Teutonic turn. It might not have made sense to many viewers, but it fit into the overall debate’s unusually substantive focus on energy policy.

“You believe in things that the American people don’t believe in,” he said, addressing Harris. “You believe in things like, we’re not gonna frack. We’re not gonna take fossil fuel. We’re not gonna do — things that are going to make this country strong, whether you like it or not.”

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Sparks

What Would Trump Do About Climate Change? Something About the Mayor of Moscow’s Wife.

Hunter Biden also made an appearance in Trump’s answer to the debate’s one climate question.

Donald Trump.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

Well, it happened — over an hour into the debate, but it happened: the presidential candidates were asked directly about climate change. ABC News anchor Linsey Davis put the question to Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump, and their respective answers were both surprising and totally not.

Harris responded to the question by laying out the successes of Biden’s energy policy and in particular, the Inflation Reduction Act (though she didn’tmention it by name). “I am proud that as vice president, over the last four years, we have invested a trillion dollars in a clean energy economy,” Harris noted.

Keep reading...Show less
Red