Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy


Formula One Races Into Climate Change

What happens to a famously globetrotting sport when the globe becomes hard to trot?

An underwater F1 driver.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

This past Tuesday, the skies opened up over the Italian region of Emilia-Romagna. What followed was record-shattering: half of an average year’s rainfall fell on parts of the region in just 36 hours, according to The New York Times. Twenty-one rivers broke their banks, and communities in the region have been inundated with water — at least 14 people have died as of Friday, thousands are homeless, and at least 10,000 people have been evacuated.

“It’s probably been the worst night in the history of Romagna,” said Michele de Pascal, mayor of the city of Ravenna, on Italian radio. “Ravenna is unrecognizable for the damage it has suffered.”

Among the places the rains inundated is the Autodromo Internazionale Enzo e Dino Ferrari, also known as the Imola Circuit. The circuit has a storied history: First opened in 1953, it has, for decades, played on-and-off host to one of two Formula One races in Italy and is the home of the Ferrari F1 team, with their iconic red cars.

Over the past few weeks, the circuit had been gearing up for its yearly spot in the limelight — this year’s Emilia-Romagna Grand Prix was scheduled for Sunday. But on Wednesday, as the floodwaters continued to seep into homes, Formula One made an announcement: the race was off. It’s the first time in the history of the sport that a race has been cancelled because of the weather.

Formula One is possibly my most climate-unfriendly guilty pleasure. I have, since I was a teenager, been a tifosi — a Ferrari fan, the F1 equivalent of a Mets fan — and the advent of the hyper-popular Netflix series Drive to Survive has meant that suddenly many of my friends are also F1 fans. But I’m acutely aware that it isn’t exactly the lowest-emission sport out there. A regular F1 season consists of about 22 races that take place around the world, and F1’s sustainability strategy from 2019 puts the sport’s carbon dioxide emissions at over 256,000 tons each year, or the equivalent of about 34,000 American homes. Sebastian Vettel, a four-time world champion, retired from the sport last year partly due to climate concerns.

Much can be written about whether Formula One’s climate commitments mean anything. But I can’t help but wonder about a different question entirely: what happens to a famously globetrotting sport when the globe becomes hard to trot?

The Emilia-Romagna floods are the prime example. Last year, the same region suffered from the opposite problem: Drought gripped the country, drying up the soil and making it less able to soak up water. This meant that when it finally rained earlier this year, the ground became saturated with water. A warming world results in an atmosphere that holds more water vapor, which results in storms that dump water of the magnitude we saw this week. With the ground already saturated, that water had nowhere to go. Added together, each factor compounded upon the other.

The F1 calendar is essentially a tour of climate risk: Last year saw the debut of the Miami Grand Prix in the shadow of a city that’s famously endangered by sea level rise. F1 cars are not air conditioned and run incredibly hot (you’re wearing multiple layers of fire protection while sitting in front of what’s essentially a jet engine that cooks the air around you as you drive), so this year’s brand-new Las Vegas Grand Prix will take place at night to avoid the searing daytime temperatures of Nevada. That makes it the fourth night race of the season, along with the Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, and Singapore Grands Prix — that last one is so famously hot and humid that drivers work out in saunas to prepare. But climate change is making nights warm faster than days, so in a few years those places might not be safe to race in even after the sun goes down.

Outdoor sports at large are contending with similar questions: Last year’s Winter Olympics in Beijing relied entirely on artificial snow, surfing is becoming a bit of an endangered sport, and America’s favorite pastime might need a new asterisk strategy to cope with all the extra home runs coming with hotter weather.

Formula One, with its money and glitz, has so far managed to avoid the real-world impacts of climate change — a luxury the residents of Emilia-Romagna don’t quite have, though the motorsport made a 1 million euro donation to help with relief efforts. To adapt to the future F1 might, somehow, have to find a new racing line.

Neel Dhanesha profile image

Neel Dhanesha

Neel is a founding staff writer at Heatmap. Prior to Heatmap, he was a science and climate reporter at Vox, an editorial fellow at Audubon magazine, and an assistant producer at Radiolab, where he helped produce The Other Latif, a series about one detainee's journey to Guantanamo Bay. He is a graduate of the Literary Reportage program at NYU, which helped him turn incoherent scribbles into readable stories, and he grew up (mostly) in Bangalore. He tweets sporadically at @neel_dhan.


Why Republicans Grilled the Energy Secretary About UFOs

You have to get creative when you allege a “war on energy” during an oil boom.

Jennifer Granholm and UFOs.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

When Donald Trump met with a group of oil executives at Mar-a-Lago last month, his message was somewhere between “refreshingly blunt” and “blatant shakedown.” Attendees spilled to The Washington Post that Trump told the executives they should raise a billion dollars for his campaign so he could make them even richer by reducing their taxes and removing regulations on their industry.

One can’t help but wonder if any of them thought to themselves that as appealing as that kind of deal might be, there’s no reason for them to be desperate. After all, the Biden years have actually been quite good for the fossil fuel industry.

Keep reading...Show less

Biden’s Long Game on Climate

The president isn’t trying to cut emissions as fast possible. He’s doing something else.

President Biden playing chess.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

Here’s the problem with President Joe Biden’s climate policy: From a certain point of view, it makes no sense.

Take his electricity policy. At the top level, Biden has committed to eliminating greenhouse-gas pollution from the power sector by 2035. He wants to accomplish this largely by making clean energy cheaper — that’s the goal of the Inflation Reduction Act, of course — and he has also changed federal rules so it’s slightly easier to build power lines and large-scale renewable projects. He has also added teeth to that goal in the form of new Environmental Protection Agency rules cracking down on coal and natural gas.

Keep reading...Show less

AM Briefing: Greenlight for Geoengineering?

On the return of geoengineering, climate lawsuits, and a cheaper EV.

Sunrise over a mountain.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

Current conditions: Battered Midwest in for more bad weather this weekend • Tornadoes keep hitting the Great Plains • A heat wave in New Delhi that pushed temperatures above 116 degrees Fahrenheit on Friday is expected to last several more days.


1. Red states challenge climate lawsuits

Nineteen Republican-led states are asking the Supreme Court to stop Democrat-led states from trying to force oil and gas companies to pay for the impacts of climate change. Rhode Island in 2018 became the first state to sue major oil companies for climate damages and has since been joined by California, Connecticut, Minnesota, and New Jersey. The states pursuing legal action against oil companies are trying to “dictate the future of the American energy industry,” the Republican attorneys general argued in a motion filed this week, “not by influencing federal legislation or by petitioning federal agencies, but by imposing ruinous liability and coercive remedies on energy companies” through the court system.

Keep reading...Show less