The Fight

Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Hotspots

Missouri Could Be First State to Ban Solar Construction

Plus more of the week’s biggest renewable energy fights.

•
The United States.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

Cole County, Missouri – The Show Me State may be on the precipice of enacting the first state-wide solar moratorium.

  • GOP legislation backed by Missouri Governor Mike Kehoe would institute a temporary ban on building any utility-scale solar projects in the state until at least the end of 2027, including those currently under construction. It threatens to derail development in a state ranked 12th in the nation for solar capacity growth.
  • The bill is quite broad, appearing to affect all solar projects – as in, going beyond the commercial and utility-scale facility bans we’ve previously covered at the local level. Any project that is under construction on the date of enactment would have to stop until the moratorium is lifted.
  • Under the legislation, the state would then issue rulemakings for specific environmental requirements on “construction, placement, and operation” of solar projects. If the environmental rules aren’t issued by the end of 2027, the ban will be extended indefinitely until such rules are in place.
  • Why might Missouri be the first state to ban solar? Heatmap Pro data indicates a proclivity towards the sort of culture war energy politics that define regions of the country like Missouri that flipped from blue to ruby red in the Trump era. Very few solar projects are being actively opposed in the state but more than 12 counties have some form of restrictive ordinance or ban on renewables or battery storage.

Clark County, Ohio – This county has now voted to oppose Invenergy’s Sloopy Solar facility, passing a resolution of disapproval that usually has at least some influence over state regulator decision-making.

  • Ordinarily, this project wouldn’t be able to move forward because of a county moratorium on solar development that is in place until fall 2027. However Invenergy was able to grandfather the project in because of an existing agreement with PJM Interconnection, sending the decision to the Ohio Power Siting Board which will have to parse through extremely staunch and well-documented opposition.
  • At issue here is whether the OPSB will see the overwhelming rejection at the local level as evidence of the project being contrary to public necessity. A vote is not yet scheduled on that decision.

Millard County, Utah – Here we have a case of folks upset about solar projects specifically tied to large data centers.

  • Millard County commissioners unanimously rezoned thousands of acres of state land for Creekstone Energy solar projects that would eventually power AI data centers. According to local media reports, negative public comments primarily focused on the fact public land would be dedicated to energy powering private companies, and a need to ensure the community receives adequate benefits for use of that land.
  • The county assuaged those concerns by coupling its approval with a requirement that Creekstone Energy draft a “development agreement” that lays out responsible use of the public lands. My hunch is that this was sufficient for Millard County officials because it is a massive county with very little private land, and they’re used to navigating multiple-use issues and solar development.

Orange County, California – Compass Energy’s large battery project in San Juan Capistrano has finally died after a yearslong bout with local opposition.

  • Compass had the chance to take a second bite at the apple after Orange County regulators rejected the proposal, thanks to the state’s permitting primacy law governing batteries. We’ve seen other examples of contested battery projects gliding smoothly thanks to that statute. But it appears Compass decided to take the route that didn’t require continued public relations frustrations and criticism from Democratic U.S. Representative Mike Levin, who represents the development area and is usually one of Congress’s most forceful proponents of renewable energy.
  • The company rescinded its permitting request to the California Energy Commission in late December. The letter was first reported this week by the local publication Voice of OC.
  • My conclusion from this saga is simple: Battery storage projects sited near schools or residential homes will consistently find themselves in hot water.

Hillsdale County, Michigan – Here’s a new one: Two county commissioners here are stepping back from any decision on a solar project because they have signed agreements with the developer.

  • The commission is deciding whether to approve a large Ranger Power solar facility that includes land deals with two members, Dale Baker and Steve McElroy. The solar project is being inundated with opposition from nearby landowners and farmers, and so it makes sense these two would recuse themselves from any final outcome that could appear biased.
  • By stepping away, however, they’re apparently depriving the county commission a quorum, meaning it cannot decide on the project. Making matters even trickier, another commissioner represents the host town for the project, which supports its development for tax revenue reasons. Quite the comedic outcome of a failure in local governance!
Yellow

This article is exclusively
for Heatmap Plus subscribers.

Go deeper inside the politics, projects, and personalities
shaping the energy transition.
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Hotspots

Meta Data Center Federal Pipeline Review Due Early Next Year

And more of the week’s top fights around development.

•
The United States.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

1. Richland Parish, Louisiana – Gird your loins for the coming fight over the Meta Hyperion data center’s gas pipeline.

  • On Wednesday, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission laid out plans for an environmental assessment of the Entergy pipeline for the Meta data center under the National Environmental Policy Act and stated it’ll be issued in early January 2027. Federal agencies have been ordered by the panel to complete any remaining decisions on authorizations by April.
  • The decision to do an environmental assessment under NEPA will be controversial. The Sierra Club filed comments to FERC stating they wanted an environmental impact statement instead that took into account the environmental impacts of the data center being fed by the pipeline, as well as a review of the project’s cumulative impacts, as the activist group said they’re explicitly linked to the data center’s operations. “The power stations and data center are not remote or speculative developments unrelated to the proposed action,” their comments read.
  • This is quite similar to what’s playing out with the Green Chile pipeline in New Mexico for Oracle and OpenAI’s Project Jupiter, which we recently explained could turn into litigation with high stakes for future gas pipelines linked to data centers. But to me, this conflict with Meta feels like it has more at stake for this individual project, as it’s playing out while construction on gas power plants for the data center has been underway for almost a year after earlier being blessed by state regulators.
  • I asked Sierra Club what could happen next. Eric Huber, one of their managing attorneys, told me on Thursday, “I heard the EA is expected in January, but we are in wait and see mode and will decide on further steps when it comes out.” Meta and Entergy did not respond to a request for comment.

2. Spartanburg County, South Carolina – I have one last data center race to tell you to watch on Tuesday: South Carolina’s 4th, on the northern rim of the state.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Plus

Is the Election Really About Data Centers?

Talking with Kevin Gundersen, the head of public affairs for Digital Realty.

•
Kevin Gundersen
Heatmap Illustration

This week’s conversation is with Kevin Gundersen, head of public affairs for data center developer Digital Realty. On Wednesday, Digital Realty released a fascinating poll as part of Infrastructure for America, a pro-data center organization that also includes Compass, Vantage Data Centers, and QTS. The poll pushed back on the idea that we’re currently in the middle of a “data center election”; instead, it found most voters are not expected to choose their national elected officials based on a politician’s stance on data centers.

I reached out to folks involved in the poll's release, and they put me in touch with Gundersen, whom I’ve met before and consider to be a straight shooter. He accepted my invitation to do a candid hot-seat chat about the findings, his thoughts on all the data center attack ads, and whether his industry’s actually recovering any ground with the American people.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Spotlight

Trump Hasn’t Been Advancing New Wind Farms During Permitting Talks

Only upgrades for pre-existing wind projects have been approved.

••
Donald Trump.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

In September, the Trump administration told a reporter that the president directed the Pentagon to finally process wind projects through routine airspace approvals as required under a court order. By doing this, it created the appearance of real headway and good faith in talks with Democrats in Congress on energy permitting legislation before the November midterm elections.

But the White House’s assurances are not what they seem.

Keep reading...Show less