The Fight

Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Hotspots

Offshore Wind Bluster Hits New England


And more on the week’s most important conflicts around renewable energy projects.

The United States.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

1. Newport County, Rhode Island – The Trump administration escalated its onslaught against the offshore wind sector in the past week … coincidentally (or not) right after a New England-based anti-wind organization requested that it do so.

  • Over the Labor Day weekend, the Trump administration stated in a court filing that it planned to potentially redo the record of decision for Orsted’s SouthCoast wind project off the coast of Massachusetts, and yesterday, Justice Department officials said they would vacate the approval of Avangrid’s construction and operations plan for its New England 1 offshore project.
  • These announcements got a lot of media attention. Less focus was bestowed on what preceded these moves: Last week, the anti-wind organization Green Oceans partnered with four tribes native to the Northeast and together sent petitions to the Interior and Transportation Departments, as well as the Defense Department, calling for the “immediate suspension” of offshore wind in the region.
  • According to a press release, the petitions asked for projects under construction to stop work as well as called for an end to the operation of South Fork, a completed and operating wind farm off the coast of New York. The petitions rely largely on a national security rationale that mirrors the administration’s reasoning for halting work on Orsted’s Revolution Wind offshore project. (Orsted sued over that move today, by the way.)
  • We cannot say at the moment how much this specific maneuver mattered to an administration already hostile to offshore wind. But there’s reason to believe Green Oceans is an influential organization within Trump administration circles. Early this year I reported on a roadmap created by a constellation of opposition groups, including the head of Green Oceans, and submitted to the Trump transition team showing how the incoming administration could block offshore wind development. Several of the turns in that roadmap have ultimately come to pass.
  • We also now know that Green Oceans has been in direct contact with Trump officials about individual offshore wind projects. Last week, E&E News published internal emails that showed the organization obtained a meeting in May with senior Interior Department officials to discuss cancelling all current offshore wind leases held by developers.
  • At this juncture, it’s genuinely impossible to know how far Trump will go. But now we know the opposition to offshore wind is going for the Full Monty: shutting down operating projects on a national security justification.

2. Madison County, New York – Officials in this county are using a novel method to target a wind project: They’re claiming it’ll disrupt 911 calls.

  • Apparently, independent analysis commissioned by Madison County found four turbines planned for a Liberty Renewals wind project would potentially inhibit emergency communications, including 911 calls, because of their proximity to key microwave transmitters.
  • Last week, Liberty Renewals and Madison County met with an administrative law judge to discuss whether the developer will be required under their permits to relocate at least one turbine identified in that analysis. A decision will be reached within 45 days.
  • Of course, Madison County isn’t just concerned about communications disruptions, as officials were previously opposed to the wind farm on other grounds. It’s also worth noting that utilizing the potential for interruptions in emergency response is a tactic that’s been used before by the Trump administration against wind power, as discussed earlier in today’s edition.

3. Wells County, Indiana – A pro-solar organization is apparently sending mass texts to people in this county asking them to sign a petition opposing a county-wide moratorium on new projects.

  • I learned about this on Facebook, where a resident in the county posted a screenshot of a text they recently received with a link to this petition to “stop the solar ban in Wells County.” Although it is unclear who was behind the text message itself, the petition is from Solar United Neighbors, a solar energy advocacy group.
  • The petition’s language tries to convince locals to oppose the ban because of its impacts on small residential solar and community solar installations that could potentially benefit individual farmers. It also describes how a ban on utility-scale solar would negatively impact property rights.
  • I’m used to seeing this sort of text message outreach in a political campaign, not in a fight over local renewables zoning. It’s fascinating to see pro-solar promotion at the grassroots level get this granular and direct, given the lead opponents have taken in this kind of organizing.
  • I’m still not convinced these forms of outreach will work with populations that are at risk of turning NIMBY though, as direct text messages can be kind of annoying to some. Which is probably why this text was posted to social media in the first place.

4. Henderson County, Kentucky – Planning officials in this county have recommended a two-year moratorium on wind power, sending the matter to a final vote before the county fiscal court.

  • Local opposition to wind energy has encircled a proposal from Cordelio Power for Rock Bluff Energy Park, which would involve almost 100 turbines in the eastern portion of the county. If enacted, this moratorium would effectively shut out the company from developing the wind farm fast enough to receive federal renewable energy tax benefits. The county previously enacted a ban on developing the Cordelio Power project for at least one year.
  • A review of Heatmap Pro’s data on this county shows that this outcome was predictable: Despite a high degree of support for renewable energy overall at the local level, Henderson is exactly the kind of rural farming county and conservative political region that carries all the hallmarks of risk.

5. Monterey County, California – Uh oh, another battery fire in central California.

  • On Friday, the battery at an Averon solar-storage facility in the tiny town of Parkfield caught fire, leading local law enforcement to order an evacuation within a two-mile radius of the site.
  • Five homes were evacuated in the rural area that is home to fewer than 20 people, but the incident caught the attention of the media because it happened within the same county as the now-infamous Moss Landing facility. I watched this news take off like an ignition across anti-renewables Facebook, and it’s tough to see another battery fire happening so close to such an already-fraught region for battery storage.
Yellow

This article is exclusively
for Heatmap Plus subscribers.

Go deeper inside the politics, projects, and personalities
shaping the energy transition.
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Spotlight

How a Giant Solar Farm Flopped in Rural Texas

Amarillo-area residents successfully beat back a $600 million project from Xcel Energy that would have provided useful tax revenue.

Texas and solar panels.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

Power giant Xcel Energy just suffered a major public relations flap in the Texas Panhandle, scrubbing plans for a solar project amidst harsh backlash from local residents.

On Friday, Xcel Energy withdrew plans to build a $600 million solar project right outside of Rolling Hills, a small, relatively isolated residential neighborhood just north of the city of Amarillo, Texas. The project was part of several solar farms it had proposed to the Texas Public Utilities Commission to meet the load growth created by the state’s AI data center boom. As we’ve covered in The Fight, Texas should’ve been an easier place to do this, and there were few if any legal obstacles standing in the way of the project, dubbed Oneida 2. It was sited on private lands, and Texas counties lack the sort of authority to veto projects you’re used to seeing in, say, Ohio or California.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Hotspots

A Data Center Is Dead, Long Live a Solar Farm

And more of the most important news about renewable projects fighting it out this week.

The United States.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

1. Racine County, Wisconsin – Microsoft is scrapping plans for a data center after fierce opposition from a host community in Wisconsin.

  • The town of Caledonia was teed up to approve land rezoning for the facility, which would’ve been Microsoft’s third data center in the state. Dubbed “Project Nova,” the data center would have sat near an existing We Energies natural gas power plant.
  • After considerable pushback at community meetings, the tech giant announced Friday that it would either give up on the project or relocate it elsewhere to avoid more fervent opposition.
  • “While we have decided not to proceed with this particular site, we remain fully committed to investing in Southeast Wisconsin. We view this as a healthy step toward building a project that aligns with community priorities and supports shared goals,” Microsoft said in a statement published to its website, adding that it will attempt to “identify a site that supports both community priorities and our long-term development objectives.”
  • A review of the project opponents’ PR materials shows their campaign centered on three key themes: the risk of higher electricity bills, environmental impacts of construction and traffic, and a lack of clarity around how data centers could be a public good. Activists also frequently compared Project Nova to a now-infamous failed project in Wisconsin from the Chinese tech manufacturer Foxconn.

2. Rockingham County, Virginia – Another day, another chokepoint in Dominion Energy’s effort to build more solar energy to power surging load growth in the state, this time in the quaint town of Timberville.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Q&A

How the AI Boom Could Come Back Around for Natural Gas

A conversation with Enchanted Rock’s Joel Yu.

The Fight Q & A subject.
Heatmap Illustration

This week’s chat was with Joel Yu, senior vice president for policy and external affairs at the data center micro-grid services company Enchanted Rock. Now, Enchanted Rock does work I usually don’t elevate in The Fight – gas-power tracking – but I wanted to talk to him about how conflicts over renewable energy are affecting his business, too. You see, when you talk to solar or wind developers about the potential downsides in this difficult economic environment, they’re willing to be candid … but only to a certain extent. As I expected, someone like Yu who is separated enough from the heartburn that is the Trump administration’s anti-renewables agenda was able to give me a sober truth: Land use and conflicts over siting are going to advantage fossil fuels in at least some cases.

The following conversation was lightly edited for clarity.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow