Sign In or Create an Account

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Politics

The Loan Programs Office Application Portal Is Closed

Though the office says companies can still request to submit, the page has been scrubbed from LPO’s website.

The Department of Energy
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

Speaking in front of a roomful of journalists at CERAWeek in Houston this week, Secretary of Energy Chris Wright vowed to honor deals his agency made through the Loan Programs Office and “very selectively use” the in-house lender “to nudge things that ultimately can deliver more affordable, reliable, secure energy.”

“We inherit a loan book and follow the rule of law,” Wright told the audience.

Yet, in an apparent violation of federal law, the Department of Energy has scrubbed the instructions and guidelines for how to apply for loans from its website, Heatmap has learned.

A link on a page outlining the application process now directs back to the agency’s homepage.

“They didn’t just close the front door, they removed it from the building,” a former LPO contractor, who spoke on condition of anonymity to avoid reprisals, told Heatmap.

The federal statute governing the LPO lays out specific rules for making applications available online. The LPO’s website “must include, at a minimum” the “method and further instructions for submission” of an application and “the programmatic, technical, financial, and other factors and criteria that DOE will use to evaluate” the request.

Until January, that information was easily accessible on the site. Snapshots from the Internet Archive show the link with instructions on the process was still live as of January 21, the day after President Donald Trump’s inauguration. By the end of that month, however, the page was no longer available.

A source with direct knowledge of the deletion said the page came down amid Trump officials’ hasty purge of references to Biden-era policies directing infrastructure funding to economically disadvantaged, polluted neighborhoods. The page in question referenced programs such as the Justice40 initiative, a policy to direct 40% of federal benefits to such neighborhoods, and community benefits plans, a requirement in the Inflation Reduction Act to develop strategies to benefit local residents and workers in places where federal dollars funded projects, and was swept up in the mass removal.

A spokesperson for the Energy Department said companies can receive a link to the application upon request and pointed to a link for pre-application consulting that remains live on the site.

Locking away vital public information is just one sign of how the once-bustling LPO has ground to a halt in the past two months.

The lender, which has nearly $400 billion of loan authority, formed the spear tip of the Biden administration’s approach to deploying money from the nation’s landmark climate spending laws. Over the past four years, the LPO invested over $100 billion through dozens of deals to modernize and expand the United States’ aging electrical grids, bring solar panel manufacturing back home, and finance the reopening of a shuttered nuclear power station for the first time in American history.

In a cease-and-desist letter sent in early December, House Republicans accused the LPO’s then-director Jigar Shah of “scrambling to close deals” as part of a “rush-to-green agenda” voters rejected when they re-elected Trump. Two weeks later, the Energy Department’s Trump-appointed inspector general issued a report urging the LPO to halt “all loan and loan guarantee packages.”

The job cuts undertaken by billionaire Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency slashed the LPO’s headcount by at least 10%, according to another former employee who was part of the office’s unionized workforce.

“These deals are complicated, and people were already in overdrive,” the former employee said. “I really do not see how LPO can manage these projects with a reduction in headcount.”

In mid-February, the Trump administration approved its first disbursement of funding through the LPO to a sustainable aviation fuel producer — but only after facing pressure from Montana Senator Steve Daines, a Republican in whose state the jet-fuel refinery is set to be built.

Other companies that were promised financing from the LPO aren’t waiting. In October, LPO granted Aspen Aerogels a conditional loan of $670 million to fund a factory in Statesboro, Georgia, to make thermal barriers for electric vehicle batteries. General Motors was expected to be an early offtaker.

But last month, the Massachusetts-based manufacturer told investors it had backed out of the loan process and decided instead to focus on its existing assembly line in Rhode Island — and increase production in China and Mexico.

You’re out of free articles.

Subscribe today to experience Heatmap’s expert analysis 
of climate change, clean energy, and sustainability.
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Green
Spotlight

Is the California Battery Fire an East Palestine Moment?

Moss Landing is turning into a growing problem for the energy storage industry.

Moss Landing in the crosshairs.
Heatmap Pro/Getty Images

The Moss Landing battery fire now may be the storage industry’s East Palestine moment – at least in California.

In the weeks since Vistra’s battery plant south of San Francisco caught fire on January 16, at least two lawsuits have been filed against Vistra, PG&E, and battery manufacturer LG Chem by people and business owners claiming damages from the blaze. I have learned at least one more will be filed by individuals who’ve conducted headline-grabbing soil samples that found toxic metals.

Keep reading...Show less
Hotspots

The Vineyard Wind Lawsuit 2.0

And more of the week’s top conflicts around renewable energy.

The Vineyard Wind Lawsuit 2.0

1. Nantucket County, Massachusetts – Welcome to the Vineyard Wind lawsuit 2.0.

  • Fishermen represented by a conservative legal group – the Texas Public Policy Foundation – filed a petition to the Supreme Court this week asserting that the justices can now reconsider approvals for the Vineyard Wind offshore wind project because of the high court’s decision to overturn the Chevron doctrine, a now-defunct judicial precedent that courts defer to agencies on statutory interpretation.
  • It’s not entirely clear whether overturning Chevron will produce a different outcome than the Court’s decision to ignore the last petition from fisherman about Vineyard Wind’s permits. But the argument is definitely different, as the new petition argues a lower court wrongly deferred to agency interpretation of federal laws used to approve the project.
  • The Texas Public Policy Foundation did not respond to requests to discuss this case.

2. Carroll County, Maryland – Carroll County commissioners are intervening in the state permitting fight over two relatively small solar projects, in what has become a wider proxy battle between the county and the state over solar on farmland.

Keep reading...Show less
Q&A

The Case for Agrivoltaics

A conversation with Samantha Levy of American Farmland Trust

The Case for Agrivoltaics

Today’s conversation is with Samantha Levy, senior policy manager for conservation and energy at American Farmland Trust, an agriculture and energy advocacy organization I became familiar with through covering the conflict over solar on farmland. I reached out to Levy after the organization released new recommendations for agrivoltaics policy last week – just before a large agrivoltaics project was canceled in Ohio over local opposition. I wanted to ask: are there any bright spots for the future of solar and farms commingling?

Today’s conversation was lightly edited for clarity.

Keep reading...Show less