Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Sparks

The Oil Market Is Chilling Out About Hezbollah

A broader regional war is looking unlikely after a speech by the secretary general of the Lebanese militia.

People watching Hassan Nasrallah on television.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

The global energy market breathed a sigh of relief after Hassan Nasrallah, the secretary general of the Lebanese militia Hezbollah, gave a widely anticipated speech that indicated the group would not escalate its current skirmishes with the Israeli military into a full-on conflict. Hezbollah maintains a large force on Lebanon’s border with Israel.

Ever since Hamas’s attack on southern Israel and the subsequent Israeli bombardment of Gaza, a lurking question has been whether other regional powers — specifically Iran, which supports Hamas as well as Hezbollah — would get involved.

“Nasrallah sent a pretty strong signal — Hezbollah won’t enter the fight to save Hamas. If the conflict remains contained to Gaza, there’s little chance we’ll see an escalation that could impact Iran or regional oil flows,” Greg Brew, an analyst at Eurasia Group, told me.

There have been fears that a regional conflagration would not only lead to widespread suffering, but hit the global oil market and broader energy sector as well.

Oil prices shot up after the October 7 attack, with Brent crude rising to roughly $88 a barrel on Monday, October 9, and hitting as high as $92.16 on October 20. It has since settled to around $85, falling over two dollars Friday. Crude prices peaked at $96.55 in late September, the highest they have been this year.

“Prices are still volatile and we’ll probably see more reactions based on changes to the conflict,” Brew told me. “But the consensus that this won’t spill over to markets has only strengthened; Nasrallah speech will reinforce it further.”

While the eastern Mediterranean is only a minor region for hydrocarbon extraction, both Iran and Saudi Arabia are major oil exporters, despite Iran being under sanctions for its nuclear program.

Saudi Arabia and Israel had been in talks about normalizing relations before the Hamas attack and there were even indications that Saudi Arabia would boost production next year to ease the path to a deal. After the attack, Republicans in Congress called on the Biden administration to tighten sanctions on Iran to limit oil exports.

In his speech, Nasrallah’s “general message was that Hezbollah was already doing enough,” according to The New York Times, a sign that escalation beyond the occasional clashes between Hezbollah and the Israeli military — let alone directly involvement by Iran — was unlikely.

You’re out of free articles.

Subscribe today to experience Heatmap’s expert analysis 
of climate change, clean energy, and sustainability.
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Sparks

Esmeralda 7 Solar Project Has Been Canceled, BLM Says

It would have delivered a gargantuan 6.2 gigawatts of power.

Donald Trump, Doug Burgum, and solar panels.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images, Library of Congress

The Bureau of Land Management says the largest solar project in Nevada has been canceled amidst the Trump administration’s federal permitting freeze.

Esmeralda 7 was supposed to produce a gargantuan 6.2 gigawatts of power – equal to nearly all the power supplied to southern Nevada by the state’s primary public utility. It would do so with a sprawling web of solar panels and batteries across the western Nevada desert. Backed by NextEra Energy, Invenergy, ConnectGen and other renewables developers, the project was moving forward at a relatively smooth pace under the Biden administration, albeit with significant concerns raised by environmentalists about its impacts on wildlife and fauna. And Esmeralda 7 even received a rare procedural win in the early days of the Trump administration when the Bureau of Land Management released the draft environmental impact statement for the project.

Keep reading...Show less
Blue
Sparks

Trump Just Suffered His First Loss on Offshore Wind

A judge has lifted the administration’s stop-work order against Revolution Wind.

Donald Trump and wind turbines.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

A federal court has lifted the Trump administration’s order to halt construction on the Revolution Wind farm off the coast of New England. The decision marks the renewables industry’s first major legal victory against a federal war on offshore wind.

The Interior Department ordered Orsted — the Danish company developing Revolution Wind — to halt construction of Revolution Wind on August 22, asserting in a one-page letter that it was “seeking to address concerns related to the protection of national security interests of the United States and prevention of interference with reasonable uses of the exclusive economic zone, the high seas, and the territorial seas.”

Keep reading...Show less
Blue
Sparks

Interior Department Targets Wind Developers Using Bird Protection Law

A new letter sent Friday asks for reams of documentation on developers’ compliance with the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act.

An eagle clutching a wind turbine.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

The Fish and Wildlife Service is sending letters to wind developers across the U.S. asking for volumes of records about eagle deaths, indicating an imminent crackdown on wind farms in the name of bird protection laws.

The Service on Friday sent developers a request for records related to their permits under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, which compels companies to obtain permission for “incidental take,” i.e. the documented disturbance of eagle species protected under the statute, whether said disturbance happens by accident or by happenstance due to the migration of the species. Developers who received the letter — a copy of which was reviewed by Heatmap — must provide a laundry list of documents to the Service within 30 days, including “information collected on each dead or injured eagle discovered.” The Service did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Keep reading...Show less
Green