You’re out of free articles.
Log in
To continue reading, log in to your account.
Create a Free Account
To unlock more free articles, please create a free account.
Sign In or Create an Account.
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Welcome to Heatmap
Thank you for registering with Heatmap. Climate change is one of the greatest challenges of our lives, a force reshaping our economy, our politics, and our culture. We hope to be your trusted, friendly, and insightful guide to that transformation. Please enjoy your free articles. You can check your profile here .
subscribe to get Unlimited access
Offer for a Heatmap News Unlimited Access subscription; please note that your subscription will renew automatically unless you cancel prior to renewal. Cancellation takes effect at the end of your current billing period. We will let you know in advance of any price changes. Taxes may apply. Offer terms are subject to change.
Subscribe to get unlimited Access
Hey, you are out of free articles but you are only a few clicks away from full access. Subscribe below and take advantage of our introductory offer.
subscribe to get Unlimited access
Offer for a Heatmap News Unlimited Access subscription; please note that your subscription will renew automatically unless you cancel prior to renewal. Cancellation takes effect at the end of your current billing period. We will let you know in advance of any price changes. Taxes may apply. Offer terms are subject to change.
Create Your Account
Please Enter Your Password
Forgot your password?
Please enter the email address you use for your account so we can send you a link to reset your password:

If trees are the lungs of the Earth, then it’s reasonable to wonder how the plants of the Northeastern United States are faring during this week’s record-breaking wildfire smoke event. Certainly, we oxygen-gulping inhabitants of their sister kingdom, Animalia, have seen better days: Wildfire smoke contains tiny particles known as PM2.5 that penetrate deep into our lungs, enter our bloodstreams, and cause irritation and inflammation while exacerbating life-threatening conditions and doing who-knows-what-else. For living beings with the evolutionary luxury of both bipedal mobility and frontal cortexes capable of inventing the air purifier, it is wise, if at all possible, to get out of the smoke and stay out.
Meanwhile, trees, home gardens, and the precious Finger Lakes vineyards had to stand and bear an Air Quality Index that topped 400 in places. So … are the plants okay?
Maybe you’ve heard of “smoke taint,” an effect that happens when the highly permeable skin of a grape absorbs wildfire smoke, causing the resulting wine to taste “sooty and dead.” Smoke taint has been a serious problem for vignerons in Washington and California as wildfire seasons have gotten worse. The good news is, in this particular case, it’s still early enough in the growing season that New York’s wine industry — the third largest in the nation — likely dodged a bullet.
“Even if it’s a fairly severe [smoke] exposure, the real risk starts after the bloom is finished and the berries start to form,” Dr. Tom Collins, an assistant professor of wine and grape chemistry at Washington State University, told me. “So if you have smoke events that occur after that time, then the risk goes up significantly.” But since New York grapevines are still pre-bloom, “they probably are not going to be hurt by this.”
Kyle Anne Pallischeck, the executive director of the Finger Lakes Wine Association, confirmed that “from conversations I’ve had, there isn’t much concern at this point” about the Canadian smoke impacting the season’s harvest. Phew.
Get one great climate story in your inbox every day:
Smoke is made up of carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and particulate matter, the latter of which wreaks havoc on animal respiratory systems — which plants luckily don’t have. More importantly, plants use carbon dioxide for photosynthesis and there’s some evidence that suggests wildfire smoke as a result might increase plant productivity.
Additionally, the same researchers found that smoke potentially allows plants to use sunlight more efficiently since the smoke diffuses light: “Whereas direct sunlight might fall mainly on upper foliage, leaving the rest of a plant in shade, diffuse light can reach a greater number of photosynthesizing leaves throughout the vegetation canopy,” Eos explains. (Other research indicates photosynthesis might drop because of reduced light intensity, though this likely only matters if it happens for a prolonged period of time in the window where a crop is ripening).
Smoke, however, is much worse for plants when it’s from a nearby source since the ash can clog stomatal pores, effectively choking the plant. But while the smoke event in the East still “looks awful [and] it still smells awful, it’s not going to have as big an impact on local agriculture,” Collins said, because the fires are hundreds of miles away. By the time the smoke reaches most of the U.S., “a lot of the things that are most problematic to plants have begun to fall out or are reacted in the atmosphere into things that are less impactful.”
You worked hard to cultivate your dramatic little strawberry plant and you should get to enjoy your harvest, darn it! But maybe watching the plant endure all that yellow air has ruined your appetite.
You don’t have to hold back, though. Smoke likely won’t have penetrated deep into the plant and washing it off well is probably the biggest precaution you’ll need to take before you enjoy it. Of course, use your best judgment: If your plant is covered in a fine layer of ash, you don’t want to put it in your mouth (“When it doubt, throw it out,” the Oregon State University concurs).
You can also be extra safe by soaking fruits and veggies in a white vinegar solution at a ratio of one teaspoon of vinegar to three cups of water.
Farm workers are one of the highest-risk groups for short- and long-term health effects from wildfires due to their strenuous outdoor labor that can’t often be put off. But if you have the ability to opt out of tending to your garden for a few days when the AQI is this bad, then yes, absolutely opt out.
Read more about the wildfire smoke engulfing the eastern United States:
Why Are the Canadian Wildfires So Bad This Year?
How to Stay Safe from Wildfire Smoke Indoors
Wildfire Smoke Is a Wheezy Throwback for New York City
Wednesday Was the Worst Day for Wildfire Pollution in U.S. History
Log in
To continue reading, log in to your account.
Create a Free Account
To unlock more free articles, please create a free account.
There is a heat wave in Europe, the world’s fastest warming continent. And so, as you may have heard, a perennial topic of online climate discourse has returned: Why don’t more Europeans have air conditioning?
I’m partially convinced this is psy op, or at least a figment of how social media organizes attention. I have a hypothesis that various “For You” page algorithms, especially that of the social network X, began to reward content that performed unusually well across national borders a few years ago. Since then, the amount of America vs. Europe content has surged. (Of course, writers have been comparing American and European lifestyles for much longer than that.)
Suffice it to say, though: It’s a fraught topic. I’ve assumed that as extreme heat gets worse as the climate changes, Europeans will simply get on with it and install AC, much as Americans in the Pacific Northwest have done. Yet there are cultural and regulatory obstacles to AC’s growth in Europe.
I’m sure I’ll write about it in the future, but for now I want to get a grip on the facts themselves. And so as a Friday special, I present to you — the facts about European AC, as I understand it:
Thanks so much for reading, and talk soon.
The movement against data centers is raising up a raison d'etre of the anti-renewables movement: protecting would-be farmland.
Farm owners and operators across the U.S. are winning national headlines almost every week for rejecting big dollar offers from data center developers. In Hanover County, Virginia, protestors are chanting “Grow Tomatoes, Not Data Centers.” In Pennsylvania and elsewhere, Republican legislators are mulling proposals to block the sale of so-called “prime farmland” for data center development. In Texas, the fight over data center development has engulfed the race for the state’s ag commissioner seat. In the Midwest, where agriculture reigns supreme, statewide races and congressional campaigns are slowly but surely being defined by the issue. Like in Nebraska where Austin Ahlman, an independent candidate running for Congress in Nebraska’s first district, told me he believes the data center backlash is reflective of a populist politics that broadly criticize elites and top-down control of the economy: “I think sometimes people misunderstand the anxieties of rural Americans when it comes to these data centers because a lot of their fears are about control long term.”
Unlike the farmland backlash around renewable energy development, the loudest critics are on the anti-monopolist left. On Wednesday, the prominent opposition group Food and Water Watch signaled farmland could soon be a watchword in the national data center debate – in a fashion analogous to what we’ve seen with renewable energy. The organization’s blog post entitled “The AI Data Center Boom Is Coming for Farmers” declared data centers verboten because of the threat they posed to “small and midsized family farmers.” Mitch Jones, deputy director of the campaign outfit, said he believes the threat to farmland is “a compelling reason to oppose data center development” but that his organization’s fight is primarily focused on protecting small business owners and an anti-monopoly sentiment.
“If data centers are coming into their areas, this puts even more pressure on them. It drives up the cost of their electricity, just as it does anyone else. It competes with them for water for crops, and it affects the value of their land in a perverse way,” Jones told me.
None of this should be surprising. An agricultural workforce has always been a good barometer for figuring out if a community will accept new infrastructure of any kind. We’ve seen as much time and time again with renewable energy, carbon capture, fossil energy and mining, just to name a few industries.
This same rule is true with data centers. In April, county commissioners in Kosciusko County, Indiana, unanimously rejected a Prologis data center; nearly 90% of acreage in Kosciusko County is being actively farmed, according to the Heatmap Pro database. Linn County, Iowa, in February enacted a rule severely restricting data center development in unincorporated areas; almost three-fourths of the land is used by the ag sector. A potential Amazon facility is causing heartburn in Clinton County, Ohio; nearly all land in the county is used for farming and utility-scale solar development has a recent history of conflict with landowners.
To be candid, I’m struck by the similarity in the backlash over siting data centers on farmland – a resemblance so close that some counties are starting to restrict renewable energy and data center development on farmland at the same time. This week, Eau Claire County, Wisconsin created a new “farmland preservation plan” discouraging utility-scale solar energy and data centers on any potential farmland. (More than 40% of land in this county is currently being used for farmland, according to Heatmap Pro.)
Jones at Food and Water Watch said his organization taking on the “protect farmland” mantle had nothing to do with the success this argument has had against renewable energy. “That thought never entered my head,” he told me, adding that if communities respond to the data center backlash by taking steps that short-circuit solar and wind too, that’s “a coincidence.”
I kept pressing. What if the pivot to farmland protection leads to more communities restricting renewable energy along with the data centers? “If you’re looking for a reason to oppose solar and wind, you can come up with that without having to attach data centers to it,” Jones said. “We’ve seen rural communities oppose solar and wind before data centers blew up across the country. It’s nothing new.”
And more of the week’s top news around project fights.
1. Virginia Beach, Virginia – The right-wing interest group lawsuit against Dominion Energy’s Coastal Virginia offshore wind is now dead, concluding one of the wackier tales of the Trump 2.0 energy era.
2. Box Elder County, Utah – Call it the Box Elder County massacre.
3. Davidson County, Tennessee – We have the latest updates in the Nashville Zoo data center drama and they’re a doozy and a half.
4. Clark County, Ohio – Yet another utility-scale solar farm is in the Ohio state permitting graveyard.