Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Electric Vehicles

Aerodynamics Is the Next Frontier of EV Design

New designs are giving consumers exactly what they want — striking looks and killer range. Electric vehicles will never be the same.

A Mercedes-Benz EV.
Heatmap Illustration/Mercedes-Benz, Getty Images

Cutting-edge aerodynamics tend to only be appreciated in hindsight.

The first American car to truly be designed aerodynamically was the iconic 1934 Chrysler Airflow. At a time when everything else on the road was huge and imposing, the Chrysler Airflow introduced streamlining to the automotive industry and featured a radical Art Deco shape that was developed in a wind tunnel. It was much more efficient and stable at high speeds than its contemporaries, and its groundbreaking unibody construction provided fantastic ride quality.

It was an absolute flop.

The Chrysler Airflow.Via Stellantis

Yet the Airflow’s aerodynamic design changed the face of the industry. Toyota’s first production car was inspired by the Airflow, and Peugeot found big success with its streamliner 202 and 402 models.

Since then, there have been many other aero-focused cars that push the boundaries of engineering, and quite a few of them have been flops. The UFO-like General Motors EV1 of the 1990s was a lease-only experimental electric vehicle with a record-breaking 0.19 drag coefficient. Almost its entire production run was bought back and crushed. Then there was the limited-run 2013 Volkswagen XL1, a diesel-powered hybrid with carbon-fiber construction and butterfly-wing doors that returned 260 MPG. Only 250 were ever made. Maybe the most successful modern example of aero-first design is the Toyota Prius, which is hugely popular, seriously efficient, and has an exterior that people love to hate.

Modern electric cars might just change things though.

The category is still in its relative infancy. Most automakers are focusing on large, heavy EV crossovers and trucks, whether powered by batteries or combustion engines, because those are the most popular segments. But they are also seriously inefficient. To get the kind of range that customers want, most of these new EVs have enormous battery packs. The GMC Hummer EV’s 210-kWh pack is double the size of the ones found in most other EVs and weighs 3,000 pounds. Yet the boxy Hummer still only has a range of around 300 miles.

But EVs like the Hummer might quickly end up an evolutionary curiosity. There’s growing concerned about the dangers these heavy but lightning-fast EVs pose to pedestrians and smaller cars, and some countries are already pushing consumers towards lighter and smaller options through tax rates and incentives. Yet even as charging infrastructure improves and solid-state battery tech emerges, consumers are still expected to prioritize range and efficiency. The result will be a sea change in EV styling, and we’re already starting to see the tides shift.

Finally, aerodynamic designs are going mainstream.

The Lucid Air, Porsche Taycan, and Tesla Model S are all super slippery sedans, but good aero isn’t limited to high-end EVs. The new Hyundai Ioniq 6 has an incredible drag coefficient of 0.21, giving the Long Range RWD trim a range of 361 miles from a 77.4-kWh battery pack. Its starting price of $46,615 is a couple of grand below the average price of a new car. Hyundai prominently features the Ioniq 6’s streamlined design in its advertising, positioning aerodynamics and efficiency not only as economical but cool and desirable. Volkswagen’s upcoming ID 7 will essentially take the Passat’s place in the lineup, featuring a sleek sedan body and a range of well over 300 miles.

The Hyundai Ioniq 6.Via Hyundai

This is not to say SUVs won’t still remain incredibly popular, and engineers are finding interesting ways to improve their aerodynamics too. The gorgeous Polestar 3 has an aero blade at the front of the hood that improves airflow and reduces pressures, and a floating rear wing that increases downforce and stability.

The Polestar 3.Via Polestar

The closest modern equivalent to the Airflow is arguably the Mercedes-Benz EQS, the first of Mercedes’ electric EQ sub-brand to go on sale in the U.S. The EQS’ lozenge-shaped body and cab-forward proportions give it a drag coefficient of 0.20, enough to make it the most aerodynamic series-production car when it launched. (The Lucid Air has since beat it with a 0.197 coefficient.) Like the Airflow, many customers and vocal online commenters are put off by the EQS’ styling, especially traditional Mercedes buyers. Mercedes appears undeterred, using the blobby styling throughout its EQ lineup, with an SUV version of the EQS and a midsize EQE sedan already on sale. Despite the success of the EQ models, Mercedes is still probably leaving money on the table by doubling down on the controversial aesthetic.

The Mercedes-Benz EQS.Via Mercedes-Benz

Until then, there is one recent production car that has pushed the boundaries of what’s currently possible: The Lightyear 0, an expensive Dutch sedan that briefly entered production in 2022. The nearly $300,000 Lightyear 0 was touted as the first truly solar-powered car, with 782 solar cells on the body that add over 40 miles of range per day during the summer, and its drag coefficient of 0.175 makes it the most aerodynamic production car ever. But back in January, Lightyear’s owners went bankrupt and production of the 0 was stopped for good after just a handful were made. The company says it’s focusing now on launching a much cheaper, still solar-powered EV called the Lightyear 2, which will wrap the 0’s know-how in a more accessible package.

The Lightyear 0.Via Lightyear

Chrysler is bringing back the name Airflow for its first legit production electric car, which will be going on sale in 2024. Sadly, the new Airflow is a crossover that, while handsome, captures none of the same groundbreaking spirit as the original. Yet while Chrysler might still be playing it safe 100 years later, the Airflow’s influence lives on in the world’s most exciting new cars. Aerodynamics are once again having a moment.

Blue
Daniel Golson profile image

Daniel Golson

Daniel Golson is a freelance automotive journalist based in Los Angeles. While obsessed with every facet of the industry, his specialities are discussing design, new technology and the intersection of cars and culture. His personal garage is filled by a bright teal 1991 Mercedes-Benz 300SL named after Meryl Streep's character in 'Death Becomes Her.'

Politics

What the Conventional Wisdom Gets Wrong About Trump and the IRA

Anything decarbonization-related is on the chopping block.

Donald Trump holding the IRA.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

The Biden administration has shoveled money from the Inflation Reduction Act out the door as fast as possible this year, touting the many benefits all that cash has brought to Republican congressional districts. Many — in Washington, at think tanks and non-profits, among developers — have found in this a reason to be calm about the law’s fate. But this is incorrect. The IRA’s future as a climate law is in a far more precarious place than the Beltway conventional wisdom has so far suggested.

Shortly after the changing of the guard in Congress and the White House, policymakers will begin discussing whether to extend the Trump-era tax cuts, which expire at the end of 2025. If they opt to do so, they’ll try to find a way to pay for it — and if Republicans win big in the November elections, as recent polling and Democratic fretting suggests could happen, the IRA will be an easy target.

Keep reading...Show less
Climate

AM Briefing: A Wind and Solar Milestone

On the rise of renewables, peak oil, and carbon capture

U.S. Wind and Solar Just Hit a Power Milestone
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

Current conditions: More than 10 inches of rain fell over nine hours in southwestern China • Wildfires are spreading in Canada, with at least 140 burning as of yesterday afternoon • The streets of Cape Town in South Africa are under water after severe storms caused widespread flooding.

THE TOP FIVE

1. Wind and solar surpass nuclear in U.S. electricity generation

More electricity was generated by wind and solar than by nuclear plants in the first half of 2024 for the first time ever in U.S. history, Reutersreported, citing data from energy think tank Ember. Solar and wind farms generated 401.4 terawatt hours (TWh) compared to 390.5 TWh generated from nuclear reactors, setting 2024 on pace to be the “first full year when more U.S. electricity will come from renewables than from any other form of clean power.” It’s helpful to compare these numbers to the same period last year, when nuclear generated 9% more power than solar and wind. Solar saw the greatest gains, with output 30% higher in the first half of 2024 compared to 2023; wind generation was up 10% and nuclear was up just 3.4%. Between 2018 and 2023, installed capacity grew by 168% for utility solar and 56% for wind. Meanwhile, nuclear generation capacity dropped by 4%.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Politics

Trump’s Likely VPs All Have Different Bad Ideas About Climate

Though not, perhaps, the bad ideas you might expect.

Donald Trump and VP contenders.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

Donald Trump will announce his running mate any day now, and according to multiple reports his choice has come down to Florida Senator Marco Rubio, Ohio Senator J. D. Vance, and North Dakota Governor Doug Burgum. All erstwhile critics of Trump, they now share a fervent admiration for the former president they once scorned. But where do they stand on climate change?

Opinions on climate within the Republican Party are complex, and these three men reflect the divisions. According to Pew Research Center polls, 47% of Republicans over the age of 65 believe that human activity contributes a great deal or some to climate change, but a full 79% of Republicans under 30 think so. Yet only a tiny number of them feel any urgency around climate: In a Pew poll earlier this year, only 12% of Republicans said climate should be a top priority for the president and Congress, the lowest score of the 20 issues they asked about. (59% of Democrats said it should be a top priority.)

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow