Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Energy

Why Gas in California Is Almost $6 a Gallon — and Could Go Higher

War with Iran adds to a long list of factors making California gas hella expensive.

Scary gas prices.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

California’s gasoline market is a world all its own. Gas prices there are consistently higher than anywhere else in the U.S. — and with the global oil industry currently experiencing its greatest physical supply shock since at least the 1970s, that difference has gotten especially painful.

Since Iran effectively closed the Strait of Hormuz to tanker traffic in response to U.S.- and Israel-led attacks, blocking around 10% of global oil production from reaching the world market, the average gasoline price in California has risen to $5.62 per gallon, according to AAA, up from $4.59 a month ago. Compare that to the national average $3.88 per gallon, up from $2.93 in February, and you’ll begin to feel Californians’ pain. The longer the strait remains closed and the higher oil prices continue to rise, the more dramatic those price increases are likely to be.

But where does that difference come from in the first place? In part it’s due to deliberate policy choices, including California’s unusually high taxes on gasoline, environmental regulations that require a unique blend of fuel, and the state’s cap and invest program. Then there’s what University of California Berkeley energy economist Severin Borenstein calls the “mystery gasoline surcharge,” which emerged after a 2015 refinery fire in Torrance that drove up prices beyond what the obvious tax and regulatory factors could explain. (Borenstein thinks it may be in part due to lack of competition between gas stations, but he admits it’s still an open question.)

California is also unusually dependent on other states — and even other countries — for its crude oil and even gasoline itself. The state is essentially cut off from the U.S. oil pipeline network due to its geographic isolation, strict environmental regulations (again), and the uncertainty of investing in fossil fuel infrastructure for a state that is actively and aggressively trying to decarbonize.

Not only that, California’s local refining capacity has been shrinking at a precipitous rate. The Phillips 66 refinery in Los Angeles shut down last year, and the Valero refinery in Benicia is due to shut down later this year, taking out some 17% of the state’s refinery capacity.

This makes California reliant on maritime imports, and thanks to the Jones Act — which requires that sea-based trade within the U.S. use American-made, owned, and crewed ships, of which there are just 55 in operation — those ships essentially have to come from overseas.

Since the Torrance refinery fire, the state’s gas price has fluctuated largely based on the price of imports of finished gasoline or components used to blend California’s unique fuel, Ryan Cummings, the chief of staff at the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, told me.

“In California, the marginal barrel, which is what sets the price — the most expensive barrel to bring to market — is imported and has been that way since 2015,” he said.

While some of the feedstock for California’s gasoline does come from the U.S. (but arrives by way of the Bahamas to skirt Jones Act restrictions), far more comes from India and South Korea, which are at the heart of the current energy shock. Along with other states in the western U.S. that rely on imports, Cummings told me, California is “disproportionately” affected by the physical price of oil in the Middle East “because that’s where a lot of the imports come from.”

One curious feature of the unfolding energy crisis is that the benchmarks typically used as stand-ins for the price of oil — West Texas Intermediate and Brent — have diverged substantially from the physical price of oil being bought by refineries in Asia, which rely on Persian Gulf supplies. Asian refineries have been paying around $155 per barrel, according to JPMorgan chief commodities strategist Natasha Kaneva. The WTI, which is based on oil to be delivered in Oklahoma, sits at $96, and Brent, in the North Sea, is $110.

“The immediate physical shortfall is concentrated in Asian markets, where reliance on Gulf barrels is greatest,” Kaneva wrote in a note to clients. “Early signs of demand destruction are emerging in Asia as product prices surge and spot barrels become prohibitively expensive.”

California, on the other hand, will likely just continue to grit its teeth and buy. Cummings has advocated that the Benicia refinery, which is due to shut down by the end of April, be converted into an import terminal for petroleum products to ensure that California maintains adequate supplies of imported gasoline and components. That would help insulate it from shortages that cause spikes beyond high global prices.

If the strait remains closed through March and production shut-ins increase as storage fills up, “it’s totally reasonable to think oil is going to be $150 a barrel, if not more,” Cummings told me. “And if that’s the case, we’ll see higher than $7 a gallon average gasoline price in California.”

At least so far, however, “gasoline prices are doing about what you’d expect them to do,” Borenstein, the Berkeley professor, told me, rising in line with the rest of the country.But the state “really needs to make sure that we are out ahead of this by making sure there are no frictions that are created in expanding port capacity, pipeline capacity and storage,” he added. The ability to store and move gasoline around is particularly important, Borenstein explained, because of the lack of refining capacity in the state.

The real test for California’s petroleum system will be when “one of the remaining refineries has an unexpected shutdown,” Borenstein told me. “It always happens, and so at that point I hope we will have made sure there’s enough inventory to handle that and enough capacity to keep bringing product in.”

Green

You’re out of free articles.

Subscribe today to experience Heatmap’s expert analysis 
of climate change, clean energy, and sustainability.
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Energy

Why This Gas Crisis Isn’t Hitting Like 1979

$4 of gasoline will actually get you pretty far these days.

The 1970s gas crisis.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

Everyone’s mad about high oil prices, but are they doing anything about it? With around 11 million barrels per day (about a tenth of global production) shut in, and thus missing from the global oil market, someone has to be using less of it. Maybe it’s petrochemical plants that run on tight margins slowing down. Maybe it’s European airlines cancelling flights.

At least so far, it’s probably not American drivers.

Keep reading...Show less
Blue
AM Briefing

Science Experiments

On China’s fossil fuel controls, Maine data centers, and a faster NRC

The National Science Foundation.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

Current conditions: Nearly two dozen states from Texas to Minnesota are bracing for days of thunderstorms, tornadoes, hail, and winds up to 70 miles per hour • Japan is deploying 1,400 firefighters to battle a wildfire in Iwate prefecture that has forced at least 3,000 people to evacuate • While it’s nearly 50 degrees Fahrenheit and sunny today in Chernobyl, Ukraine, exactly 40 years ago yesterday the weather worsened the world’s worst nuclear accident by blowing radiation from the melted-down reactor.


THE TOP FIVE

1. Trump ousts the board members from National Science Foundation

The Trump administration has dismissed every member of the independent board that oversees the National Science Foundation. In what The New York Times described as a “terse email” sent Friday afternoon, members of the 25-member National Science Board were told their position was “terminated, effective immediately.” Willie E. May, a terminated board member and a vice president at Morgan State University, told the newspaper: “I am deeply disappointed, though I cannot say I am entirely surprised. I have watched the systematic dismantling of the scientific advisory infrastructure of this government with growing alarm, and the National Science Board is simply the latest casualty.” The move to seize tighter control over funding for scientific research comes two months after the Environmental Protection Agency repealed the legal finding that underpins all federal climate regulations and days after the Department of Health and Human Services nixed publication of a study about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines.

Keep reading...Show less
Blue
Climate Tech

At San Francisco Climate Week, Everyone Was Betting on Data Centers

Plus three big announcements from the annual hullabaloo.

A SFCW light bulb.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

Now in its fourth year, San Francisco Climate Week is noticeably bigger and buzzier each time I go. When I first attended in 2024, everyone was trying to shoehorn generative artificial intelligence into climate solutions. Last year, founders and funders were struggling to figure out how to deploy capital and stay afloat after Trump took a hammer to Biden-era climate incentives.

This year — which reportedly saw double 2025’s attendance, with roughly 60,000 people choosing from more than 700 events — everyone was banking on the data center buildout, the speed-to-power race, and the broader effort to squeeze more capacity out of the existing grid to save climate tech. Given that the AI race is essentially keeping the U.S. economy afloat during a tumultuous year of tariffs, war, and ongoing energy price shocks, that doesn’t look like such a bad bet, at least for now.

Keep reading...Show less
Green