Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Energy

Why Gas in California Is Almost $6 a Gallon — and Could Go Higher

War with Iran adds to a long list of factors making California gas hella expensive.

•
Scary gas prices.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

California’s gasoline market is a world all its own. Gas prices there are consistently higher than anywhere else in the U.S. — and with the global oil industry currently experiencing its greatest physical supply shock since at least the 1970s, that difference has gotten especially painful.

Since Iran effectively closed the Strait of Hormuz to tanker traffic in response to U.S.- and Israel-led attacks, blocking around 10% of global oil production from reaching the world market, the average gasoline price in California has risen to $5.62 per gallon, according to AAA, up from $4.59 a month ago. Compare that to the national average $3.88 per gallon, up from $2.93 in February, and you’ll begin to feel Californians’ pain. The longer the strait remains closed and the higher oil prices continue to rise, the more dramatic those price increases are likely to be.

But where does that difference come from in the first place? In part it’s due to deliberate policy choices, including California’s unusually high taxes on gasoline, environmental regulations that require a unique blend of fuel, and the state’s cap and invest program. Then there’s what University of California Berkeley energy economist Severin Borenstein calls the “mystery gasoline surcharge,” which emerged after a 2015 refinery fire in Torrance that drove up prices beyond what the obvious tax and regulatory factors could explain. (Borenstein thinks it may be in part due to lack of competition between gas stations, but he admits it’s still an open question.)

California is also unusually dependent on other states — and even other countries — for its crude oil and even gasoline itself. The state is essentially cut off from the U.S. oil pipeline network due to its geographic isolation, strict environmental regulations (again), and the uncertainty of investing in fossil fuel infrastructure for a state that is actively and aggressively trying to decarbonize.

Not only that, California’s local refining capacity has been shrinking at a precipitous rate. The Phillips 66 refinery in Los Angeles shut down last year, and the Valero refinery in Benicia is due to shut down later this year, taking out some 17% of the state’s refinery capacity.

This makes California reliant on maritime imports, and thanks to the Jones Act — which requires that sea-based trade within the U.S. use American-made, owned, and crewed ships, of which there are just 55 in operation — those ships essentially have to come from overseas.

Since the Torrance refinery fire, the state’s gas price has fluctuated largely based on the price of imports of finished gasoline or components used to blend California’s unique fuel, Ryan Cummings, the chief of staff at the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, told me.

“In California, the marginal barrel, which is what sets the price — the most expensive barrel to bring to market — is imported and has been that way since 2015,” he said.

While some of the feedstock for California’s gasoline does come from the U.S. (but arrives by way of the Bahamas to skirt Jones Act restrictions), far more comes from India and South Korea, which are at the heart of the current energy shock. Along with other states in the western U.S. that rely on imports, Cummings told me, California is “disproportionately” affected by the physical price of oil in the Middle East “because that’s where a lot of the imports come from.”

One curious feature of the unfolding energy crisis is that the benchmarks typically used as stand-ins for the price of oil — West Texas Intermediate and Brent — have diverged substantially from the physical price of oil being bought by refineries in Asia, which rely on Persian Gulf supplies. Asian refineries have been paying around $155 per barrel, according to JPMorgan chief commodities strategist Natasha Kaneva. The WTI, which is based on oil to be delivered in Oklahoma, sits at $96, and Brent, in the North Sea, is $110.

“The immediate physical shortfall is concentrated in Asian markets, where reliance on Gulf barrels is greatest,” Kaneva wrote in a note to clients. “Early signs of demand destruction are emerging in Asia as product prices surge and spot barrels become prohibitively expensive.”

California, on the other hand, will likely just continue to grit its teeth and buy. Cummings has advocated that the Benicia refinery, which is due to shut down by the end of April, be converted into an import terminal for petroleum products to ensure that California maintains adequate supplies of imported gasoline and components. That would help insulate it from shortages that cause spikes beyond high global prices.

If the strait remains closed through March and production shut-ins increase as storage fills up, “it’s totally reasonable to think oil is going to be $150 a barrel, if not more,” Cummings told me. “And if that’s the case, we’ll see higher than $7 a gallon average gasoline price in California.”

At least so far, however, “gasoline prices are doing about what you’d expect them to do,” Borenstein, the Berkeley professor, told me, rising in line with the rest of the country.But the state “really needs to make sure that we are out ahead of this by making sure there are no frictions that are created in expanding port capacity, pipeline capacity and storage,” he added. The ability to store and move gasoline around is particularly important, Borenstein explained, because of the lack of refining capacity in the state.

The real test for California’s petroleum system will be when “one of the remaining refineries has an unexpected shutdown,” Borenstein told me. “It always happens, and so at that point I hope we will have made sure there’s enough inventory to handle that and enough capacity to keep bringing product in.”

Green

You’re out of free articles.

Subscribe to access Heatmap's exclusive climate and energy polling, award-winning journalism, and subscriber-only events, now just $99 $79.20/year.
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Hotspots

Meta Data Center Federal Pipeline Review Due Early Next Year

And more of the week’s top fights around development.

The United States.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

1. Richland Parish, Louisiana – Gird your loins for the coming fight over the Meta Hyperion data center’s gas pipeline.

  • On Wednesday, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission laid out plans for an environmental assessment of the Entergy pipeline for the Meta data center under the National Environmental Policy Act and stated it’ll be issued in early January 2027. Federal agencies have been ordered by the panel to complete any remaining decisions on authorizations by April.
  • The decision to do an environmental assessment under NEPA will be controversial. The Sierra Club filed comments to FERC stating they wanted an environmental impact statement instead that took into account the environmental impacts of the data center being fed by the pipeline, as well as a review of the project’s cumulative impacts, as the activist group said they’re explicitly linked to the data center’s operations. “The power stations and data center are not remote or speculative developments unrelated to the proposed action,” their comments read.
  • This is quite similar to what’s playing out with the Green Chile pipeline in New Mexico for Oracle and OpenAI’s Project Jupiter, which we recently explained could turn into litigation with high stakes for future gas pipelines linked to data centers. But to me, this conflict with Meta feels like it has more at stake for this individual project, as it’s playing out while construction on gas power plants for the data center has been underway for almost a year after earlier being blessed by state regulators.
  • I asked Sierra Club what could happen next. Eric Huber, one of their managing attorneys, told me on Thursday, “I heard the EA is expected in January, but we are in wait and see mode and will decide on further steps when it comes out.” Meta and Entergy did not respond to a request for comment.

2. Spartanburg County, South Carolina – I have one last data center race to tell you to watch on Tuesday: South Carolina’s 4th, on the northern rim of the state.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Plus

Is the Election Really About Data Centers?

Talking with Kevin Gundersen, the head of public affairs for Digital Realty.

Kevin Gundersen
Heatmap Illustration

This week’s conversation is with Kevin Gundersen, head of public affairs for data center developer Digital Realty. On Wednesday, Digital Realty released a fascinating poll as part of Infrastructure for America, a pro-data center organization that also includes Compass, Vantage Data Centers, and QTS. The poll pushed back on the idea that we’re currently in the middle of a “data center election”; instead, it found most voters are not expected to choose their national elected officials based on a politician’s stance on data centers.

I reached out to folks involved in the poll's release, and they put me in touch with Gundersen, whom I’ve met before and consider to be a straight shooter. He accepted my invitation to do a candid hot-seat chat about the findings, his thoughts on all the data center attack ads, and whether his industry’s actually recovering any ground with the American people.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Politics

Why Project Certainty Is the Thorniest Part of the Permitting Bill

Can a key section of BAAJA be saved from unintended consequences?

Donald Trump and Congress.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

Any bipartisan bill to update the nation’s permitting laws was always going to be a compromise, with advantages for the oil and gas industry as well as clean energy. Proponents of the Senate’s latest attempt at permitting reform have painted it as a delicate balance, a hard-won opportunity, and an all-or-nothing deal.

What, then, to make of drafting errors, or unintended consequences?

Keep reading...Show less