The Fight

Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Hotspots

More Moratoria in Michigan and Madison, Wisconsin

Plus a storage success near Springfield, Massachusetts, and more of the week’s biggest renewables fights.

The United States.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

1. Sacramento County, California – A large solar farm might go belly-up thanks to a fickle utility and fears of damage to old growth trees.

  • The Sacramento Municipal Utility District has decided to cancel the power purchase agreement for the D.E. Shaw Renewables Coyote Creek agrivoltaics project, which would provide 200 megawatts of power to the regional energy grid. The construction plans include removing thousands of very old trees, resulting in a wide breadth of opposition.
  • The utility district said it was canceling its agreement due to “project uncertainties,” including “schedule delays, environmental impacts, and pending litigation.” It also mentioned supply chain issues and tariffs, but let’s be honest – that wasn’t what was stopping this project.
  • This isn’t the end of the Coyote Creek saga, as the aforementioned litigation arose in late December – local wildlife organizations backed by the area’s Audubon chapter filed a challenge against the final environmental impact statement, suggesting further delays.

2. Hampden County, Massachusetts – The small Commonwealth city of Agawam, just outside of Springfield, is the latest site of a Massachusetts uproar over battery storage…

  • … though Longroad Energy’s battery storage project in Agawam is moving forward quickly in spite of the opposition. At an informational meeting Monday, Agawam Mayor Christopher Johnson told attendees that the state’s new battery storage siting rules mean it’s far more difficult for localities to block projects.
  • I expect this project to be built, full stop. But as we’ve seen in Westfield, Oakham, and other Massachusetts towns, there is a wave of resentment building in more rural areas of the Commonwealth that suggests future legislation or legal action could occur, akin to what’s happened in Michigan.

3. Washtenaw County, Michigan – The city of Saline southwest of Detroit is now banning data centers for at least a year – and also drafting regulations around renewable energy.

  • Saline Township, which is an autonomous municipality abutting the larger city of Saline, is the site of the ginormous Stargate data center complex, expected to involve OpenAI and Oracle. The project is drawing the ire of many Michiganders, including state Attorney General Dana Nessel, while getting support from Governor Gretchen Whitmer.
  • Responding to concerns among locals, the city of Saline this week instituted a year-long moratorium to provide time to draft fresh regulations. Per public statements at the vote, Saline city officials plan to also plan to ponder restrictions on how and where renewable energy projects may be sited.
  • “[I]t gives us an opportunity to look more into the support systems and the support businesses around the data center, the battery storage facilities, construction and the alternative energy, windmill technologies, solar panels, all of that could generate potential interest in business industrial parks in the same community,” council member Jim Dell’Orco said at the vote, per local newspaper Sun Times News.

4. Dane County, Wisconsin – Another city with a fresh data center moratorium this week: Madison, home of the Wisconsin Badgers.

  • As we’ve previously reported, Madison is south of myriad data center conflicts, including the QTS project in DeForest we’ve been following closely. As with other county-level moratoria, officials say the pause is intended to provide time for regulations governing data center construction and operation.
  • I expect land use and energy consumption to be the two biggest priorities in the rulemaking process as city councilors made plain in their public statements about the moratoria that a key focus will be deciding where data centers would be preferably sited.

5. Hood County, Texas – Last but not least, I bring you one final stop on the apparent data center damnation tour: Hood County, south of the Texas city of Fort Worth.

  • Hood County this week gave conditional approval to the Comanche Circle data center park. Proposed by real estate firm Sailfish, Comanche Circle will reportedly require upwards of 5 gigawatts of power, span more than 2,500 acres, and rely on a mixture of off- and on-site power, including small modular nuclear reactors and solar farms. On the water front, reports indicate that it’ll rely on private groundwater wells.
  • Residents in Hood County are, as per usual, piping hot mad about the development and are calling for a moratorium of their own. The county will hold its first meeting on a moratorium in early February. But the county’s attorney explained at a recent hearing on Comanche Circle that the project is too far along to be impacted by any temporary ban.
Yellow

This article is exclusively
for Heatmap Plus subscribers.

Go deeper inside the politics, projects, and personalities
shaping the energy transition.
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Spotlight

The Trump Administration Is Now Delaying Renewable Projects It Thinks Are Ugly

The Army Corps of Engineers is out to protect “the beauty of the Nation’s natural landscape.”

Donald Trump, wetlands, and renewable energy.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

A new Trump administration policy is indefinitely delaying necessary water permits for solar and wind projects across the country, including those located entirely on private land.

The Army Corps of Engineers published a brief notice to its website in September stating that Adam Telle, the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works, had directed the agency to consider whether it should weigh a project’s “energy density” – as in the ratio of acres used for a project compared to its power generation capacity – when issuing permits and approvals. The notice ended on a vague note, stating that the Corps would also consider whether the projects “denigrate the aesthetics of America’s natural landscape.”

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Hotspots

A Data Center Dies in Wisconsin

Plus more of the week’s biggest renewable energy fights.

The United States.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

Dane County, Wisconsin – The QTS data center project we’ve been tracking closely is now dead, after town staff in the host community of DeForest declared its plans “unfeasible.”

  • As I previously explained to Fight readers, this QTS project was a quintessential data center conflict. Not only was it situated in a blue county inside of a purple state, but a recent imbroglio over emails between the village mayor and QTS have made it a key example of how private conversations between tech companies and local governments can tarnish the odds of getting a data center permitted.
  • Late Tuesday, DeForest town staff issued a public statement disclosing they would recommend rejecting QTS’ petition to annex land for construction, without which the developer can’t build. A vote on whether to formally deny the petition was scheduled for February 3.
  • If the town rejects the project, the statement reads, DeForest staff expect QTS to “formally withdraw” its request for changes to land zoning plans and the annexation application. The town also cited vociferous opposition to the project, declaring: “The Village of DeForest appreciates the dedicated engagement of our community. Engagement is at the core of democracy. Reviewing public information, participating in public meetings, and discussing potential opportunities and impacts are all important civic activities.”
  • I was prepared to wait and see what happened at the public meeting before declaring this project dead in the water, but QTS itself has gone and done it : “Through our engagement, it has become clear that now is not the right time for our proposed project to move forward in DeForest.”

Marathon County, Wisconsin – Elsewhere in Wisconsin, this county just voted to lobby the state’s association of counties to fight for more local control over renewable energy development.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Q&A

How Data Centers Became an Election Issue in Georgia

A conversation with Georgia Conservation Voters’ Connie Di Cicco.

The Q&A subject.
Heatmap Illustration

This week’s conversation is with Connie Di Cicco, legislative director for Georgia Conservation Voters. I reached out to Connie because I wanted to best understand last November’s Public Service Commission elections which, as I explained at the time, focused almost exclusively on data center development. I’ve been hearing from some of you that you want to hear more about how and why opposition to these projects has become so entrenched so quickly. Connie argues it’s because data centers are a multi-hit combo of issues at the top of voters’ minds right now.

The following conversation has been lightly edited for clarity.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow