Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Politics

Trump’s Funding Freeze Will Hit These Climate and Energy Programs

A federal judge temporarily blocked the move just before the freeze went into effect.

Russell Vought.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

UPDATE: On Wednesday, the Office of Management and Budget rescinded the memo cited in this story, according to multiple reports.

The Trump administration has specifically targeted many large federal energy and climate programs in its sweeping freeze and review of grant funding, according to a list obtained by Heatmap News.

The list follows the release of a two-page memo dated January 27 and released Monday evening, in which the Office of Management and Budget ordered a pause on federal grant programs that “advance[s] Marxist equity, transgenderism, and green new deal social engineering policies.” The memo was first reported by independent journalist Marisa Kabas and stated that the pause would go into effect at 5 p.m. ET Tuesday.

Targeted programs include vast swathes of the federal government most relevant to the energy sector, from major Energy Department cleantech research offices and labs to all implementations of energy tax credits, including those in the Inflation Reduction Act. It also includes essentially all work at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, a Commerce Department subagency that produces climate science and weather forecasting.

The document states that programs targeted by the administration will be reviewed to determine whether they “impose an undue burden on the identification, development, or use of domestic energy resources.” Programs will also be reviewed to discover whether they’re funded by the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and Inflation Reduction Act or implicated under the president’s Day One executive order to terminate activities related to “diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility,” or whether they “promote gender ideology” — terms defined vaguely, if at all, in the document.

It’s too early to know how the legal system will handle this maneuver by the new administration, or how the U.S. political system will respond to the chaos. Already, impromptu protests are being convened outside of the White House, a group of high-powered plaintiffs has filed a lawsuit, and moderate Republicans — namely Senators Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski — are worrying publicly over the sweeping pause.

Heatmap has reached out to the Office of Management and Budget for comment on the document, and we will update this story if we receive it. The full list of targeted programs was first reported by Jennifer Shutt at States Newsroom. Among those named relating to the energy sector are:

  • United States Department of Agriculture’s commodity loans and conservation payments
  • USDA’s Powering Affordable Clean Energy program
  • Department of Commerce’s climate and atmospheric research, including National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration programs
  • Department of Energy cybersecurity and emergency response
  • DOE’s nuclear legacy cleanup activities
  • DOE’s renewable energy research and development office
  • DOE’s fossil energy research and development office
  • DOE’s energy efficiency and conservation grant block program
  • ARPA-E spending
  • DOE’s state heating oil and propane program
  • DOE’s manufacturing and energy supply chain demonstrations office
  • DOE’s clean energy demonstrations office
  • Department of Health and Human Services’ low-income home energy assistance program
  • Department of Homeland Security’s disaster assistance programs, including post-disaster grants, community disaster loans and flood mitigation assistance
  • DHS’ fire management assistance grant program
  • Department of Housing and Urban Development’s healthy homes weatherization grants
  • Department of Labor’s coal mine workers’ compensation fund
  • Department of the Interior’s energy community revitalization program
  • Interior Earth mapping resources initiative
  • Interior wildfire management and preparedness funding to local governments
  • Interior Tribal energy development grants
  • Interior abandoned mine land reclamation
  • Interior regulation of surface coal mining
  • Interior’s threatened and endangered species protection program
  • Interior implementation of the Mineral Leasing Act
  • Many Department of the Treasury tax credit implementation programs, including:
    • Oil and gas exploration and development expensing
    • Enhanced oil recovery credit
    • Energy production credit
    • Energy investment credit
    • Advanced nuclear power production credit
    • Zero-emission nuclear power production credit
    • Reduced tax rate for nuclear decommissioning funds
    • Clean vehicle tax credit
    • Refueling station tax credit
    • Energy efficiency tech deductions
    • Advanced manufacturing production credit
    • Carbon oxide sequestration credit
  • Department of Transportation’s highway funding
  • Transportation clean fuels program
  • Transportation electrification for passenger ferries
  • Transportation pipeline safety grant programs
  • Environmental Protection Agency’s diesel emissions reduction programs
  • EPA climate pollution reduction grants
  • EPA Solar for All program
  • EPA clean heavy-duty vehicles program
  • EPA Clean Ports program
  • EPA environmental justice programs and grant funding
  • EPA pollution prevention grants program
  • EPA Toxic Substances Control Act monitoring cooperative
  • EPA consolidated pesticide enforcement cooperative
  • The Export-Import Bank
  • The International Development Finance Corporation
  • Nuclear Regulatory Commission research and scholarship programs
  • Small Business Administration disaster loans

This story is still developing. It was last updated Tuesday, January 28, at 6 p.m. ET.

You’re out of free articles.

Subscribe today to experience Heatmap’s expert analysis 
of climate change, clean energy, and sustainability.
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
AM Briefing

Trump's Billion-Dollar Coal Gamble

On flesh-eating parasites, Italian nuclear, and China’s “wasted” renewables

Donald Trump.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

Current conditions: Tropical Storm Amanda has formed in the eastern Pacific off Baja California, marking the first big storm of the season • Typhoon Jangmi is pummeling Japan, leaving 60,000 without electricity • Western and central Argentina are bracing for a deluge of up to 8 inches of rain this week.


THE TOP FIVE

1. Trump offers nearly $1 billion in funding for coal

President Donald Trump just upped his bid to revive America’s dying coal-fired power sector. In the first of three funding announcements Thursday, the Department of Energy said it would spend up to $425 million to support the supply chain and expand the capacity of at least 13 coal plants. The agency said in the same press release that it would give $75 million to build a new coal export facility at the West Gateway Terminal Project in Oakland, designed to ship more than 10 millions tons of coal overseas each year. Then the Energy Department unveiled another $350 million to support construction of America’s first new coal plants in over a decade: one in Anchorage, Alaska, and the other in Mt. Storm, West Virginia. The money will also support an upgrade of Puerto Rico’s only coal plant, the infamous 510-megawatt facility in Guayama, and the recommissioning of a 205-megawatt Cumberland, Maryland-based plant that shut down in 2024. Since taking office, Secretary of Energy Chris Wright has repeatedly ordered coal plants set to shutter to remain open, despite steep costs to utilities that the companies are now challenging in court. But coal plants themselves have played the biggest part in thwarting his plans, given that — as Heatmap’s Matthew Zeitlin wrote last year — they keep breaking down.

Keep reading...Show less
Blue
Daily Briefing

The U.S. Government’s Screwworm Screw-Up

An unwanted lesson in good governance.

A screw worm fly.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

The U.S. Department of Agriculture confirmed on Wednesday that a New World screwworm — a flesh-eating fly that feeds on cattle, livestock, and other mammals — was found in a 3-week old calf in southern Texas. The screwworms aren’t dangerous to people, but they are a serious health risk to cows, and they are likely to drive already record-high beef prices even higher.

The finding reflects the defeat of what was, up until recently, one of my favorite “unknown” government programs. For decades, the United States government paid to breed millions of male screwworms, blast them with radiation to make them sterile, and then drop them from planes into the rainforest at the narrowest stretch of the Panama peninsula. (Sarah Zhang, the bravura science writer at The Atlantic, wrote the ultimate story about this project back in 2020, which is how I learned about it in the first place.) These sterile male worms mate with female screwworms but produce no larvae, creating a biological border in Central America across which screwworms cannot pass, at least in theory.

Keep reading...Show less
Green
AI jail.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

Like many new parents, I devote considerable time to thinking about sleep and why it’s not happening. Should I have sung the bedtime song and then changed the diaper? Did the baby need a fourth nap, or was the mistake letting her take a third so close to bedtime? It came as a surprise the other day, then, when a fellow parent in my baby group revealed she isn’t overthinking the whole sleep schedule thing at all. “I asked ChatGPT to write my baby’s sleep plan,” she told us. “It’s validating!”

To this author, personally, outsourcing parenting decisions to the world’s most sophisticated Mad Libs respondent seems like one of the signs that we’re doomed. Sleepmaxxing mothers aside, a plurality of Americans agree with me. Per Heatmap Pro’s latest polling, 45% of voters are “pessimistic” about the long-term impact of artificial intelligence on their lives, with just 22% saying they’re “optimistic” and about a third saying they’re unsure.

Keep reading...Show less
Blue