Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Politics

Trump’s Funding Freeze Will Hit These Climate and Energy Programs

A federal judge temporarily blocked the move just before the freeze went into effect.

Russell Vought.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

UPDATE: On Wednesday, the Office of Management and Budget rescinded the memo cited in this story, according to multiple reports.

The Trump administration has specifically targeted many large federal energy and climate programs in its sweeping freeze and review of grant funding, according to a list obtained by Heatmap News.

The list follows the release of a two-page memo dated January 27 and released Monday evening, in which the Office of Management and Budget ordered a pause on federal grant programs that “advance[s] Marxist equity, transgenderism, and green new deal social engineering policies.” The memo was first reported by independent journalist Marisa Kabas and stated that the pause would go into effect at 5 p.m. ET Tuesday.

Targeted programs include vast swathes of the federal government most relevant to the energy sector, from major Energy Department cleantech research offices and labs to all implementations of energy tax credits, including those in the Inflation Reduction Act. It also includes essentially all work at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, a Commerce Department subagency that produces climate science and weather forecasting.

The document states that programs targeted by the administration will be reviewed to determine whether they “impose an undue burden on the identification, development, or use of domestic energy resources.” Programs will also be reviewed to discover whether they’re funded by the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and Inflation Reduction Act or implicated under the president’s Day One executive order to terminate activities related to “diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility,” or whether they “promote gender ideology” — terms defined vaguely, if at all, in the document.

It’s too early to know how the legal system will handle this maneuver by the new administration, or how the U.S. political system will respond to the chaos. Already, impromptu protests are being convened outside of the White House, a group of high-powered plaintiffs has filed a lawsuit, and moderate Republicans — namely Senators Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski — are worrying publicly over the sweeping pause.

Heatmap has reached out to the Office of Management and Budget for comment on the document, and we will update this story if we receive it. The full list of targeted programs was first reported by Jennifer Shutt at States Newsroom. Among those named relating to the energy sector are:

  • United States Department of Agriculture’s commodity loans and conservation payments
  • USDA’s Powering Affordable Clean Energy program
  • Department of Commerce’s climate and atmospheric research, including National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration programs
  • Department of Energy cybersecurity and emergency response
  • DOE’s nuclear legacy cleanup activities
  • DOE’s renewable energy research and development office
  • DOE’s fossil energy research and development office
  • DOE’s energy efficiency and conservation grant block program
  • ARPA-E spending
  • DOE’s state heating oil and propane program
  • DOE’s manufacturing and energy supply chain demonstrations office
  • DOE’s clean energy demonstrations office
  • Department of Health and Human Services’ low-income home energy assistance program
  • Department of Homeland Security’s disaster assistance programs, including post-disaster grants, community disaster loans and flood mitigation assistance
  • DHS’ fire management assistance grant program
  • Department of Housing and Urban Development’s healthy homes weatherization grants
  • Department of Labor’s coal mine workers’ compensation fund
  • Department of the Interior’s energy community revitalization program
  • Interior Earth mapping resources initiative
  • Interior wildfire management and preparedness funding to local governments
  • Interior Tribal energy development grants
  • Interior abandoned mine land reclamation
  • Interior regulation of surface coal mining
  • Interior’s threatened and endangered species protection program
  • Interior implementation of the Mineral Leasing Act
  • Many Department of the Treasury tax credit implementation programs, including:
    • Oil and gas exploration and development expensing
    • Enhanced oil recovery credit
    • Energy production credit
    • Energy investment credit
    • Advanced nuclear power production credit
    • Zero-emission nuclear power production credit
    • Reduced tax rate for nuclear decommissioning funds
    • Clean vehicle tax credit
    • Refueling station tax credit
    • Energy efficiency tech deductions
    • Advanced manufacturing production credit
    • Carbon oxide sequestration credit
  • Department of Transportation’s highway funding
  • Transportation clean fuels program
  • Transportation electrification for passenger ferries
  • Transportation pipeline safety grant programs
  • Environmental Protection Agency’s diesel emissions reduction programs
  • EPA climate pollution reduction grants
  • EPA Solar for All program
  • EPA clean heavy-duty vehicles program
  • EPA Clean Ports program
  • EPA environmental justice programs and grant funding
  • EPA pollution prevention grants program
  • EPA Toxic Substances Control Act monitoring cooperative
  • EPA consolidated pesticide enforcement cooperative
  • The Export-Import Bank
  • The International Development Finance Corporation
  • Nuclear Regulatory Commission research and scholarship programs
  • Small Business Administration disaster loans

This story is still developing. It was last updated Tuesday, January 28, at 6 p.m. ET.

You’re out of free articles.

Subscribe today to experience Heatmap’s expert analysis 
of climate change, clean energy, and sustainability.
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Spotlight

An Energy Developer Is Fighting a Data Center in Texas

Things in Sulphur Springs are getting weird.

Energy production and a data center.
Heatmap Illustration/Library of Congress, MSB Global, Luminant

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is trying to pressure a company into breaking a legal agreement for land conservation so a giant data center can be built on the property.

The Lone Star town of Sulphur Springs really wants to welcome data center developer MSB Global, striking a deal this year to bring several data centers with on-site power to the community. The influx of money to the community would be massive: the town would get at least $100 million in annual tax revenue, nearly three times its annual budget. Except there’s a big problem: The project site is on land gifted by a former coal mining company to Sulphur Springs expressly on the condition that it not be used for future energy generation. Part of the reason for this was that the lands were contaminated as a former mine site, and it was expected this property would turn into something like a housing development or public works project.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Hotspots

Who Really Speaks for the Trees in Sacramento?

A solar developer gets into a forest fight in California, and more of the week’s top conflicts around renewables.

The United States.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

1. Sacramento County, California – A solar project has become a national symbol of the conflicts over large-scale renewables development in forested areas.

  • This week the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors unanimously voted to advance the environmental review for D.E. Shaw Renewables’ Coyote Creek agrivoltaics solar and battery project, which would provide 200 megawatts to the regional energy grid in Sacramento County. As we’ve previously explained, this is a part of central California in needs of a significant renewables build-out to meet its decarbonization goals and wean off a reliance on fossil energy.
  • But a lot of people seem upset over Coyote Creek. The plan for the project currently includes removing thousands of old growth trees, which environmental groups, members of Native tribes, local activists and even The Sacramento Bee have joined hands to oppose. One illustrious person wore a Lorax costume to a hearing on the project in protest.
  • Coyote Creek does represent the quintessential decarb vs. conservation trade-off. D.E. Shaw took at least 1,000 trees off the chopping block in response to the pressure and plans to plant fresh saplings to replace them, but critics have correctly noted that those will potentially take centuries to have the same natural carbon removal capabilities as old growth trees. We’ve seen this kind of story blow up in the solar industry’s face before – do you remember the Fox News scare cycle over Michigan solar and deforestation?
  • But there would be a significant cost to any return to the drawing board: Republicans in Congress have, of course, succeeded in accelerating the phase-out of tax credits under the Inflation Reduction Act. Work on Coyote Creek is expected to start next year, in time to potentially still qualify for the IRA clean electricity credit. I suspect this may have contributed to the county’s decision to advance Coyote Creek without a second look.
  • I believe Coyote Creek represents a new kind of battlefield for conservation groups seeking to compel renewable energy developers into greater accountability for environmental impacts. Is it a good thing that ancient trees might get cut down to build a clean energy project? Absolutely not. But faced with a belligerent federal government and a shrinking window to qualify for tax credits, companies can’t just restart a project at a new site. Meanwhile, the clock is ticking on decarbonizing the electricity grid. .

2. Sedgwick County, Kansas – I am eyeing this county to see whether a fight over a solar farm turns into a full-blown ban on future projects.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Q&A

How to Build a Data Center, According to an AI-Curious Conservationist

A conversation with Renee Grabe of Nature Forward

Renee Grebe.
Heatmap Illustration

This week’s conversation is with Renee Grabe, a conservation advocate for the environmental group Nature Forward who is focused intently on data center development in Northern Virginia. I reached out to her for a fresh perspective on where data centers and renewable energy development fits in the Commonwealth amidst heightened frustration over land use and agricultural impacts, especially after this past election cycle. I thought her views on policy-making here were refreshingly nuanced.

This transcript was lightly edited for clarity.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow