Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Politics

Trump’s Funding Freeze Will Hit These Climate and Energy Programs

A federal judge temporarily blocked the move just before the freeze went into effect.

Russell Vought.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

UPDATE: On Wednesday, the Office of Management and Budget rescinded the memo cited in this story, according to multiple reports.

The Trump administration has specifically targeted many large federal energy and climate programs in its sweeping freeze and review of grant funding, according to a list obtained by Heatmap News.

The list follows the release of a two-page memo dated January 27 and released Monday evening, in which the Office of Management and Budget ordered a pause on federal grant programs that “advance[s] Marxist equity, transgenderism, and green new deal social engineering policies.” The memo was first reported by independent journalist Marisa Kabas and stated that the pause would go into effect at 5 p.m. ET Tuesday.

Targeted programs include vast swathes of the federal government most relevant to the energy sector, from major Energy Department cleantech research offices and labs to all implementations of energy tax credits, including those in the Inflation Reduction Act. It also includes essentially all work at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, a Commerce Department subagency that produces climate science and weather forecasting.

The document states that programs targeted by the administration will be reviewed to determine whether they “impose an undue burden on the identification, development, or use of domestic energy resources.” Programs will also be reviewed to discover whether they’re funded by the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and Inflation Reduction Act or implicated under the president’s Day One executive order to terminate activities related to “diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility,” or whether they “promote gender ideology” — terms defined vaguely, if at all, in the document.

It’s too early to know how the legal system will handle this maneuver by the new administration, or how the U.S. political system will respond to the chaos. Already, impromptu protests are being convened outside of the White House, a group of high-powered plaintiffs has filed a lawsuit, and moderate Republicans — namely Senators Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski — are worrying publicly over the sweeping pause.

Heatmap has reached out to the Office of Management and Budget for comment on the document, and we will update this story if we receive it. The full list of targeted programs was first reported by Jennifer Shutt at States Newsroom. Among those named relating to the energy sector are:

  • United States Department of Agriculture’s commodity loans and conservation payments
  • USDA’s Powering Affordable Clean Energy program
  • Department of Commerce’s climate and atmospheric research, including National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration programs
  • Department of Energy cybersecurity and emergency response
  • DOE’s nuclear legacy cleanup activities
  • DOE’s renewable energy research and development office
  • DOE’s fossil energy research and development office
  • DOE’s energy efficiency and conservation grant block program
  • ARPA-E spending
  • DOE’s state heating oil and propane program
  • DOE’s manufacturing and energy supply chain demonstrations office
  • DOE’s clean energy demonstrations office
  • Department of Health and Human Services’ low-income home energy assistance program
  • Department of Homeland Security’s disaster assistance programs, including post-disaster grants, community disaster loans and flood mitigation assistance
  • DHS’ fire management assistance grant program
  • Department of Housing and Urban Development’s healthy homes weatherization grants
  • Department of Labor’s coal mine workers’ compensation fund
  • Department of the Interior’s energy community revitalization program
  • Interior Earth mapping resources initiative
  • Interior wildfire management and preparedness funding to local governments
  • Interior Tribal energy development grants
  • Interior abandoned mine land reclamation
  • Interior regulation of surface coal mining
  • Interior’s threatened and endangered species protection program
  • Interior implementation of the Mineral Leasing Act
  • Many Department of the Treasury tax credit implementation programs, including:
    • Oil and gas exploration and development expensing
    • Enhanced oil recovery credit
    • Energy production credit
    • Energy investment credit
    • Advanced nuclear power production credit
    • Zero-emission nuclear power production credit
    • Reduced tax rate for nuclear decommissioning funds
    • Clean vehicle tax credit
    • Refueling station tax credit
    • Energy efficiency tech deductions
    • Advanced manufacturing production credit
    • Carbon oxide sequestration credit
  • Department of Transportation’s highway funding
  • Transportation clean fuels program
  • Transportation electrification for passenger ferries
  • Transportation pipeline safety grant programs
  • Environmental Protection Agency’s diesel emissions reduction programs
  • EPA climate pollution reduction grants
  • EPA Solar for All program
  • EPA clean heavy-duty vehicles program
  • EPA Clean Ports program
  • EPA environmental justice programs and grant funding
  • EPA pollution prevention grants program
  • EPA Toxic Substances Control Act monitoring cooperative
  • EPA consolidated pesticide enforcement cooperative
  • The Export-Import Bank
  • The International Development Finance Corporation
  • Nuclear Regulatory Commission research and scholarship programs
  • Small Business Administration disaster loans

This story is still developing. It was last updated Tuesday, January 28, at 6 p.m. ET.

You’re out of free articles.

Subscribe to access Heatmap’s expert analysis of climate change, clean energy, and sustainability. Save $57 on an annual subscription, just $156 $99/year.
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Politics

How a Rhode Island Mayoral Race Became a Referendum on Climate Policy

In Providence, at least, climate change is still on the ballot.

Providence mayoral candidates.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images, Library of Congress

Here’s some trivia for you: What was the first state to see its average temperature break the 2-degree Celsius threshold for warming above pre-industrial levels? It wasn’t Alaska, the fastest-warming state, nor was it California or Florida, states with some of the most visible impacts of the extreme weather crisis. It was not Arizona or Texas, either, though “hot” and “warming” are often conflated.

The answer, in fact, is humble Rhode Island, which passed the international benchmark for accelerated climatic impacts back in 2019. It is perhaps less surprising, then, to learn that in the Ocean State’s largest city, Providence, climate change and how to adapt to it have become one of the central talking points in a heated mayoral race, which in the deep-blue city is likely to culminate in the September 9 primary.

Keep reading...Show less
Blue
Q&A

How an ‘Abundance’ Policy Shop Is Approaching Data Centers

Chatting about win-win solutions with the Abundance Institute’s Ryan Norris.

Ryan Norris.
Heatmap Illustration

This week’s conversation is with Ryan Norris, senior fellow for energy policy at the Abundance Institute. The libertarian-leaning institute — whose name cleverly shortens to AI — is a new-ish entity with increasing relevance in energy and tech spaces. As Norris and I discussed, it’s starting to help shape policy on data center development and the generation that’ll power it all, especially in Republican circles. Norris himself previously worked with Americans for Prosperity, a right-wing political organization. I reached out to him and asked if we could chat because I wanted to know more about the institute’s work within the energy space. He wound up saying a lot more than I expected. So let’s dive into it.

The following conversation was lightly edited and abridged for clarity.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Hotspots

Wisconsin’s Anti-Data Center Voters Never Showed Up

Plus more of the week’s biggest development fights.

The United States.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

1. Shelby County, Alabama — The Trump administration’s widening effort to intervene in rural energy project fights is facing an early test: What happens if companies don’t take it seriously?

  • This week country music star John Rich, Trump’s “special envoy for American landowners,” explained to an Alabama radio station that one of his first public efforts to support a landowner with administration support ran aground. Rich said he reached out to Alabama Power in the hopes they it could move a planned transmission line cutting across the property of a trucking company owner seeking to retire in the woods. But Rich said Alabama Power has so far shrugged off both him and the Agriculture Department, refusing to allow any company representatives to speak with them.
  • “They farmed my conversation out to a third party attorney. Outside counsel. Not even someone with Alabama Power,” Rich told radio host Leland White. After an hour and a half with the attorney led to “no answers,” the musician said, he sent questions in writing with USDA assistance, which he claimed were met with “legal mumbo jumbo.” “It’s like a slap in the face. I still haven’t spoken to anyone at Alabama Power about this.”
  • Rich told the radio host he may raise the landowner’s issues directly with President Trump. Alabama Power did not respond to a request for comment from me. The utility so far has declined to address specifics with local media, citing ongoing litigation over the conflict.
  • If I had to hazard a guess, I’d say this is a turning point for the Trump administration’s efforts to expand its energy culture war saber-rattling tactics beyond renewable energy permitting. So much of the transmission process, for example, happens outside of any federal purview. Should Rich actually try to raise this issue with the president, what could Trump do besides a Truth Social post? If that’s where this heads, then I think we’re seeing this effort hit a wall, at least for now.

2. Ozaukee County, Wisconsin — Speaking of walls, we just saw the political power of the data center resistance hit one in the Badger State.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow