Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Sparks

The FEMA Alert Test Is Creepy (But Not for the Reasons You Think)

Forget nukes and aliens — or, god forbid, “nanoparticles.” Extreme weather events can strike anywhere — and you’re being asked to rehearse.

A phone with an emergency alert.
Heatmap Illustration/FEMA

You’ll hear it in the grocery store, a racket rising from the cereal aisle and checkout lines. You’ll hear it on the subway or on the bus, so loud and synchronous and sudden that strangers will exclaim, laugh nervously, or make eye contact in surprise. You’ll hear it in the office, where it will cut off meetings mid-sentence and jolt the hands of anyone pouring themselves a third cup of coffee in the breakroom. You’ll hear it even if you’re alone: an unfamiliar two-part alarm from the spot on the couch where you left your phone, summoning you to see what is wrong.

This time, at least, nothing will be.

But at 2:20 p.m. ET on October 4, 2023 — that is, midday tomorrow — FEMA and the FCC will conduct a nationwide test of the Wireless Emergency Alert (WEA) system, prompting nearly every cellphone in the country to vibrate and make “a special sound that’s similar to an alarm,” even if it’s set to silent. (You also can’t opt out). You’ll additionally get a message to reassure you that we are not being nuked or worse: “THIS IS A TEST of the National Wireless Emergency Alert System. No action is needed,” it will read in English or Spanish, depending on your phone’s settings.

Although this is a standard, federally required systems test — the second to be transmitted to nationwide cellphones after a similar exercise in 2021 — bizarre conspiracy theories have nevertheless emerged. Regrettably, the alert will not in fact “activate nanoparticles … that have been introduced into people’s bodies [via] the COVID-19 vaccine,” The Associated Press reported.

I sort of get it, though: The enormous scale of the test invites your imagination to run pretty wild. What sort of event would require the government to send every American the same emergency alert at the same time? (The agencies will also be conducting a nationwide test of the Emergency Alert System on television and radio in tandem with the cellphone test).

Experts, though, say the test is more likely an attempt to push the “technological limits of the system,” which will be used more frequently to target specific geographical regions for occasions like extreme weather (or, uh, manhunts). Of course, that makes the broad scale of the test chilling in a different way: FEMA isn’t just testing if it can push an alert to fire-prone communities in the American West or Tornado Alley; they want to be sure they can reach everyone, everywhere.

It’s fairly unlikely that there will be an extreme weather event that will affect the entire continent at the same time, though the smoke and heat this summer came close. But it is likely that everywhere in the country will continue to experience extreme weather. Warning systems like FEMA’s are still one of the best ways to save lives in such scenarios. And tests like tomorrow’s are necessary because the alert systems remain worryingly imperfect (or are imperfectly implemented, like the time an emergency management officer sent everyone in the state of Hawaii an incoming ballistic missile warning with the words “THIS IS NOT A DRILL”).

But there is an even bigger, more ominous reason why tomorrow’s test is so essential. Joseph Trainor of the University of Delaware’s Disaster Research Center told CBS News that the natural reaction to an emergency alert on your phone is something called “milling,” when recipients “have to kind of process [the message], and make sense of what’s going on, and decide if they’re going to do something.” In that sense, “warning systems and alert systems, they get you started,” Trainor added. They are a rehearsal for if — for when — the real thing hits.

It doesn’t have to be something like terrorists or aliens. Our own environments are threatening enough for FEMA to need the ability to reach as many people as possible, as quickly and efficiently and assuredly as possible.

And now you’ve been warned.

Blue

You’re out of free articles.

Subscribe today to experience Heatmap’s expert analysis 
of climate change, clean energy, and sustainability.
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Sparks

It’s Been a Big 24 Hours for AI Energy Announcements

We’re powering data centers every which way these days.

Google and Exxon logos.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

The energy giant ExxonMobil is planning a huge investment in natural gas-fired power plants that will power data centers directly, a.k.a. behind the meter, meaning they won’t have to connect to the electric grid. That will allow the fossil fuel giant to avoid making the expensive transmission upgrades that tend to slow down the buildout of new electricity generation. And it’ll add carbon capture to boot.

The company said in a corporate update that it plans to build facilities that “would use natural gas to generate a significant amount of high-reliability electricity for a data center,” then use carbon capture to “remove more than 90% of the associated CO2 emissions, then transport the captured CO2 to safe, permanent storage deep underground.” Going behind the meter means that this generation “can be installed at a pace that other alternatives, including U.S. nuclear power, cannot match,” the company said.

The move represents a first for Exxon, which is famous for its far-flung operations to extract and process oil and natural gas but has not historically been in the business of supplying electricity to customers. The company is looking to generate 1.5 gigawatts of power, about 50% more than a large nuclear reactor, The New York Timesreported.

Keep reading...Show less
Blue
Sparks

Trump Promises ‘Fully Expedited’ Permitting in Exchange for $1 Billion of Investment

But ... how?

Donald Trump.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

President-elect Donald Trump on Tuesday rocked the energy world when he promised “fully expedited approvals and permits, including, but in no way limited to, all Environmental approvals” for “Any person or company investing ONE BILLION DOLLARS, OR MORE, in the United States of America,” in a post on Truth Social Tuesday.

“GET READY TO ROCK!!!” he added.

Keep reading...Show less
Green
Sparks

The Mad Dash to Lock Down Biden’s Final Climate Dollars

Companies are racing to finish the paperwork on their Department of Energy loans.

A clock and money.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

Of the over $13 billion in loans and loan guarantees that the Energy Department’s Loan Programs Office has made under Biden, nearly a third of that funding has been doled out in the month since the presidential election. And of the $41 billion in conditional commitments — agreements to provide a loan once the borrower satisfies certain preconditions — that proportion rises to nearly half. That includes some of the largest funding announcements in the office’s history: more than $7.5 billion to StarPlus Energy for battery manufacturing, $4.9 billion to Grain Belt Express for a transmission project, and nearly $6.6 billion to the electric vehicle company Rivian to support its new manufacturing facility in Georgia.

The acceleration represents a clear push by the outgoing Biden administration to get money out the door before President-elect Donald Trump, who has threatened to hollow out much of the Department of Energy, takes office. Still, there’s a good chance these recent conditional commitments won’t become final before the new administration takes office, as that process involves checking a series of nontrivial boxes that include performing due diligence, addressing or mitigating various project risks, and negotiating financing terms. And if the deals aren’t finalized before Trump takes office, they’re at risk of being paused or cancelled altogether, something the DOE considers unwise, to put it lightly.

Keep reading...Show less
Green