The Fight

Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Hotspots

Conservative Activists Join a New Assault on Vineyard Wind

And more of the week’s most important conflicts around renewable energy.

The United States.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

1. Nantucket County, Massachusetts – The fight over Vineyard Wind is back with a vengeance. But can an aggrieved vacation town team up with conservative legal activists to take down an operating offshore wind project?

  • The offshore wind project, which is under construction and currently provides power to Massachusetts, was threatened this week when Nantucket signaled it may sue Vineyard Wind over a laundry list of demands related to the facility and last year’s blade breakage. Then less than 24 hours later, the Texas Public Policy Foundation – a conservative legal advocacy group – filed a petition to the Interior Department requesting it not only reconsider previous permits issued for Vineyard Wind but also halt operations at the site.
  • It’s hard to ignore the timing here: before this flurry of activity, the Interior Department released a new secretarial order that laid out many ways it would potentially go after wind facilities. One method would be potentially settling lawsuits filed against both offshore and onshore wind projects in favor of plaintiffs.
  • We are still waiting to see if Interior will take up the Vineyard Wind petition. But this activity suggests that opponents of offshore wind feel increasingly emboldened by the anti-renewables direction that Trump has taken in recent weeks, and we may soon find out if their aspirations for killing operating projects are well-founded.

2. Henry County, Virginia – A fresh fiasco around a solar farm is renewing animus against solar projects in the Commonwealth of Virginia.

  • Virginia regulators fined Energix’s Sunny Rock project $120,000 for alleged failures to properly contain erosion and water runoff at the project site. A photograph released by the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality resembles an anti-renewables fantasy, showing the project operating atop mangled and erupted soil.
  • This fine demonstrates why rural Virginians are increasingly skeptical of the stewardship solar developers bring to the land, as this is reportedly the fourth time in as many years Energix has been fined by the state of Virginia for environmental issues at its solar farms.

3. Calcasieu Parish, Louisiana – Solar developer Aypa is now suing this parish on the grounds it allegedly used zoning rules in an unfair and biased manner against one of its projects.

  • The parish rejected Aypa’s Cajun Crescent solar project last year but the developer says it was motivated by political pressure, not legitimate health or environmental concerns. The lawsuit was filed against the parish’s policy jury, an equivalent of a commission or board of supervisors.
  • I’m watching this litigation closely because it is notable and risky any time a renewables company sues over a rejection, as I’ve previously written.

4. Outagamie County, Wisconsin – If at first you don’t kill the solar farm, try and go after the substation.

  • The residents of rural Maple Creek, a largely agriculture-based community west of Green Bay with the highest possible risk rating in Heatmap Pro, are now trying to get the neighboring small city of New London to reject an electrical substation for a yet-to-be-named Avangrid solar megaproject. That’s because there appears to be a groundswell of opposition to the project but, per one local report, the project will produce enough electricity to qualify for a state-based permitting and zoning process that circumvents local land use restrictions.
  • Like with transmission, I’ve previously detailed how substations are a new zone for conflict in renewables development. This tactic doesn’t surprise me, but it’s fascinating to see it organically crop up elsewhere.

5. La Paz County, Arizona – Republicans in Congress are helping at least one area open up for more solar development.

  • Last week, the House of Representatives passed a bill that instructed the Interior to convey acres for the expansion of a solar energy facility in this desert county represented by conservative Paul Gosar. The legislation was not only introduced by Gosar and two other of the state’s rightwing representatives, Andy Biggs and David Schweikert, but these GOP members then teamed up with the state’s two Democratic senators, Mark Kelly and Ruben Gallego, to try and get the bill across the finish line. Now all it needs is passage through the Senate and a signature from President Trump, though support from far-right legislators in the House will certainly help.
  • La Paz County has a relatively high opposition risk score in the Heatmap Pro database – 74 – but much of that appears to stem from how a vast quantity of its desert acreage is protected land. As we explained in a previous edition, one of the few places Republicans seem eager to put solar farms is in the isolated desert, far away from towns.

6. Idaho – The federal government will officially re-do its review of the LS Energy Lava Ridge wind farm.

  • The Interior secretarial order I discussed above also ordered the Bureau of Land Management to review the record of decision for Lava Ridge and produce recommendations “on the need for a new, comprehensive analysis.”
  • Why does this matter if Lava Ridge is already blocked by a Trump executive order? If I could hazard a guess, I’d say this would be a potential framework for undoing permits for other previously-approved wind farms. But that doesn’t sound like something this administration would do, does it?

7. Monterey County, California – The EPA is finally getting more involved in the Moss Landing battery plant cleanup, after the agency declared this week it approved a new comprehensive remediation plan under CERCLA, a law that also governs the Superfund program.

  • EPA disclosed it entered into a new agreement with Vistra, operator of Moss Landing, to oversee removal of batteries at the site. EPA will also bill Vistra for the work involved.
  • There’s no question that the eyes of the battery storage sector will stay on this cleanup as the risk of re-ignition pervades the site. And trouble continues to dog Moss Landing: last month, when Vistra tried to restart Tesla batteries in an area separate from what ignited, malfunctions led to the attempt getting scrapped.
  • Meanwhile Moss Landing’s shadow continues to follow other battery storage projects in California. In neighboring Santa Cruz County, activists from the group Never Again Moss Landing – who I profiled earlier this year – are working with concerned locals to try and stop three separate storage projects from coming online.
Yellow

This article is exclusively
for Heatmap Plus subscribers.

Go deeper inside the politics, projects, and personalities
shaping the energy transition.
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Q&A

How Developers Should Think of the New IRA Credit Rules

A conversation with Scott Cockerham of Latham and Watkins.

How Developers Should Think of the New IRA Credit Rules
Heatmap Illustration

This week’s conversation is with Scott Cockerham, a partner with the law firm Latham and Watkins whose expertise I sought to help me best understand the Treasury Department’s recent guidance on the federal solar and wind tax credits. We focused on something you’ve probably been thinking about a lot: how to qualify for the “start construction” part of the new tax regime, which is the primary hurdle for anyone still in the thicket of a fight with local opposition.

The following is our chat lightly edited for clarity. Enjoy.

Keep reading...Show less
Hotspots

An Influential Anti-ESG Activist Targets A Wind Farm

And more of the week’s most important news around renewable energy conflicts.

Map of renewable energy fights.
Heatmap Illustration

1. Carroll County, Arkansas – The head of an influential national right-wing advocacy group is now targeting a wind project in Arkansas, seeking federal intervention to block something that looked like it would be built.

  • Will Hild, executive director of Consumers’ Research, recently called on the Trump administration to intervene against the development of Scout Clean Energy’s Nimbus wind project in Arkansas. Consumers’ Research is known as one of the leading anti-ESG advocacy organizations, playing a key role in the “anti-woke” opposition against the climate- and socially-conscious behavior of everyone from utilities to Anheuser-Busch.
  • In a lengthy rant posted to X earlier this month, Hild pointed to Carroll County’s local moratorium on wind projects and claimed Nimbus being built would be “a massive win for ESG radicals – and a slap in the face for local democracy.”
  • As I told you in April, the Nimbus project prompted Carroll County to enact the moratorium but it was grandfathered in because of contracts signed prior to the ban’s enactment.
  • However, even though Nimbus is not sited on federal land, there is a significant weak point for the project: its potential impacts on endangered birds and bats.
  • Scout Clean Energy has been working with the Fish and Wildlife Service since at least 2018 under Trump 1.0. However, the project’s habitat conservation plan was not completed before the start of the current Trump term and Scout did not submit an application for Nimbus to receive an incidental take permit from the Service until May of this year.
  • Enter the Trump administration’s bird-centric wind power crackdown and the impact of Hild’s commentary comes into fuller focus. What will happen to all the years of work that Scout and the Service did? It’s unclear how the project reckons with this heightened scrutiny and risk of undue federal attention.

2. Suffolk County, New York – EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin this week endorsed efforts by activists on Long Island to oppose energy storage in their neighborhoods.

Keep reading...Show less
Spotlight

Trump’s Permit Freeze Prompts Some Solar to Eye Exits

Is there going to be a flight out of Nevada?

Solar in Nevada.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

Donald Trump’s renewables permitting freeze is prompting solar companies to find an escape hatch from Nevada.

As I previously reported, the Interior Department has all but halted new approvals for solar and wind projects on federal lands. It was entirely unclear how that would affect transmission out west, including in the solar-friendly Nevada desert where major lines were in progress to help power both communities and a growing number of data centers. Shortly after the pause, I took notice of the fact that regulators quietly delayed the timetable by at least two weeks for a key line – the northern portion of NV Energy’s Greenlink project – that had been expected to connect to a litany of solar facilities. Interior told me it still planned to complete the project in September, but it also confirmed that projects specifically necessary for connecting solar onto the grid would face “enhanced” reviews.

Keep reading...Show less