Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Politics

Trump Paves the Way to Firing Loads of Civil Servants

Schedule F is back.

Donald Trump.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

President Trump signed nine binders of executive orders in front of an arena full of supporters on Monday night, with actions ranging from a regulatory freeze to requiring all federal workers to return to the office full-time. While the full implications of Trump’s Day One actions for energy and climate are still unfolding, one of the most consequential executive orders so far — a sweeping rollback of 80 of former President Joe Biden’s executive orders — quietly paved the way for the return of Schedule F, which converts at least 50,000 career civil servants to “at-will” political employees. He later formally reinstated Schedule F during a signing in the White House.

Trump first signed an executive order creating the new employment category in October 2020, though Biden reversed it shortly after taking office via Executive Order 14003 — Protecting the Federal Workforce. While Trump didn’t have much time to implement the policy last time around, he revoked Executive Order 14003 in his omnibus executive order targeting Biden’s policies just hours into his second shot at the presidency. The move cued up his formal reinstatement of Schedule F Monday evening. “Most of those bureaucrats are being fired,” Trump boasted during a speech at the Capital One Arena in Washington, D.C., ahead of the signing on Monday night. “They’re gone. Should be all of them but some sneak through; we have to live with a couple, I guess.”

As I’ve written before, the reclassification is designed to “make it easier to replace ‘rogue’ or ‘woke’ civil servants and would-be whistleblowers, a.k.a. ‘the deep state,’ with party-line faithful.” The Trump administration has characterized it as giving him “full control of the government,” with the Schedule F-specific Executive Order issued under the title “Restoring Accountability to Policy-Influencing Positions Within the Federal Workforce.” Russ Vought, Trump’s controversial pick to lead the Office of Management and Budget and the mind behind Schedule F, has further said that it is the aim of the policy to give a “whole-of-government unwinding” to the “climate fanaticism” of the Biden years.

Get the best of Heatmap in your inbox daily.

* indicates required
  • The most concerning part of the Schedule F policy is the anticipated loss of institutional knowledge. “What we’re going to end up with is an executive branch that’s just uninformed,” Daniel Farber, the director of the Center for Law, Energy, and the Environment at the University of California, Berkeley, previously told me. Climate-related experts, in particular, could face replacement by “spoils system” hires.

    Democratic Senator Andy Kim of New Jersey drilled Vought on Schedule F during the OMB nominee’s confirmation hearing last week, during which Vought insisted the goal of the policy “was not to fire anyone” but rather to ensure federal employees “do a good job or they may not be in those positions for longer.” He additionally told Democratic Senator Richard Blumenthal that he did not believe it would be unconstitutional for Trump to impound funds appropriated by Congress — including, potentially, unspent funds in the Inflation Reduction Act or the CHIPS for America Act.

    Editor’s note: This story has been updated to reflect Trump’s signing of an executive order reinstating Schedule F.

    Yellow

    You’re out of free articles.

    Subscribe today to experience Heatmap’s expert analysis 
of climate change, clean energy, and sustainability.
    To continue reading
    Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
    or
    Please enter an email address
    By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
    Energy

    All the Nuclear Workers Are Building Data Centers Now

    There has been no new nuclear construction in the U.S. since Vogtle, but the workers are still plenty busy.

    A hardhat on AI.
    Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

    The Trump administration wants to have 10 new large nuclear reactors under construction by 2030 — an ambitious goal under any circumstances. It looks downright zany, though, when you consider that the workforce that should be driving steel into the ground, pouring concrete, and laying down wires for nuclear plants is instead building and linking up data centers.

    This isn’t how it was supposed to be. Thousands of people, from construction laborers to pipefitters to electricians, worked on the two new reactors at the Plant Vogtle in Georgia, which were intended to be the start of a sequence of projects, erecting new Westinghouse AP1000 reactors across Georgia and South Carolina. Instead, years of delays and cost overruns resulted in two long-delayed reactors 35 miles southeast of Augusta, Georgia — and nothing else.

    Keep reading...Show less
    Blue
    Q&A

    How California Is Fighting the Battery Backlash

    A conversation with Dustin Mulvaney of San Jose State University

    Dustin Mulvaney.
    Heatmap Illustration

    This week’s conversation is a follow up with Dustin Mulvaney, a professor of environmental studies at San Jose State University. As you may recall we spoke with Mulvaney in the immediate aftermath of the Moss Landing battery fire disaster, which occurred near his university’s campus. Mulvaney told us the blaze created a true-blue PR crisis for the energy storage industry in California and predicted it would cause a wave of local moratoria on development. Eight months after our conversation, it’s clear as day how right he was. So I wanted to check back in with him to see how the state’s development landscape looks now and what the future may hold with the Moss Landing dust settled.

    Help my readers get a state of play – where are we now in terms of the post-Moss Landing resistance landscape?

    Keep reading...Show less
    Yellow
    Hotspots

    A Tough Week for Wind Power and Batteries — But a Good One for Solar

    The week’s most important fights around renewable energy.

    The United States.
    Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

    1. Nantucket, Massachusetts – A federal court for the first time has granted the Trump administration legal permission to rescind permits given to renewable energy projects.

    • This week District Judge Tanya Chutkan – an Obama appointee – ruled that Trump’s Bureau of Ocean Energy Management has the legal latitude to request the withdrawal of permits previously issued to offshore wind projects. Chutkan found that any “regulatory uncertainty” from rescinding a permit would be an “insubstantial” hardship and not enough to stop the court from approving the government’s desires to reconsider issuing it.
    • The ruling was in a case that the Massachusetts town of Nantucket brought against the SouthCoast offshore wind project; SouthCoast developer Ocean Winds said in statements to media after the decision that it harbors “serious concerns” about the ruling but is staying committed to the project through this new layer of review.
    • But it’s important to understand this will have profound implications for other projects up and down the coastline, because the court challenges against other offshore wind projects bear a resemblance to the SouthCoast litigation. This means that project opponents could reach deals with the federal government to “voluntarily remand” permits, technically sending those documents back to the federal government for reconsideration – only for the approvals to get lost in bureaucratic limbo.
    • What I’m watching for: do opponents of land-based solar and wind projects look at this ruling and decide to go after those facilities next?

    2. Harvey County, Kansas – The sleeper election result of 2025 happened in the town of Halstead, Kansas, where voters backed a moratorium on battery storage.

    Keep reading...Show less
    Yellow