Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Economy

A Sigh of Interest Rate Relief for Renewables

The Fed chair signaled cuts on the horizon, much to the joy of clean energy investors.

A Sigh of Interest Rate Relief for Renewables

Are clean energy developers finally free from high interest rates? Not yet, but this might be the beginning of the end. At the Federal Reserve’s annual conference in Jackson Hole, Fed chair Jerome Powell told attendees, “The time has come for policy to adjust.”

Analysts and market participants immediately appeared to interpret this as locking in a series of interest rate cuts starting at the next Federal Open Market Committee meeting next month. Stocks immediately rose and yields on U.S. government debt fell. Market prognosticators expect the federal funds rate to fall a quarter of a percentage point at the September meeting, but there’s a reasonable chance the cut would be larger.

The renewable energy industry — or at least its share prices — got in on the party. Shares of NextEra, which has a massive renewables business, rose following the speech. The stock price of Iberdrola, the Spanish utility with a large wind business, rose after text of the speech was released. The iShares Global Clean Energy ETF, which tracks a range of clean energy companies, is up more than 2.5% today. (No such luck for GE Vernova, which manufactures wind turbines — its shares fell today after another turbine blade failure at the Dogger Bank wind farm off the coast of England, coming barely a month after a blade manufacturing defect led to the Vineyard Wind disaster.)

Renewables investors are particularly giddy at the moment because for years now, the industry has disproportionately suffered the effects of high interest rates compared to fossil fuels. Unlike a natural gas- or coal-fired power plant, a wind turbine or a solar panel does not have to pay for its fuel. In the long term that’s a win, because there is no such thing as a wind pipeline rupture or the discovery of new reserves of sun, and therefore nothing that can send prices reeling. But in the short term, that means the lifetime cost of a solar or wind farm is heavily weighted towards building it.

And to build, you need to borrow money.

“Wind and solar have taken a beating from high interest rates because they’re very capital intensive projects,” Lori Bird, director of the World Resources Institute’s U.S. Energy Program, told me. “Because they’re capital intensive, a 2 percentage point increase in interest rates yields a 20% increase in the cost of electricity, compared to 11% from fossil,” Bird said, citing estimates from Wood Mackenzie.

Developers take out construction loans to build their projects and then pay those back with a term loan that covers the life of the project, explained Advait Arun, senior associate of energy finance at the Center for Public Enterprise (and also a Heatmap contributor).

“If you’re a developer who’s going through the construction process right now, your construction loan is probably floating-rate, so the amount of of interest you’re paying on your construction loan will fall,” Arun said. After you're done building, you get another loan to pay off the construction loan, and that loan can be smaller if your construction loan gets cheaper thanks to lower rates.

These longer-term loans are paid back from the project’s revenues over the life span of the project, which means that the developer or investor will not have to earn as much from selling the electricity to cover the cost of their debt.

Alongside the supply chain issues and inflation that developers — especially offshore wind developers — had to deal with over the last few years, high interest rates have led to higher costs for the power that renewables developers sell. The price of power purchase agreements for wind and solar rose in 2023, thanks, in part, to high rates, and only stabilized early this year as investors became convinced that cuts were finally close.

But whether these lower financing costs turn into higher profits or lower prices for electricity consumers is, unfortunately, not a sure thing — which is one reason why the industry's shareholders may have responded positively to Powell's speech.

“I think profit expectations will rise,” Arun said. “If there’s less money you need to pay in debt service, it doesn’t mean developers will pass on price savings.”

Green

You’re out of free articles.

Subscribe today to experience Heatmap’s expert analysis 
of climate change, clean energy, and sustainability.
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Energy

All the Nuclear Workers Are Building Data Centers Now

There has been no new nuclear construction in the U.S. since Vogtle, but the workers are still plenty busy.

A hardhat on AI.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

The Trump administration wants to have 10 new large nuclear reactors under construction by 2030 — an ambitious goal under any circumstances. It looks downright zany, though, when you consider that the workforce that should be driving steel into the ground, pouring concrete, and laying down wires for nuclear plants is instead building and linking up data centers.

This isn’t how it was supposed to be. Thousands of people, from construction laborers to pipefitters to electricians, worked on the two new reactors at the Plant Vogtle in Georgia, which were intended to be the start of a sequence of projects, erecting new Westinghouse AP1000 reactors across Georgia and South Carolina. Instead, years of delays and cost overruns resulted in two long-delayed reactors 35 miles southeast of Augusta, Georgia — and nothing else.

Keep reading...Show less
Blue
Q&A

How California Is Fighting the Battery Backlash

A conversation with Dustin Mulvaney of San Jose State University

Dustin Mulvaney.
Heatmap Illustration

This week’s conversation is a follow up with Dustin Mulvaney, a professor of environmental studies at San Jose State University. As you may recall we spoke with Mulvaney in the immediate aftermath of the Moss Landing battery fire disaster, which occurred near his university’s campus. Mulvaney told us the blaze created a true-blue PR crisis for the energy storage industry in California and predicted it would cause a wave of local moratoria on development. Eight months after our conversation, it’s clear as day how right he was. So I wanted to check back in with him to see how the state’s development landscape looks now and what the future may hold with the Moss Landing dust settled.

Help my readers get a state of play – where are we now in terms of the post-Moss Landing resistance landscape?

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Hotspots

A Tough Week for Wind Power and Batteries — But a Good One for Solar

The week’s most important fights around renewable energy.

The United States.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

1. Nantucket, Massachusetts – A federal court for the first time has granted the Trump administration legal permission to rescind permits given to renewable energy projects.

  • This week District Judge Tanya Chutkan – an Obama appointee – ruled that Trump’s Bureau of Ocean Energy Management has the legal latitude to request the withdrawal of permits previously issued to offshore wind projects. Chutkan found that any “regulatory uncertainty” from rescinding a permit would be an “insubstantial” hardship and not enough to stop the court from approving the government’s desires to reconsider issuing it.
  • The ruling was in a case that the Massachusetts town of Nantucket brought against the SouthCoast offshore wind project; SouthCoast developer Ocean Winds said in statements to media after the decision that it harbors “serious concerns” about the ruling but is staying committed to the project through this new layer of review.
  • But it’s important to understand this will have profound implications for other projects up and down the coastline, because the court challenges against other offshore wind projects bear a resemblance to the SouthCoast litigation. This means that project opponents could reach deals with the federal government to “voluntarily remand” permits, technically sending those documents back to the federal government for reconsideration – only for the approvals to get lost in bureaucratic limbo.
  • What I’m watching for: do opponents of land-based solar and wind projects look at this ruling and decide to go after those facilities next?

2. Harvey County, Kansas – The sleeper election result of 2025 happened in the town of Halstead, Kansas, where voters backed a moratorium on battery storage.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow