Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Energy

Alabama Is Threatening to Ban Utility-Scale Solar

A proposed Meta-backed solar project in a small, unincorporated town is gearing up to be a big problem for renewables in the state.

Solar panels and Alabama.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

It started as a brawl between Meta and a small Alabama town over a solar farm. Now it’s become a push to ban utility-scale solar across much of the state.

Stockton, Alabama, is a teeny, unincorporated town of fewer than 1,000 people. It’s a conservative community in Baldwin County, south of the state capital of Montgomery, where homeowners are very concerned about nature conservation, as it is surrounded by undeveloped bucolic Gulf Coast forest and swampland. And right now, Stockton residents are hopping mad over a giant solar farm that would power a data center in Montgomery owned by tech giant Meta Platforms Inc.

Meta is working with developer Silicon Ranch to construct a huge solar farm to help power an expansive data center campus in the capital. The Alabama Public Service Commission approved the project last winter through a process opponents say was rushed. Whether the surprise of the solar farm was intentional or not, the approval sent shockwaves across the region. Worse for disgruntled renewables opponents, under state law, county officials say they aren’t allowed to regulate land use within unincorporated and unzoned areas, leaving local elected bodies with little recourse.

That left state-wide elected bodies to muster a response. The Meta-Silicon Ranch project in Stockton also frustrated some Republicans in the state legislature, giving rise to SB 354, a bill that would ban new utility-scale solar projects across most of Alabama for at least a year. The bill was reported out of the state senate’s transportation and energy committee on March 11 with one exception added allowing the Tennessee Valley Authority to add new solar capacity. But anywhere else? This bill would stop big solar farms in their tracks. If enacted, the ban would take immediate effect.

We’ve seen a lot of local bans like these in towns and counties. We’ve also seen states restrict wind farms. But as far as I know, this would be the first time a state issued a blanket ban on solar projects.

SB 354’s author is State Senator Greg Albritton, who represents Stockton. At the bill’s hearing earlier this week, he compared his legislation to the ways towns, cities, and counties have in recent years paused solar and wind projects to develop hypothetical regulations.

“What I’ve done with this bill — what I’m doing here, at this point — is I’m asking we pass this, a moratorium on construction of any new ones until we can get answers on any policies and procedures,” Albritton told the committee.

The odds of the bill’s final passage and enactment have yet to come into focus, and Governor Kay Ivey previously supported the Meta data center campus. But there’s also clear precedent in Alabama for taking an action like this. In 2013, Alabama temporarily banned wind energy projects in response to a conflict over an Apex Clean Energy proposal near Stockton in Baldwin County. The state then explicitly gave counties like Baldwin the power to reject turbines.

If Alabama can ban wind for a while, why wouldn’t it try the same with solar?

“There was a wind farm nobody wanted. It’s like the same scenario on repeat,” Meagan Fowler, president of opposition group Friends of the Tensaw River, told Gulf Coast radio show Mobile Mornings in an episode published March 11. Fowler said she hopes the bill can advance while legislators also work in language explicitly granting the county power to regulate solar farms. “Our hope is that this regulation might make Silicon Ranch want to go somewhere else because that’s what happened with the wind turbine thing.”

John Dodd, policy director for the pro-renewables organization Energy Alabama, told me a House companion bill to the one-year ban was introduced yesterday, but the group’s aim is to “effectively kill it,” he said, or try to get legislators to narrow the focus of the ban just to Stockton and Baldwin County.

“SB 354 would impose a blanket, statewide prohibition on new large-scale solar facilities — something that isn’t defined — for an entire year. That’s not targeted oversight. That’s effectively hitting the kill switch on an entire industry overnight,” Dodd told me in a statement. “In a state that prides itself on being pro-business and welcoming to investment, that sends a troubling signal.”

The Stockton solar farm is planned to begin full construction in 2027, and the process will take between a year and 18 months, according to Silicon Ranch’s recent statements to local media. The project still requires a building permit from Baldwin County and a water permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

Silicon Ranch could not provide comments by publication time, and Meta did not respond to a request for comment.

Yellow

You’re out of free articles.

Subscribe to access Heatmap’s expert analysis of climate change, clean energy, and sustainability. Save $57 on an annual subscription, just $156 $99/year.
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Daily Briefing

What Worries Me Most About This Wildfire Smoke

We didn’t know days like this could happen. Then we learned how bad they really are.

Wildfire smoke.
Heatmap Illustration/NOAA

When I woke up this morning in Chicago, the Air Quality Index was in the 300s, and I could barely see the top of the skyscraper across the street. The weather app on my phone featured a little image of a man wearing a World War I-style full-face gas mask. That’s fun, I thought. I didn’t know it could do that.

I went downstairs. Old photographs of the city were hanging in the hotel lobby — girls playing in bathing suits next to the lake — and I realized that the haze shrouding the old Lakeshore Drive condos was in fact haze, smoke, particulate matter, and not a lens artifact. It really used to be that smoky all the time, back before the Clean Air Act. Then I glanced up and saw that the haze out the window was far worse than the century-old pollution in the picture.

Keep reading...Show less
Blue
Sparks

Microsoft Sustainability Chief Hounded by Protestors at Seattle Climate Week

“Microsoft, you can’t hide, we can see your dirty side!”

Melanie Nakagawa.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images, Katie Brigham

Protestors interrupted one of the final sessions of PNW Climate Week — a conference that brings together climate leaders across Washington, Oregon, and British Columbia — objecting to Microsoft’s rising carbon emissions from data centers and partnerships with oil and gas companies. The company’s Chief Sustainability Officer Melanie Nakagawa was having a one on one conversation with GeekWire climate reporter Lisa Stiffler at Seattle’s City Hall when protestors carrying signs reading “Microsoft’s AI pollutes” and other slogans began shouting from the audience.

I was there, having just moderated the prior panel on how to finance Washington’s clean energy ambitions. Early on there were some rumblings in the crowd from up front. “Climate leaders don’t build gas pipelines in Moses Lake,” was the first objection I heard clearly. It came shortly after Nakagawa kicked off the conversation by highlighting Microsoft’s partnership with sustainable aviation fuel startup Twelve, which recently opened its first commercial-scale SAF plant in Moses Lake, Washington. The tech giant has supported the project through a strategic investment from its Climate Innovation Fund, as well as an offtake agreement for the fuel that will help offset its emissions from employee travel.

Keep reading...Show less
Adaptation

The East Coast’s New Forever Problem

Smoke is back. Again. It’s time to make a plan.

East coast smoke.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

Heat kills more Americans than any other extreme weather event in the United States. But wildfire smoke — while not strictly “weather” — appears to kill even more. Current excess death estimates put American heat mortality at about 10,000 people per year, or possibly as high as 12,000. Recent studies on wildfire PM 2.5 exposure suggest a mortality of double that: 24,000 all-cause deaths every year.

Needless to say, wildfire smoke is definitely not something you want to inhale if you can avoid it. (And really, you should try to.) But for the 115 million Americans in the Great Lakes and Northeast regions of the country who’ve been exposed to hazardous air from the fires in Ontario and Minnesota this week, there’s a chance that the damage is already done. According to a wildfire smoke mortality estimation tool from Cornell University’s School of Public Health and the Northeast Regional Climate Center, the total mortality for this smoke event could already be as high as 424 people so far, including nearly 100 in Michigan and more than 50 in both New York and Wisconsin.

Keep reading...Show less