Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Carbon Removal

Exclusive: The Startup Trying to Salvage Carbon Removal Know-How Before It’s Lost Forever

Jason Hochman is building an archive of intellectual property from failed direct air capture companies.

Direct air capture in a junk heap.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

The Direct Air Capture industry is contracting. Investment in the technology, which is designed to suck carbon out of the air, has dropped by more than 60% from its peak in 2022. The Trump administration has cancelled tens of millions in federal funding for the tech. Customers are prioritizing other, more affordable climate projects. Dozens of DAC startups that have made important advancements are “running out of runway,” according to Jason Hochman.

Hochman would know. For the past four years, he ran the Direct Air Capture Coalition, an industry association. Now, he’s stepping down from the role of advocate and into the role of entrepreneur, launching his own company in order to preserve DAC startups’ valuable innovations, data, and learnings before they disappear.

“A lot of the progress that they’ve made, a lot of the R&D, a lot of the innovation that has been hard-won over the past several years is at risk of being lost because of this shift in external factors,” Hochman told me.

His company, Ctrl-S — a reference to the keyboard command for saving a file — plans to acquire intellectual property, experimental data, and engineering knowledge from distressed DAC companies. It will assemble the assets into a library, making them available to “better positioned companies that can further develop, improve, and deploy the technology,” or at the very least, make use of the data, Hochman said.

Ctrl-S has at least three potential revenue streams — annual subscription sales for access to the library, licensing fees for the IP, and, in the medium-to-longer term, royalties tied to the tech developed from those licenses.

Hochman has several different customers in mind. The library could be useful to the remaining, more stable DAC companies who might find some other startup had developed a solution to a problem they are struggling with, or a more efficient way of accomplishing some part of the process. Large energy companies with more capital to actually deploy DAC, like the Occidentals of the world, could gain access to pre-vetted tech.

The library could also help catalyze innovations in entirely different industries. Direct air capture systems contain several different components, like the “air contactor,” the mechanism that draws air into the system, and the “sorbent,” the proprietary material that captures carbon molecules. Phil De Luna, the former chief scientist for the DAC development company Deep Sky and a member of Ctrl-S’ expert review committee, told me these components could have applications in other processes that involve separating gases. He gave the example of hydrogen gas that’s trapped underground. “It's often mixed with other gasses underground. These air contactors that are used in DAC, could they be repurposed to separate hydrogen from natural gas or other gas impurities underground?”

Another market Hochman thinks the library could serve is AI-driven material science development. The startups working on materials discovery need experimental data to train their models, he said, and a lot of what is available elsewhere is the data behind success stories. “What they don't have access to is the negative learnings.”

The Ctrl-S team has a process to “diligence” the IP it acquires, looking at the technoeconomics, the life-cycle analysis of the carbon removed by the process, and its commercial potential. The company will not only conduct these reviews for the systems as a whole, but for the key components like the sorbent and air contactor. The process will distinguish between companies that were victims of circumstance and those that failed because their tech didn’t work as promised. Both can be of use.

“The stuff that didn't work can be valuable in saving folks time, energy, and resources going down the same dead ends,” Hochman said.

His founding team also includes Nicole Williams, the former IP Lead for Climeworks, the largest and most successful DAC startup in the industry, and Silvan Aeschlimann, who was previously a DAC and carbon removal lead for the clean energy research nonprofit RMI.

There’s some precedent for what Hochman is doing. In the early 2000s, in the wake of the Dot Com bubble bursting, funding for startups dried up and many began to fail. A group of former Microsoft executives started a company called Intellectual Ventures which bought up a lot of those startups’ IP. “Similarly, our concept was that it would be available to larger companies,” Edward Jung, one of the co-founders who now serves as an advisor to Intellectual Ventures, told me.

Jung said the actual uptake and development of the IP by larger companies was less than what he and his partners had hoped. “I'm actually more bullish now, in this thesis that you talk about, because I think AI is going to unlock a lot of complex technologies that will be hard for larger companies to ignore,” he told me when I described Ctrl-S to him. “The ability for AI to go through a lot of different options in a way that humans have difficulty going through opens a lot of opportunities for new materials. So I do think maybe the thesis is better now than it was back when we did it.”

Intellectual Ventures’ trajectory ended up being quite controversial. It was accused of patent-trolling — buying up tens of thousands of patents and then suing companies for infringing on them. But it also used the patent revenue to fund a successful tech incubator called IV Labs that spun out promising companies, like Terrapower, the advanced nuclear startup.

Ctrl-S is still in very early stages. It’s in the process of closing its first two acquisitions, with a “handful of others in the pipeline,” Hochman told me. He’s actively fundraising for a seed round targeting $2.5 million. If all goes according to plan, he hopes to eventually diversify into other types of climate tech.

Green

You’re out of free articles.

Celebrate the Fourth of July with us and save 20% off an annual subscription, now just $99 $79/year with code: FIREWORKS
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Spotlight

Trump Taps Nashville Legend to Fight Solar and Wind Farms

And data centers might be collateral damage.

Farmland.
Simon Abranowicz | Getty Images | Unsplash

After derailing gigawatts of renewable power with a permitting freeze, the Trump administration is expanding its war on renewable energy, retaining one of country music’s biggest stars in a PR offensive against utility-scale projects on “prime farmland.”

The administration recently onboarded John Rich – one half of the stadium-packing American musical duo Big & Rich – to be Trump’s “special envoy for American landowners.” Rich entered activism around landowner rights last January when he backed opponents fighting a large Tennessee Valley Authority transmission project routed through his home county of Cheatham, Tennessee. This led to him joining the Trump team, where he’s fashioning himself as a go-to guy and cheerleader for anyone who wants Trump to help stop a solar or wind farm they don’t want built.

Keep reading...Show less
Hotspots

Data Centers Are the Election Year Villain

And more of the week’s top news around project fights.

Data Centers Are the Election Year Villain
Heatmap Illustration

1. Kansas City, Missouri – Data centers are so toxic that politicians are using them as boogeymen in totally unrelated policy discussions.

  • All week I’ve been thinking about Missouri, where a widely-screened TV campaign ad is airing screeds against AI hyperscale projects to sell a constitutional amendment initiative up for a vote in this year’s November elections. “That hum is the sound of Big Tech making money on online gambling, for porn,” says a nameless man in the ad. “Amendment 5 makes Big Tech pay so you don’t have to. Yes on Amendment 5.”
  • What does Amendment 5 do? Based on the ad, you would think it was focused on tax exemptions for data centers. But no – a yes vote supports cutting the state income tax, a proposal backed by Republican Gov. Mike Kehoe.
  • The ad is misinformation and a mind-blowing use of a confusing conversation around tech infrastructure most were unfamiliar with before this year. Per reporting by the Missouri Independent, the state’s existing tax exemptions for data centers would stay in place if the amendment was adopted.
  • My gut tells me this is only the beginning of the data center industry’s transformation into an election year villain.

2. Ingham County, Michigan – We have our first major anti-data center candidate in a Democratic congressional primary.

Keep reading...Show less
Q&A

Why Data Center NDAs Are a Big Mistake

A conversation with Grant Gutierrez of Carbon Direct

Why Data Center NDAs Are a Big Mistake
Heatmap Illustration

This week’s conversation is with Grant Gutierrez, head of community impacts at carbon management company Carbon Direct. This week Carbon Direct published a white paper Gutierrez authored on opposition around data centers he’s studied. His research reinforces much of what Heatmap Pro has uncovered, but I was particularly intrigued by a topline finding – that transparency is the most common thread in the 46 data center fights he looked into. Was he seeing what I’ve been seeing? So I asked him to hop onto a Zoom call and let me know his thoughts.

The following conversation was lightly edited for clarity.

Keep reading...Show less